a first contact with star-ccm+mdx2.plm.automation.siemens.com/sites/default/files/... · 2018. 5....
TRANSCRIPT
-
Comparing analytical and finite volume solutions
with STAR-CCM+ simulations
A first contact
with STAR-CCM+
Michael Heyer
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
2 / 21
ParisTech is a consortium of 12 of the most
prestigious French institutes of education and
research
A powerful network that unites and rationalize strength while bringing international visibility
What is ParisTech?
Best University in France in
Production Engineering and
Manufacturing Engineering
1000 graduate engineers
per year
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
3 / 21
Study program of our students :
Objectif: to show the relationship between the analytical solution,
the finite volume solution and the STAR-CCM+ simulation
for the same problem
12 h : 2.5 h Discovering of STAR-CCM+
2 h Poiseuille flow → Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film of a plain cylindrical journal bearing:
1.5 h → Analytical solution
2 h → Numerical solution : the finite volume equation
2 h → Numerical solution : programming the finite volume equation
2 h → STAR-CCM+ simulation
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
4 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Poiseuille flow : laminar flow in a tube
𝐯𝒛 𝒓 = ∆𝒑
𝟒 𝑳 𝝁 𝑹𝟐 − 𝒓𝟐
vz(r) : fluid velocity at the distance r from the central axis [m/s]
Dp: pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet of the tube: 10 Pa
L: tube length: 50 cm m: dynamical viscosity (water): 8.887110-4 Pas
R: tube radius: 0.5 cm r: distance from the central axis: 0 cm, 0.125
cm, 0.25 cm, 0.375 cm, 0.5 cm
r [cm] vz(r) [m/s]
0 0.141
0.125 0.132
0.25 0.105
0.375 0.062
0.5 0
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
5 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Inlet Outlet
50 cm
0.5 cm
Stagnation
inlet
Pressure
outlet
Wall
Meshing models:
« Surface Remesher », « Polyhedral Mesher » and « Prism Layer Mesher »
Physics models:
Steady, Liquid, Segregated Flow, Constant Density, Laminar
10 Pa 0 Pa
STAR-CCM+ version: 7.02.011 and 8.02.011
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
6 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
r [cm] Analytical velocity [m/s] STAR-CCM+ velocity [m/s]
0 0.141
0.125 0.132
0.25 0.105
0.375 0.062
0.5 0
0.056
0.055
0.052
0.044
-0.006
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
7 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Is it a problem of the Meshing model? « Trimmer »
« Polyhedral Mesher » and « Extruder »
r [cm] Analytical velocity [m/s]
STAR-CCM+ Polyhedral
Mesher + Prism Layer Mesher
[m/s]
STAR-CCM+ Trimmer
[m/s]
STAR-CCM+ Polyhedral
Mesher + Extruder
[m/s]
0 0.141 0.056 0.095 0.1
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
8 / 21
But the fluid is moving at the inlet (0 m/s at the wall ; 0.55 m/s at the central
axis), so the static pressure is lower then 10 Pa :
𝒑𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄 = 𝒑𝒕𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 − 𝝆𝐯𝟐
𝟐= 𝟖. 𝟒 𝑷𝒂
and we use the static pressure in the Poiseuille équation.
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Length [m]
Sta
tic
pre
ss
ure
[P
a]
Static pressure
Why is the static pressure at the inlet 8.4 Pa and not 10 Pa ?
The boundary condition « Stagnation inlet » imposes a total pressure of 10 Pa
and not a static pressure of 10 Pa at the inlet
(Remember: ptotal = pstatic + pdynamic )
Velo
cit
y [
m/s
]
0.1
Inlet
Outlet
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
9 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Length [m]
Sta
tic
pre
ss
ure
[P
a]
Static pressure
But the static inlet pressure of 8.4 Pa does not explain all the difference
between the analytical solution and the STAR-CCM+ simulation!
2.5 Pa/0.1 m
STAR-CCM+ transforms in the first part of the tube the inlet boundary
condition
ptotal = 10 Pa = constant over the inlet section
into pstatic = constant over the section (with a parabolic velocity profile)
2 Pa/0.1 m
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
10 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Length [m]
Sta
tic
pre
ss
ure
[P
a]
Static pressure
Is there now comformity between the STAR-CCM+ velocity and the
analytical velocity calculated with the Poiseuille equation?
1.45 Pa/0.1 m
r [cm] STAR-CCM+ Polyhedral Mesher + Extruder [m/s]
Analytical velocity [m/s]
0 0.1
𝐯𝒛 𝒓 = ∆𝒑
𝟒 𝑳 𝝁 𝑹𝟐 − 𝒓𝟐
0.1025
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
11 / 21
Poiseuille flow
→ Analytical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
→ Why is there a difference?
Oil film in a bearing
Length [m]
Sta
tic
pre
ss
ure
[P
a]
Static pressure
Conclusions:
It is difficult to impose a static pressure drop with STAR-CCM+.
We recommand to foresee a run-in length and to calculate the
velocity/pressure dependance only in the part where the pressure
gradient is constant.
Meshing models have a big influence on the results.
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
12 / 21
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
Simplified study of the bearing
Arbre
Film lubrifiant
Coussinet
0,3 mm x
y v x
arbre = 50 °C
coussinet = 47 °C
Plain cylindrical journal bearing
Lubricating oil film
Bush
Shaft shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
Hub
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
13 / 21
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
Principle of mass conservation:
0y
v
x
v yx
Equation of momentum conservation:
y
v
y
vv
x
vv 2
x2
xy
xx
Equation of energy conservation:
yv
xv
y
vx
cya yx
2
p2
2
vx: fluid velocity in the x axis direction [m/s]
: kinematical viscosity [m2/s] a: thermal diffusivity [m2/s] : temperature [°C]
cp: specific heat [J/(kg K)]
yArbre
Coussinetx
Film
lubrifiant
Lubricating
oil film
Bearing bush
Shaft
shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
vx
vy = 0 in every point
vx = ay + b
= cy2 + dy + e
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
14 / 21
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
yArbre
Coussinetx
Film
lubrifiant
Lubricating
oil film
Bearing bush
Shaft
shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
vx
Velocity equation: ys
*1
844,9773vx
vx (Node 3) = 2.199115 m/s
vx (Node 2) = 1.466077 m/s
vx (Node 1) = 0.7330383 m/s
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3
Noeud
vx [m/s]
0.3
mm
vx = ay + b
Vx shaft = 2.9321531 m/s
Vx bush= 0 m/s
N
ode
Shaft
Bearing bush
No
de
0
1
2
3
4
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
15 / 21
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
yArbre
Coussinetx
Film
lubrifiant
Lubricating
oil film
Bearing bush
Shaft shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
vx
Noeud
0.3
mm
Node
Shaft
Bearing bush
No
de
1
0
2
3
4
= cy2 + dy + e
𝐜 = −𝜈
2 𝑎𝑐𝑝
𝜕vx𝜕𝑦
2
Temperature equation: C30y*m
K5,145625y*
m
K10*196,263
2
2
6
0
1
2
3
4
25 35 45 [°C]
(Node 3) = 49,44143 °C
(Node 2) = 45,92191 °C
(Node 1) = 39,44144 °C
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
16 / 21
yArbre
Coussinetx
Film
lubrifiant
Lubricating
oil film
Bearing bush
Shaft
shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
vx
0.3
mm
No
de
1
0
2
3
4
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
Equation of momentum conservation:
y
v
y
vv
x
vv 2
x2
xy
xx
Node y Analytical velocity [m/s] Finite volume velocity [m/s]
4
3
2
1
0
2.932153
2.1991148
1.4660765
0.7330382
0
2.932153
2.1991147
1.4660765
0.7330382
0
uy(t+1) = uy(t) + Dt
Dy2 uy+1(t) - 2 uy(t) + uy-1(t)
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
17 / 21
yArbre
Coussinetx
Film
lubrifiant
Lubricating
oil film
Bearing bush
Shaft
shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
vx
0.3
mm
No
de
1
0
2
3
4
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
Equation of energy conservation:
Node y Analytical temperature [°C] Finite volume temperature [°C]
4
3
2
1
0
yv
xv
y
vx
cya yx
2
p2
2
50
49.4414354
45.9219139
39.4414454
30
50
49.44142
45.92190
39.44142
30
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
18 / 21
Left face
Right face
Front face
Back face Shaft face
Bush face
Meshing models: « Surface Remesher » et « Trimmer »
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
Physics models: Steady, Liquid, Segregated Flow, Constant Density, Laminar,
Segregated Fluid Temperature
STAR-CCM+ version: 7.02.011 and 8.02.011
Wall
2.93 m/s
Wall Symmetry plane
Symmetry plane
Translational
periodic
Translational
periodic 0 m/s
50 °C
30 °C
0.3 mm
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
19 / 21
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
3
2
1
2,1991148
1,4660765
0,7330382
2,1991147
1,4660765
0,7330382
STAR-CCM+ velocity
Left face
Right face
Front face
Back face Shaft face
Bush face
Node y Analytical velocity Fin volume velocity
2,1958 → 2,1962
1,4650 → 1,4879
0,7315 → 0,7354
2.93 m/s
0 m/s
-
Analytical Finite volumes STAR-CCM+
20 / 21
Poiseuille flow
Oil film in a bearing
→ Analytical solution
→ Numerical solution
→ STAR-CCM+ simulation
Conclusion :
Students learn
the application of the fondamental heat transfer equations
a simple version of programming code of STAR-CCM+
a (mistrustful) use of STAR-CCM+
Arbre
Film lubrifiant
Coussinet
0,3 mm x
y v x
arbre = 50 °C
coussinet = 47 °C
Lubricating oil film
Bush
Shaft shaft = 50 °C
bush = 30 °C
-
Questions ?