a comparison of titanium mim parts produced using various furnace conditions. © paul ewart:...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various
furnace conditions.
© Paul Ewart: December 2013
![Page 2: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Metal injection moulding (MIM) is an established manufacturing method.
Metal powders are mixed with a thermoplastic binder to form a feedstock that can be moulded to formed complex shapes (green parts).
The binder is removed (debinding) and the powders are consolidated (sintered) to form the final part with the desired metal composition.
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 3: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Overview
Research aims
Feedstock
Moulding
Debinding
Sintering
Conclusion
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 4: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Research aims
• To investigate impurity uptake in relation to sinter conditions
• To define defect formation with respect to metal composition within sintered parts
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 5: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
Feedstock
Binder combination of bees wax (BW), carnauba wax (CW), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polypropylene (PP)
The powder was titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V of 200 mesh, HDH)
![Page 6: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Moulding
Process temperature above all melting points and below the degradation points
Feedstock flow a function of fluidity of the binder
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 7: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Debinding
Solvent debinding targeted PEG with dissolution
Thermal debinding targeted waxes by melt extraction, capillary pressure and volatilities
Polyolefins and remaining residues removed early in sintering phase by pyrolysis @ < 93 %
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 8: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Image Furnace Temperature
(°C) Hold time
(Min) Atmosphere Pressure (MPa)
a Molybdenum 1250 60 Static argon Atm b Vacuum 1250 180 Vacuum 2.0 x 10-4
c MIM vacuum 1350 180 Argon flow/ Vacuum 2.0 x 10-3
Sintering
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
Incomplete debinding ?
Furnace atmosphere ?
Through part ?
![Page 9: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
External surfaces do not necessarily represent the metal composition of the part
Micro-structure analysis to investigate residual binder levels, elemental diffusion and density
Density 91, 93 and 96 % respectively
Metal composition
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 10: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusion
Static atmosphere produced the highest level of impurities
Vacuum sintering removed more residue but impurities remain from pore disconnection
Sweep gas during heat-up enhanced residue removal and with vacuum atmosphere impurities were reduced.
© Paul Ewart: November 2013
![Page 11: A comparison of titanium MIM parts produced using various furnace conditions. © Paul Ewart: December 2013](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110116/5519d59d550346047c8b4d7e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Thank you.Questions please?
Acknowledgements:Aamir Mukhtar and the Titanium Industry Development Association (TiDA), Tauranga, NZ for analytical support.ProMould Custom Moulding Ltd, Hamilton, NZ for part moulding.AME Powder Technology Limited, Hamilton, NZ for sample preparation and sintering assistance.
© Paul Ewart: November 2013