8. mandibular orthognathic procedures(113) dr. rahul tiwari
TRANSCRIPT
Good Morning
Mandibular OrthognathicProcedures
Presenter-Dr. Rahul Tiwari
Final Yr MDSOMFS, SIDS
05/03/2023 07:55:41 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115
1
05/03/2023 07:55:42 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 2
CONTENTS • Introduction
• Surgical anatomy
• Revascularisation & healing of
orthognathic surgical procedures
• Classification
• Surgical procedures
• Ramus osteotomies
• Body osteotomies
• Symphysis osteotomies
• Soft tissue changes after mandibular orthognathic procedures
• Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgeries
• References
05/03/2023 07:55:42 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 3
• Orthognathic in Greek Orthos- straight ; Gnathos- jaw
• Orthognathic surgery refers to surgical procedures designed to correct jaw deformities
• Orthognathic procedures are divided into three categories:• Maxillary surgery• Mandibular surgery• Bimaxillary procedures
05/03/2023 07:55:43 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 4
• Indications to orthognathic surgery
• Impaired mastication• Temporomandibular pain • Dysfunction• Sleep apnea • Susceptibility to caries and periodontal
disease• Unaesthetic appearance
05/03/2023 07:55:43 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 5
• Once growth has ceased, the combination of
orthognathic surgery with orthodontics, usually becomes the only means of correcting severe dentofacial deformities
• In severe malocclusion there are three possibilities for correction: • Growth modification• Orthodontic treatment• Orthognathic surgery in conjunction with
orthodontics to establish proper jaw relationship
• Orthognathic surgery was originally developed in the United States of America (Steinhäuser ).
• The first mandibular osteotomy is considered to be Hullihen´s procedure in 1849 to correct anterior open bite & mandibular dento alveolar protrusion with an intraoral osteotomy.
• Osteotomy of the mandibular body for the correction of mandibular horizontal excess was performed by Vilray Blair.
05/03/2023 07:55:43 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 6
HISTORY
• Berger (1897) described a condylar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism.
• Limberg in 1925 first reported the subcondylar osteotomy as an extraoral technique, later it was modified to the intraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy.
• A variation of the vertical subcondylar osteotomy was suggested by wassmund in 1927,which is similar to the inverted –L-osteotomy.
05/03/2023 07:55:43 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 7
05/03/2023 07:55:43 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 8
• Hofer in 1936 demonstrated an anterior mandibular alveolar osteotomy to advance anterior teeth in correction of a mandibular dentoalveolar retrusion.
• In 1954, Caldwell and Letterman developed a vertical ramus osteotomy technique, which had the advantage of minimizing trauma to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle.
The greatest development in osteotomies of the vertical ramus is the sagittal split osteotomy credited to obwegeser in 1955. The major modifications in the osteotomies design were first made by Dalpont in 1961.This was further discussed by Hunsuck in 1968 in order to decrease the trauma to overlying soft tissues.
Kent & Hinds in 1971 initially presented the use of single tooth osteotomies of the mandible.Macintosh closely followed with his description of the total mandibular alveolar osteotomy in 1974.
05/03/2023 07:55:44 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 9
05/03/2023 07:55:44 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 10
Aesthetics
Function
Stability
AIMS OF MANDIBULAR OSTEOTOMIES
• Patient’s perception of the deformity and expectations
• Surgeon’s recognition of the deformity
• Complete physical examination, model surgery, cephalometric analysis
• Optimal treatment plan
• Counseling of the patient
• Informed consent05/03/2023
07:55:44 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 11
PRINCIPLES IN TREATING MANDIBULAR DEFORMITIES
Vascular
structures
NervesMuscles
05/03/2023 07:55:44 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 12
ANATOMICAL & PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF MANDIBULAR
OSTEOTOMIES
05/03/2023 07:55:44 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 13
Surgical Anatomy
Bell and Levy’s work {1970} demonstrated that blood flow through the mandibular periosteum could easily maintain a sufficient blood supply to the teeth of a mobile segment, even when the labial periosteum was degloved.
subapical osteotomies need to be carefully planned to ensure as large a vascular pedicle as possible.
05/03/2023 07:55:45 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 14
VASCULAR STRUCTURES
The proximal segment of the vertical sub sigmoid osteotomy maintains its blood supply through the temporomandibular joint capsule and the attachment of the lateral pterygoid muscle.
But the inferior tip of this fragment has undergone vascular necrosis in some studies.
This led to the suggestion that fewer problems may occur if the cut was made above the angle of the mandible.
05/03/2023 07:55:45 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 15
We should minimize the periosteal and muscle attachment stripping on the medial surface of the proximal fragment with either the C or L osteotomy or any of their variations.
The greater distance from the apices of the teeth not only minimizes direct pulpal injury but increases the vascular pedicle to the mobile segment as well.
05/03/2023 07:55:45 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 16
NERVES
• In most cases in orthognathic surgery avoiding injury to marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve is achieved because soft tissue anatomy in patients undergoing the surgery has not been disturbed by disease or trauma.
• The course of the inferior alveolar nerve into the vertical ramus and then through the body of the mandible makes it extremely susceptible to damage from almost every mandibular surgical procedure.
• Main goal – “To minimize the trauma because its avoidance is impossible”
05/03/2023 07:55:45 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 17
05/03/2023 07:55:45 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 18
MUSCLESOrthognathic surgery affects muscles in
primarily two ways:
• It changes the length of a muscle or it changes the
direction of muscle function.
• The muscles commonly discussed in orthognathic
surgery of the mandible have been the muscles of
mastication and the suprahyoid group of muscles .
05/03/2023 07:55:46 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 19
• A- S to lingula - 14.8 +/-
2.90 mm• C- S to mandibular foramen
– 21.6 +/- 3.31 mm
• B- Horizontal distance from lingual to anterior border of ramus –
17.7 +/- 2.89 mm• D- Mandibular foramen to
ramus – 18.6 +/- 2.49 mm
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg, 2008
05/03/2023 07:55:46 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 20
• At a distance between 7.5
to 13.3 mm above the lingula
Buccal and lingual cortex fusion occurs at a rate of • 20% in the anterior ramus• 39% in the posterior ramus
05/03/2023 07:55:46 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 21
• The position of the lingula is posterior-inferior relative to the position of the antilingula
• Any osteotomies performed at a measurement of 5 mm posterior to the antilingula (at the level of the antilingula)- no risk of damaging the neurovascular bundle
Accuracy of Using the Antilingula as a Sole Determinant of Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Position . J Oral Maxillofac Surg,
2007
05/03/2023 07:55:47 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 22
Position of IAN at
second molar• Bone thickness from
mandibular canal to buccal plate- 7.2 +/- 1.47 mm
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg, 2008
05/03/2023 07:55:47 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 23
Tsuji et al, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg, 2005
05/03/2023 07:55:47 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 24
• PATTERNS OF ANTERIOR LOOP OF MENTAL NERVE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007
05/03/2023 07:55:48 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 26
Revascularisation & Healing
05/03/2023 07:55:48 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 27
• Blood flow is crucial for revascularisation and healing
• Blood flow will be decreased in the areas where the mucoperiosteum will be elevated
05/03/2023 07:55:48 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 28
• Immediate post-operatively
• Intermedullary circulation between the proximal and distal segments
• Margins of osteotomy- avascular
• One week post-op• Level of hypervascularity around surgical
site• No soft tissue re-attachment• Isolated areas of sub- periosteal bone
formation
05/03/2023 07:55:48 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 29
• 2 weeks post-op
• Avascular zone at the proximal osteotomy site • Necrotic zone at the distal osteotomy site• No soft tissue attachment at the distal
necrotic zone
• 3 weeks post-op• Soft tissue re-attachment • Vascular anastamoses between proximal and
distal segments • Osteoid formation through out marrow
formation
05/03/2023 07:55:49 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 30
• 6 weeks post-op
• Circulation reconstituted across the osteotomy site
• Soft tissue re- attachment established
• 12 weeks post- op• Circulation between the segments is
continuous
CLASSIFICATION
05/03/2023 07:55:49 AMRT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 31
MANDUBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURES
BODY
OSTEOTOMIES
SUB APICAL OSTEOTOMIES
RAMUS OSTEOTOMIES
HORIZONTAL OSTEOTOMY
OF CHIN
SAGGITAL SPLITOSTEOTOMY
VERTICAL RAMUS
OSTEOTOMY
INVERTED “L” &“C” OSTEOTOMY
ANTERIOR SUB APICAL
OSTEOTOMIES
POSTERIOR SUB APICAL
OSTEOTOMIES
TOTAL SUB APICAL OSTEOTOMIES
05/03/2023 07:55:49 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 32
Bilateral Saggital Split Osteotomy
05/03/2023 07:55:49 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 33
• First described in 1942 by Schuchardt in German literature
• Most widely used surgical procedure for correcting mal- positioned mandible
• It has been modified in many ways, but for longer than 50 years, benefits and advantages of the procedure have remained unchanged
05/03/2023 07:55:49 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 34
• Versatility of the procedure allows wide application
• It increases the range of possible movements compared with orthodontic treatment alone
• Broad bony overlap of the separated fragments allow not only advancement or set- backs of the distal tooth- baring mandible, but also rotations
05/03/2023 07:55:50 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 35
• A. Trauner & Obwegezer, 1957
• B. Dal pont, 1961
• C. Hunshuck, 1968
• D. Epcker, 1977
05/03/2023 07:55:50 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 36
• Bell and Schendel established the
biological basis for BSSO
• Minimal detachment of the pterygomassetric sling there is decreased intra- osseous ischemia, and necrosis of the proximal segment
• 1976, Spiessel advocated rigid internal fixation of BSSO to promote primary healing, restore early function, and attenuate relapse
05/03/2023 07:55:50 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 37
Indications
• Mandibular deficiency• Advancements beyond 10- 12 mm, extra oral
approach should be considered
• Mandibular prognathism• Large setbacks of more than 7 -8 mm, IVRO/
inverted L osteotomy should be considered
• Mandibular asymmetry
05/03/2023 07:55:50 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 38
Surgical Procedure
05/03/2023 07:55:51 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 39
ADVANTAGES
• Broad bony overlap of
osteotomised segments
• Minimal alteration of natural
position of muscles of mastication
• Minimal alteration in position of
TMJ
• Short operating time and low
complication rate
DISADVANTSGES
• Requires additional
maxillary surgery for most
dentofacial deformities
05/03/2023 07:55:51 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 40
Osteosynthesis
• Post- operative fixation of the osteotomised segments was once a great challenge
• Initially, No fixation of the fragments Healing- intermaxillary splinting of the teeth
• Introduction of wires for fixation
05/03/2023 07:55:51 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 41
• Major breakthrough- development of “stable compression osteosynthesis”-
Spiessl in 1974
• The degree of immediate postoperative stability achieved with this technique completely obviated the need for intermaxillary fixation
• Wide variety of methods and materials for fixation are available
05/03/2023 07:55:51 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 42
• Initially the use of three 2.7 mm “lag” screws on each side was advocated
• Concern • Compression may cause increased nerve
damage • Displacement of the condyles, with
subsequent temporomandibular joint dysfunction
05/03/2023 07:55:51 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 43
• The position screw or bicortical screw
This technique permits maintenance of the gaps between the proximal and distal fragments, with no compression of the two segments together
• Osteosynthesis with miniplates• 4- holed plate with 2screws on each side of
the osteotomy cut
05/03/2023 07:55:52 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 44
• Resorbable screws• Obvious advantage of resorbable fixation is
to obviate the need for future hardware removal
• 4 screws have to be placed on each side of the mandible
05/03/2023 07:55:52 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 45
Vertical Ramus Osteotomies
05/03/2023 07:55:52 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 46
• 1st described by Caldwell and Letterman in 1954- extra oral
• Introduced by Moose in 1964- intra-oral technique performed from lingual aspect
• Wistanley, 1968- performing the technique from the lateral aspect of the mandible
05/03/2023 07:55:52 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 47
Comparison between SSRO and VRO
SSRO VROOSTEOTOMY PA Saggital split Latero medial cut
Open procedure Blind procedureAlong IAN Rear to IANFrequent exposure of IAN
No exposure of IAN
BONE HEALING Contact on marrow to marrow
Contact on cortex to cortex
BONE FIXATION Rigid internal fixation No fixationCONDYLAR HEAD
Original position New equilibrated position
POST OP IMF None or shorter period Required PROGNOSIS Weakely dependent on
PTStrongly dependent on PT
05/03/2023 07:55:53 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 48
Indications
• Horizontal mandibular excess
• Mandibular asymmetry
• Minor occlusal discrepancy after
isolated Le Fort I osteotomy
• Asymmetric lateral open bite
• Failure to achieve passive rotation
of the mandible after the release of
MMF
• Patients with significant TMJ
complaints
Contraindications
• Advancement of the distal
segment
• Aesthetic assessment of the soft
tissues of the neck is the integral
factor in planning mandibular
set back by ramus surgery
• Recent condylar fractures
• Should be differed for 6-12
months
05/03/2023 07:55:53 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 49
ADVANTAGES
• Can be performed on OPD basis
• Inherent anatomic architecture of the
mandible poses little interference to
place the cuts
• Less chance of damaging the IAN
bundle
• Found to have curable effects in pts
with pre-op TMD
• Less incidence of condylar sag
DISADVANTSGES
• Need for MMF
05/03/2023 07:55:53 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 50
05/03/2023 07:55:53 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 51
• IMF-7-10 days .elastic traction-4-5 weeks
• Rigid fixation-uncommonly used because of• Technical difficulty• Increased operation time• Good results with wire fixation or IMF
05/03/2023 07:55:53 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 52
Bony interference
• Occurring between the overlapped proximal and distal segments- causing a backward rotation of the of the proximal segment• If interference is not
reduced- forward skeletal relapse upon IMF release
• Contact between the condyle and coronoid
05/03/2023 07:55:54 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 53
Inverted L/C Osteotomies
05/03/2023 07:55:54 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 54
• These are designs in the vertical ramus that include both the condyle and coronoid in the same segment
• Most commonly done via an extra- oral approach
05/03/2023 07:55:54 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 55
• Indications
• Large advancements >12mm• Mandibular setback -10mm or more-bypasses the
need for coronoidectomy• Secondary correction of proximal segment
malrotation following BSSO• Simultaneous advancement and lengthening of ramus
in case of severe ramus under development.
• Less risk of condylar sag compared with VRO
05/03/2023 07:55:54 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 56
05/03/2023 07:55:55 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 57
Vertical Body Osteotomies
05/03/2023 07:55:55 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 58
• Blair -1907-as an extra oral procedure
• Dingman –combination of extraoral and
intra oral access
• Now contemplated only as an intraoral
procedure.
05/03/2023 07:55:55 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 59
Indications
• Mandibular setback• Mandibular prognathism with ramus procedure.• Mandibular prognathism where long body in
relation to ramus
• Anterior open bite closure• Curve of spee reduction• Progenia correction
• In class III-anterior body osteotomy –wedge of bone removed and set back
05/03/2023 07:55:55 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 60
Pitfalls
• Anatomic discrepancies leading to reduction in bone to
bone contact
• Segment control
• Torquing of the proximal segments is the classic
problem
• Root anatomy is variable
• Difficult to perform osteotomy in the premolar
region when trying to skrit the mental nerve and
root of the 1st premolar
05/03/2023 07:55:55 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 61
Sub-apical Osteotomies
05/03/2023 07:55:56 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 62
ANTERIOR MADIBULAR SUB-APICAL OSTEOTOMY
• Earliest referenced description of symphyseal osteotomies was by Trauner in 1952
• Aids in correction of dentofacial deformities.
• When combined with AMO non skeletal open bite or bimaxillary protrusion can be corrected
• Useful to level the plane of occlusion with out decreasing the vertical facial height
05/03/2023 07:55:56 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 63
05/03/2023 07:55:56 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 64
Complications
• Loss of bone or teeth in osteotomised segment.(lingual tissues not protected-decrease in blood supply)
• Bone cuts placed close to the teeth-loss of vitality and periodontal defects
• Mental nerve paresthesia-directly related to the amount of trauma
05/03/2023 07:55:56 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 65
Posterior Subapical Osteotomy
• First described by- Peterson Indications
• Correction of super eruption of posterior mandibular
teeth
• Ankylosis of one or more posterior teeth
• Abnormal buccal or lingual position of these teeth
especially if orthodontics is not feasible
05/03/2023 07:55:56 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 66
Total Mandibular Subapical Osteotomy
• Oldest procedures used to correct Jaw Deformity.
• Described by HULLIHEN in 1849.
• Popularised by Hofer and Koele.
05/03/2023 07:55:57 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 67
• Primary indication Malocclusion caused by
Mandibular Dentoalveolar deformity with normally positioned Maxilla and Mandibular skeletal bases
• Bell concluded that horizantal osteotomy be completed 0.5cm or more from the apices of teeth in order to preserve pulpal circulation.
05/03/2023 07:55:57 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 68
Horizontal Osteotomy of the Symphysis
05/03/2023 07:55:57 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 69
• Facial features often form a basis for stereotyping of personality charecteristics
• Chin is most prominent facial feature
• Chin deformities can manifest in 3 dimensions but majority are in the horizontal direction
05/03/2023 07:55:57 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 70
• Horizontal sliding osteotomy-first described by Hofer in 1942-through extra oral approach.
• Trauner and Obwegeser-1957- horizontal osteotomy through an intra oral incision.
• Reichenbach-1965-wedge osteotomy and vertical shortening of the chin.
05/03/2023 07:55:57 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 71
05/03/2023 07:55:58 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 72
05/03/2023 07:55:59 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 73
Types Of Genioplasties
05/03/2023 07:55:59 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 75
Double Sliding Horizontal Osteotomy
• Indication- severe chin deficiency
• Surgical technique involved-creation of a stepped intermediate wafer between the inferior fragment and mandible.
• Inferior fragment also advanced to provide bony contact between upper and lower fragments.
05/03/2023 07:56:00 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 76
Propellar Genioplasty
•
05/03/2023 07:56:01 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 77
Saggital Splilt Genioplasty
Sagittal Split Genioplasty: A New Technique . J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010
05/03/2023 07:56:01 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 78
Transverse Reduction Genioplasty
Transverse Reduction Genioplasty to Reduce Width of the ChinJ Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010
05/03/2023 07:56:02 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 79
Chin Sheild Genioplasty
Chin shield osteotomy – a new genioplasty technique avoiding a deep mento-labial fold in order to increase the labial competence . Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg, 2009
05/03/2023 07:56:02 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 80
M- Shaped Genioplasty
M- shaped genioplasty: new surgical technique for vertical and saggital chin augmentation: 3 case
reports J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012
05/03/2023 07:56:02 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 81
Soft Tissue Changes After Mandibular Orthognathic
Procedures
05/03/2023 07:56:03 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 82
• The major goal of orthognathic surgery is the establishment of a balanced and stable dentoskeletofacial complex
• Most important aspect- achieving aesthetically pleasing facial soft tissue envelope
• Ability to predict soft and hard tissue changes before an orthognathic surgical procedure is critical to treatment planning
05/03/2023 07:56:03 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 83
• Change in soft tissue morphology after orthodontics + surgery depends upon
• Method of wound closure• New spatial arrangement of skeletal and
dental elements• Adaptive qualities of soft tissues • Vector of tooth movement• Lip thickness, tonicity, lip area, competence,
strength, postop oedema, etc.
05/03/2023 07:56:03 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 84
Anterior Repositioning• Little change in upper lip &
none above ANS
• Variable advancement in lower lip, it often lengthens
• Lower labial sulcus & chin adhere to bone, so advance more than lower lip-opening of labiomental fold
05/03/2023 07:56:03 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 85
Posterior Repositioning
• No effect on subnasale or the tissues superior to subnasale
• Slight posterior displacement of upper lip, with lengthening can occur
• Slight increase in nasolabial angle• Soft tissues follow the mandible posteriorly, with
chin following most closely, followed by inferior labial sulcus
05/03/2023 07:56:03 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 86
Autorotation
• During autorotation of mandible, the soft tissues follow the osseous landmarks on approximately 1:1 basis
• But lower lip falls slightly lingual to arc of rotation
• Slight increase in labiomental angle
• Slight thickening of lower lip
05/03/2023 07:56:04 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 87
Soft Tissue Changes After Genioplasty
• The soft tissue changes depend on magnitude & direction of positional change of the genial segment, design of mucosal & osseous incisions, amount of soft tissue stripping, & other concomitant jaw movements
• Advantage of genial surgery is preservation of normal tissue contour
• Vertical reduction allows larger soft tissue advancement
Anterior repositioning
• Majority of change is in soft tissue of chin; less effect is in labial sulcus &
lower lip
• Soft tissue follow hard tissue without chin droop
• Small but negligible effect on labiomental sulcus
• Increase in submental length
• Improved lower lip to tooth relationship
• Less soft tissue thinning
• Improved neck chin angle
05/03/2023 07:56:04 AM RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 88
05/03/2023 07:56:04 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 89
Posterior repositioning
• Little improvement in profile
• Soft tissue changes are little correlated with hard tissue movements (than with advancement)
• Contraindicated in patient with minimal or no labiomental fold
• Undesirable changes in neck chin proportion
05/03/2023 07:56:04 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 90
COMPLICATIONS
05/03/2023 07:56:04 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 91
• Surgical relapse to varying degree can
occur after mandibular surgery
• Complications in orthognathic surgery• Pre-operative phase • Intra-operative phase • Post-operative phase
05/03/2023 07:56:04 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 92
PRE-OPERATIVE PHASE
• Limitations on surgical movement- failure to eliminate dental compensations
• Molar root fenestrations, transverse surgical relapse- Failure to manage transverse discrepancy
• Immpossibilility in achieving class I cusp relation, overjet and over bite- failure to indentify and manage tooth size discrepancies
• Root damage during osteotomies- failure to properly level and achieve root divergence in segmental cases
• Psychological preparation of the patient
05/03/2023 07:56:05 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 93
INTRA-OPERATIVE PHASE
• Attributed to improper surgical technique and/or failure to appreciate patient’s anatomy
• Unanticipated intra-op complications are not unheard of
• Can be categorised into• Unfavourable osteotomy splits• Nerve injury• Bleeding• Proximal segment malpositioning• Miscellenaeous
05/03/2023 07:56:05 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 94
Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
UNFAVORABLE OSTEOTOMY SPLIT • Incidence- 18%
Bad split
Abort the procedure& perform after healing
Correct the split &Complete the procedure
05/03/2023 07:56:05 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 95
Proximal segment fracture• Also called “Buccal plate fracture”• Most frequent
• Presence of impacted 3rd molar• Recent removal of 3rd molar• Age of the patient• Incomplete transection of the inferior border • Surgeon’s experience
• # of distal segment occurred more often in young people with impacted 3rd molars
05/03/2023 07:56:05 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 96
• Role of impacted 3rd molars in unfavorable # is debatable• Advocated removal 6months prior surgery
Fracture of coronoid process• Occurs when the horizontal cut is placed
too high where the ramus is thin
• Fracture of distal segments• Inferior border remains attached to distal
segment
05/03/2023 07:56:05 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 97
NERVE INJURY
• Damage can occur at many points
• When nerve was transected- usually in 3rd molar
region or anterior to it
• Higher incidence of neurosensory disturbance
with bicortical screws than monocortical screws
05/03/2023 07:56:06 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 98
BLEEDING • Incidence decreased from 38% in 1972
to 1% in 2005
• Most common sources• Maxillary artery and its branches (massetric
and inferior alveolar artery)• Retromandibular vein• Facial artery and vein
05/03/2023 07:56:06 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 99
PROXIMAL SEGMENT MAL-
POSITIONING• Counterclockwise rotation and condylar
distraction are frequent positional changes in proximal segment
• MINOR DIFFICULTIES• Herniation of buccal fat pad• Difficulty in incision closure • Breaking of bur
05/03/2023 07:56:06 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 100
Vertical Ramus Osteotomy
UNFAVOURABLE OSTEOTOMY
• Inadvertent subcondylar osteotomy
• More likely in
• Prognathic mandible with high mandibular
plane angle and ill- defined gonial angle
05/03/2023 07:56:06 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 101
NERVE INJURY
• Incidence ranges from 0%- 14%• Less incidence when compared to SSO
• Can occur in 2 phases• If osteotomy is close to mandibular foramen• Medial displacement of the proximal
segment compressing and tearing the nerve
05/03/2023 07:56:06 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 102
BLEEDING• Common source- maxillary artery and
its branches
PROXIMAL SEGMENT MALPOSITIONING
• Control of proximal segment- major disadvantage• May be displaced antero- medially, anteriorly
towards articular eminence or can be displaced medially and inferiorly
05/03/2023 07:56:07 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 103
Sub- Apical Osteotomies
• Nerve injury• Damage to teeth roots• Non- vitality of teeth • Mal-positioning of mobilised segments
• Inadequate trimming, inadequate bone removal
• Difficulty in stabilisation
05/03/2023 07:56:07 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 104
Genioplasty
UNFAVOURABLE OSTEOTOMY• Inadvertent # of body and ramus• Damage to teeth roots
NERVE INJURY• Mental nerve is commonly injured
• incision, reflection and retraction, osteotomies, plating or closure
05/03/2023 07:56:07 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 105
• BLEEDING• Damage to lingual soft tissues
• Injury to genioglossus, geniohyoid muscles • Laceration of sublingual and submental
arteries
• Usually not life threatening• Managed by local measures
COMPLICATIONS
05/03/2023 07:56:07 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 106
POST-OPERATIVE PHASEEARLY POSTOP
• Excessive swelling • Haemorrhage &
Haematoma • PONV • Neurological
dysfunction• Mandibular
dysfunction• Hypomobility, reduction
in bite force, TMJ dysfunction
• Relapse
Genioplasty
Neurological
dysfunction
Chin asymmetry
Uneven mentalis
muscle contraction
Chin ptosis
05/03/2023 07:56:07 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 107
LATE POST-OP
• Long term neurological dysfunction• TMJ dysfunction• Dental and periodontal problems
05/03/2023 07:56:08 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 108
• CONDYLAR SAG• Immediate or late caudal movement of condyle in
the glenoid fossa after surgical establishment of the preplanned occlusion and bone fragments leading to change in the occlusion
• Types –• Central• Peripheral
05/03/2023 07:56:08 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 109
Central condylar sag
Bilateral
Unilateral
05/03/2023 07:56:09 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 110
Peripheral condylar sagType I
Peripheral condylar sagType II
Bilateral
Unilateral
05/03/2023 07:56:10 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 111
REFERENCES
• Maxillofacial Surgery-Peter Ward Booth
• Principles Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery- Peterson
• Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-Fonseca
• Essentials Of Orthognathic Surgery-Reyneke
• Chin shield osteotomy – a new genioplasty technique avoiding a deep mento-labial fold in order to increase the labial competence Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg, 2009
05/03/2023 07:56:10 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 112
• Transverse Reduction Genioplasty to Reduce Width of the Chin J Oral
Maxillofac Surg, 2010
• Sagittal Split Genioplasty: A New Technique J Oral Maxillofac Surg,
2010
• M- shaped genioplasty: new surgical technique for vertical and saggital
chin augmentation: 3 case reports J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012
REFERENCES
05/03/2023 07:56:10 AM
RT/8/MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC PROCEDURE/115 113
THANK YOU