7. evaluation(4)

14
FMP Evaluation Your name

Upload: edan-burrows

Post on 21-Mar-2017

14 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 7. evaluation(4)

FMP EvaluationYour name

Page 2: 7. evaluation(4)

Production Process Evaluation

Page 3: 7. evaluation(4)

Research• Research aloud me to find out what products were out there like the

product I was thinking about making, by finding out what was out there it aloud me to see what worked well and what didn’t to help me make my product the best it could be.

• There wasn’t that many products out there to work off of so I was one of the only people doing what it I was doing. I didn’t have many things to work off of so I was just doing my own thing.

• With there not been many things out there I was able to make it my own and do things that people haven’t been doing. Also I was able to talk about the film and the back ground of the group Storror.

Page 4: 7. evaluation(4)

PlanningI planned my production well as I made the script easy to read and made it so if I wanted to add bits or take away bits I could and it would still make sense also I made the sound affects before the product so I new how long to make my product this way I only had to edit the speech when it came down to editing. A weakness of my product was that no one on my course new anything about what I was doing about and we needed to do it in a pair but I only designed the script for me so I did it by myself and its not as lively as it would have been if there was another person with me.

Page 5: 7. evaluation(4)

Time Management• I stuck to the schedule I made about what I was going to do, I also stuck to

the schedule that was on blackboard to get my work In on time. I didn’t have time to book out a studio because there were technicians working in there so I had to use a recorder but when I was recording the microphone died so I had to use my phone to record it.

Page 6: 7. evaluation(4)

Technical Qualities• ParkourEDU has a good feel to it

as they have got famous parkour and freerunning athletes to interview. It is made by a professional parkour athlete Brandon Douglass. They are talking about the films Giles Longley has been making last year and what parkour is and how it has changed his life. They also talk about the teams he’s in and how he can work with lots of different teams he can work with such as Storror or team storm.

Mine is about the film made by the Storror guys and there documentary supertramps and there back story and info about the film and stuff that you wouldn’t know about while watching the film like how they only finished editing it an hour before it was meant to be in cinemas.

Page 7: 7. evaluation(4)

Aural Qualities

The music in the background sounded good and the speech was clear. The pace of it was quite fast but it was also chilled out.

Page 8: 7. evaluation(4)

Audience Appeal

I worked to the table I made to appeal to my audience so I stuck to that andAppealed to the target audience by keeping it to the same age range at 12+ as The film is rated a 12, the genders are the same as the film appeals to both male And female, and its all based for people who do or enjoy to watch free running orParkour.

Page 9: 7. evaluation(4)

Peer Feedback

Page 10: 7. evaluation(4)

Feedback 1

• What did you like about the product?– What I liked about the radio show is the different

opening to the show, making it sound professional. Working well with what u wanted to get across. The content was perfect for the target audience and was full of information.

• What improvements could have been made to the product?

Adding in more sound effects would help the flow.

Page 11: 7. evaluation(4)

Feedback 2

• What did you like about the product?– The speech is easy to listen to and understand – The music fits well in the background – Its fast paced witch makes it flow better.

• What improvements could have been made to the product?– Could do with more sound effects witch would

make it sound better if it had an into.

Page 12: 7. evaluation(4)

Feedback 3• What did you like about the product?

– The soundtrack compliments the audio delivery well– The information delivered is clear and relevant to the subject– The language used suits the target audience.

• What improvements could have been made to the product?• Some pauses could have been edited to make the delivery flow better• The delivery could have been sped up slightly to keep the audience engaged• The delivery seems to pause as you deliver the titles of the segments, this

could have been emphasised to separate the sections of the delivery and sound effects to match the segments would have given the soundtrack more variety.

• Catchy sign off such as ‘ follow up on the next segment from Edan with the ____ podcast’ would have made the product comply as a part of a series

Page 13: 7. evaluation(4)

Peer Feedback Summary

• What do you agree with from your peer feedback? I agree with my feedback as it could have more sound effects and a better intro than just get straight into it. Could have got rid of some pauses to make it speed up a bit to give it a better flow and keeping the audiences engaged.

• What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?– There was nothing that I didn't agree with and if I had the

chance to redo it I would add what they said would help with my show to make it the best it could be.

Page 14: 7. evaluation(4)

Peer Feedback SummaryI would add a intro song or an actual intro to make my show more professional also I would have more than just me in it to give it a more lively feeling and more fun to listen to than just me reeling off information I would get rid of all the times I pause and say “erm” and little things like that to make it flow better and keep the audience engaged. I would keep the music the same style to make it work well with the audio track this would help with keeping the audience wanting to keep listening and engaged.