a critique of two allegation of engineer “ali: mirza: of jhelum city on saiyiduna: ‘ima:m ‘ibn...

7/25/2019 A CRITIQUE OF TWO ALLEGATION OF ENGINEER ALI: MIRZA: OF JHELUM CITY ON SAIYIDUNA: IMA:M IBN TAIMIAH

1/18

A CRITIQUE OF TWOALLEGATION OFENGINEER ALI: MIRZA:OF JHELUM CITY ON

SAIYIDUNA: IMA:M IBNTAIMIAH RH [d:132 AC!MM SINDHI

["#$% &'( d)&(!A CRITIC OF ALI: MIRZA:!


2/18

2

2

ENGINEER ALI MIRZA AND HIS CLAIM THAT IMAM IBN TAIMIAH COMMITED *UFR

[ASTTAGHFARULLAH!

E+,#+((- A.#: M#-/) d0( +0& (.#(( &')& I4):4 #+ T)#4#)' RH: # ) M5.#4 -)&'(-

'( (.#(( &')& I4):4 #+ T)#4#)' # ) *):6-7

T'# 4)8 ( )+ (9($& 0 T)%6-#: M#+d(d Z5)#- ; &'( 0-4(- &()$'(- 0- 4)&(- #

E+,#+((- A.#: M#-/)7

E+,#+((- A.# M#-/): $.)#4 &')& &')& '( d0( +0& d($.)-( I4):4 I+ T)#4#)' RD: )

%)6- #+$( #& # '( 4#,'& ')( -(($+ $0+$(#(d #+ &'( 4#+d 0 &'( O>($+ M)%(- [A.# M#-/):! #

&')& I4):4 I+ T)#4#)' RD: IS THAT:?

I4):4 I+ T)#4#)' (.#(( &')& &'( T(4


3/18

3

3

I4):4 I+ T)#4#)' RD: )+d &'( D0,4)

0 "-(E#&(+$( )+d E&(-+#&8 0 D##+(

E(+$( [ALLH ! )+d D##+( A&--#5&(7An Infinite Back Word Series Of Temporals [H:ava:dith:] implies that To Each and Ever Temporal Thin! there is a Temporal Thin! "rior to It#

B$t no mem%er of the Infinite Series is Temporal [&on Eternal]# The follo'in! are the Implied (es$lts of this %elief#

)] *A++,H is I&-I&ITE "rior to Each and Ever Temporal Thin! in the Infinite Back Ward Series#

.] The /ivine Attri%$tes Of *A++,H are Infinitel "rior to Each and Ever Temporal E0istn! tThin! in the Infinite Back Ward SeriesSereis #

1] The Series /oes not (eache to Eternit Since &o 2em%er of the Series is Eternal# In other Words 3 there is an Infinite series of H:ava:dith:4 and

to each and ever H:a:dith: of the Infinite series of H:va:dith there is a H:a:dith: "rior to it # 5et none of the mem%er of the infinite Back Word Series

of H:ava:dith: is Eternal# So there is no mem%er in the Infinite Back Ward Series that is Eternal 3 5et it is in direction to'ard Eternit# B$t it never

reaches to Eternit3 %$t al'as tends to the Eternit# Even the %e!innin!,lesness of the series cannot impl the series to reach at Eternit#

2ATHE2ATI6A+ E7"+A&ATIO&:8

This concept can %est %e $nderstood % 2O/E(& 2ATHE2ATI6S#

-or E0ample there are Infinite 2an (eal &$m%ers "rior to An Ar%itraril 6hosen (eal &$m%er sa 0.

5et none of the n$m%er in the set of Infinite 2an (eal &$m%ers "rior to the &$m%er0 is infinitel "rior to it i#e

0.

Like wise there are infnite many Temporals Prior to any given Temporal say0 yet none

o them is Infnitely Prior to 0 . Only Eternity and Eternals [ivine Essen!e and ivine

"ttri#i#$tes%.

I2"+IES/ (ES9+TS:8

A] This doeth Impl that the ETE(&IT5 A&/ "(EE7ISTE&6E O- /II&E ESEE&6E [A++,H] A&/ /II&E ATT(IB9TES A(E

"E("ET9A++5 A&/ ETE(&A++5 6O&SE(E/#

B] The infinite Back Ward Series is not Eternal since no mem%er of the series is Eternal and the &ecessar and

S$fficient 6ondition for an Infinite Series to Be Eternal is thatAtleast one of the 2em%er of the Series is Eternal and

"reE0istent#

/I--E(E&6E -(O2 "HI+OSO"HE(S:8

"hilosophers Of Islam +ike I%n Sina and I%n ($shd %elieve that Some Temporals like the 'orld or the Basic 2atter

["rime 2atter] of the 6osmos is Eternal#

The -alse Impression#


4/18

It does appear that an Infinite Series approachin! to'ards Eternit reacheth Eternit and atleast one of the

2em%er of the series is Eternal# This is not the case #

SI2I+A(IT5ES A&/ /ISSI2I+A(IT5 -(O2 2A;O(IT5 O- AH+9SS9&&AH [ASHA:afir# Or Both# That is E0tremism and

>har=ism# The sa?me is tr$e for 2a=orit of *Ahl$ss$nnah#

We have tried to she' that *Imam I%n Taimiah (H: neither /enieth Eternit Of *A++,H naf His 9ncreated *Attri%$tes &or

/enieth Their "re E0istence as incorrectl ass$med % @$%air Ali @ai and his Apostatre St$dent En!ineer Ali 2ira:

of the "lace called ;hel$m#

S($0+d

"-(.#4#+)-8:?*Ima:m *I%n Taimiah (/: %elieved that there is a difference %et'een 6(EATIO& and Temporal#

Accordin! to him each and Ever 6reation is a Temporal %$t not Ever Temporal is a 6reation#

When he saith *A+ H:AA:/ITH: +A *A9A+A +AHA: *4It means Temporals 'hich are not 6reations#

S$ch Temporals are /ivine Acts# Accordin! to *Ima:m *I%n Taimiah (/: /ivine Attri%$tes are 9ncreated and Eternal

%$t /ivine Acts are &ot Eternal [Temporal] B$t also not 6reated#

One ma s$mmaries as follo':8


5/18

)] /ivine Essence [ A++,H S$%h:a:n,h$: a Taa:la:] is Eternal3 "re E0istent 6ontino$s and 9ncreated #

.] /ivine 9ncreated Attri%$tesOf *A++,H [ A++,H S$%h:a:n,h$: a Taa:la:] Are Eternal3 "re E0istent 6ontino$s and

9ncreated #

1]/ivine &o$ns Of *A++,H [ A++,H S$%h:a:n,h$: a Taa:la:] Are Eternal3 "re E0istent 6ontin$o$s and 9ncreated #

C] /ivine Acts and /oin!s are &either Eternal nor 6reated#3 &either "re,e0istents nor 6ontin$o$s#

So *Imam *I%n Taimiah is neither talkin! a%o$t 6reations nor Talkin! a%o$t /ivine Attri%$tes as incorrectl

ass$med % Shaikh *Al Ba:ni: (H: #

There are t'o tpes O- /ivine Acts# [&] Transitive Acts [/oin!s] #[ ] Intransitive Acts#

6reation is one of the Transitive Acts#

Imam I%n Taimiah sharpl differentiateth %et'een Act of 6reation and the 6reated Thin!#

That is a Transative Act and a Term of the Transative Act#

er -e' /ivine Acts 'hich emanateth from /ivine Attri%$tes Have Terms as in the case of Act of Speakin!#

The A%ilit TO Speak [A%ilit of Speech] is the /ivine Attri%$te3 Act of Speakin! is the /ivine Act 'hich Emanateth

from the Stated Attri%$te of Speech is the /ivine Act 3 and the Words3 Sentences3 E0pressions and +etters Spoken

are the Terms of the /ivine Act of Speakin!#

What that is implied from the 'orks of *Ima:m I%n Taimiah is as follo':8

ID The Attri%$te of Speech is Eternal [adi:mFGhair H:a:dith:] 3 Ghair 2akhl$:? and Ghair 2a=$:l#

In other words they are Ghair H:a:dith: [Eternal] , Ghair Makhlu:q [Uncreated] and

Ghair Maju:l[Unmade]

.] The Act of Speakin! is &either Eternal &or 2akhl$:? [6reated] and Also not 2a=$:l [2ade]#

The are ;$st H:a:dith: [TemporalF&on EternalFGhair adi:m]3 %$t neither 2akhl$:? nor 2a=$:l#

In other words they are H:a:dith: [!on"Eternal#$em%oral#Ghair &adi:m] 'et Ghair

Makhlu:q [Uncreated] and Ghair Maju:l[Unmade]

1] The Terms of /ivine Acts Of Speakin! are Temporal [&on EternalFH:a:dith:FGhair adi:m] and 2a=$l# 5et the are

neither Eternal nor 2akhl$:?< #

In other words they are H:a:dith: [!on"Eternal#Ghair &adi:m] , Ghair Makhlu:q

[Uncreated] 'et Maju:l [made]

This theolo!ical delicacies ma %e $nderstood properl # I m self differ and %elieve in Asharite and 2at$ridite

%elieves in re!ard to the /ivine Speech et *Imam *I%n Taimiah cannot %e declared as >afir or even Ghair S$nni3 as

alle!ed % ;HE+92I E&GI&&E( A+I 2I(@A#


6/18

Shaikh *Al%a:nis 'as $na%le to $nderstand the /elicacies of the 6oncept of *Ima:m *I%n Taimiah (H: #

Simple 2inded Shaikh Ali @ai 'as also conf$sed since %oth @$%air Ali @ai A&/ Shaikh Al%a:ni: (H: 'ere neither

theolo!ians nor "hilosophers# B$t Shaikh *Al%a:ni: never declared *Ima:m *i%n Taimiah as >afir3 since he confessed

the S$periorit Of *Ima:m *I%n Taimiah (/: OE( Himself# @$%air Ali @ai did not have the co$ra!e to declare *Imam

*I%n Taimiah (H: to declare as a Ghair *Ahl H:adi:th: # He kno'eth conse?$ences of this #

B$t En!ineer Ali 2ira: can sa an thin! to an one# Wate for the /a En!ineer Ali 2ira saith some thin! to *Ima:m

B$kha:ri [*Asta!hfar$llah]#

ASHA(ITES A&/ 2AT9(I/ITES /O BE+IEE THAT O&+5 ESSE&TIA+ ATT(IB9TES O- A++,H A(E 9&6(EATE/ A&/ ETE(&A+#

THE BE+IEE THAT A6TS O- *A++,H Are 6(EATE/ A&/ TE2"O(A+#

(E+ATIE ATT(IB9TES O- ETE(&A+ ATT(IB9TES A(E ABST(A6TIO&S#

O&+5 E7T(E2ISTS 6A& /E6+A(E A&5 O&E O- THE -O9( S6HOO+S O- THO9GHT AS GHAI(9 *AH+ISS9&&AH [*ASTAGH-A(9++,

H] #

Similarl @$%air Ali @ai had no idea of Immanent Act [Acts in association of the Essence of the A!ent or Acts

S$%sistin! in the A!ent of the Act] and &ot Immanent Acts3 [Acts 'ith neither S$%sisteth in the Essence of the A!ent

of the Act nor E0ist in Association 'ith the Essence of the A!ent of the Act] i#e Eternal FE0traneo$s Acts#

Third "reliminar:8One ma simpl e0plain that *A++,H [ST] Is (ecitin! $r


7/18

[!ot -ust /ossi0ility] that 1ur Eninner 2hall !ot 3ttem%t to 3nswer4

$here is a .ery .ery stron /ro0a0ility $hat the Eninner 1+ -helum shall

use his enineered $echnique o+ just *ecitin this M(& and then sayin

32$3GH53*U663H 3s i+ it is some thin a sort o+ 7u+r

$o %re.ent Enineer3li Mir8a +rom usin this sort o+ technique which is

Enineered 0y him we %resent a .erse +rom Holy &ur9a:n Itsel+

Indeed, e ha.e [-336!3:HU] made it an

3ra0ic &ur;an that you miht understand

AZZU*HRUF THE ORNAMENTS OF GOLD

A:YAH NUMBER 37

T'# # ) @(-( 5(d 8 M5&)/#.)' &0


8/18


9/18

-orth "reliminar:8I& )0-#&8 0 A'.55+)' (.#(( &')& )+8 &'#+, U+$-()&(d # E&(-+). 5&S04( M#+0-#( 0 A'.55++)' d0 (.#(( &')& N0& A.. U+$-()&(d )-( E&(-+).7

B5& &'(8 ),-(( 0+ 0+( "0#+& &')& A+8 &'#+, U+$-()&(d # +0& )40+, &'( C-()+

)+d C-()&5-( 0 ALLH7

IF E+,#++(- A.# M#-/): $)+ d($.)-( &')& I4)4 I+ T)#4#)' C0+&-)d#$&(d 04(

S:AH:I:H: H:ADI:TH: )+d &'(-( 0- '( # *)6- &'(+ A.# M#-/) 45& ')( d($.)-(d A5

A.): M)5d5d#: ) *)6- #+$( '( EP"LICITLY d(+8 &'( H:ADI:TH: OF HOLY BU*HARI:

T')& SAIYIDUNA IBRA:HI:M S"O*E FALSEHOOD THREE TIMES7

ABU ALA: MAUDUDI: DID NOT ACCE"TED ANY INTER"RETATION BUT CLEARLYREJECTED THE TRADITION7[S(( '# #(= )05& &'( H:Ad#&': 0 T'-(( F).'00d 0

S)#8#d5+) I-):'#:4 A.)#'# S).:4 IN M)5d5d#K W0-%!7

B5& A.#: M#-/) # #.(+& ) $'5-$'(K 4#$( )+d # +0& .#%(.8 &0 -()% &'( #$(7

S0 '( $)++0& $.)#4 &')& '( d($.)-( I4)4 I+ T)#4#)' ') $044#&&(d ) *5- >5&

($)5( '( ') -(>($&(d ) S:H:I:H: H:ADITH: ; OTHERWISE HE HAS TO SAY THE SAME

FOR MAULANA: MAUDU:DI7

I #& # A54(d 0- ) W'#.( &')& I4)4 I+ T)#4#)' # )8#+, 0- &'( C-()+ )+d

+0& 0- N(#&'(- E&(-+). )+d N0- C-()+ &')& &'(8 ')( +0 (,#++#+, ; &'(+ &'#

&)&(4(+& $)+ 0+.8 ( %5- # #& $0+&-)d#$&(&' )+ E


10/18

1

1

*5- =#&' C(-&)#+&8 0- B0&' ; #+$( '( +0& 0+.8 d(+#(d ) S:)':#:': T-)d#+ 5& ).0


11/18

11

11

not declare E!$ 2E65 EI>E!$ 7U5*

$H12E H1 3*E 53626' 32(*I@E> I$H 7U5* (1!$I!UE $1 @E MU26IM2

'E$ 1!E H1 /*3($I(E 2U(H 3! EI6 3($ (E32E2 $1 @E 3 MU26IM

(] 3n E)%osition o+ a Great /ossi0le (ons%iracy:

3n other %oint is that it is %ossi0le that this Enineer may use the same

technique +or Mir8a: Ghula:m &adiani: 0y e)cusin that he [ ie the

Enineer ] >oes not declare him as 7a?r +or the similar 0ene?t o+ %ossi0le

*e%entance 0e+ore his death in AD 3(

2o this is a /ossi0le cons%iracy enineered 0y the %ramatic mind o+ =3li:

Mir8a: 1+ -helum

e 0elie.e that alleation o+ =3li Mir8a: on


12/18

12

12

hat a reat 2cheme indeed 3ll Gratitudes to


13/18

13

13

*Ima:m B$kha:ri (H:and

*Ima:m Ah:mad Bin

H:an%al (H: # So 'e shall

estimate 'hat thisapostate en!ineer can

sa a!ainst them# Thisre?$ires a separate

'ork# That shall %e

disc$ssed latter# -or


14/18

1

1

the time %ein! The

Apostate En!ineer of

;hel$m is ref$ted % the

Grace of

*A++,H [ST]#


15/18

1

1

*E5U$3$I1! 15 3! 1$HE*

366EG3$I1! 15 =36I MI*F3[W( ')( $0


16/18

1

1

T'# )++08(d T)%6-#: 4#+d(d Z5)#- A.#: )+d '( d($.)-(d S'):' I4):#:. S')'#:d )

*)6- 0+ ((-). #5(7

H# 4)#+ 0>($+ =(-( :? 1! S'):' I4):#. (.#((d #+ ) 0-4 0 @):&)&5. @5>5:d

) E#d(+& -04 '# 00% ABQA:T7 2! H( (.#((d &')& ALLH H)&' O4+#0-#&8 0 A'.5. H:)d#:&': ')..

+0& )$$(($&(d '# 0>($+ #+ &'( 4#+d 0 A.#: M#-/): O J'(.54 ='0 ')

+0 -(,)-d 0- I4):4 #+ T)#4#)' RD: (&$7 5& 5& ')( &-(4(+d05 84($+ # -('):d ='#$' =) +0& 05+d #+ &'( ( 0

S)#8#d5+) A5 B)%- (&$7


17/18

1

1

S0 #+ &'( .#&(-). 4()+#+, #& # )+ I++0)+ #+$( #& =) +0- 05+d '):d 0 )+8 S:)':#: RD: $)+ ( &(-4(d )

H(-(8 [B#d) M5&)d# IN THE TERMONOLOGICAL MEANING!; 8(& &'( =0-d $)+ (

5(d #+ &'( .#&(-). 4()+#+,7!

=3n other e)am%le is that 2aiyiduna: =Umar *>: usred the

word @">3"H +or the -ama:ah o+ $ra:.i:h:

2o this is an e)am%le that the word @idah is sometime used in the 6iteral

Meanin [3 thin not +ound 0e+ore #Inno.ation ]and not in the

$erminoloical Meanin [Heresy#Unorhtodo)y,Heterodo)y]

W'(+ &'# )+=(- =)


18/18

1

1

Similarl the difference %et'een Innovator and Heretic are t'o different thin!s#

Ima:m *I%n Taimiah (/: onl meant that This *I=tiha:d O- *I%n 9mar (/: 'as not fo$nd prior to his act of

*I=tiha:d# B$t it is not an heres even if it ma not %e preferred# Since This *I=tiha:d 'as not fo$nd in the

times of &o%le 6aliphate#

2$lti,Standard Of En!ineer Ali 2ira

M)5.)+) M)5d5d#: DECLARED 04( )$& 0 S)#8#d5+): M5:)#)' RD:) B#d)'

[A&),')-5..)'! :+0& #+ &'( L#&(-). M()+#+, 5& #+ &'( R(.#,#05 M()+#+, 7 B5& A.#:

M#-/) -(4)#+(d #.(+$(d ) # '( ') +0& -()d #&7 [*'#:.))& @) M.5:%#)& BY M A7A

M)5d5:d#:!

T'# #4

a critique of two allegation of engineer “ali: mirza: of jhelum city on saiyiduna: ‘ima:m ‘ibn...

Documents