8 fact book 2008 09 peer comparisons - cmu

Peer Comparisons

Table of ContentsPeer Comparisons Introduction 8.1

Total Enrollment 8.3 Total Enrollment by Level 8.3 Undergraduate Enrollment 8.4 by Full- and Part-time Status 8.4 by Gender 8.5 by Ethnicity 8.5 Graduate Enrollment 8.6 by Full- and Part-time Status 8.6 by Gender 8.7 by Ethnicity 8.7 Total Degrees Awarded 8.8 by Level 8.8 by Gender 8.9 by Ethnicity 8.9 Bachelor's Degrees Awarded by Gender 8.10 by Ethnicity 8.10 by Discipline 8.11 Master's Degrees Awarded by Gender 8.12 by Ethnicity 8.12 by Discipline 8.13 Doctoral Degrees Awarded by Gender 8.14 by Ethnicity 8.14 by Discipline 8.15 First-time First-year Retention Rate 8.16 Six-year Graduation Rate 8.16 Student to Faculty Ratio 8.17 Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students 8.17 Percent of Classes with 50 or more Students 8.17 First-time First-year Enrollment 8.18 by Gender 8.19 by Ethnicity 8.19 Acceptance Rate 8.20 First-time First-year Yield 8.20 SAT 25th-75th Percentile Range 8.21 Proportion of Incoming First-years in Top 10% of High School Class 8.21 Average Faculty Compensation Professors 8.22 Associate Professors 8.22 Assistant Professors 8.23 Proportion of Instructional Faculty Who are Full-time 8.23 University Endowment Funds 8.24 University Endowment Assets per FTE Student 8.24 Expenditures per FTE Student 8.25 Tuition and Fees 8.26 Tuition, Fees, Room, and Board 8.26 Full-time First-year Enrollment 8.27 Percent of Full-time First-year Students Receiving Financial Aid 8.27 Full-time First-year Students Receiving Federal Grant Aid Percent Receiving Aid 8.28 Average Amount of Federal Grant Aid Received 8.28 Full-time First-year Students Receiving State and Local Grant Aid Percent Receiving Aid 8.29 Average Amount of Aid Received 8.29 Full-time First-year Students Receiving Institutional Grant Aid Percent Receiving Aid 8.30 Average Amount of Aid Received 8.30 Full-time First-year Students Receiving Student Loan Aid Percent Receiving Aid 8.31 Average Amount of Aid Received 8.31

Peer ComparisonsData Sources:

The data used for the peer comparisons section of this book come from:

Academe - Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (Academe)National Center for Education Statistics - Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS)National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO)U.S. News & World Report's "America's Best Colleges 2009" (US News & World Report)

Peer Institution List:

The following list of schools was selected by executive administration for benchmarking purposes:California Institute of Technology (Cal Tech)Cornell University (Cornell)Duke University (Duke)Emory University (Emory)Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech)Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)Northwestern University (Northwestern)University of Pennsylvania (Penn)Princeton University (Princeton)Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)Rice University (Rice)Stanford University (Stanford)Washington University in St. Louis (Washington)

Ethnicity Categories:

Non-resident Alien: A person who is not a citizen or national of the United States and is in this country on a visa or temporary basis, regardless of race

Other: Includes White, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Unknown

Under-represented Minority: Includes US Citizens and Permanent Residents who self-identify race as African American/Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, or Hispanic

Definitions:

Degree Disciplines: All degree disciplines are categorized according to their Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codeArchitecture, Visual, and Performing Arts: Includes Architecture and related services; visual and performing artsBusiness Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services: Includes business, management, marketing, and related support servicesComputer and Information Sciences: Includes computer and information sciences and support servicesEngineering: Includes engineering; engineering technologies/techniciansHumanities and Social Sciences: Includes area, ethnic, cultural, and gender studies; communication, journalism, and related programs; communications technologies/technicians and support services; foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics; english language and literature/letters; liberal arts and sciences, general studies and humanities; philosophy and religious studies; theology and religious vocations; psychology; social sciences; historyMathematics, Statistics, Biological and Physical Sciences: Includes biological and biomedical sciences; mathematics and statistics; physical sciences

Other Disciplines: Includes agriculture, agriculture operations, and related sciences; natural resources and conservation; personal and culinary services; education; family and consumer sciences/human sciences; legal professions and studies; library science; military technologies; multi/interdisciplinary studies; parks, recreation, leisure, and fitness studies; science technologies/technicians; security and protective services; construction trades; mechanic repair technologies/technicians; precision production; transportation and materials moving; health professions and related clinical sciencesPublic Administration and Social Services: Includes public administration and social services professions

Expenditures: Includes the following institutional expenses: Instruction, research, public service, academic support, student services, and institutional support

Faculty Compensation: Sum of salaries and benefits

8.1

Federal Grant Aid: Includes grants that were provided by federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Education, including Title IV Pell Grants and Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOGs). Also includes need-based and merit-based educational assistance funds and training vouchers provided from other federal agencies and/or federally-sponsored educational benefits programs, including the Veteran's Administration, Department of Labor, etc.

First-time First-year Retention Rate: The percent of first-time first-year students who return for their sophomore year

Institutional Grant Aid: Includes scholarships and fellowships that were granted and funded by the institution and/or individual departments within the institution (and are limited to students attending the institution). Also includes tuition and fee waivers granted by the institution (for which the institution is not reimbursed from another source). These would include scholarships targeted to certain groups of individuals (from a particular state or studying a certain subject) for which the institution designated the recipient; athletic scholarships; etc.

Runzheimer Indices: Indices to adjust salaries for cost of living; adjusts salaries to a standard U.S. city

SAT 25th-75th Percentile Range: The range in which the middle 50% of the first-time freshmen scored on their SATs

Six-Year Graduation Rate: The percent of first-time first-year students who graduate within six years

State/Local Grant Aid: Includes grants that were provided by your state such as Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnerships (LEAP) (formerly SSIGs). Also includes merit scholarships that were provided by your state and tuition and fee waivers for which your institution was reimbursed by a state agency. Local grants would include any local government grants, scholarships or gift-aid that are awarded directly to the student.

Student Loan Aid: Includes all Title IV subsidized and unsubsidized loans made directly to students and for which the student is the designated borrower. (Include Perkins Loans made to students.) Exclude PLUS and other loans made directly to parents and for which the parent is the designated borrower. Also includes all institutionally- and privately-sponsored loans made to students, for which the student is the designated borrower (as long as the funds pass through the financial aid office).

Student to Faculty Ratio: The total full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment of students divided by the total full-time equivalent (FTE) of instructional faculty. For this calculation, FTE is equal to full-time headcount plus one-third part-time headcount.

Other Notes: Carnegie Mellon enrollment figures do not include Qatar enrollment per IPEDS reporting guidelines.

8.2

Total EnrollmentCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

2,133

10,326

19,800

13,598 12,570

18,742

10,220

19,005

23,980

7,261 6,5665,161

19,782

13,382

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Total Enrollment by LevelCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

% Undergraduate % First-professional % GraduateSource: IPEDS

Enrollment: 2,133 10,326 19,800 13,598 12,570 18,742 10,220 19,005 23,980 7,261 6,566 5,161 19,782 13,382

8.3

Undergraduate EnrollmentCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

913

5,682

13,510

6,394 6,719

12,565

4,172

9,261

11,877

4,845 5,164

3,017

6,5847,253

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Undergraduate Enrollment by Full-time/Part-time StatusCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

% Full-time % Part-timeSource: IPEDS

913 5,682 13,510 6,394 6,719 12,565 4,172 9,261 11,877 4,845 5,164 3,017 6,584 7,253Enrollment:

8.4

Undergraduate Enrollment by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

% Under-represented Minority % Non-resident Alien % OtherSource: IPEDS

913 5,682 13,510 6,394 6,719 12,565 4,172 9,261 11,877 4,845 5,164 3,017 6,584 7,253Enrollment:

Undergraduate Enrollment by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

% Men % WomenSource: IPEDS

913 5,682 13,510 6,394 6,719 12,565 4,172 9,261 11,877 4,845 5,164 3,017 6,584 7,253Enrollment:

8.5

Graduate EnrollmentCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

1,220

4,6445,375 5,517

4,159

6,177 6,048

8,294

9,730

2,4161,402

2,144

12,160

4,864

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Graduate Enrollment by Full-time/Part-time StatusCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

% Full-time % Part-timeSource: IPEDS

Enrollment: 1,220 4,644 5,375 5,517 4,159 6,177 6,048 8,294 9,730 2,416 1,402 2,144 12,160 4,864

8.6

Graduate Enrollment by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


1,220 4,644 5,375 5,517 4,159 6,177 6,048 8,294 9,730 2,416 1,402 2,144 12,160 4,864Enrollment:

Graduate Enrollment by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


1,220 4,644 5,375 5,517 4,159 6,177 6,048 8,294 9,730 2,416 1,402 2,144 12,160 4,864Enrollment:

8.7

Total Degrees Awarded by LevelCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Academic Year 2006-07

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Bachelor %Masters %Doctoral %Other

486 2,919 5,920 3,747 3,623 4,301 3,209 5,632 6,957 1,860 1,448 1,765 4,815 3,649Degrees:

Source: IPEDS

Total Degrees AwardedCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


486

2,919

5,920

3,747 3,6264,301

3,209

5,632

6,957

1,8601,448

1,765

4,815

3,649

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

Source: IPEDS

8.8

Total Degrees Awarded by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Men %WomenSource: IPEDS

Degrees: 486 2,919 5,920 3,747 3,623 4,301 3,209 5,632 6,957 1,860 1,448 1,765 4,815 3,649

Total Degrees Awarded by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Under-represented Minority %Non-resident Alien %OtherSource: IPEDS

Degrees: 486 2,919 5,920 3,747 3,623 4,301 3,209 5,632 6,957 1,860 1,448 1,765 4,815 3,649

8.9

Bachelor's Degrees Awarded by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Men %Women

172 1,215 3,467 1,530 1,582 2,542 1,167 2,089 2,823 1,144 818 1,244 1,709 1,660Degrees:

Source: IPEDS

Bachelor's Degrees Awarded by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Under-represented Minority %Non-resident Alien %OtherSource: IPEDS

Degrees: 172 1,215 3,467 1,530 1,582 2,542 1,167 2,089 2,823 1,144 818 1,244 1,709 1,660

8.10

Carnegie Mellon Versus Peer Institutions A

rchi

tect

ure,

Vi

sual

, and

Pe

rfor

min

g A

rts

Engi

neer

ing

Publ

ic A

dmin

-

istr

atio

n an

d So

cial

Svc

s.

Hum

aniti

es

an

d So

cial

Sc

ienc

es

Mat

hem

atic

s1

Com

pute

r and

In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

es

Bus

ines

s2

Oth

er

Tota

l

B

ache

lor's

Cal Tech - 31% - 6% 53% 9% - - 172

Carnegie Mellon 13% 30% 2% 16% 11% 9% 10% 8% 1,215

Cornell 6% 19% 2% 23% 16% 3% 13% 19% 3,467

Duke 3% 14% 10% 49% 17% 2% - 5% 1,530

Emory 3% - - 51% 12% - 17% 17% 1,582

Georgia Tech 6% 58% 1% 4% 7% 8% 14% 2% 2,542

MIT 3% 37% - 6% 28% 12% 8% 5% 1,167

Northwestern 12% 14% 3% 58% 8% 1% 1% 3% 2,089

Penn 3% 9% - 46% 8% - 21% 13% 2,823

Princeton 6% 15% 7% 56% 16% - - - 1,144

Rice 12% 16% - 43% 21% 2% - 6% 818

RPI 4% 55% - 5% 12% 13% 8% 3% 1,244

Stanford 3% 15% 2% 45% 17% 4% - 14% 1,709

Washington 12% 13% - 43% 10% 3% 14% 4% 1,660

1. Mathematics - Mathematics, Statistics, Biological, and Physical Sciences2. Business - Business Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services

Bachelor's Degrees Awarded by Discipline


8.11

Master's Degrees Awarded by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Men %Women

108 1,499 1,701 1,411 1,058 1,300 1,440 2,665 2,996 384 487 358 2,137 1,261Degrees:

Source: IPEDS

Master's Degrees Awarded by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Under-represented Minority %Non-resident Alien %Other

Degrees:

Source: IPEDS

108 1,499 1,701 1,411 1,058 1,300 1,440 2,665 2,996 384 487 358 2,137 1,261

8.12

Arc

hite

ctur

e,

Visu

al, a

nd

Perf

orm

ing

Art

s

Engi

neer

ing

Publ

ic A

dmin

-

istr

atio

n an

d So

cial

Svc

s.

Hum

aniti

es

an

d So

cial

Sc

ienc

es

Mat

hem

atic

s1

Com

pute

r and

In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

es

Bus

ines

s2

Oth

er

Tota

l

M

aste

r's

Cal Tech - 69% - 5% 22% 4% - 1% 108

Carnegie Mellon 9% 21% 9% 7% 4% 19% 30% 3% 1,499

Cornell 6% 27% 3% 9% 7% 7% 31% 10% 1,701

Duke - 9% 3% 14% 3% 1% 52% 18% 1,411

Emory 1% - - 9% 10% - 34% 45% 1,058

Georgia Tech 8% 52% 1% 4% 7% 12% 13% 3% 1,300

MIT 10% 42% - 4% 2% 9% 33% - 1,441

Northwestern 3% 8% 1% 17% 2% 2% 50% 16% 2,665

Penn 7% 7% 7% 10% 5% 3% 33% 28% 2,996

Princeton 8% 25% 24% 25% 14% - 4% - 384

Rice 15% 11% - 8% 17% 3% 44% 2% 487

RPI 8% 35% - 2% 8% 14% 30% 4% 358

Stanford 1% 40% - 11% 10% 7% 21% 10% 2,137

Washington 6% 14% 14% 9% 8% 6% 30% 13% 1,261


Master's Degrees Awarded by Discipline Carnegie Mellon Versus Peer Institutions Academic Year 2006-07

8.13

Doctoral Degrees Awarded by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Men %Women

206 205 485 277 217 459 601 462 483 332 143 163 720 347Degrees:

Source: IPEDS

Doctoral Degrees Awarded by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Cal Te

ch

Carneg

ie Mello

n

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northw

ester

nPen

n

Prince

ton Rice RPI

Stanfor

d

Washin

gton

%Under-represented Minority %Non-resident Alien %Other

Degrees:

Source: IPEDS

206 205 485 277 217 459 601 462 483 332 143 163 720 347

8.14

Arc

hite

ctur

e,

Visu

al, a

nd

Perf

orm

ing

Art

s

Engi

neer

ing

Publ

ic A

dmin

-

istr

atio

n an

d So

cial

Svc

s.

Hum

aniti

es

an

d So

cial

Sc

ienc

es

Mat

hem

atic

s1

Com

pute

r and

In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

es

Bus

ines

s2

Oth

er

Tota

l

D

octo

ral

Cal Tech - 40% - 3% 50% 1% - 6% 206

Carnegie Mellon 1% 42% - 5% 18% 25% 7% 1% 205

Cornell 4% 21% - 19% 33% 4% 2% 17% 485

Duke 2% 14% - 26% 30% 3% 6% 19% 277

Emory - 5% - 40% 36% - 1% 18% 217

Georgia Tech 2% 73% 1% 1% 15% 6% 2% - 459

MIT 3% 49% - 9% 23% 7% 3% 6% 601

Northwestern 6% 21% - 23% 24% 1% 4% 21% 462

Penn 2% 10% 1% 25% 29% 4% 6% 21% 483

Princeton 4% 27% 1% 37% 31% - - - 332

Rice 3% 26% - 24% 38% 9% - - 143

RPI - 60% - 4% 18% 10% 3% 4% 163

Stanford 2% 33% - 18% 28% 4% 3% 12% 720

Washington 1% 9% 3% 12% 36% 3% 3% 34% 347


Doctoral Degrees Awarded by Discipline Carnegie Mellon Versus Peer Institutions Academic Year 2006-07

8.15

First-time First-year Retention RateCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort98%

94% 96% 97% 94% 92%98% 97% 98% 98%

92%97% 98% 97%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Six-year Graduation RateCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2001 Cohort

89% 87%92% 94%

88%78%

93% 93% 95% 95%

82%91% 95% 92%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: US News & World Report

8.16

Student to Faculty RatioCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

3

11 108 7

14

6 7 6 5

14

5 6 7

02468

10121416

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 StudentsCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

69% 65% 60%70% 68%

40%

64%75% 74% 73%

53%68% 74% 73%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


Percent of Classes with 50 or More StudentsCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

8% 9%17%

5% 7%22%

12% 7% 7% 10% 10% 7% 11% 9%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


8.17

First-time First-year EnrollmentCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

231

1,416

3,010

1,700 1,606

2,628

1,067

1,981

2,385

1,242 1,288

742

1,721

1,338

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

8.18

First-time First-year Enrollment by GenderCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


Enrollment: 230 1,416 3,010 1,700 1,606 2,628 1,067 1,981 2,385 1,242 1,288 742 1,721 1,338

First-time First-year Enrollment by EthnicityCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


230 1,416 3,010 1,700 1,606 2,628 1,067 1,981 2,385 1,242 1,288 742 1,721 1,338Enrollment:

8.19

Acceptance RateCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

17%

28%21% 23%

32%

63%

12%

30%

16%10%

49%

25%

10%17%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

First-time First-year YieldCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

38%

23%

46%41%

30%

45%

69%

38%

66% 68%

26%33%

70%

34%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

8.20

SAT 25th-75th Percentile RangeCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Ric

e

Cal

Tec

h

Car

negi

e M

ello

n

Cor

nell

Duk

e

Emor

y

Geo

rgia

Tec

h

MIT

Nor

thw

este

rn

Penn

Prin

ceto

n

RPI

Stan

ford

Was

hing

ton


Proportion of Incoming First-years in Top 10% of High School ClassCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007 Cohort99%

73%

87% 90% 88%

66%

97%

85%

96% 96%

64%

83%91%

95%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on*

Cornell

Duke

Emory*

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

ton*RPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: US News & World Report (*Fewer than 51% of entering first-year students reporting)

8.21

Average Faculty Compensation - Professors(Compensation Adjusted Using Runzheimer Indices)

Carnegie Mellon vs. Peer InstitutionsAcademic Year 2007-08

$145

,563

$140

,990

$178

,415

$196

,397

$185

,702

$159

,414

$131

,423

$151

,007

$177

,914

$165

,374

$152

,312

$130

,962

$169

,648

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRice

Stanford

Washington

Source: Academe

Average Peer Professor Compensation = $162,011

Average Faculty Compensation - Associate Professors(Compensation Adjusted Using Runzheimer Indices)


$107

,266

$108

,240

$123

,286

$133

,248

$111

,571

$108

,622

$101

,521

$100

,038

$122

,242

$114

,814

$100

,659

$80,

384

$105

,370

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRice

Stanford

Washington

Source: Academe

Average Peer Associate Professor Compensation = $109,085

8.22

Average Faculty Compensation - Assistant Professors(Compensation Adjusted Using Runzheimer Indices)


$92,

383

$94,

395

$108

,088

$111

,387

$103

,215

$96,

432

$89,

939

$87,

882

$118

,886

$100

,069

$89,

267

$60,

928

$85,

030

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRice

Stanford

Washington

Source: Academe

Average Peer Assistant Professor Compensation = $95,292

Proportion of Instructional Faculty who are Full-timeCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2007

98%93%

98% 97% 95%100%

90%96%

86%93% 95% 93%

99%94%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington


8.23

University Endowment Funds ($000)Carnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fiscal Year 2007

$1,8

60,0

52

$1,1

15,7

40 $5,4

24,7

33

$5,9

10,2

80

$5,5

61,7

43

$327

,520

$9,9

80,4

10

$6,5

03,2

92

$6,6

35,1

87

$15,

787,

200

$812

,996 $4

,669

,544

$17,

164,

836

$5,5

67,8

43

$0$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000

$10,000,000$12,000,000$14,000,000$16,000,000$18,000,000$20,000,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington U

niv

Endo

wm

ent F

unds

($00

0)

Source: NACUBO

Average Peer Institution Endowment Funds ($000) = $6,631,203

University Endowment Assets per FTE Student ($000)Carnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fiscal Year 2007

$891

$119 $2

76 $475

$458

$19

$973

$397

$317

$2,2

28

$127

$946 $1

,152

$473

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington U

nivEndo

wm

ent A

sset

s pe

r FTE

Stu

dent

($00

0)

Source: NACUBO

Average Peer Institution Endowment Assets per FTE Student ($000) = $672

8.24

Expenditures per FTE Student ($000)Carnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fiscal Year 2007

$236

$77 $72

$128

$93

$40

$211

$74

$110 $108

$48$69

$145 $139

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

WashingtonEx

pend

iture

s pe

r FTE

Stu

dent

($00

0)

Source: IPEDS

Average Peer Institution Expenditures per FTE Student ($000) = $113.4

8.25

Tuition and FeesCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Academic Year 2008-2009$3

4,51

5

$38,

081

$36,

504

$37,

295

$36,

336

$25,

182

$36,

390

$37,

125

$37,

526

$35,

085

$37,

990

$30,

630

$36,

578

$37,

248

$0$5,000

$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000$45,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Average Peer Institution Tuition & Fees = $35,262

1

1. Carnegie Mellon University total cost is the weighted average for cost based upon year of entry.

Tuition, Fees, Room and BoardCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions


$44,

661

$47,

902

$48,

144

$47,

985

$47,

908

$32,

876

$47,

250

$48,

420

$48,

148

$46,

490

$48,

720

$41,

380

$47,

760

$48,

884

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Average Peer Institution Tuition, Fees, Room & Board = $46,048

1. Carnegie Mellon University total cost is the weighted average for cost based upon year of entry.

1

8.26

Full-time First-year EnrollmentCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

231

1,416

3,010

1,700 1,606

2,628

1,067

1,981

2,385

1,242 1,288

742

1,721

1,338

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Percent of Full-time First-year Students Receiving Financial AidCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

60%65%

53%47%

64%

81% 84%

55%63%

55%

98%

61%

72%64%

-2%

19%

39%

59%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDSSource: IPEDS

8.27

Percent of Full-time First-year StudentsReceiving Federal Grant Aid

Carnegie Mellon vs. Peer InstitutionsFall 2006 Cohort

9% 12% 12% 10% 13% 12%

24%

9% 9% 10%16%

10% 13% 10%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Average Amount of Federal Grant Aid ReceivedCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

$6,297 $6,200

$2,903

$5,832$5,106

$3,500

$6,798$7,532

$6,522$5,974

$8,268

$5,374 $5,401

$3,901

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000$6,000$7,000$8,000$9,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

8.28

Percent of Full-time First-year StudentsReceiving State and Local Grant AidCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

15%6%

17%7%

27%

61%

3% 6% 5% 6%

31%

18%

7% 7%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Average Amount of State and Local Grant Aid ReceivedCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

$3,417 $3,365$2,819

$4,091 $3,972

$5,388

$2,270

$4,816

$3,228

$2,069 $1,788

$3,851

$9,648

$2,384

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

8.29

Percent of Full-time First-year Students Receiving Institutional Grant Aid


55% 57%

41% 43%49%

24%

63%

49%

38%

55%

98%

58%48%

55%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Average Amount of Institutional Grant Aid ReceivedCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

$21,531

$17,437$19,653

$24,500

$20,033

$5,966

$26,532

$20,072$22,023

$26,601

$16,779$18,612

$22,691$19,735

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

8.30

Percent of Full-time First-year Students Receiving Student Loan Aid


36%42% 39% 37% 35% 33% 37% 37%

28%

13%

49%

23% 27%32%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

Average Amount of Student Loan Aid ReceivedCarnegie Mellon vs. Peer Institutions

Fall 2006 Cohort

$3,170

$6,622$7,146 $7,228

$5,124 $4,859$4,164

$4,629$4,010

$3,195

$5,819

$3,408

$4,271$4,638

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

Cal Tec

h

Carneg

ie Mell

on

Cornell

Duke

Emory

Georg

ia Tec

hMIT

Northwes

tern

Penn

Prince

tonRPI

Rice

Stanford

Washington

Source: IPEDS

8.31

Carnegie Mellon University does not discriminate and Carnegie Mellon University is required not to discriminate in admission, employment, or administration of its programs or activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex or handicap in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or other federal, state, or local laws or executive orders. In addition, Carnegie Mellon University does not discriminate in admission, employment or administration of its programs on the basis of religion, creed, ancestry, belief, age, veteran status, sexual orientation or gender identity. Carnegie Mellon does not discriminate in violation of federal, state, or local laws or executive orders. However, in the judgment of the Carnegie Mellon Human Relations Commission, the Presidential Executive Order directing the Department of Defense to follow a policy of, “Don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue,” excludes openly gay, lesbian and bisexual students from receiving ROTC scholarships or serving in the military. Nevertheless, all ROTC classes at Carnegie Mellon University are available to all students. Inquiries concerning application of these statements should be directed to the Provost, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, telephone 412-268-6684 or the Vice President for Campus Affairs, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, telephone 412-268-2057. Carnegie Mellon University publishes an annual campus security report describing the university's security, alcohol and drug, and sexual assault policies and containing statistics about the number and type of crimes committed on the campus during the preceding three years. You can obtain a copy by contacting the Carnegie Mellon Police Department at 412-268-2323. The security report is available through the World Wide Web at www.cmu.edu/police/. Obtain general information about Carnegie Mellon University by calling 412-268-2000.

8 fact book 2008 09 peer comparisons - cmu

Documents