73985382 advancements in concentrating solar power csp
TRANSCRIPT
Advancements in Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Reflectors and Solar-
Selective Coatings
C.E. Kennedy1National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 1617 Cole Boulevard, M/S 3321, Golden, CO
80401-3393, 303-384-6272, 303-384-6103 (fax), [email protected]
E3 2007 University of Minnesota, MN
November 27, 2007
Concentrating Solar Power TechnologiesPower TowerParabolic Trough Dish-Stirling
CPV Heliostat CPV Winston Collector
Compact Linear Fresnel Reflector (CLFR)
Solar concentration allows tailored design
approaches
100kW LCPV Tracking
Goals for Improved Optical Materials
• >90% Specular reflectance into a 4-mrad cone angle – Unofficially 95%
• 10 - 30 year lifetime– Unofficially 30 y
• Manufacturing cost $10.76/m2 ($1/ft2)– 1992 Cost Goal
– Adjusted for inflation to $15.46/m2 ($1.44/ft2)
– Structural (self-supporting) mirror to $27/m2 ($2.50/ft2)
Technical Approach• Samples supplied by:
– Industry– Subcontracts– Developed in-house
• Optical Characterization:– Perkin-Elmer (PE) Lambda 9 & 900 UV-VIS-NIR
spectrophotometers (250-2500 nm) w/ integrating spheres
– PE IR 883 IR spectrophotometer (2.5-50 μm)– Devices & Services (D&S) Field Portable
Specular Reflectometer (7, 15, & 25-mrad cone angle at 660 nm)
• Outdoor (OET) & Accelerated Exposure Testing (AET):
– Atlas Ci65 & Ci5000 WeatherOmeters (WOM) (1X & 2X Xenon Arc/60ºC/60%RH)
– QPanel QUV (UVA 340@ 290- 340 nm/ 4 h UV at 40º / 4 h dark at 100%RH)
– 1.4 kW Solar Simulators (SS) (≈5X Xenon 300-500 nm. 1.4 kW-SS-4 quadrants 2 RH &T, light /dark)
– BlueM damp heat (85ºC/85%RH/dark)– 3 meterologically monitored sites at Golden,
Colorado (NREL), Miami, Florida (FLA), and Phoenix, Arizona (APS)
3
2
1
3
2
1
Reflective Layer (wet-silver)
Low-iron Slumped Glass (4- or 5-mm thick)
Acrylic (w/ high UV stability)
2nd coat Paint Layer (heavy Pb)(1% Pb)
1st coat Paint Layer (heavy Pb)(2.5% Pb)
Parabolic Trough Glass Mirror Architecture
Back Layer (Cu)
Three-coat paint system designed for outdoor applications
Mactac adhesive
Ceramic pad
Original vs. New Flabeg Mirror
85
90
95
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)
% H
emis
pher
ical
Ref
lect
ance
APS - OLDFLA - OLDNREL - OLDCi65 - OLD
Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)3 6 12 15 180 24219
Reflective Layer (wet-silver)
Low-iron Glass (3- or 4-mm thick flat)
2nd coat Paint Layer (lead-free <0.15% Pb EU)<1 ppm Pb US)
1st coat Paint Layer (lead-free <0.15% Pb EU)<1 ppm Pb US)
Alternate Thick Glass Mirror Architecture
Back Layer (Cu-less)
Adhesive (PS, spray)
Substrate (SS, Al)
Alternate Thick Glass Mirrors
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0 23.3 26.6 30.0 33.3 36.6 40.0 43.3 46.6 50.0 53.3
Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)
% H
emis
pher
ical
Ref
lect
ance
NREL - PilkingtonNREL - SpanishCi65 - PilkingtonCi65 - Spanish
Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)1 2 3 4 50 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 1610
Reflective Layer (wet-silver)
Low-iron Glass (~1 mm- thick)
Substrate (SS, Al)
Adhesive (PS, spray)
Paint Layer (Pb)(Pb-free)
Thin Glass Mirror Architecture
Back Layer (Cu)(Cu-less)
Thin glass mirrors are designed for indoor applications.
Thin Glass Corrosion
Thin Glass Mirror
0
20
40
60
80
100
250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
Wavelength (nm)
% R
efle
ctan
ce
0.0 MOBlueM 3.52 MOBlueM 7.21 MOCi65 3.16 MOCi65 6.15 MONREL 3.82 MONREL 9.57 MO
(Naug/Clearcoat/966
PVD Al Reflective Layer
Reflectivity-enhancing Oxide
Polished Aluminum Substrate
Protective Overcoat
Aluminized Reflector Architecture
Aluminized Reflectors
80
85
90
95
100
0 333 666 999 1332 1665 1998 2331Total UV Dose (MJ/m2)
% H
emis
pher
ical
Ref
lect
ance
OriginalImproved Miro2Improved Miro2 Set#2Miro/4270kk
NREL Exposure Time (y)
1 2 3 4 50 6 7
Aluminized Reflector Specularity
Alanod 4270/kk
FLA 11.8 m
APS 27.7 m
NREL 11 m
WOM 10.2 m0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 13.3 16.7 20.0 23.3 26.6
Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)
7-m
radi
an S
pecu
lar R
efle
ctan
ce a
t 660
nm
APSFLANRELCi65
Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)
1 2 3 4 50 6 7 8
Aluminized ReflectorSpecular Reflectance at 7- and 25-mradians at 660 nm of Alanod MiroSun mirrors after
accelerated exposure in Blue M (dark / 85oC / 85%RH), WOM (1 sun / 60oC / 60%RH) chambers, and outdoor exposure at NREL, APS, FLA, and Sandia
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
EXposure Time (Months)
% S
pecu
lar R
efle
ctan
ce
NREL - 25 mrNREL - 7 mrNREL - SWVAPS - 25 mrAPS - 7 mrAPS - SWVFLA - 25 mrFLA - 7 mrFLA - SWVWOM - 25 mrWOM - 7 mrWOM - SWVBlue M - 25 mrBlueM - 7 mrBlueM - SWVSandia -25mr
Silvered Polymer Reflector Architecture
UV-Screening Superstrate
Base Reflector
Bonding Layer
Flexible Polymer Substrate
Silvered Polymer
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
0 3.3 6.6 9.9 13.2 16.5 19.8 23.1 26.4
Total UV Dose (100 x MJ/m2)
% H
emis
pher
ical
Ref
lect
ance
UV-Screen/SS95-NRELReflecTech A-NRELReflecTech B-NRELUV-Screen/SS95-WOMReflecTech A-WOMReflecTech B-WOM
Equivalent NREL Exposure Time (years)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Advanced Selective Coating Goals• Receivers:
– 4 m long x 70 mm diameter– 64 MWe Nevada plant
• 820 collectors with 24 (96 m) receivers each
• 19,680 receivers• 82 km of receivers (50 mi)
– 3-4%/yr Failure Rate– ~$1000/tube
• To develop receiver coatings that have:– Good optical and thermal
performance: absorptance (α) ≥96%, & emittance (ε) ≤ 7% >450ºC
– High temperature stability in air at temperatures ≥ 550ºC
– Manufacturing processes with improved quality control
– Lower cost
200C (0.31 kW/m2)
300C (0.80 kW/m2)
400C (1.78 kW/m2)
500C (3.56 kW/m2)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
100 1000 10000 100000
Wavelength (nm)
Bla
ckbo
dy Ir
radi
ance
(W/m
2 -nm
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
% R
efle
ctan
ce ( ρ
)
Direct AM 1.5 (0.77 kW/m2)
Ideal Solar Selective
Conclusion• DOE, the WGA, state RPS mandates, and feed-in tariffs have
successfully jump-started growth in CSP technologies that would require 7 to 10 million square meters of reflector and more than 600,000 HCEs over the next 5 years.
• Commercial glass mirrors, Alanod, and ReflecTech may meet the 10-yr lifetime goals based on accelerated exposure testing. Predicting an outdoor lifetime based on accelerated exposure testing is risky because AET failure mechanisms must replicate those observed by OET.
• None of the solar reflectors available have been in test long enough to demonstrate the 10-year or more aggressive 30-year lifetime goal, outdoors in real-time
• Emittance excellent & absorptance of modeled coatings is very good but further improvements are expected. However, trade-off exists between emittance and absorptance. Key issue is making the coating and prototype development underway. Patent being pursued
AcknowledgmentsAlanod, Glaverbel, Naugatuck, ReflecTech, SAIC, and SES for providing
solar reflective samples.Schott and Solel for providing solar selective samples.AZ Technology and Surface Optics Corporation for high-temperature optical
measurements .Armstrong World Industries: Dr. J. S. RossNortheastern University: Dr. Jackie IsaacsPenn State University: Prof. Singh, Tom Medill, and Dale DonnerSAIC: Dr. Russell Smilgys and Steve WallaceStat-Ease: Wayne F. AdamsSwisher and Associates: Dick Swisher
NREL:Lynn Gedvilas, Gary Jorgensen, Mark Mehos, Judy Netter, Craig Perkins, Hank Price, Kent Terwilliger, and Student interns: Micah Davidson, Anthony Nelson, Michael Milbourne, and Christopher, and Andrea Warrick.
DOE supported this work under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337.