a 5. budget project budget and proposal budget 1water.ca.gov › legacyfiles › irwm › grants ›...

8
LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget Page 1 ATTACHMENT 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget DWR Tables 4 and 5 present the project budget and proposal budget, respectively. Because there is only one project the proposal budget is the same as the grand total (line v on Table 4) for the project budget. DWR Table 4: Big Valley GSP Development Project Budget DWR Table 5: Big Valley GSP Proposal Budget Proposal Title: Big Valley GSP Project Title: Big Valley GSP Development Project Serves a need of a DAC? Yes Cost Share Waiver Request?: Yes (a) (b) (c) (d) Requested Grant Amount Cost Share: Non- State Fund Source 1 Other Cost Share Total Cost a Task 1 Stakeholder Communication and Engagement 130,853 $ 9,946 $ - $ 140,799 $ b Task 2 Plan Area and Authority 25,270 $ 6,086 $ - $ 31,356 $ c Task 3 Basin Setting (sum lines d-g, k-n) 487,304 $ 30,324 $ - $ 517,628 $ d Task 3.1 Data Management System 79,254 $ - $ - $ 79,254 $ e Task 3.2 Data Collection and Monitoring Evaluation 19,412 $ - $ - $ 19,412 $ f Task 3.3 Data Gaps Assessment 29,650 $ 30,324 $ - $ 59,974 $ g Task 3.4 Special Projects for Critical Data Gaps (sum lines h-j) 236,960 $ - $ - $ 236,960 $ h Task 3.4.1 Uplands Geologic Assessment 52,705 $ - $ - $ 52,705 $ i Task 3.4.2 Monitoring Well Installation 163,687 $ - $ - $ 163,687 $ j Task 3.4.3 Water Quality Sampling 20,568 $ - $ - $ 20,568 $ k Task 3.5 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 29,848 $ - $ - $ 29,848 $ l Task 3.6 Groundwater Conditions 23,312 $ - $ - $ 23,312 $ m Task 3.7 Water Budget 33,904 $ - $ - $ 33,904 $ n Task 3.8 Management Areas 34,964 $ - $ - $ 34,964 $ o Task 4 Sustainable Management Criteria 42,984 $ - $ - $ 42,984 $ p Task 5 Monitoring Network 44,512 $ - $ - $ 44,512 $ q Task 6 Sustainability Thresholds 40,812 $ - $ - $ 40,812 $ r Task 7 Projects, Management Actions, and Adaptive Management 72,496 $ - $ - $ 72,496 $ s Task 8 Reporting and Implementation Plan 30,556 $ - $ - $ 30,556 $ t Task 9 GSP Compilation and Preparation 59,280 $ - $ - $ 59,280 $ u Task 10 Project and Program Management 65,118 $ - $ - $ 65,118 $ v Grand Total (sum lines a-c, o-u) 999,185 $ 46,356 $ - $ 1,045,541 $ 1 Lassen County is requesting a cost share waiver based on Disadvantaged Community (DAC) status as documented in Attachment 7. Some cost share items are included in this table because some of the work required for the tasks described in the project workplan has been started over the last two years. For FY 2016/17, Lassen County Board of Supervisors appropriated $75,000 from county general funds to support SGMA compliance in Big Valley. Expenditures of these funds was subsequently extended to December 31, 2017. The cost share line items in this table are consultant costs under this appropriation: $9,946 for consultants support for public outreach meetings, $6,086 for consultant support for a preliminary coordination agreement between the counties and $30,324 for a Preliminary Hydrogeologic Data Assessment. Detail of these consultant costs can be provided upon request. Table 4 — Project Budget Tasks 1 Proposal Title: Big Valley GSP (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Requested Grant Amount Cost Share: Non- State Fund Source 2 Other Cost Share Total Cost % Cost Share (Col b/Col d) a Big Valley GSP Development 999,185 $ 46,356 $ - $ 1,045,541 $ 4% b Proposal Grand Total 999,185 $ 46,356 $ - $ 1,045,541 $ 4% Individual Project Title 1 Table 5 — Proposal Budget 2 Lassen County is requesting a cost share waiver based on Disadvantaged Community (DAC) status as documented in Attachment 7. Some cost share items are included in this table because some of the work required for the tasks described in the project workplan has been started over the last two years. Detail of these consultant costs can be provided upon request.

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 1

ATTACHMENT 5. BUDGET

Project Budget and Proposal Budget DWR Tables 4 and 5 present the project budget and proposal budget, respectively. Because there is only

one project the proposal budget is the same as the grand total (line v on Table 4) for the project budget.

DWR Table 4: Big Valley GSP Development Project Budget

DWR Table 5: Big Valley GSP Proposal Budget

Proposal Title: Big Valley GSP

Project Title: Big Valley GSP Development

Project Serves a need of a DAC? Yes

Cost Share Waiver Request?: Yes

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Requested Grant

Amount

Cost Share: Non-

State Fund Source1 Other Cost Share Total Cost

a Task 1 Stakeholder Communication and Engagement 130,853$ 9,946$ -$ 140,799$

b Task 2 Plan Area and Authority 25,270$ 6,086$ -$ 31,356$

c Task 3 Basin Setting (sum lines d-g, k-n) 487,304$ 30,324$ -$ 517,628$

d Task 3.1 Data Management System 79,254$ -$ -$ 79,254$

e Task 3.2 Data Collection and Monitoring Evaluation 19,412$ -$ -$ 19,412$

f Task 3.3 Data Gaps Assessment 29,650$ 30,324$ -$ 59,974$

g Task 3.4 Special Projects for Critical Data Gaps (sum lines h-j) 236,960$ -$ -$ 236,960$

h Task 3.4.1 Uplands Geologic Assessment 52,705$ -$ -$ 52,705$

i Task 3.4.2 Monitoring Well Installation 163,687$ -$ -$ 163,687$

j Task 3.4.3 Water Quality Sampling 20,568$ -$ -$ 20,568$

k Task 3.5 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 29,848$ -$ -$ 29,848$

l Task 3.6 Groundwater Conditions 23,312$ -$ -$ 23,312$

m Task 3.7 Water Budget 33,904$ -$ -$ 33,904$

n Task 3.8 Management Areas 34,964$ -$ -$ 34,964$

o Task 4 Sustainable Management Criteria 42,984$ -$ -$ 42,984$

p Task 5 Monitoring Network 44,512$ -$ -$ 44,512$

q Task 6 Sustainability Thresholds 40,812$ -$ -$ 40,812$

r Task 7 Projects, Management Actions, and Adaptive Management 72,496$ -$ -$ 72,496$

s Task 8 Reporting and Implementation Plan 30,556$ -$ -$ 30,556$

t Task 9 GSP Compilation and Preparation 59,280$ -$ -$ 59,280$

u Task 10 Project and Program Management 65,118$ -$ -$ 65,118$

v Grand Total (sum lines a-c, o-u) 999,185$ 46,356$ -$ 1,045,541$ 1 Lassen County is requesting a cost share waiver based on Disadvantaged Community (DAC) status as documented in Attachment 7. Some cost share

items are included in this table because some of the work required for the tasks described in the project workplan has been started over the last two

years. For FY 2016/17, Lassen County Board of Supervisors appropriated $75,000 from county general funds to support SGMA compliance in Big Valley.

Expenditures of these funds was subsequently extended to December 31, 2017. The cost share line items in this table are consultant costs under this

appropriation: $9,946 for consultants support for public outreach meetings, $6,086 for consultant support for a preliminary coordination agreement

between the counties and $30,324 for a Preliminary Hydrogeologic Data Assessment. Detail of these consultant costs can be provided upon request.

Table 4 — Project Budget

Tasks1

Proposal Title: Big Valley GSP

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

Requested Grant

Amount

Cost Share: Non-

State Fund Source2Other Cost Share Total Cost

% Cost Share

(Col b/Col d)

a Big Valley GSP Development 999,185$ 46,356$ -$ 1,045,541$ 4%

b Proposal Grand Total 999,185$ 46,356$ -$ 1,045,541$ 4%

Individual Project Title1

Table 5 — Proposal Budget

2 Lassen County is requesting a cost share waiver based on Disadvantaged Community (DAC) status as documented in Attachment 7. Some

cost share items are included in this table because some of the work required for the tasks described in the project workplan has been

started over the last two years. Detail of these consultant costs can be provided upon request.

Page 2: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 2

Derivation of Project Budget The project budget for the Big Valley GSP Development Project was estimated from a detailed analysis

of hours and costs necessary to perform the tasks described in the Work Plan included as Attachment 4

and the Project Schedule presented as Attachment 6. Budgeted costs for this project are based on a

schedule that assumes grant funding would become available early in 2018, consultant contracting

would be in place before April 2018, and the GSP would be submitted to DWR before the January 1,

2022 deadline. Table A5-1 presents the budgeting detail, and Appendices A5-1 through A5-5 contain

supporting documentation for the estimates.

Costs in Table A5-1 were separated into Current Costs (already incurred by the counties) and Future

Costs. Current costs were further subdivided into those that the applicant considers cost share (incurred

prior to Jan 1, 2017) and those that will be reimbursed by grant funds (incurred after Jan 1, 2017).

Future costs were divided into those that the applicant would seek consultant and contractor services

and those that would be performed by County staff. The weighted rates for the county staff likely to

support GSP development are $48.10 and $30 per hour. County staff costs were estimated using a rate

of $50 per hour to account for pay increases during the Project and the potential that more senior

county staff may perform some of the work.

Consultant services were divided into those necessary to support the GSP Development process (SGMA

Process Consultant), those necessary to perform the technical geologic studies (SGMA Geologic

Consultant), and others that would be necessary for completion of the work plan such as drilling

contractors and surveyors (Other Consultant or Contractor). The overall cost estimate was made by GEI

Consultants, with estimates for the “SGMA Process Consultant” provided by Woodard and Curran and

“SGMA Geologic Consultant” made by GEI. Estimates for “Other Consultant or Contractor” were

obtained and are documented in Appendices A5-1 through A5-5. Below is a summary list of the content

in the appendices:

• A5-1: Volcanology support cost estimate for Uplands Geologic Assessment from Brian Hausback,

California State University Sacramento

• A5-2: Opinion of Costs for Drilling and Well Construction

• A5-3: Surveying Cost Estimate from NST Engineering.

• A5-4: Cost to purchase water level pressure transducers with data loggers from In-Situ.

• A5-5: Laboratory Analytical Costs from Basic Laboratory

Page 3: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 3

Table A5-1: Big Valley GSP Development Project Costing Summary

SGMA

PROCESS

CONSULTANT1

SGMA

GEOLOGIC

CONSULTANT2

COUNTY

STAFF TOTAL

JAN 2015 TO

JUNE 2017

CONSULTANT3

JULY 2017 TO

DEC 2017

CONSULTANT3

SGMA PROCESS

CONSULTANT1

SGMA

GEOLOGIC

CONSULTANT2

OTHER

CONSULTANT OR

CONTRACTOR4

COUNTY

STAFF TOTAL

LABOR LABOR LABOR LABOR COST SHARE REIMBURSABLE PROJECT

HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS

1 - Stakeholder Communication and Engagement 293 225 420 938 $9,946 $0 $70,253 $39,600 $0 $21,000 $140,799

2 - Plan Area and Authority 70 12 170 252 $6,086 $0 $14,658 $2,112 $0 $8,500 $31,356

3 - Basin Setting

3.1 - Data Management System 12 470 20 502 $0 $0 $2,988 $75,266 $0 $1,000 $79,254

3.2 - Data Collection and Monitoring Evaluation 6 126 10 142 $0 $0 $1,494 $17,418 $0 $500 $19,412

3.3 - Data Gaps Assessment 8 180 16 204 $30,324 $0 $1,992 $26,858 $0 $800 $59,974

3.4 - Special Projects for Critical Data Gaps

3.4.1 - Uplands Geologic Assessment 4 112 10 126 $0 $0 $996 $16,660 $34,549 $500 $52,705

3.4.2 - Monitoring Well Installation 4 118 34 156 $0 $0 $996 $16,616 $144,375 $1,700 $163,687

3.4.3 - Water Quality Sampling 4 94 6 104 $0 $0 $996 $12,832 $6,440 $300 $20,568

3.5 - Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 4 194 10 208 $0 $0 $996 $28,352 $0 $500 $29,848

3.6 - Groundwater Conditions 4 150 10 164 $0 $0 $996 $21,816 $0 $500 $23,312

3.7 - Water Budget 4 216 10 230 $0 $0 $996 $32,408 $0 $500 $33,904

3.8 - Management Areas 56 132 16 204 $0 $0 $13,944 $20,220 $0 $800 $34,964

4 - Sustainable Management Criteria 192 8 16 216 $0 $0 $40,776 $1,408 $0 $800 $42,984

5 - Monitoring Network 184 28 16 228 $0 $0 $38,784 $4,928 $0 $800 $44,512

6 - Sustainability Thresholds 182 8 16 206 $0 $0 $38,604 $1,408 $0 $800 $40,812

7 - Projects, Management Actions, and Adaptive Management 274 68 16 358 $0 $0 $59,728 $11,968 $0 $800 $72,496

8 - Reporting and Implementation Plan 90 12 130 232 $0 $0 $21,944 $2,112 $0 $6,500 $30,556

9 - GSP Compilation of Report 147 162 50 359 $0 $0 $31,576 $25,204 $0 $2,500 $59,280

10 - Project and Program Management 58 84 250 392 $0 $23,442 $14,578 $14,598 $0 $12,500 $65,118

TOTAL 1596 2399 1226 5221 $46,356 $23,442 $357,295 $371,784 $185,364 $61,300 $1,045,541

1 Costs estimated by Woodard & Curran $999,1852 Costs estimated by GEI Consultants3 Consultant costs already incurred and paid through Lassen County general funds4 Costs estimated based on quotes from various consultants and contractors; documentation included

REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT:

Big Valley GSP Development Project Costing Summary

Task Number / Name

CURRENT COSTS FUTURE COSTS

Page 4: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 4

Appendix A5-1: Volcanology support cost estimate for Uplands Geologic Assessment from Brian Hausback, California State University Sacramento

Page 5: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 5

Appendix A5-2: Opinion of Costs for Drilling and Well Construction from GEI Consultants, Inc.

Conner’s Well Drilling, Adin, CA

The well cluster details shown in the work plan (Attachment 4) were provided to Conner’s Well Drilling

of Adin, CA. Conner’s has drilled the majority of the wells in Big Valley. Based on the details provided,

Conner’s gave a verbal cost estimate of about $100,000.

Detailed Cost Estimate from GEI Consultants

This cost estimate is based on bid items necessary to complete the scope of work provided in the work

plan for constructing a single well cluster. Quantities are based on well cluster details for the Big Valley

GSP Development Project. Unit costs are from a bid estimate provided by Bradley and Sons Drilling for a

similar scope of work in Santa Barbara County, CA. This higher (more conservative) cost estimate was

used for well construction estimation in this grant application.

Contract #

Project Big Valley GSP Development

Opinion of CostsClient Lassen County

Proj Mgr David Fairman

Bid Date 11/8/2017

Project # None

Item Unit Item

No. Item Unit Quanity Cost Cost

1 Mobilization/Demobilization including Temporary Facilities LS 1 $30,000 $30,000

2 8-inch Diameter Mud Rotary or Hollow-Stem Auger Pilot Hole Drilling LF 620 $25.50 $15,810

3 Geophysical (E-Logs) EA 1 $3,200 $3,200

4 16-inch Diameter Reaming LF 265 $35 $9,275

5 2.5” Dia. SCH 80 PVC Well Casing LF 285 $16.75 $4,774

6 2.5” Dia. SCH 80 PVC Well Screen 0.030 slot LF 30 $14.50 $435

7 2" Dia. SCH 40 PVC Well Casing LF 90 $6 $540

8 2" Dia. SCH 40 PVC Well Screen 0.030 slot LF 20 $8 $160

9 Borehole Seals LF 419 $40 $16,760

10 Gravel Envelope LF 72 $28 $2,016

11 Sanitary Seal LF 129 $40 $5,160

12 Well Development – Bailing and Swabbing, Air-Lifting HR 20 $275 $5,500

13 Temporary Storage Tanks (20,000 gallons) and Piping (per month) EA 1 $3,500 $3,500

14 Furnish and Install Test Pumps EA 2 $800 $1,600

15 Pump Development HR 12 $175 $2,100

16 Borehole Destruction LF 0 $20 $0

17 Furnish and Install Enclosures EA 3 $1,200 $3,600

18 Drill Cuttings, Mud and Thin-Down Water Disposal LS 1 $15,000 $15,000

19 Drill Cuttings and Water Disposal LS 2 $5,000 $10,000

20 Standby HR 8 $450 $3,600

Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate from Bradley and Sons for similar wells in rural Santa Barbara County Total $133,030

* Mobilization costs increased by 50% from original Bradley and Sons estimate based on distance from contractor

DRAFT

4 - 2" dia PVC wells

Engineer Est.

3 boreholes

3 Locations within 500' of

each other

Page 6: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 6

Appendix A5-3: Surveying Cost Estimate from NST Engineering.

The cost quote form NST Engineering was used to estimate surveying costs. Installation and creation of

the subsidence monument was estimated at $1,000 while locating and surveying monitoring wells is

estimated at $4,000. Total Surveying costs are estimated at $5,000 (the upper end of the pricing range

was used as estimates).

Page 7: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 7

Appendix A5-4: Cost to purchase water level pressure transducers with data loggers from In-Situ.

The cost quote below was used to estimate the purchase of 4 non-vented Level Troll 500 transducers (at

$1,170 each), 1 Baro Troll 500 (assumed to cost similar to the Level Troll at $1,170), and a Wireless

TROLL Com to communicate with the devices ($495). Other equipment detailed below is not necessary

using non-vented transducers. Total cost for equipment is $6345.

Page 8: A 5. BUDGET Project Budget and Proposal Budget 1water.ca.gov › LegacyFiles › irwm › grants › sgwp › sgwp_docs › 2017...Notes: Unit costs based on 2017 drilling estimate

LASSEN COUNTY 2017 Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Attachment 5 – Budget

Page 8

Appendix A5-5: Laboratory Analytical Costs from Basic Laboratory

This quote from Basic Laboratory was used to estimate water quality laboratory analytical costs. Total

cost for 7 samples is $6440.