8 making use of existing data in river health assessment results cn

使用现有数据使用现有数据 – – 来自中国河流的结来自中国河流的结果果Dr Chris Gippel, AustraliaDr Chris Gippel, Australia

澳大利亚澳大利亚 Chris GippelChris Gippel 博士博士

Project Completion WorkshopProject Completion Workshop

项目完工研讨会项目完工研讨会

Ministry of Water Resources Ministry of Water Resources 水利部水利部2012 February 23 2012 February 23 20122012 年年 22 月月 2323 日日

水文– 流量健康 ( 月度数据 )

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Cu

mu

lati

ve d

am a

ctiv

e st

ora

ge

cap

acit

y (1

09m

3 )

post-Sanmenxia

post-Longyangxia

post-Xiaolangdi

Liujiaxia

pre-Sanmenxia

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Lij

in a

nn

ual

nat

ura

l d

isch

arg

e (1

09

m3 )

61.7 x 109 m3

43.9 x 109 m3

Seasonality flow shiftPersistently very low

Persistently lower flowPersistently higher flow

Lowest monthly flowLow flow volume

Highest monthly flowHigh flow volume

IFD index score

Flow Index

Huayuankou

1950

1951

1952

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Very large (0.0-0.2)Deviation Very small (0.8-1.0) Small (0.6-0.8) Moderate (0.4-0.6) Large (0.2-0.4)





IFD index score

Flow Index

Lijin

1950

1951

1952

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008


8 个变化指标

总体评分变化很小变化很大Huayuankou 花园口

Lijin 利津

流量健康

Xiaolangdi 小浪底

1950 2008

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

Huayuankou DamDamDam Dam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

Sunkou DamDam DamDam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

Luokou DamDam DamDam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

in

dex

sco

re

Lijin DamDam DamDam

Overall score

总体评分

大坝建成大坝建成大坝建成大坝建成

1950 2008

Huayuankou花园口

Sunkou孙口

Luokou泺口

Lijin利津

Finished 1995Finished 199521.68 × 108m3

Finished 19697.07 × 108m3

Finished 19727.91 × 108m3

Yingkou

GuanyingeReservoir观音阁水库

Tanghe Reservoir汤河水库

Shenwo Reservoir参窝水库

Bohai

TangmazhaiBenxi

Xiaolinzi

Liaoyang

12

3

4

Stream flow gauge

Environmental flows reach2





IFD index score

Flow Index

Benxi

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Deviation Very small (0.8-1.0) Very large (0.0-0.2)Moderate (0.4-0.6)Small (0.6-0.8) Large (0.2-0.4)





IFD index score

Flow Index

Liaoyang

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007






IFD index score

Flow Index

Xiaolinzi

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007






IFD index score

Flow Index

Tangmazhai

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

Benxi Dam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0IF

D in

dex

sco

reLiaoyang DamDam Dam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

Xiaolinzi DamDam Dam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

in

dex

sco

re

Tangmazhai DamDam Dam

Overall score

总体评分

大坝建成

大坝建成大坝建成





IFD index score

Flow Index

Guilin

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010






IFD index score

Flow Index

Majiang/J ingnan19

5719

5819

5919

6019

6119

6219

6319

6419

6519

6619

6719

6819

6919

7019

7119

7219

7319

7419

7519

7619

7719

7819

7919

8019

8119

8219

8319

8419

8519

8619

8719

8819

8919

9019

9119

9219

9319

9419

9519

9619

9719

9819

9920

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

10






IFD index score

Flow Index

Gongcheng

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010


0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

GuilinDam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

ind

ex s

core

Majiang/JingnanDam

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

IFD

in

dex

sco

re

Gongcheng

Overall score

总体评分

大坝建成

环境流量要素的符合程度指数

• 得分基于观测值 / 预期值

– 观测值是一年中实测的日流量

– 预期值是通过环境流量评估所得出的建议的维持河流健康的流量事件和基流

Low flow rate of riseLow flow rate of fall

Cease to flowLow flows

Low flow pulse

High flow rate of riseHigh flow rate of fall

High flowsHigh flow pulse

Bankfull

Overall (minimum)

Flow Component

Benxi

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Critical (0.0-0.2)Good (0.6-0.8) Fair (0.4-0.6) Poor (0.2-0.4)Very Good (0.8-1.0)



Low flow pulse



Bankfull

Overall (minimum)

Flow Component

Liaoyang

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Good (0.6-0.8) Fair (0.4-0.6) Poor (0.2-0.4) Critical (0.0-0.2)Very Good (0.8-1.0)



Low flow pulse



BankfullOverbank

Overall (minimum)

Flow Component

Xiaolinzi

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007




Low flow pulse



BankfullOverbank

Overall (minimum)

Flow Component

Tangmazhai

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007


在报告卡中的使用 – 黄河下游

在报告卡中的使用 – 太子河

Water quality 水质% of time meeting standard 全年达标天数比例

Chinese Grade

Sou

rce

area

s

1st C

lass

2nd

Cla

ss (

requ

ires

trea

tmen

t)

Prim

ary

cont

act

Sec

onda

ry c

cont

act

Pas

sive

non

-con

tact

Aqu

acul

ture

Gen

eral

indu

stria

l us

es

Indu

stria

l coo

ling

Agr

icul

tura

l irr

igat

ion

irrig

atio

n of

par

ks a

nd

crea

ted

land

scap

es

Nat

iona

l con

serv

atio

n ar

eas

Sen

sitiv

e an

d ra

re

aqua

tic s

peci

es

Com

mon

aqu

atic

sp

ecie

s

Fis

h sp

awni

ng

Fis

h re

arin

g

Fis

h m

igra

tion

Fis

h w

inte

r su

rviv

al

Arbitrary aquatic

health rating

I S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S High-V. high

II U S S S S S S S S S S U S S S S S S Mod. -High

III U U S S S S S S S S S U U S U U S S Low-Mod.

IV U U U U S S U S S S S U U U U U U U Very low

V U U U U U S U U S S S U U U U U U U Very low

VI U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U No value

Drinking water Recreation Industry agriculture and parks Ecological river health

饮用娱乐用途工农业和公园生态河流健康

中国

标准

U = 不当 S = 适合中国 II 类水 = 良中国标准 III = 黄河下游的官方标准

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Annual - Proportion of months target achieved

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

High flow - Proportion of months target achieved

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Low flow - Proportion of months target achieved

花园口

High 丰水期 Low 枯水期

由于小浪底运行良好，最近几年有很大改善

Annual 年平均

Trend in water quality (Grade III target)水质的趋势 ( 中国标准 III)% of time meeting standard 全年达标天数比例

Trend in water quality (Grade II target)水质的趋势 ( 中国标准 II)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Annual - Proportion of months target achieved

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

High flow - Proportion of months target achieved

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Low flow - Proportion of months target achieved

花园口

% of time meeting standard 全年达标天数比例

Annual 年平均 High 丰水期 Low 枯水期

分数很低，并没有随着时间得到改善

在报告卡中的使用 – 黄河下游

8 making use of existing data in river health assessment results cn

Technology