9 september 28-30 ivt update course evaluation

ANSAP, INC. - AESCULAP ACADEMY Three-Day IV Therapy Update ProgramSeptember 28 - 30, 2011 Aesculap Academy, Pasig City

ParticipantsDATE 28-Sep-11 29-Sep-11 30-Sep-11 TOPIC Ethico Legal Issues of IVT Blood Transfusion Nosocomial Infection SPEAKER Roselle Azucena, RN, MAN Charisse Magallanes, RN Charles Almin Alba, RN NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 76 79 78

Participating Institutions

A. Zarate General Hospital Adventist University of the Phils. Al Aferiah Primary Health Center Alabang Medical Center APDNPP Bernardino General Hospital Bulacan Medical Center Capitol Medical Center Cardinal Santos Medical Center Chinese Gen.l Hospital and Med. Cr. Civic Ambulance Services Singapore Coast Guard Medical Service De La Salle Univ.Medical Center DLSMC Duru's Insdustrial Corp. Estevez Memorial Hospital

Evangelista Medical Specialty Hospital Fort Bonifacio General Hospital Fresinius Medical Care Gov. Faustino N. Dy Mem' Hosp Healthserv Los Banos Medical Center JP Sioson General Hospital Lung Center of the Phils Makati Health Specialist Manila Doctors Hospital Manila Water Company Marikina Valley Medical Center MCU Hospital Medical Center Paranaque MMC College of Nursing NKTI Northern Palawan Prov Hospital

OLLH Ospital ng Binan Ospital ng Makati Palawan Adventist Medical Center Pasig City General Hospital Pasig Emergency Unit Philippine Heart Center Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia SLMC Global City Sorsogon Medical Mission Group Sta. Teresita General Hospital The Medical City Univ. of Perpetual Help Dalta Med Ctr VRPMC WNS GS

Event: ANSAP-Aesculap Academy IVT Update Location: Aesculap Academy Date: September 28, 2011

Topic: Ethico-Legal Issues of IVT Speaker: Roselle Azucena, RN, MAN No. of Participants: 76

1) Objectives of the IVT Update (Relevance to present needs in nursing practice) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 64% 47 1) Outstanding 32% 24 2) Very Good 3% 2 3) Good 1% 1 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 2 6) No Answer Totals 100% 76 Comments:

3% 1% 1 2 3 4 5 6 31%

3%

62%

2) Content (Relevance of topic to IV nursing practe) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 61% 43 1) Outstanding 34% 24 2) Very Good 3% 2 3) Good 1% 1 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 6 6) No Answer Totals 100% 76 Comments:

3% 1 2 3 4 5 34%

1%

62%

AESCULAP ACADEMY www.aesculap-academy-ap.com Page 3 of 24



3) Length of Seminar Responses (Percent) (Count) 35% 24 55% 38 7% 5 3% 2 7 76

Answer Options 1) Outstanding 2) Very Good 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 6) No Answer Comments:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7%

3% 9% 31%

50%

Totals

100%

4) Resource Speaker (Ability to discuss subject matter clearly) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 68% 50 1) Outstanding 28% 21 2) Very Good 4% 3 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 2 6) No Answer Totals 100% 76 Comments:

4% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 6 27% 66%




5) Resource Speaker (Mastery of Subject Matter) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 72% 53 1) Outstanding 27% 20 2) Very Good 1% 1 3) Good 4) Fair 2 5) Needs Improvement Totals 100% 76 Comments:

1% 1 2 3 4 5 26%

3%

70%

6) Contents of Presentation Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 64% 48 1) Outstanding 32% 24 2) Very Good 4% 3 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 1 6) No Answer Totals 100% 76 Comments:

4% 1% 1 2 3 4 5 6 32% 63%




7) Audience Participation Responses (Percent) (Count) 50% 36 42% 30 7% 5 1% 1 4 76

1%

Totals

100%


1 2 3 4 5 42%

7%

50%

8) Overall Evaluation Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 50% 37 1) Outstanding 45% 33 2) Very Good 5% 4 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 2 6) No Answer Totals 100% 76 Comments:

5% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 6 43% 49%




9) Did this Update meet your expectations? Responses (Percent) (Count) 99% 75 1) Yes 1% 1 2) No Answer Totals 100% 76 Comments:

1%

Answer Options

1 2 99%

1. I learned a lot. 2. It explained the rights of nurses, updates about present issues. 3. I am now knowledgeable on the scope, duties, responsibilities as a nurse. 4. The speaker discussed topics that I have long been perplexed about and even those I didn't expect to hear. 5. Very informativemore than I expected. 6. Well discussed; easy to understand. 7. My personal objectives were met. 8. Ethico-legal is one of the boring subjects; but, the speaker was able to break that trend. 9. I learned new things which I can apply in my profession in delivering good nursing care. 10. I became updated with new laws. 11. I am now geared with new and updates knowledge with the legal aspcts of nursing care. I hope these provisions are strictly imposed in all hospitals for the betterment of both the patients and the nursing profession 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. It refreshed my memory about nursing laws and principles. The lecturer was very good.. Concise but comprehensive. It's reality based. The speaker did very well in discussing the subect matter. Superb! Well experiences speaker. She shared her experiences related to IVT.




WHAT DID YOU LIKE MOST ABOUT THIS UPDATE?

1. New learning. 2. Updates 3. Ethico-legal issues; It refreshed my memory to be assertive and principled as we do IVT. 4. Examples 5. It created an empowerment in me. It boosted my outlook towards my profession and added awareness on my responsibilities and accountabilities. 6. Practical application of theories 7. New and improved system of nursing care. 8. Citation of true-to-life examples; concise descriptions on what to do in certain situations. 9. Understanding the importance of the legality of our profession. 10. Lively discussion 11. Humor and knowledge of the speaker. 12. Relevance of topic tio nursing practice. 13. Nurses' rights; nurse:patient ratio 14. New laws, principles governing IVT 15. Lively and entertaining speaker. She explained her lecture well and tried to answer our questions. 16. Workshop: The team shared knowledge. We also got acquainted with other team members. 17. The speake based the topics on personal experiences and shared them to us. 18. Very interactive. 19. It became clearer to me that being in this profession requires proper implementation of nursing care with the guidanc of nursing laws. 20. How the lecture flowed and the friendliness of the speaker. The examples were also nice and based on reality. 21. How the speaker established rapport with the listeners and how she easily caught the attention of listeners and instill knowledge.




HOW WOULD YOU LIKE THIS UPDATE TO BE IMPROVED?

1. Longer hours. There seems to be a lot to learn. 2. More examples, activities 3. A nurse-lawyer might also give good information about this topic. 4. Hands-on and videos 5. Contents of the slides should not be wordy. Slides should match the handouts 6. Handouts must be improved. It's not logically arranged and it's incomplete. 7. Stick to the topic. 8. More activities so we can apply our learnings. 9. Demo, if possible. 10. Aside from texts, please include photos. 11. More evidence-based cases.



Topic: Blood and Blood Components Transfusion Therapy Speaker: Maria Charisse Y. Magallanes, RN No. of Participants: 79

1) Objectives of the IVT Update (Relevance to present needs in nursing practice) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 55% 42 1) Outstanding 41% 31 2) Very Good 4% 3 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 3 6) No Answer Totals 100% 79 Comments:

4% 4% 1 2 3 4 5 6 39% 53%

2) Content (Relevance of topic to IV nursing practe) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 51% 40 1) Outstanding 46% 36 2) Very Good 4% 3 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 6) No Answer Totals 100% 79 Comments:

4% 1 2 3 4 5 45% 51%




3) Length of Seminar Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 38% 29 1) Outstanding 55% 42 2) Very Good 7% 5 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 3 6) No Answer Totals 100% 79 Comments:

1 2 3 4 5 6

6% 4%

37%

53%

4) Resource Speaker (Ability to discuss subject matter clearly) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 51% 39 1) Outstanding 43% 33 2) Very Good 5% 4 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 3 6) No Answer Totals 100% 79 Comments:

5% 4% 1 2 3 4 5 6 42% 49%




5) Resource Speaker (Mastery of Subject Matter) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 46% 36 1) Outstanding 47% 37 2) Very Good 6% 5 3) Good 4) Fair 2 5) Needs Improvement Totals 100% 80 Comments:

6% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 46% 45%

6) Contents of Presentation Responses (Percent) (Count) 45% 35 47% 37 6% 5 1 1 79

7% 1%

1%


1 2 3 4 5 6 47% 44%

Totals

99%




7) Audience Participation Responses (Percent) (Count) 21% 14 67% 44 11% 7 2% 1 13 79

1%

Totals

100%


1 2 3 4 5

11%

21%

67%

8) Overall Evaluation Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 32% 25 1) Outstanding 64% 50 2) Very Good 4% 3 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 1 6) No Answer Totals 100% 79 Comments:

4% 1% 1 2 3 4 5 6 63% 32%




9) Did this Update meet your expectations? Responses (Percent) (Count) 99% 74 1) Yes 1% 1 2) No 4 3) No Answer Totals 100% 79 Comments:

1% 5%

Answer Options

1 2 3 94%

1. I was able to understand the do's and dont's when it comes to blood transfusion. 2. I can apply the things I've learned today in my work. 3. It did provided us with updates regarding BT. 4. It clearly explained and discussed the components of BT. 5. It answered my queries. 6. Topics were relevant to the practice. 7. The speaker was excellent. She was able to impart new ideas, updates regarding BT. It augmented my knowledge and learnings. 8. BT has not changed much over the years but being able to refresh ourselves with what's right and what's is a good thing. Hearing feedback on how this practice is being done in private and public institutions and placing them in comparison is a good thing. 9. It served as a review. 10. The speaker cited examples that can be applies on actual settings. 11. Types of blood, blood products were well defined. Post-test was good. 12. She's good as was able to discuss the topic clearly. 13. Very specialized; definite on a specific subject matter. 14. It made us aware of the special considerations needeed in BT.





1. Discussion on the importance of each blood component. 2. It reminded me of the basic knowledge in BT. I liked the things I've learned regarding alternative ways in Jehovah's winessess' beliefs 3. Its short yet it encompasses almost everything that we need to know about BT; video. 4. RH compatibility presentation. 5. The simple way of discussing every subtopic of BT. 6. It provided me with conidence in BT administration. 7. ARS for the post-test. 8. Current trends. 9. AV materials (donuts) 10. Knowing the blood compatibility and being able to recall its transfusion reaction and management. 11. Dynamic lecture, very good presentation and pace, food 12. Additional info about the topic. 13. Interesting topic and knowledgeable speaker 14. Overall environment; nice lecturer. She gave examples based on experiences. 15. Video presentation was clearly explained. 16. ..the speaker explained well so I clearly understood. 17. We were able to learn from the experiences she shared.





1. More slides and examples 2. Provide a handout containing a table of all blood products, its indications, nursing responsibilities 3. Video on BT reaction. 4. More rapport with audience. 5. Add trivias 6. Discuss even the small details. Start on time. 7. More catchy AV presentation to make is more lively. 8. More updates 9. Make it applicable in government setting 10. More AV presentation, ARS 11. Present evidence-based research, 2011 National patient safety goals 12. More Q & A. 13. More exam 14. Sana may demo or show latest equipment or instruments na nase trend for modern practice para we can see those na ginagamit sa modern setting if we are working in a government hospital 15. Nurse-medtech speaker



Topic: Prevention of Nosocomial Infection Speaker: Charles Almin Alba, RN No. of Participants: 78

1) Objectives of the IVT Update (Relevance to present needs in nursing practice) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 46% 35 1) Outstanding 49% 37 2) Very Good 3% 2 3) Good 3% 2 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 2 6) No Answer Totals 100% 78 Comments:

2% 3% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 6 47% 45%

2) Content (Relevance of topic to IV nursing practe) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 48% 37 1) Outstanding 45% 35 2) Very Good 5% 4 3) Good 1% 1 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 1 6) No Answer Totals 100% 78 Comments:

5% 1 2 3 4 5 46%

1%

48%




3) Length of Seminar Responses (Percent) (Count) 36% 27 55% 41 8% 6 1 3 78

1% 4%

Totals

99%


1 2 3 4 5 6 52% 8% 35%

4) Resource Speaker (Ability to discuss subject matter clearly) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 42% 33 1) Outstanding 49% 38 2) Very Good 9% 7 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 6) No Answer Totals 100% 78 Comments:

1 9% 2 3 4 49% 5 6 42%




5) Resource Speaker (Mastery of Subject Matter) Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 42% 33 1) Outstanding 51% 40 2) Very Good 6% 5 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement Totals 100% 78 Comments:

7% 1 2 3 4 5 51% 42%

6) Contents of Presentation Responses (Percent) (Count) 38% 30 50% 39 9% 7 3% 2

3%


1 2 3 4 5 6 50% 9% 38%

Totals

100%

78




7) Audience Participation Responses Answer Options (Percent) (Count) 47% 36 1) Outstanding 48% 37 2) Very Good 5% 4 3) Good 4) Fair 5) Needs Improvement 1 6) No Answer Totals 100% 78 Comments:

5% 1 2 3 4 5 48% 47%

8) Overall Evaluation Responses (Percent) (Count) 36% 28 59% 46 4% 3 1% 1

4%

1%


1 2 3 4 5 6 59% 36%

Totals

100%

78




9) Did this Update meet your expectations? Responses (Percent) (Count) 95% 74 1) Yes 1% 1 2) No 4% 3 3) No Answer Totals 100% 78 Comments:

1%

4%

Answer Options

1 2 3 95%

NO: 1. The presentation lacked examples or situations regarding the topic. YES: 1. All information were discussed. 2. Lively lecture; explained in a simple, funny [way]. [But], it turned out educational. 3. It provided us with proper and adequate information on preventing health care associated [infection]. 4. The speaker tackled everything related to the topic. 5. Eventhough we all know it, the lecture started first with the basics. It's a nice and very good start. Starting and doing the basics first. 6. I gained a lot information about the topic. 7. In-depth discussion. The lecture, if given ample time, will teach a lot. 8. Subject matter was explained well but there were some point which needs to be elaborated. 9. They ensured that every nurse will be more knowledgable a and confident in dealing with different aspects being encounted in the profession. 10. Very essential for us nurses to prevent harm to our patients. 11. Its not boring. 12. He discussed the lecture very well. He cited some examples of actual situations. 13. It's always good to hear about trends, policies that are being followed in other hospitalsAESCULAP ACADEMY www.aesculap-academy-ap.com Page 21 of 24



CONTINUATION OF "MEETING EXPECTATIONS"

14. It refreshed my infection control knowledge. 15. It presented new standards used in the current practice of IVT. 16. He was able to explain and share current trends. 17. It increased more my awareness if the infection and complications associated with intravascular devices used in IVT. 18. It reminded me about safety first. 19. I was, at least, made aware of the possible ways to cause nosocomial infection, risks and factors, ways to prevent it. The information gathered helped me to reinforce preventionary measures to prevent Iv and nosocomial infection.





1. Very lively speaker 2. Updated lectures 3. The presentation of CDC/HICPAC recommendations 4. The lecturer was funny anf gave us information in a very cheerful and enjoyous manner. 5. He shared different reality-based experiences which helped us understand the importance of the topic. 6. Interesting topic and knowledgable speaker. 7. It refreshed us about the latest trends and helped us become more confident. 8. Comprehensive 9. The style of the lecturer--very lively and interesting 10. Very interactive 11. The topic and the speaker. He showed mastery of the subject matter. 12. The discussion outside the topichearing that nurses are human and we all came from different backgrounds, entered the profession for different reasons but all ought to uphold it by keeping abreast with all the ideal practices towards patient safety. I also liked the exam part using ARS. 13. The speaker kept the topic interesting. 14. Lecturer's getting-to-know interaction. It made us comfortable. I also liked the side stories in between lectures and interview of nurses from other institutions. 15. Very informative. 16. It reinforced my learnings. 17. Motivation part before the actual discussion. 18. Different types of precaution and its modern and new equipment ro protect health personnel. 19. Needleless IV medication. 20. Wisdom of the speake which helped me more to appreciate nursing and become assertive.





1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

I hope Mr. Alba's slides are not too long so that memory retention is longer. Improve slides. They're too small that most of them were not readable. Meals should be more Make it more applicable in government facilitities, more realistic and easily attainable. Present visuals regarding actual infected sites. More samples of incidents in the hospitals..so that we will learn from that and prevent doing it. More latest trends.

8. Sana may example yung mga gamit that we can hold or examine--product samples of the latest innovation and technology related to IVT. 9. Stick to the topic. 10. Keep the slides simple and understandable. 11. take into consideration some cultural diversity issues related to the topic presented. 12. More ARS activities 13. Show actual equipment


9 september 28-30 ivt update course evaluation

Documents

charles almin

iv nursing

audience participation

aesculap academy

aesculap academy

nosocomial

responses

discuss subject