9c9605298b274e8afc
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 9c9605298b274e8afc
1/4
Thermostatic Mixing Valves Thermostatic temperature
distribution during various operating conditions
Joakim Wren, Peter Persson and Dan LoydDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
Linkpings universitet, SE 581 83 Linkping, SWEDEN
Abstract: A model of a thermostat used in thermostatic mixing valves (TMVs) has been developed. The model
contains realistic boundary conditions and material properties including the latent heat corresponding to a mixture
of waxes inside the thermostat. The temperature-time characteristics show a relatively slow heating of the thermo-
stat regardless of the flow rate. This implies an improvement potential for the thermostat and thus the entire valve.
KeyWords: Thermostatic mixing valves, Thermostat, heat flux, Modeling and simulation, Phase transition
1 IntroductionThermostatic mixing valves (TMVs) are important
components in many heating, refrigeration and sani-
tary systems. The demands on such systems have in-
creased the last years, for example due to new safety
standards [1]. In this study we look at the temperature
distribution inside the thermostat, which is responsi-
ble for the thermostats function as a combined sen-
sor/actuator. The thermostat contains a specific mix-
ture of waxes and all waxes in the mixture undergo
a phase transition within the working temperature in-
terval of the valve. The thermostat is also influencedby among others the heat flux from the surrounding,
which in turn is affected by e.g. the flow conditions in
the proximity of the thermostat.
In this study a finite element model of the ther-
mostat including the temperature dependent thermal
conductivity, the specific and latent heat of the mix-
ture of waxes and the convective heat transfer. The
results show a temperature distribution that varies
greatly in both axial and radial directions throughout
the response time for the valve for all investigated con-
ditions.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 The valve and thermostat
A thermostatic mixing valve (TMV) mixes hot and
cold water to a preset mean temperature. The TMV
investigated is ESBE series30 HR valve (ESBE AB,
Reftele, Sweden) which has a short response time and
stable mixed water temperature under varying water
pressure, flow and temperature conditions. The valve
is shown in Fig.1.
Figure 1: The thermostatic mixing valve. Cold water inlet
is at the bottom of the valve, hot water inlet to the left and
mixed water outlet to the right. The height of the valve is
approximately 100 mm.
The valve regulation emerges from a thermo-static element (thermostat) located in the water-stream
inside the valve. The thermostat contains a phase
change material consisting of copper powder and a
specific mixture of waxes, which change its density
upon heating and thereby bring rise to the control.
The wax mixture also contains a significant amount
of copper powder in order to increase the thermal dif-
fusivity and thereby the speed of the thermal response.
The thermostat forces a plastic shuttle to move to-
wards/against a spring feed-back mechanism, which
determine the cold and hot water intake (see Fig.2).
Proceedings of the 2006 WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Heat and Mass Transfer, Miami, Florida, USA, January 18-20, 2006 (pp42-45)
-
8/12/2019 9c9605298b274e8afc
2/4
Thermostat(Probe)
Outlet
Inlets: hotand cold
Shuttle
Spring
Figure 2: Schematic picture of the valve in Fig.1.
2.2 Governing equations and boundary con-
ditions
The heat transport in the thermostat is given by
the heat conduction equation (1), which in axial-
symmetric cylindrical co-ordinates, r and z , is givenby
cT
t =
1
r
r
krr
T
r
+
z
kz
T
z
+ Q (1)
for an isotropic material whereis the density,cis the specific heat capacity,T =Ti(t,r,z)is the tem-perature,t is time,ki is the thermal conductivity (i=randz), and Qis a heat sink or source. All parameterscan vary in both time and space. See e.g. [2].
The equation is used together with a convective(Neumann) boundary condition, see e.g. [2]. In this
case the convective heat flux is descried by equation
(2). The surrounding temperature is given by T,hBis the convective heat transfer coefficient andlrand lzare the direction cosines. All parameters can vary in
both time and space.
krT
rlr+kz
T
zlz+ hB(T T) = 0 (2)
Equation (1) was solved along with appropriate
boundary conditions for the present geometry using
the simulation software Femlab 3i (Comsol AB, Swe-
den), which as the name indicates exhibits simula-
tion capabilities based on the Finite Element Method
(FEM), see e.g. [3].
2.3 Simulation model
The axi-symmetric simulation model (Fig.3) com-
prises the thermostat including the phase-change cop-
per/wax mixture in its surrounding of flowing water at
three flow rates (4, 10 and 20 liters per minute).
Figure 3:The geometry of the thermostat showing its prin-
ciple parts included in the model.
For the copper, brass and rubber of the thermo-
stat, the density was 8850, 8430 and 1100 kg/m3
re-spectively, the specific heat 385, 400 and 2000 J/kgK
respectively, and the thermal conductivity was 230,
110 and 0.24 W/mK respectively; all these are hand-
book values. For the copper/wax mixture, conduc-
tivity measurements were carried out at 20, 35, 43
and 51 C, giving a conductivity of 3.8, 3.0, 2.2 and2.0 W/mK respectively. Interpolation was carried out
along with the simulations. Also measurements of
the combined effect of specific/latent heat of the cop-
per/wax mixture were carried out at discrete tempera-
tures, giving the result shown in Fig.4.
Simulations were carried out for three flowcases, each corresponding to a set of measured [4]
space-dependent convective heat transfer coefficients
(hB). For the lowest flow rate (4 l/min), hB is 4500kW/m2 for the lowest horizontal face of the thermo-
stat, linearly decreasing from 9600 to 6000 for the
long vertical face, 3000 for the upper horizontal face
and 2000 for the vertical curved part. For the other
flow rates, 10 and 20 liters per minute, hB was in-creased by approximately 50 and 90%, respectively.
Further details of the values and measurement ofhBfor the flow cases are found in [4].
Proceedings of the 2006 WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Heat and Mass Transfer, Miami, Florida, USA, January 18-20, 2006 (pp42-45)
-
8/12/2019 9c9605298b274e8afc
3/4
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
20 30 40 50 60
Spec
ificheat[J/kgK]
Temperature [C]
Figure 4: The combined specific/latent heat of the copper
wax mixture measured at discrete temperatures and fitted
by a cubic spline function.
3 Results
The temperature as a function of time for each flow
condition is given in Fig.5 for two locations, both at
a radius of 1 mm and at axial locations 3 and 15 mm
from the bottom of the thermostat. The temperature-
time derivative is slightly larger for the higher bound-
ary heat fluxes. It is also interesting to note that the
curves tend to flatten out at between 30 and 40 C,before their derivative increases again.
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2 3 4 5
Temperature[C]
Time [s]
Flow 4, AFlow 4, B
Flow 10, A
Flow 10, BFlow 20, AFlow 20, B
Figure 5: Temperature in the copper/wax mixture as a
function of time for the flows 4, 10 and 20 l/min at a radiusof 1 mm and axial locations 3 and 15 mm (A and B respec-
tively) from the bottom of the thermostat. The temperature
decreases from the bottom to the top of the thermostat.
4 Discussion
The temperature distribution inside a thermostat of a
TMV has under various operating conditions been an-
alyzed using modeling and computer simulation. This
is an interesting problem from a thermal point of view,
due to the steep pressure and temperature gradients
present inside the valve [5] as well as the large spa-
tially and temporally dependent convective heat trans-
fer at the boundary of the thermostat [4]. These affect
the valve/thermostat characteristics, which in turn are
responsible for the performance and safety classifica-
tion of the valve. This is among others actualized by
the risk for invasion of Legionellae bacteria [6].The temperature-time plots in Fig.4 show that
the the large difference in heat transfer coefficients
associated with the various flow rates do not have a
substantial impact of the temperature inside the cop-
per/wax mixture. This means that other aspects than
the heat flux over the boundary dominates the situ-
ation. The relatively low thermal conductivity of the
mixture together with the latent heat of the phase tran-
sition in the copper wax mixture decreases the thermal
diffusivity and thus slow down the heating of the mix-
ture. This effect is actually seen in Fig.4 where the
curves tend to flatten out at slightly below 30 C. Onereason is that this temperature coincides with the tem-
perature for which the largest change in specific heat
and thermal conductivity (increase and decrease, re-
spectively) occurs. Another reason is the various tran-
sition temperatures for the wax mixture.
An interesting finding is that after four seconds
after a temperature step, the temperature distribution
inside the thermostat is far from equilibrated. This is
quite unexpected, as the valve is classified as a high
performance valve meeting among others the Asse
(American Society of Sanitary Engineering) no.1016
standard which demands a response time less thanfour seconds. See e.g. [7] for a discussion of response
times.
5 Conclusion
The temperature-time characteristics of the thermostat
show a relatively slow heating regardless of the flow
rate. There is an axial temperature difference inside
the thermostat throughout the simulated time, and the
combined effect of the specific and latent heats can be
seen in the presented graphs. Altogether, this impliesan improvement potential for the thermostat and thus
the entire valve.
Acknowledgement
The author is very grateful to Tech.Lic. Nils Hjelte
and Eng. Dan Bengtsson, both at ESBE AB, for fruit-
ful discussions during this work, and to Res.Eng. Ulf
Bengtsson at Linkping university for accurate design
of the thermostat dummy. The study was supported
by The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research.
Proceedings of the 2006 WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Heat and Mass Transfer, Miami, Florida, USA, January 18-20, 2006 (pp42-45)
-
8/12/2019 9c9605298b274e8afc
4/4
References:
[1] N. McGrellis, Tmv3 why was it needed,Hospi-
tal Development.
[2] H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger,Conduction of heat
in solids(Oxford University Press, 1959), 2 edn.
[3] O. C. Zienkiewicz, The Finite Element Method
(McGrawHill, 1977).
[4] J. Wren and P. Persson, Thermostatic mixing
valves a method for non-disturbing intra-valve
heat transfer estimation, Transactions on Fluid
Mechanics, ISSN: 1790-5087.
[5] P. Persson, D. Loyd and J. Wren, A measure-
ment equipment for analyzing control characteris-
tics of thermostatic mixing valves, inProceedings
of the 4th European Thermal Sciences Conference
(Birmingham, UK, 2004).
[6] M. Lacroix, Electric water heater designs for
load shifting and control of bacterial contamina-tion,Energy Conversion and Management, 40(2),
1999, 131340.
[7] J. P. Murray, A study of the prevention of hot tap-
water burns,Burns, 14(3), 1988, 18593.
Proceedings of the 2006 WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Heat and Mass Transfer, Miami, Florida, USA, January 18-20, 2006 (pp42-45)