8 d lift onload ft

Upload: ajaybatra2012

Post on 04-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    1/16

    1

    Objective of 8 D Review

    Progress review of all the 10 8D Teams

    Out come of the 8 D steps

    Support required by teams from

    PU HeadsMr. Anil Menon

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    2/16

    8 D Problem Solving on

    FT - Hydraulic Lift On Load

    Project start Date - 14 Sept12

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    3/16

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    4/16

    4

    Progress Summary :

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    5/16

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    6/16

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    7/16

    7

    D2 : Problem Definition

    S.No Factors Problem Details Comparative Study Inference (which should

    be analysed further )Is Is not

    Differences / Changes

    1WHO reported the problem? 1. Test Rig 1.FTA Tet Rig is equipped with Pressure Gauge

    which is showing the pressure value/directly

    indication of the problem. Whereas in FTA

    there is no pressure gauge, Engine noise level

    is the criteria to identify the problem which

    depends on skill set of Operator.

    1. Variable inspection

    facility is not available at

    FTA level.

    2. Operator dependent

    inspection at FTA.

    2WHAT is part

    number/description?

    FT 30, 45, VMX, AMX, FT 60,

    FT 60 SMX, FT 60/65 EPI.

    Nil Problem persists in all FT models.

    Concentration is more in Heavy Liftcompared to Normal Lift.

    Capacity of normal lift is

    1050 kg, & heavy lift

    1500 kg load variation

    3WHAT is problem ? After Lifting, Lift not

    achieving neutral circuit.

    Pump is taking load.

    Nil

    4WHAT is measurement

    method ?

    Hyd. Test Rig using Pr. Gauge with 'OK' /

    'NOT OK' decisions (Attribute).5What is potential/actual

    effect to the customer / in

    the field (As stated by

    Customer).

    Engine taking load by noise difference,

    Pump failure.

    6What could be commercial

    impact over this problem.

    Increase in Cost of Poor

    Quality.

    7If the product is being

    assembled in using multiplelines, which lines is causing

    problem ?

    N/A since being assembled in

    single line.

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    8/16

    8

    D2 : Problem Definition

    S.No Factors Problem Details Comparative Study Inference (which

    should be analysed

    further )Is Is notDifferences / Changes

    8 If the product is being tested in usingdifferent Test Rigs, which Test Rig

    problems are reported ?

    On all 3 test rigs

    9 What item has got the problem. Cylinders sub assly. (

    in most of the

    cases).

    It is not in all the cases. Data not available To conduct further

    study on OK assy and

    Not OK assy.

    linkages of hydrualic

    assly. (in few cases).

    Its not in all the cases. To conduct further

    study on OK assy and

    Not OK assy.

    10 What all are the items which can lead

    the problem (Boundary Diagram).

    Attached

    11 What similar product could has the

    problem but doesnot seen/reported.

    N/A.

    12 When the problem was first

    noticed/found ?

    Since beginning.

    13 When it is noticed after 1st time? Continuous

    14 Where on the components the problemnoticed ?

    N/A.

    15 Where is the process flow/ sequence

    the problem is noticed?

    Test Rig Operation

    no. 110

    16 Where on the product, geographically

    the problem was seen?

    N/A.

    17 When in the product life cycle, this

    problem is noticed,

    1. Infant mortality

    2.Warranty Failures3.Due to wear and tear ?

    Infant Mortality

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    9/16

    9

    11.8

    15.9

    22.8

    19.2 19.2

    40.2

    26.5

    9.4

    18.721.3

    25.6

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12

    DPTT

    Month

    D2 : Problem Definition :

    How Much : On load Defect trend ( Test Rig )

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    10/16

    10

    D2 : Problem Definition

    How Big : Pareto Diagram of all defects at Test Rig ( Last 6

    Months)

    42.1

    23.6

    13.4

    2.5 2.4 1.7 0.2 0.0 0.00.010.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    90.0

    100.0

    0.05.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    45.0

    M/c

    Drop

    Onload Not

    lifting

    Linkage

    fault

    Jerking Slow

    lifting

    Sticky Lifting

    not

    proper

    Main

    cover

    leak

    AxisTitle

    Defects at Test Rig

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    11/16

    11

    D2 : Boundary Diagram

    Hydraulic

    Pump

    OIl

    flow

    sensor

    Main

    Cover

    Coveracces

    sory

    Draft &

    Position

    control

    lever

    Yoke

    assly

    Lift

    Arm

    Ram

    Arm

    Pisto

    n

    Cylinde

    r assly

    Linka

    ges

    Pr. Relief Valve

    Dead

    Weigh

    t

    Test Rig machine body DirtyOil tank

    Clean

    Oil

    tank

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    12/16

    12

    Hyd lifton load

    Piston , Ram arm&Yoke

    LinkagesCylinder Subassly

    Test Rig

    Torsion spring stiffness not O.K.

    Machine body fouling with Ram arm

    Contaminated oil

    Cam Profile

    on ram not ok

    Piston Under size

    Hydraulic pump malfunctioning

    Main cover subassly

    Pr. Relief valve settingInternal leakages

    Poor Face

    roughnessCheck valve

    seat bore dia

    O/S

    Blow Holes/ porosity in cydActuator lever sticky

    Cyd. Hole block / missNPT Plug loose / miss

    Cylinder main Bore O/SInternal leakage in cylinder

    U/L valve stickyC.V sticky

    CD of connecting rod seat and piston face

    Linings / scratches in main bore

    C.V. setting ( 30 Thou )

    Safety valve leakF/V sticky / tight

    U/L valve hole blockF/V hole blockC.V. hole block

    Internal galleries block due to

    contaminationBaffle plate loose

    Linkage bend

    CoverAccessory

    Linkage foulingHole interconnected

    Blow holes

    Hole block

    Hole U/S or block

    Inlet Hole O/S

    Master spline

    shift in Ram Arm

    Play in Yoke

    Connecting Rod& Serr. Shaft

    Conn. Rod O/S

    or U/S

    Spline shift inserr. shaft

    U/L valve plug O ring cut

    F/valve plug O ring cut

    Cylinder face O ring cut

    y2 y3y1

    y4 y5 y6 y7

    Y

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    13/16

    13

    y Factor Causes April May June July August Sept Total

    y1 Cylinder sub assly

    Cylinder Sub assly changed 8 5 21 21 24 44 123

    C.V. setting 0 0 0 2 1 1 4Actuating lever 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

    Face O ring cut 0 2 1 0 2 2 7

    F.V. valve tight 0 1 9 2 3 6 21

    Baffle plate loose 0 0 1 2 1 4

    Plug O Ring cut 2 1 0 3 0 4 10

    Cylinder dia 90 O/S 0 0 0 0 8 0 8

    Spring setting0 0 1 0 0 0 1

    y2 Linkages Draft link fouling 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

    y3 Cover Acc. Cover acc. Changed 0 0 1 0 0 1 2

    y4 Test Rig Pump changed 0 0 0 2 0 2 4

    y5 Main cover Sub assly

    Main cover hole U/S 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

    Seat Change 0 0 1 0 0 2 3

    y6 Piston , Ram Arm & Yoke Ram arm changed 0 1 2 0 1 0 4

    y7 Conn. Rod & Serr. Shaft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Not known 0 4 1 1 2 2 10

    Total 11 14 40 33 43 64 205

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    100.0

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Cylinder sub assly Not known Test Rig Main cover Sub

    assly

    Piston , Ram Arm

    & Yoke

    Linkages Cover Acc. Conn. Rod & Serr.

    Shaft

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    14/16

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    15/16

    S.No Activity Result

    1. Check valve replaced No Change

    2. Torsion spring changed No change

    3. Unload valve O ring changed No change

    4. Complete attachment ( including rear plate ,

    torsion spring , actuator lever control lever & roller

    No change

    5. 30 thou setting done again No Change6. Replacement of cylinder Problem solved

    Cylinder no :- UF 017 , lift no. 1157 , Normal

    Problem : Onload

    Date :- 26.09.2012Team :- Mr. Ritesh ( KMC ) , J Sabarwal , L.R. Kaushik , Sajal Verma , Shlvinder Singh (rework opt. ) , S. Rajneesh & Manoj Giri

    Other Observations :Contaminations not seen

    All plug O rings found O.K.

    All valves holes ( C.V. / F.V. / U.V. ) found O.K.

    Baffle plate was tightened properly

    Cylinder Face O ring found O.K.

  • 7/31/2019 8 D Lift Onload FT

    16/16