a maximum likelihood analysis of the cogent public dataset
DESCRIPTION
A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset. Chris Kelso University of Utah Astroparticle Physics 2014 June 25, 2014. Work in progress with: Matt Bellis, Juan Collar, and Nicole Fields. Our Analysis. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public datasetChris Kelso
University of UtahAstroparticle Physics 2014June 25, 2014
Work in progress with: Matt Bellis, Juan Collar, and Nicole Fields
![Page 2: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Our Analysis
The CoGeNT collaboration has released more than 3 years of data including the spectrum and time variation of the nuclear candidate events in their germanium detector.
We perform an unbinned, maximum likelihood fit to the data, accounting for known backgrounds and systematic effects to search for dark matter interactions with the detector.
Background and possible signals are characterized by two dimension probability distribution functions that account for energy and possible temporal variation. Additionally, we utilize the pulse rise time to model the “surface
events” which are a known contamination of the bulk events where a dark matter signal should appear.
We test several possible dark matter velocity distributions including the standard halo model employed by most direct detection experiments as well as more directional streams.
![Page 3: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A Simple Detector Schematic
Slide from Matt Bellis’ April, 2014 APS Talk
![Page 4: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Rise times are different for the two types of events
Slide from Matt Bellis’ April, 2014 APS Talk
![Page 5: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Actual Data
![Page 6: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Simulated data for the fast pulses with actual detector noise
One Log-Normal is not good fit
![Page 7: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Two Log Normals fit much better
![Page 8: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Use data to define the PDF’s in Energy
![Page 9: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Background Only Fit to the Data
Background model is good fit to the data
![Page 10: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Now Include a WIMP Signal
Does the fit improve?
![Page 11: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Including a WIMP with a Standard Halo
![Page 12: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A Sagittarius-like Stream
![Page 13: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Our Results versus Collaboration-(Collar and Fields)
arXiv: 1401.623
![Page 14: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56812d03550346895d91dc24/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Conclusions
We perform an unbinned, maximum likelihood fit to the public CoGeNT data using extensive studies to separate bulk and surface events
We find a good fit to the data with our background model The likelihood gets worse when including a WIMP component
either as a standard halo or Sagittarius like stream Still to come
Try to understand the different conclusions with the likelihood analysis performed by Collaboration – (Collar and Fields)
Look at more exotic signals (such as axion-like particles scattering from electrons)
Set upper limits on the cross section