a brief history of management field
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
A Brief History of the Management Field
![Page 2: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
• ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, B.COM.
• FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
• COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
• CONTACT:• 0322-3385752• R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK
19,F.B.AREA, KARACHI, PAKISTAN.
![Page 3: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
No Universally Accepted No Universally Accepted Theory of ManagementTheory of Management
• There are several approaches to the theory and practice of management.– The universal process approach– The operational approach– The behavioral approach– The systems approach– The contingency approach– The attributes of excellence approach
![Page 4: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
The Universal Process The Universal Process ApproachApproach
• Universal Process Approach– Assumes all organizations require the
same rational management process.• Core management process remains the same
regardless of the purpose of the organization.• The management process can be reduce to a
set of separate functions and related principles.
![Page 5: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Henri Fayol’s Universal Henri Fayol’s Universal Management ProcessManagement Process
• Fayol published Administration Industrielle et Générale in 1916.– Divided the manager’s job into five
functions:• Planning, organizing, command, coordination,
and control.– Developed 14 universal principles of
management.
![Page 6: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Henri Fayol’s Universal Henri Fayol’s Universal Management Process Management Process
(cont’d)(cont’d)• Lessons from the Universal Process Approach– The management process can be
separated into interdependent functions.– Management is a continuous process.– Management is a largely, though not an
entirely, rational process.– The functional approach is useful because
it specifies what managers should do.
![Page 7: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
The Operational ApproachThe Operational Approach• Operational Approach
– Describes the production-oriented area of management dedicated to improving efficiency, cutting waste, and improving quality.
– Covers the technical and quantitative approaches to management :• Management science• Operations research• Production management• Operations management
![Page 8: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
The Operational Approach The Operational Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Frederick W. Taylor’s Scientific Management– Developing performance standards on the basis of
systematic observations and experimentation.• Standardization of work practices and methods
reduce waste and increase productivity• Time and task study of workers’ efforts to
maximize productivity and output.• Systematic selection and training of workers to
increase efficiency and productivity.• Differential pay incentives based on established
work standards.
![Page 9: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Taylor’s FollowersTaylor’s Followers• Frank and Lillian Gilbreth
– Refined time and motion study methods for use in work simplification.
• Henry L. Gant– Refined production control and cost control
techniques.– Developed the Gantt chart for work-scheduling of
projects.– Early advocate of the importance of the human
factor and the importance of customer service over profits.
![Page 10: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
The Quality AdvocatesThe Quality Advocates• Walter A. Shewhart
– Introduced the concept of statistical quality control.
• Kaoru Ishikawa– Proposed a preventive approach to quality.– Developed fishbone diagram approach to
problem-solving.• W. Edwards Deming
– Based his 14 principles on reformed management style, employee participation, and striving for continuous improvement.
![Page 11: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
The Quality Advocates The Quality Advocates (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Joseph M. Juran– Proposed the concept of internal customers,
teamwork, partnerships with suppliers, and brainstorming.
– Developed Pareto analysis (80/20 rule) as a tool for separating major problems from minor ones.
• Armand V. Feigenbaum– Developed the concept of total quality control.
• Philip B. Crosby– Promoted the idea of zero defects (doing it right
the first time).
![Page 12: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
The Operational Approach The Operational Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Lessons from the Operational Approach– A dedication to finding a better way is still
important.– Using scientific management doesn’t dehumanize
workers.– Quality advocates, inspired by the scientific
approach, have been right all along about the importance of quality and continuous improvement
– The operational approach fostered the development of operations management.
![Page 13: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
The Behavioral ApproachThe Behavioral Approach• The Human Relations Movement
– An effort to make managers more sensitive to their employees’ needs.
– Arose out the influences of• the threat of unionization.• the Hawthorne studies.• the philosophy of industrial humanism.
![Page 14: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Figure A.2Figure A.2The Human Relations The Human Relations Movement PyramidMovement Pyramid
![Page 15: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
The Behavioral Approach The Behavioral Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• The Threat of Unionization– The Wagner Act of 1935 legalized union-
management collective bargaining, promoting the growth of unions and union avoidance by firms.
• The Hawthorne Studies (1924)– The study’s results that productivity was
strongly affected by workers’ attitudes turned management toward the humanistic and realistic viewpoint of the “social man” model.
![Page 16: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
• ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, B.COM.
• FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
• COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
• CONTACT:• 0322-3385752• R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK
19,F.B.AREA, KARACHI, PAKISTAN.
![Page 17: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
• Elton Mayo– Believed emotional factors were more
important determinants of productive efficiency than were physical and logical factors.
• Mary Parker Follett– Advocated that managers become aware
of how complex each employee is and how to motivate employees to cooperate rather than to demand performance from them.
The Philosophy of Industrial The Philosophy of Industrial HumanismHumanism
![Page 18: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
• Douglas McGregor– Developed Theory X and Theory Y
• Theory X: management’s traditionally negative view of employees as unmotivated and unwilling workers.
• Theory Y: the positive view of employees as energetic, creative, and willing workers.
The Philosophy of Industrial Humanism The Philosophy of Industrial Humanism (cont’d)(cont’d)
![Page 19: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
TABLE A.2TABLE A.2 McGregor’s Theories X and Y
![Page 20: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Behavior• Organization Behavior
– A modern research-oriented approach seeking to discover the causes of work behavior and to develop better management techniques.
• Lessons from the Behavioral Approach– People are the key to productivity.– Success depends on motivated and skilled
individuals committed to the organization.– Managerial sensitivity to employees is necessary
to foster the cooperation needed for high productivity.
![Page 21: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
The Systems ApproachThe Systems Approach• What is a System?
– A collection of parts that operate interdependently to achieve a common purpose.
• Systems Approach– Posits that the performance of the whole is
greater that the sum of the performance of its parts.• Analytic versus synthetic thinking: outside-in thinking
versus inside-out thinking.• Seeks to identify all parts of an organized activity and
how they interact.
![Page 22: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
The Systems Approach The Systems Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Chester I. Barnard’s Early Systems Perspective– Wrote Functions of the Executive.– Characterized all organizations as cooperative
systems.– Defined principle elements in an organization as
•willingness to serve.•common purpose.•communication.
– Strong advocate of business ethics.
![Page 23: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
General Systems TheoryGeneral Systems Theory• General Systems Theory
– An area of study based on the assumptions that everything is part of a larger, interdependent arrangement.
• Levels of systems– Each system is a subsystem of the system
above it.– Identification of systems at various levels
helps translate abstract systems theory into more concrete terms.
![Page 24: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
General Systems Theory General Systems Theory (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Closed Versus Open Systems– Closed system
• A self-sufficient entity.– Open system
• Something that depends on its surrounding environment for survival.
– Systems are classified open (closed) by how much (how little) they interact with their environments.
![Page 25: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
General Systems Theory General Systems Theory (cont’d)(cont’d)
• New Directions in Systems Thinking: Organizational learning and knowledge management
• Organizations are living and thinking open systems that learn from experience and engage in complex mental processes.
• Chaos theory– Every complex system has a life of its own, with its
own rule book.• Complex adaptive systems
– Complex systems are self-organizing.
![Page 26: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
The Contingency ApproachThe Contingency Approach• Contingency Approach
– A research effort to determine which managerial practices and techniques are appropriate in specific situations.• Different situations require different managerial
responses.• Can deal with intercultural feelings in which
custom and habits cannot be taken for granted.
![Page 27: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
The Contingency Approach The Contingency Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Contingency Characteristics– An open-system perspective
• How subsystems combine to interact with outside systems.
– A practical research orientation• Translating research findings into tools and
situational refinements for more effective management.
– A multivariate approach• Many variables collectively account for
variations in performance.
![Page 28: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
The Contingency Approach The Contingency Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• Lessons from the Contingency Approach– Approach emphasizes situational
appropriateness rather than rigid adherence to universal principles.
– Approach creates the impression that an organization is captive to its environment.
– Approach has been criticized for creating the impression that an organization is a captive of its environment.
![Page 29: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Attributes of Excellence: A Modern Attributes of Excellence: A Modern Unconventional ApproachUnconventional Approach
• Peter and Waterman’s Approach– Attacked conventional management theory
and practice as outmoded in almost every dimension.
– Replaced conventional management terminology with new catch phrases.
– Made key points with anecdotes and stories rather than quantifiable objective data and facts.
![Page 30: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Attributes of Excellence: A Modern Attributes of Excellence: A Modern Unconventional Approach Unconventional Approach (cont’d)(cont’d)
• A Critical Appraisal of the Excellence Approach– Raises more questions than it answers.– Ignores the contingency approach to management.– Relies heavily on unsupported generalizations.– Fails to position management effectiveness as important to
sustaining corporate excellence.• Lessons from the Excellence Approach
– Reminded managers to pay close attention to the basics.– Reminded managers of the importance of on-the-job
experimentation.
![Page 31: A brief history of management field](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062905/54bfa8bd4a7959444b8b4569/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
• ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, B.COM.
• FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
• COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
• CONTACT:• 0322-3385752• R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK
19,F.B.AREA, KARACHI, PAKISTAN.