a brief review of ‘social networks for scientists’
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
KEITA BANDO, THE 3RD SPARC JAPAN SEMINAR 2015, JANUARY 19 2016
![Page 2: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINE
• Self-introduction
• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?
A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
![Page 3: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
KEITA BANDOCOORDINATOR FOR THE ONLINE PLATFORM FOR SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION
![Page 4: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• MyOpenArchive (2007 - 2013)
• OpenAccessWeekJP (2009 - 2010)
• ScienceCommonsJP (2010 - 2011)
• Mendeley Advisor (2011 - Present)
• ORCID Ambassador (2013 - Present)
MY ACTIVITIESKEITABANDO.ORG/ACTIVITIES
![Page 5: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Altmetrics: alternative ways of measuring scholarly impact based on the social web, Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2012 DOI: 10.1241/johokanri.55.638
• ORCID Outreach Meeting and Codefest in Chicago, Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2014 DOI: 10.1241/johokanri.57.423
• ResearchGate: SNS specialized for researchers with Repository function, Current Awareness, 2015 DOI: 10.11501/9396323
MY PUBLICATIONSORCID.ORG/0000-0003-0485-8891
![Page 6: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
• Self-introduction
• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?
![Page 7: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
… 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 …
THE HISTORY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
![Page 8: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
COMPARISON
ResearchGate Mendeley Academia
Logo
Network size 8 million (Oct 2015)
4 million (Apr 2015)
30 million (Dec 2015)
What’s? Social Network Site
Reference Manager
Social Network Site
![Page 9: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
REMARKABLE REACHNATURE SURVEY DOI:10.1038/512126A (AUGUST 2014)
![Page 13: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
REMARKABLE REACHNATURE SURVEY DOI:10.1038/512126A (AUGUST 2014)
![Page 14: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
IDLE, BROWSE OR CHAT?NATURE SURVEY DOI:10.1038/512126A (AUGUST 2014)
![Page 15: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
101 INNOVATIONS IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONHTTPS://101INNOVATIONS.WORDPRESS.COM
![Page 16: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
WHAT TOOLS/SITES DO YOU USE TO ARCHIVE/SHARE PUBLICATIONS?SURVEY DOI:10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286826 (JUNE 2015)
![Page 17: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
WHAT RESEARCHER PROFILES DO YOU USE?SURVEY DOI:10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286826 (JUNE 2015)
![Page 18: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
WHAT DISCIPLINE(S) ARE YOU WORKING IN?SURVEY DOI:10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286826 (JUNE 2015)
![Page 19: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
• Self-introduction
• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?
![Page 20: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• Repository • Collaborate • Metrics • Institution
OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
![Page 21: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
CHOOSE WHETHER YOU’D LIKE TO ENTER AN EXISTING DOI OR GENERATE A NEW DOI.
VIA CELEBRATING FIVE MILLION MEMBERS WITH FREE DOIS - RESEARCHGATE (AUGUST 2014)
![Page 25: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
THE PLATFORM .. GIVE IT A UNIQUE IDENTIFIER (A VERSIONED DOI)VIA PUT YOUR RESEARCH DATA ONLINE, WITH MENDELEY DATA! (NOVEMBER 2015)
![Page 26: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
AUTHORS ARE DEPOSITING THEIR PAPERS IN THESE WEBSITES INSTEAD OF THEIR OWN IR.
VIA NEW EDITION WITH UPDATED INFO (JANUARY 2015)
![Page 28: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE IS NOT AN OPEN ACCESS REPOSITORY
CC BY: THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION (DECEMBER 2015)
![Page 30: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• Repository • Collaborate
• Metrics • Institution
OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
![Page 31: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
RG FORMATVIA INTRODUCING THE RG FORMAT (FEBRUARY 2015)
![Page 32: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
COLLABORATE WITH YOUR RESEARCH TEAMEACH GROUP MEMBER IS ASSIGNED A DIFFERENT COLOR FOR HIGHLIGHTING
VIA INTRO TO MENDELEY (OFFICIAL EXTENDED) EDITED FOR UMICH
![Page 33: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ANNOTATING THE SCHOLARLY WEBSCIENTISTS COULD SCRIBBLE COMMENTS ON RESEARCH PAPERS AND SHARE THEM PUBLICLY ..
NATURE 528, 153–154 (03 DECEMBER 2015) DOI:10.1038/528153A
![Page 34: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ANNOTATING ALL KNOWLEDGENEW SCHOLARLY COALITION EMBRACES W3C WEB ANNOTATIONS (DECEMBER 2015)
![Page 35: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• Repository • Collaborate • Metrics
• Institution
OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
![Page 36: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
RG SCORETHE RG SCORE IS A METRIC THAT MEASURES SCIENTIFIC REPUTATION BASED
ON HOW ALL OF YOUR RESEARCH IS RECEIVED BY YOUR PEERS.
![Page 37: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
INSTITUTIONS ON RESEARCHGATETHIS LIST SHOWS INSTITUTIONS BY THE SUM OF THE RG SCORES OF THEIR
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS USING RESEARCHGATE.
![Page 38: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
THE RG SCORE INCORPORATES THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR TO EVALUATE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHERS.
VIA THE RESEARCHGATE SCORE: A GOOD EXAMPLE OF A BAD METRIC (DECEMBER 2015)
![Page 39: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
MENDELEY STATSMENDELEY STATS WILL ALLOW YOU TO SEE A NUMBER OF METRICS THAT WILL
GIVE YOU A UNIQUE, ..
![Page 40: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
ALTMETRICS - MORE & DIFFERENT DATA PLEASEVIA TRIP REPORT: 5 YEARS OF ALTMETRICS #2AMCONF #ALTMETRICS15 (OCTOBER 2015)
Photo by @digicmb
![Page 41: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
• Repository • Collaborate • Metrics • Institution
OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
![Page 42: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO ON RESEARCHGATEHTTPS://WWW.RESEARCHGATE.NET/INSTITUTION/THE_UNIVERSITY_OF_TOKYO
![Page 43: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO | MENDELEY GROUPHTTPS://WWW.MENDELEY.COM/GROUPS/7440181/THE-UNIVERSITY-OF -TOKYO/
![Page 45: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
• Self-introduction
• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?
![Page 49: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
SCIENTISTS WANT TO COLLABORATE ONLINE
Photo by @IBMbigdata
![Page 50: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
• Institutional Repository
• Current Research Information System
• Institutional Level Metrics
• Research support
• Anything else?
HOW LIBRARIANS SHOULD ENGAGE WITH ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’?
![Page 51: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
Photo by @IBMbigdata
• Self-introduction
• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?
![Page 52: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030212/58a043ee1a28ab39648b4bb9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’
KEITA BANDO, THE 3RD SPARC JAPAN SEMINAR 2015, JANUARY 19 2016
Photo by @IBMbigdata