73

Abstract

Excavations at the village of Erythron/Latrun near Apollo-

nia in Cyrenaica uncovered a potter’s rubbish dump in an

abandoned Roman bath complex, thought to be linked to

the nearby potter’s kiln. Common wares and lamps were

produced here and of particular note were Mid Roman 1

amphorae. These amphorae were thought to have been

produced mainly in Sicily but also North Africa, and with

the new discovery at Latrun we can now also add Cyrenaica

to the list. Archaeometric (thin section) analysis on samples

from the site confirms this theory.

Since 2009 research on the Roman and Byzantine ceramics from the ancient town of Apollonia in Cyre-naica and the village of Erythron/Latrun (25 km east of Apollonia, Figure 1) has been carried out within the programme of the ‘Mission Archéologique Fran-çaise en Libye’ directed by M. André Laronde until his death on February 1, 2011, and thereafter by M. Vin-cent Michel.

The archaeological campaigns of 2009 and 2010 at Erythron/Latrun, excavated under the direction of V. Michel, saw the clearing of the heated rooms of a Roman bath complex, which had been abandoned at the end of the third/beginning of the fourth cen-tury AD.

The heated rooms, whose hypocaust had been completely removed, were filled with layers of clay and ash that contained numerous ceramics. Most of the material (88%) suggested the presence of a pot-ter’s rubbish dump, including: unused ceramics, lumps of clay stuck to the walls of some pieces, many joining fragments from the same vessel, and many overfired sherds. According to the petrographic analyses (see C.C., infra), the characteristics of the fabric seem compatible with a local produc-tion, while the imported mate-rial (12% of the same context) is clearly distinguishable (ARS and a few Eastern Mediterranean amphora sherds). This ceramic material found in the hot rooms

of the bath complex seems to be associated with a pottery kiln, found just to the north, although very little material was recovered from the latter. It can thus be proposed, with some degree of confidence, that after the abandonment or destruction of the heated rooms the space was reused as a dump, linked to the functioning of the potter’s kiln.

Most of the local wares are characterised by storage vessels, jugs, cooking wares and lamps. Amongst the storage vessels found within the rich context, one particular type of amphora stood out. This was the Mid Roman 1 (MRA1) from John Riley’s typology (Riley 1979, 177–179, figs 81.215−219 and 82.220−221)(Figs 2–6). The quality of production is fairly second-rate, with many lumps of clay on the external surfaces, deformed necks, and handles with non-symmetrical rounded sections, sometimes very roughly attached to the neck and body. They usually have a shallow groove under the rim, which is triangular in section. The fabrics of these ampho-rae appear medium-fine to the naked eye, the colour varies between red and red-orange, and has numerous grey or white inclusions (see C.C., infra). Looking at the manufacture, it often shows signifi-cant variation within the same assemblage (Fig. 5) and we also found several greenish ceramic wasters, one example of which had a rim that had begun to melt under the heat (Fig. 6). This type of amphora represented more than 21% of the total quantity of ceramics in the hot rooms of the bath complex at Latrun, and more than 77% of the total quantity of amphorae from the same context.

A local production of Mid Roman 1 amphorae at Latrun, Cyrenaica

By Loïc Mazou1 and Claudio Capelli2

Libyan Studies 42 (2011)

1 University of Poitiers, France.2 DIP.TE.RIS., University of Genoa, Italy and Centre Camille Jullian, MMSH-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France. Figure 1. Location of the Latrun site in Cyrenaica.

LSJ42-073-076-LATRUN.indd 73 02/09/2011 00:43

L. Mazou and C. Capelli

74

The location of the production of MRA1 ampho-rae has been widely debated (Bonifay 2004, 146−148; Capelli and Bonifay 2007, 554). Initially considered as an African production on account of their notable pres-ence in Tripolitania, particularly at Leptis Magna (Pan-ella 1973, 471), they have also been attributed to Sicilian workshops, particularly those at Naxos in north-east-ern Sicily, following the discovery of workshops pro-ducing them (Freed and Wilson 1999, 268; Malfitana et al. 2008, 174−180; Wilson 1990, 264; Wilson 2000, 361−363). More recently, archaeometric analyses on several samples recovered in Tunisia and Tripolitania as well as in southern France have demonstrated that, for the most part, MRA1 were produced in Sicily (Capelli and Bonifay 2007, 554; Fontana et al. 2009). However, some examples from Lyon suggest the existence of a small number of workshops in North Africa, that were producing copies of this type of amphora (Capelli and Bonifay 2007, 554). Now the significant new discover-ies at Latrun demonstrate that potters imitating MRA1 amphorae also existed in Cyrenaica.

(L.M.)

Archaeometric analyses by optical microscopy (ste-reomicroscopy and thin section observation under polarizing microscope) were carried out on 30 or so samples of MR1 amphorae and other ceramics (MR8 amphorae and one lamp) recovered at Latrun (Fig. 7).

The analyses demonstrated that all the studied samples form a fairly homogeneous group in terms of fabric composition, which can be related to a single workshop or production centre.

The clay matrix is rich in iron oxide, with subor-dinate (variable) carbonate contents. The oxidation degree is high and generally homogeneous in cross-section, which gives a red to orange macroscopic colour to the pottery. Inclusions are abundant, but fine grained (there is no evidence of added temper). They are mostly composed of calcareous microfos-sils, rounded to angular micritic (fossiliferous) lime-stone fragments (up to 0.5 mm in size) and quartz inclusions (<0.1 mm). The carbonate elements are generally preserved or poorly dissociated (and often visible to the naked eye as white/yellow spots),

Figure 2. Mid Roman Amphora 1: Latrun Amphora 1a.

Figure 3. Mid Roman Amphora 1: Latrun Amphora 1b.

LSJ42-073-076-LATRUN.indd 74 02/09/2011 00:43

Latrun amphorae

75

which suggests relatively low firing temperatures (<900°C). Occasional components consist of iron-rich clay nodules, chert fragments, plagioclase feld-spar, amphibole, mica and epidote.

The raw materials used for the production are compatible with the local/regional geology, charac-terised by sedimentary sequences. It is noteworthy that the MR1 amphorae made of the possibly local (Cyrenaican) fabric can be distinguished from the other known productions of the same type located in Sicily and possibly Tunisia, which are character-ised by volcanic and metamorphic elements or aeolian quartz grains respectively (Capelli and Boni-fay 2007).

(C.C.)

Acknowledgements

Loic Mazou wishes to thank Pascale Ballet, Professor at the

University of Poitiers, for initially suggesting the existence

of a Cyrenaican MRA 1 production in 2009. Victoria Leitch is

gratefully acknowledged for help with the translation from

French to English.

Figure 4. Mid Roman Amphora 1: Latrun Amphora 1, base.

Figure 5. Mid Roman Amphora 1: Latrun Amphora 1a, rims and handles.

LSJ42-073-076-LATRUN.indd 75 02/09/2011 00:43

L. Mazou and C. Capelli

76

References

Ballet, P. and Mazou, L. 2009. Rapport préliminaire campagne 2009, Typologie et fabriques d’Apollonia à Erythron. Réflexions préliminaires sur les faciès céramiques. Unpublished report.

Bonifay, M. 2004. Etude sur la céramique romaine tardive d’Afrique. BAR Int. Ser. 1301, Archaeopress, Oxford.

Capelli, C. and Bonifay, M. 2007. Archéométrie et archéologie des céramiques africaines: une approche pluridisciplinaire. In Bonifay, M. and Tréglia, J.-C. (eds), Late Roman coarse wares, cooking wares and amphorae in the Mediterranean: archaeol-ogy and archaeometry. Vol. I. BAR Int. Ser. 1662, Archeopress, Oxford: 551−568.

Fontana, S., Ben Tahar, S. and Capelli, C. 2009. La ceram-ica tra l’età punica e la tarda antichità. In Fentress E., Drine, A. and Holod, R. (eds), An island through time: Jerba studies. Volume 1. The Punic and Roman periods. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 71. Portsmouth, Rhode Island: 241−327.

Freed, J. and Wilson, J.R.A. 1999. Sicilian Naxian Wine Amphoras: A New Look at Wine in North Africa. American Journal of Archaeology 103: 268.

Malfitana, D., Botte, E., Franco, C., Morgano, M.G., Pala-zzo, A.L., and Fragalà, G. 2008. Roman Sicily Project (“RSP”): Ceramics and Trade. A multidisciplinary approach to the study of material culture assem-blages. First overview: the transport amphorae evi-dence. Facta 2: 125−192.

Panella, C. 1973. Appunti su un gruppo di anfore della prima, media e tarda età Imperiale. In Carandini, A. and Panella, C. (eds), Ostia III Le Terme del Nuotatore. Scavo degli ambienti III, VI, VII. Scavo dell’ambiente V e di un saggio nell’area SO. Studi Miscellanei 21, Rome: 460−633.

Riley, J.A., 1979. The coarse pottery from Berenice. In Sidi Khrebish Excavations, Benghazi (Berenice), Supplements to Libya Antiqua 5, Vol. 2. Department of Antiquities, Tripoli: 91−467.

Wilson, J.R.A. 1990. Sicily under the Roman Empire. The Archaeology of the Roman Province 36 BC−AD 535. Warminster.

Wilson, J.R.A. 2000. Rural settlement in Hellenistic and Roman Sicily: excavations at Campanaio (AG), 1994−98. Papers of the British School at Rome 68: 337−369.

Figure 7. (below) Microphotographs (crossed polars) of the fabrics of two representative MR1 amphora samples (left: 9409/cyr3; right: 9414/cyr8).

Figure 6. (left) Mid Roman Amphora 1: Latrun Amphora 1a.

LSJ42-073-076-LATRUN.indd 76 02/09/2011 00:43