9. large-span structures - fsv Čvut --...
TRANSCRIPT
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 1
OK3 1
9. Large-span structuresRigid element structures, suspension structures, stayed structures, pneumatic structures reinforced by cables.
Distribution chosen according to the main load-carrying elements:(complete with cladding, bracing, side walls etc.)
structures with rigid members,suspension structures,stayed structures,pneumatic structures with ropes.
• plate girder
• truss and lattice girder
• arch
• frame
• stayed structure
• suspension structure
materialusage
supportdemands
desc
ends
asce
nd
planar systems (2D),space systems (3D).
Generally:
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 2
OK3 2
1. Structures with rigid membersPlanar systemsPlate girderDrawbacks: heavy, rarely use. Example:
Prague Wilson station, upper flange orthotropic, L = 45 m
Exception: girders with predeformed thinwalled webst = 2 ÷ 4 mm, L up to 50 m
Truss (or lattice girder with parallel chords) Drawbacks: great height (up to L/10), instability of compression chord.Modification: space truss (Lcr between nodes only)
Example:Vítkovice stadium L = 100 mAmsterdam stadium L = 177 m(with movable roof)
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 3
OK3 3
L
v
ffMH v=
Two-pinned arch (or fixed arch):- compression of centre line (→ lower H),- sensitive to settling of support and temperature,- convenient to use ties in floor (to carry H).
• in-plane buckling:
• out-of-plane buckling for:- length of trans. supports
- or β1, β2 given in standards acc. to geometry and loading)
Arch stability:a) Approximate check in buckling for Nx = L/4 :
NL
2/l)
2crl)
β=L β = 0,7
β = 1,0
β = 1,15
LL 21cr ββ=
b) 2nd order theory with imperfections (GNIA).
Arches (plate, truss)Drawbacks: curvature may cause problems to roofing.
(hence often polygonal shape). See Olymp. stadium Sydney L = 300 mOlymp. stadium Athens L = 304 m
Statics:
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 4
OK3 4
Olympic stadium in Athensarches with L = 304 m, polycarbonated roofing(Spanish architect Santiago Calatrava)
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 5
OK3 5
Portal framesVarious types of supports, haunches etc. For stability see chapter 8 (Classification of frames). connection with friction-grip bolts
(to restrict deformations)
L up to 70 m
Detail of the “pin"(fixing requirestoo large bases):
bolts in column perimeter
Space systems• grids,• truss plates,• cylindrical (wagonhead) vaults and shells,• spherical domes.
In space design:- the material (steel) is better used,- design rigidity of the structure is greater,- however, the fabrication is more laborious and assembly
more difficult.
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 6
OK3 6
Grids• bidirectional
Truss plates (usually from tubes)
Differ from grids by shifting of bottom flanges for ½ of truss panel:
plate girdersgirders:
lattice girders
(supports usually along perimeter)
in plan may become skew⇒ necessary bracing in both directions !!!
• three-way grids
- these are rigid, no bracing necessary.
• bidirectional the structure has 1º of internal freedom⇒ min. 4 vertical simple supports !!!
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 7
OK3 7
• three-way
Advantages of space truss plates• supports may be placed acc. to need (solved by member dimensions - “hidden
primary beams"),• all plan shapes available,• some members may be omitted (e.g. parts of bottom flanges, diagonals, etc.).
Drawbacks of space truss plates• complicated joints (usually patented),• material usage is high (due to requirement of minimum member size).
Joints of space truss plates
a) Welded piece of pressed hemispheres
d
~ 2d
40dt ≈ - pieces are pressed while warm,
- one tube is continuous, - other tubes are welded in the space to sphere by
butt weld ½ V.
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 8
OK3 8
b) Patented joints
Mero system Germany Analogy: KT-I Jap.:(polyhedron – up to 18 tubes may be connected)
Family of modifications, e.g.:• cylindrical joint (carries M),• plate joint (for singlelayer structures)
Outstanding structures:
Globe Arena (1987) Eden projekt (2000) Singapore Art C. (2002) S. Jordi (1992)
hexagonal coverspring
nut
cover nutbolt
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 9
OK3 9
Triodetic systemCanada
Outstanding structures:
Hawaii Energy Center (2004)Toronto IMAX (1971)Glasshouse in Vancouver (1969)
Nodus systemGB
clamping bolt
flattened tube,hooked
high-strength boltparted joint
RHS (rectangularhollow section)
lugs for pins of tubediagonals
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 10
OK3 10
Cylindrical vaults and shells• plated usually orthotropic (stiffened for local rigidity)
Example: Prague fairground stadium (1962)L= 64 m, t = 4 mm
• trussed
Lab in Moscow(collapsed in about 1985)
236 112
Static analysis (see EN 1993-1-6)
a) Strength analysis:- bending theory
6 internal resultants (Nx, Nϕ, Nxϕ, Mx, Mϕ, Mxϕ)
- membrane theory3 membrane forces only (Nx, Nϕ, Nxϕ). Necessary to take into account moment effects (namely at gables, Mx).
moment disturbanceat gable ⇒ Mx beam force Nx
+ shear force Nxϕϕ
arch force Nϕ
single-layereddouble-layered Example: lamellar structures of ice-hockey
stadiums Kladno, Prostějov
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 11
OK3 11
a) Stability analysis ( incl. “snap through" of the shell):
- global instability
- local instabilityw0
Spherical domes
membrane theory
parallel force Nϑ
meridian force Nϕ
+ shear force Nϑϕ
− in bottom there is a tension ring (or the horizontal forces are anchored),− at top there is concentration of members ⇒ insert compression ring.
• Single-layer domes
compression tube ∅ 330×17
Example: latticed Z pavillion in Brno∅ 93 m (tubes 60×2 up to 102×6)
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 12
OK3 12
• Double-layer domes2,5 m
266
135
36 truss girders
ties ∅ 100 mm (S460)
Stadium in Detroit (1979)
Sazka Arena in Prague (2004)
simillar to hall in Anaheim LAL=101×133 mhall in Chicago L = 115 ×159 m
Glasshouses Eden (GB, 2000)
Globe Arena (Stockholm, 1987)
History: Schwedler’s domes, Zimmerman’s cupolas.New trends: geodetic dome (icosahedron) - 12 peaks, 20 plates, 30 equal members.
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 13
OK3 13
Sazka Arena (2004)
- 18 000 spectators,- diameter 135 m, height 9 m,- 36 stayed trusses with ties of ∅ 98 mm (S460),- middle tube ∅ 18 m weighing 170 t (another 30 t may be suspended).
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 14
OK3 14
2. Suspension structures (use of tension suspended elements)
- cable structures,- membrane structures.
Advantages:• small material usage,• great shape possibilities (architectonic diversity).
Drawbacks:• shape lability,
M(x) = 0
shape depends on loading, i.e.:- 2nd order theory analysis,- high roofing requirements.
• great horizontal reactions.
L
ffLqH
8
2=
- great requirements on supports.
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 15
OK3 15
Ropes(see Seidel „Tensile surface structures“: spiral ropes, compound from parallel wires, one-strand ropes, more-strand ropes, open and locked ropes)
aluminium or steelswaged thimble U clampfork swaged socket clamps
open strand locked strand
galvanizedwiresZn95Al5(300g/m2)
gaps filled up bywax, polyurethane,
zinc dust + oil
plastic
Sockets:
open, filled with zinccylindrical, filled with metal or epoxy:
can be supplied with outer/inner thread, or lug for joint
plastictubes filling: resin,
polymers,cements.
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 16
OK316
Cable structures• plane (2D),• space (3D).
• Plane cable structures (cylindrical roofs)
a) Single-layer
For wind suction the roof need to be stabilized by:
change of the shapeand vibration
• heavy dead load (ballast),• stiffening (stiff elements),• prestressing (two-layer structures,
see further).
circumferential cable
anchored into foundation or into ring-beam/circumferential cable:
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 17
OK3 17
b) Double-layer
connectingtension ties
connecting compressionprops
prestressedbearing cableand tensioncable
Jawerth’s truss(all members are ropes in tension)
Examples:auditorium of Utica (USA) university ice stadium in Johannesburg (Stockholm)
82 800
15 8
00
75 000
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 18
OK3 18
• Space cable structures
a) With radial cables (usually circular in plan)
1. 3.2.
cable couple
plan
section inner tension ringouter compressionring
Example: USA pavillion in Brussels, EXPO 1958 (104 m)b) Geiger’s cable domes
upper tension ringprestressed radials
compression ring
tension ringscompression posts
great span (up to 250 m)
Example: Olympic stadium in Seul, 1988(textile covering)
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 19
OK3 19
Geiger’s system
Static behaviour Execution
Erection
compression ring
tensionrings
prestressing 1compression ring
supply tension rings
P P
P PP/2P/2
P/2 P/2
P/2 P/2
P/4 P/4
P/4 P/4
prestressing 2etc.
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 20
OK3 20
c) Cable meshes
2 cable warps concave - load bearingconvex - prestressing
Festival complex in Tartu (53,3x42,6 m): assembly and final form.
1. Straight peripheral members 2. Arched peripheral members
Examples: • Č. Budějovice, • Bratislava Pasienky, 1962 (72x66 m)
great bendingmoments
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 21
OK3 21
Membrane suspension structuresLoad bearing membrane may form roofing at the same time. Types of structures:
• cylindrical,• circular, elliptic.
Example:Moscow (ellipse 224x183 m):
t = 5 mm + stiffeners
tension ring
keeps the shape during wind suction
for fastening of soffit
224 x 183
Material of membranes in general:• stainless steel (sheets t = 4 ÷ 5 mm),• alloys of Al (up to 70 m only t ≈ 2 mm),• textile, plastic foils (today mostly ETFE, PTFE).
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 22
OK3 22
Example of textile membranes (PTFE)
peripheral cables cable anchorage
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 23
OK3 23
3. Stayed structures (use of stiff or flexible stay elements)Stays create additional supports, which are flexible. Their positions need to be optimized. The stays are:
• stiff (rods, tubes), provided they are in compression under wind suction, • flexible (cables), which may be prestressed to exclude compression.
Stayed rigid roof structures:
Stayed suspension roof structure:
anchored intocolumn base
outside anchoring(plot requirements)
48
Example:Ruzyně hangar
textile, plastic
Example:• Olympic stadium in Munich, 1972• Airport Jeddah (for pilgrims to Mecca),405000 m2, 1980
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 24
OK3 24
4. Pneumatic structures stabilized by cablesTextile structures with inner overpressure of approx. 0,003 at (= 0,0003 MPa = 0,3 kN/m2).
Examples:
• Stadium in Vancouver (1983)
Stadium for baseball, 55000 spectators,deflated in typhoons
pressure 0,003 at
textileropes ∅ 80 mm
Dimensions: 232 x 190 m
• Big Egg Tokio (1988)
ropes ∅ 80 ā 8,5 m
201 m
pressure 0,003 at
textile 0,8 mm
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 25
OK3 25
5. Structures with tension rods and glassEsthetic new structures (e.g. passenger terminals / entrance halls) are more and more using tensioned rods and glass sheets:
DETAN system MACALLOY system
Examples:
Expo Lisbon 1998 Granada Airport 1998 Madrid Barajas 2006 Senftenberg 1998
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 26
OK3 26
Glass facades supported by rope prestressed girders
Structures formed from prestressed rods and compressed posts. The tube posts support glass panes with help of rectified point fixings (“spiders").
© 9 Prof. Ing. Josef Macháček, DrSc. 27
OK3 27
Large-sized glass façade (Munich)