a barking-mad test - excerpt from psy-q

a barking-mad test 69

A Barking-Mad Test

Draw a dog.Yes, that’s it. Just draw a dog. Don’t worry, this isn’t a lie detec-

tor test à la Liar, Liar. Just draw a dog; the best dog you can.

psy-q page make-up_final.indd 69psy-q page make-up_final.indd 69 16/06/2014 15:3416/06/2014 15:34

70 a barking-mad test

answer

OK, now we will rate your drawing. Score one point for each of the following features.

dog point scale

. Head present . Neck present . Neck -dimensional – must fl ow into head or body. Eyes present. Eye detail – lashes. Eye detail – pupil . Glance – eyes focused/in same direction. Nose present – any indication . Nose present – -dimensional

. Mouth present . Lips -dimensional . Hair or spots – any indication . Hair I – scribble closely conforming to body – includes spots . Hair II – more than just scribble or on circumference . Ears present . Ears in proportion – length greater than width . Legs present – any indicator . Legs . Legs engaged in activity – or lying down . Legs in proportion – length greater than width . Legs -dimensional . Some distance between front and rear legs . Legs in perspective . Crotch-like indicator for legs . Legs in proportion – taper off from top . Digits present . Feet – any indication . Feet – -dimensional . Details of toes correct


a barking-mad test 71

. Trunk present . Trunk in proportion – length greater than width . Head not more than ½, nor smaller than /, of body width . Length of face greater than width . Tail present . Tail – -dimensional . Tail shaped . Motor coordination lines . Motor coordination junctures . Head outline – good contour . Trunk outline – deviation from oval form. Collar or leash

Th e Draw-A-Dog Scale is a real psychological test, used to measure children’s cognitive development. Th e average score for fi ve-, six- and seven-year-olds is , and points respectively, with boys and girls showing similar performance. So if you didn’t manage to beat this, you should be asking yourself some serious questions.

Th e logic behind this test, and the more widely used Good-enough-Harris Draw-A-Person Test, is that it provides a relatively pure measure of cognitive development that is unclouded by other factors. For example, more traditional IQ tests based on language, maths or logic are aff ected by factors such as children’s ability to read or understand verbal instructions, and – as such – are more a measure of education level than of pure cognitive development.

But the Draw-A-Person Test also has a darker – and more controversial – cousin: the Draw-A-Person Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. As its name implies, clinicians use these drawings to identify children who are emotionally disturbed. Some people have claimed that individual errors or distortions repre-sent specifi c problems (e.g., that children who miss out eyes are unwilling to interact with the world around them). Although there is little evidence for such specifi c claims, some studies have found that, when taken as a whole, drawings can help to distinguish nor-mal and disturbed children. One scoring criterion, for example, is whether children draw fi sts, claws, guns or knives. Drawing


72 a barking-mad test

monsters instead of people and writing swear words are both cause for concern, as is drawing unusually huge or tiny people. Th at said, this is an inexact science; even the study that provides perhaps the strongest support for this test found that drawings could correctly classify only around per cent of children as nor-mal versus potentially disturbed.

So if some of your child’s drawings are a little bit – ahem – colourful, don’t start calling the doctor just yet. But if – like the Simpsons bully Nelson Muntz – she draws ‘a robot with guns for arms, shooting a plane made out of guns that fi res guns’, you should probably run for the hills.


a barking-mad test - excerpt from psy-q

Documents