a crying lie
TRANSCRIPT
8/13/2019 A Crying Lie
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-crying-lie 1/2
A Crying Lie (An egregious shame)
Philosophy comes from ancient Greek word ‘philosophia’ which means ‘love for wisdom’. It was
introduced by Greek philosopher Pythagoras. Basically philosophy is an academic discipline that deals
with the fundamental beliefs of reason, knowledge, existence, reality, rationality, values, mind and
language. Philosophy is taught all over the world to enlighten the folks and to give them insight into thebasic concepts of reality and rational argument. It cannot be seen in isolation rather it is connected and
intermingled with almost all the discipline. Mainly it deals with mind and reason.
The role of intuition in philosophy is very significant. Without intuition philosophy is nothing. One
cannot comprehend philosophy within the cultural, social and ideological patterns. It has to be viewed
and learnt barring all the structure aside. Philosophy is beyond from the limits of time and space. It
includes time and space within. So it is necessary to read philosophy as an independent discipline. In
Pakistan, philosophy is read and taught subjectively and it is subdued to certain kind of patterns. It is
unjust to study philosophy with reference to the context. Philosophy itself is a context, so it does not
need contextual study. Here philosophy and theory are confused with each other. A theory based on an
observation while philosophy based on intuition. A theory is experimental whereas philosophy is logical
and rational inquiry of the things and incidents. So philosophy must not be confused with theory. If we
start from Greek philosophers Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Diogenes etc to the philosophers of
modern times and postmodern era, one thing is common in all and that is the use of logic and reason. It
is very significant, as far I have understood, that any of the philosophies has not been refuted. There
might be some improvement in some philosophies or some differences but the new thoughts have been
developed upon the existence logical inquires. Let’s say Sartrian idea is too much different than that of
Kierkegaardian existentialism but it is Kierkegaard who provides ground. It might be falsified but not
refuted. What is unfalsifiable that is classified as unscientific. In the words of Wolfgang Pauli, “it is not
only not right, it is not even wrong!"
In Pakistani context, the use of reason, logic, mind and rationality is cowered. We are minor in
everything except cramming. The use of intuition is prohibitive because ideology does not second
intuition. Repetition and Ratalization is encouraged because Pakistanis are in race of scoring good
grades. The only criterion is to judge intellectualism how one is good at marks. Bookish knowledge is
encouraged therefore Pakistani students are provided syllabi to cram and stuff their minds with all odds.
They are not taught languages and ideas but books. They teach the students how to sell their brawn and
brain. They are not taught to be brave but to be afraid of the situation. Abrham Lincoln orders his
teacher’s son in these words:
Teach him, if you can,
the wonder of books...
But also give him quiet time
to ponder the eternal mystery of birds in the sky,
bees in the sun,
and the flowers on a green hillside.
8/13/2019 A Crying Lie
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/a-crying-lie 2/2
In the school teach him
it is far honourable to fail
than to cheat...
Teach him to have faith
in his own ideas,
even if everyone tells him
they are wrong...
Unfortunately, in Pakistan one’s ideas are not revered and venerated but lampoon. Teachers have no
such mandate except some instructions from those who never entered the classrooms and do not
understand the environment of the classrooms. Teacher is to teach books, not the mystery of the
universe. Pakistani can do only praiseworthy thing and that is he can produce bibliophile in existing
circumstances but not philosopher cause of it visible that neither syllabi, not the State support the
teachers in their goals. State apparatuses such as syllabi, officialdom and lack of visionary policies do not
let the teacher to give an insight to the students in the mysteries of the universe. Resultantly, teachers
have no world views. They borrow their world views and then lend it to the tabula rasa students.
On the other hand, responsible officials are naming teachers as ‘dead wood’. It shows how the official
lampoon publically but no one dares to ask him because he too is considered an enlighten person of the
time. I wish I could tell him that dead woods are collected. They are not gathered themselves. It’s a
crying lie and everything is a thing of far off world.