75 years of excellence 16 june 2011 – washington dc 16 th trilateral working group meetings agenda...
TRANSCRIPT
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
Agenda Item #7Agenda Item #7
Lithium Coin Cell IngestionsLithium Coin Cell Ingestions
16th Trilateral Working Group Meeting16 June 2011Marc Boolish
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
TopicsTopicsBackgroundMedia AttentionMechanism and current workActivities ANSI / IEC CEA Working Group / UL CPSC US Federal Bill
2
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
BackgroundBackgroundIncrease in severe or fatal outcomes
3
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
BackgroundBackground
16 fatal and 85 major outcomes since 1985 94% from ≥ 20 mm 92% from 20 mm All fatalities and 85% of major effects from children
< 4 years Major or fatal outcome in 12.6% of children < 6
years who ingested 20 – 25 mm button battery.
4
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
Note Seal
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
Source of Button CellSource of Button Cell
6
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
Media AttentionMedia Attentionhttp://www.komonews.com/news/problemsolvers/110316864.html
7
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
MechanismMechanism
7 hours
pH
Time (hours)
Beginning
8
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
4 Hr. Test
7 Hr. Test
24 Hr. Test
Positive Up Positive Down
9
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
CR2032 in SalivaCR2032 in Saliva(ug)(ug)
Blank 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 4 weeksAg <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.07 0.06Al 0.27 14.6 17.8 31.4 42.1As 0.03 0.3 0.34 0.57 0.83B 0.27 <0.01 0.39 0.25 0.65
Ba 0.01 0.11 0.16 0.27 0.39Be <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Bi <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Ca 41.5 732 796 1110 1680Cd <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03Co <0.01 6.24 6.97 10.8 14.9Cr 0.08 3900 4580 6980 10000Cs <0.01 <0.01 0.03 0.03 0.06Cu 0.23 2.06 2.3 3.16 4.42Fe 14.9 17600 20300 34100 48700Ga <0.01 0.22 0.23 0.41 0.57Ge <0.01 0.11 0.12 0.19 0.26In <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01K 119 2120 2520 3640 4820Li 10.2 1060 7020 5640 7180
Mg 0.53 0.17 0.48 0.48 0.52Mn 9.6 165 192 290 432Mo 0.03 2.27 3.18 4.71 6.59Na 967 2650 2910 4460 5210Ni 0.78 1480 1710 2340 3210Pb 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01Rb <0.01 0.14 0.33 0.38 0.58Sb 1.12 0.08 0.10 0.17 0.24Se <0.01 <0.01 0.08 <0.01 <0.01Sn 0.01 0.07 0.09 0.15 0.18Sr 0.09 0.71 0.82 1.17 1.43Ti 24.3 0.42 0.8 0.8 <0.01Tl <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01V <0.01 5.02 5.77 10.1 13.6Zn 3.85 12 1.03 2.07 5.09Si n/a n/a
10
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
ActivitiesActivitiesANSI / IECANSI / IEC
Increase in prominence of requirement of warning copy for swallowable batteries (marking requirements)IEC TC 35 - Pictograms
IEC 60086 - 5 Energizer
11
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
US Consumer Product Safety CommissionUS Consumer Product Safety Commission(CPSC)(CPSC)
Attendance at ANSI meetingsIndustry meeting in March 2011CPSC • Announcement
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml11/11181.html• Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnPpxYXSpIk
12
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
CEA / UL 60065 ProposalCEA / UL 60065 ProposalCEA Product Safety Working GroupProposal to UL – 60065 UL Standard for Safety for Audio, Video and Similar Electronic
Apparatus – Safety Requirements Two construction options
• Use of a tool• Minimum of two independent and simultaneous movements
Symbols on the electronic product – reference to warnings
13
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
US Federal BillUS Federal BillSponsor – Jay Rockefeller (WV)Button Cell Battery Safety Act of 2011Concerns Duplicative to UL 60065 Requires one particular method of engineering Definition of Button Cell Battery
• A cell or battery that is 32 mm or less in diameter and less than its diameter in length, or
• Any other battery…as determined by the CPSC to pose an ingestion hazard. What about installed base of devices?
14
75 years of excellence
16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16th Trilateral Working Group Meetings
Questions?Questions?
15