(a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 d i s c h a r g e c a p a c...

6
Supporting Information (a) (b) Figure SI 1. (a) XRD patterns of Li7La3Zr2O12 * indicates La2O3 impurity phase (b) SEM image Li7La3Zr2O12 (c ) Flexible trilayer membrane (d) Cross-sectional SEM Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Sustainable Energy & Fuels. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: (a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 D i s c h a r g e C a p a c i t y (m A h g-1) C y c l e N u m b e r T L M Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs

Supporting Information

(a) (b)

Figure SI 1. (a) XRD patterns of Li7La3Zr2O12 * indicates La2O3 impurity phase (b)SEM image Li7La3Zr2O12 (c ) Flexible trilayer membrane (d) Cross-sectional SEM

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Sustainable Energy & Fuels.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020

Page 2: (a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 D i s c h a r g e C a p a c i t y (m A h g-1) C y c l e N u m b e r T L M Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs

0 20 40 60 80 100

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

Dis

char

ge C

apac

ity(m

Ahg

-1)

Cycle Number

TLM Celgard

Figure SI 2. Discharge capacity vs. cycle number for Li S cell with trilayer membrane at

Page 3: (a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 D i s c h a r g e C a p a c i t y (m A h g-1) C y c l e N u m b e r T L M Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs

0 20 40 60 80 100200

300

400

500

600

700

Disc

harg

e Ca

paci

ty(m

Ahg-1

)

Cycle Number

TLM

Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs. cycle number for Li S cell with trilayer membrane at0.2C- rate (Trilayer membrane with Li7La3Zr2O12 facing cathode while activated

Page 4: (a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 D i s c h a r g e C a p a c i t y (m A h g-1) C y c l e N u m b e r T L M Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs

Figure SI 4. SEM images of Li7La3Zr2O12 (a) before cycling (b) after cycling

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Page 5: (a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 D i s c h a r g e C a p a c i t y (m A h g-1) C y c l e N u m b e r T L M Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs

SI 5 .Table 1. Comparison of permselective trilayer membranes properties with the present system

S.No

S -content (wt%)

Mass loading of S electrode (mg/cm2)

Thickness of the

coating layer( µm)

Mass of the coating

layer (mg/cm2)

Initial discharge capacity (mAh/g)

Reversible discharge capacity (mAh/g)

Number of cycles

Current density

Degradation rate per cycle

(%). Reference

1 75 0.75 25 1.32 1067.7 804.4 100 0.2 C 1.3 1

2 802.5(areal loading) 35 1 1110.4 801.6 300 0.5 NA 2

3 60 1.4 8 0.01 1020 709 100 0.20.3

3

4 63 1.5 20 0.12 920 NA 100 0.10.49 to 0.23

4

5 60 1 25 0.5 836 610 200 0.10.1

5

6 72 0.72 47 0.8 1370 620 100 0.12.20 6

7 80 1 NA NA 1045 628 50 0.05

1.6

7

8 42 1 42 NA 1287 807.8 100 0.21.60

8

9 80 0.7 20 0.825 1382 924 200 0.11.4

9

10 70 1.7 35 0.9 1382 1015 200 0.20.1

10

11 80

0.9and

4.5(areal loading) 36 0.8 956 553 100 0.2 1.9 11

References

1. R.Song.et.al.,J. of Power Sources,2016, 301, 179-186.

2. G.Ma,et.al.,J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4,16968.

3. A.Manthiram ,et.al.,J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3,18829-18834.

4. F.Wei,et.al.,ACS Nano ,2015,9,3,3002-3011.

5. Y.Cuiet.al.,Energy.Environ.Sci.,2014,7,3381-3390.

Page 6: (a) (b) · 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 D i s c h a r g e C a p a c i t y (m A h g-1) C y c l e N u m b e r T L M Figure SI 3. Discharge capacity vs

6. A.M.Stephan,et.al.,Inorg.chem.front.,2017,4,1013-1021.

7. Z.Luo,et.al.,ACS Appl.Mater.Interfaces ,2018,10,6,5534-5542.

8. H.F.Xiang,et.al., Ionics ,2015, 21,981–986.

9. S.H.Yeon et.al.,J.Mater.Chem.A,2015,3,9461-9467.

10. L.Giebeler,et.al.,J.Phys.Chem.C ,2015,119,94580-4587.

11.The present work.