8/13/2019 8df8eRisk Return Case Study

1/3

Case Study 2

When risk isn't bad?

The title of this case study might take most by surprise. After all, we have been

conditioned to believe that while investing, risk is bad. Well, that's not entirely correct.Taking on risk without understanding its implications isn't right. Similarly, a common

mistake made is that risk is considered in isolation. The right approach for evaluating risk

is to consider it in conjunction with return what is commonly referred to as the risk!

return trade!off.

Another vital aspect about risk is being aware of one's risk appetite and sticking to it at all

times i.e. being unambiguously sure of how much risk one can take on and not e"ceeding

the same. #ften age is used as a reference point to evaluate one's risk appetite i.e. the

older an individual gets, lower is his ability to take on risk.

This case study deals with a client of $utura %onsulting , &s. ibha (hare who re)uired

assistance in financial planning.

Facts of the case

&s (hare was a **!+r old single lady i.e. she had no dependents. She was a salaried

individual earning s -, per month /pm0.

The %onsultants at $utura %onsulting started off with a series of discussions with &s.

(hare to better understand her risk appetite and the reasons for the 'e)uity!free' portfolio.

They begun by asking her one simple )uestion ! 1f she was investing in the stock markets

for the long!term, and the stock markets were to fall *.2 the ne"t day, would she

panic3 4er answer was an emphatic 56o5.

The reason &s (hare had steered clear of e)uity7mutual fund investments was because

she didn't )uite understand what they were and how they functioned. #n the other hand,

investments in fi"ed deposits and small savings schemes were something she was

conversant with and had traditionally invested in. 4ence, she chose to stick to the same

time!tested investment avenues.

.

8/13/2019 8df8eRisk Return Case Study

2/3

The following table gives &s. (hare8s 1nvestment allocation in %ase 9 and $utura

%onsulting8s recommendation in %ase *.

6ow let's get back to &s. (hare's case and her second problem area of not setting

investment objectives. The %onsultants reali:ed that &s. (hare's investment activity was

carried out in an 5off the cuff5 manner. She wasn't aware of the importance of setting

objectives before commencing any investment activity. As a result, she was yet to decide

on any concrete investment objectives. 1t transpired that &s. (hare planned to get

married in about ; years. So there was an investment objective that merited immediate

attention ! accumulating monies for the wedding. As per &s. (hare's estimate, she would

need /at present cost levels0 a corpus of s ;, to meet the wedding e"penses.

Assumed return is 9;2.

8/13/2019 8df8eRisk Return Case Study

3/3

$uestions

9. As the %$# of $utura %onsulting what are your #bservations after reading the

%ase3

*. What Ccategory of iskD does &s. (hare fall into3

>. 1s the advise given by your %ompany8s %onsultants correct in the light of theabove observations 3/Substantiate your answer by giving the isk and eturn for

the portfolios given in %ase9 and %ase *0