711911 groupware technology and team management unit 2 dr. andrea jersabek [email protected]
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
711911 Groupware Technology and Team ManagementUnit 2
Dr. Andrea [email protected]
http://suanpalm3.kmutnb.ac.th/teacher/andrea/
![Page 2: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Types of Collaboration Technology
![Page 3: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Pros
Speeding up the exchange Easy access to new information Many people being able to receive information at the
same time Increase the number of potential participants in
discussions Expand contacts Easier reach people
![Page 4: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Cons
High costs Technical limitations Low video quality Breakdowns Lack of user-friendliness Inadequate training
![Page 5: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Consequences
Under-utilization of complex software
Rarely used for complex activities, e.g. co-authoring
“Even with prior coaching on the use of the software,
instructors and students require experience to understand and exploit the features“ …..White et al (1998)
![Page 6: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Effects for groups and meetings
Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:
to a larger number and variety of people participating as information sources in the making of decisions
to a decrease in size and variety of face-to-face groups, since (some) experts can be consulted remotely.
to less of the organization’s time being absorbed by decision related meetings, since information exchange can also be done remotely and since decision support systems make meetings more effective
![Page 7: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Effects on level and flexibility of decision making
Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:
to a more uniform distribution across organizational levels of the probability that a particular organizational level will make a particular decision
to a greater variation in the levels at which a particular type of decision will be taken
to fewer intermediate human nodes within the organizational information processing network, i e. from sensor units such as marketing, to decision makers, unless this implies information overload for the decision makers.
![Page 8: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Effects for organizational memory
Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:
To a more frequent development and use of computer resident databases as components of organizational memory; this can substitute for knowledge loss because of personnel turnover, for information not being stored, or for information not being shared.
To more frequent development and use of in-house expert systems.
![Page 9: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Effects on organizational learning, intelligence and decision making
Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:
to more rapid and more accurate identification of problems and opportunities, implying better organizational learning
to organizational intelligence that is more accurate, comprehensive, timely and available, resulting in higher quality decisions, although this may lead to lower quality decisions.
![Page 10: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Power Distribution
Increased access to information may make employees more autonomous
This may result in a flattening of hierarchies
But: those in power may find this challenging
![Page 11: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Example from Centra
![Page 12: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Role of Technology in Society
Technological and Organisational Imperative
Contingency Perspective
Strategic Choice Perspective
Emergent Structures Perspective
![Page 13: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Technological and Organisational Imperative Introduction of technology in our society and in organisations is
viewed as an independent and autonomous mechanism
This view ignore the manner in which technology is designed and developed
![Page 14: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Contingency Perspective
Systems should match their environment to thrive and be effective
Effectiveness depends on task, the users, and the context
McKinsey’s 7-S model:strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, superordinate goals
![Page 15: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cultural Variations
![Page 16: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Cultural Dimensions according to Hofstede Power Distance
Individualism versus Collectivism
Masculinity versus Feminity
Uncertainty Avoidance
Long-term versus short term
![Page 17: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Individual Cultures
People have more ingroups
People are not as attached to any single ingroup, because there are numerous ingroups to which they can be attached
Survival of the individuals and the society is more dependent on the successful and effective functioning of individuals rather than groups.
People make relatively fewer distinctions between ingroups and outgroups.
![Page 18: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Collectivist Cultures
People have fewer ingroups.
People are very attached to the ingroups to which they belong.
Survival of the individuals and the society is more dependent on the success and effective functioning of the groups rather than individuals.
People make greater distinctions between ingroup and outgroup others.
![Page 19: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c0221a28abf838cd3254/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Questions on Culture
Explain the following statement: “In studying other cultures, we do so very often from the perspective of our own culture.”
Explain how changes in technology, the new global economy, and the increases in the world’s population might affect you.
Explain how and why communication and culture are linked.
Explain the following statement: “When studying intercultural communication, you should be aware of the problems associated with individual uniqueness, stereotyping, and objectivity.”