a maximum likelihood analysis of the cogent public dataset

14
A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset Chris Kelso University of Utah Astroparticle Physics 2014 June 25, 2014 Work in progress with: Matt Bellis, Juan Collar, and Nicole Fields

Upload: cassidy-jimenez

Post on 31-Dec-2015

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset. Chris Kelso University of Utah Astroparticle Physics 2014 June 25, 2014. Work in progress with: Matt Bellis, Juan Collar, and Nicole Fields. Our Analysis. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public datasetChris Kelso

University of UtahAstroparticle Physics 2014June 25, 2014

Work in progress with: Matt Bellis, Juan Collar, and Nicole Fields

Page 2: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Our Analysis

The CoGeNT collaboration has released more than 3 years of data including the spectrum and time variation of the nuclear candidate events in their germanium detector.

We perform an unbinned, maximum likelihood fit to the data, accounting for known backgrounds and systematic effects to search for dark matter interactions with the detector.

Background and possible signals are characterized by two dimension probability distribution functions that account for energy and possible temporal variation. Additionally, we utilize the pulse rise time to model the “surface

events” which are a known contamination of the bulk events where a dark matter signal should appear.

We test several possible dark matter velocity distributions including the standard halo model employed by most direct detection experiments as well as more directional streams.

Page 3: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

A Simple Detector Schematic

Slide from Matt Bellis’ April, 2014 APS Talk

Page 4: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Rise times are different for the two types of events

Slide from Matt Bellis’ April, 2014 APS Talk

Page 5: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Actual Data

Page 6: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Simulated data for the fast pulses with actual detector noise

One Log-Normal is not good fit

Page 7: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Two Log Normals fit much better

Page 8: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Use data to define the PDF’s in Energy

Page 9: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Background Only Fit to the Data

Background model is good fit to the data

Page 10: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Now Include a WIMP Signal

Does the fit improve?

Page 11: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Including a WIMP with a Standard Halo

Page 12: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

A Sagittarius-like Stream

Page 13: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Our Results versus Collaboration-(Collar and Fields)

arXiv: 1401.623

Page 14: A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset

Conclusions

We perform an unbinned, maximum likelihood fit to the public CoGeNT data using extensive studies to separate bulk and surface events

We find a good fit to the data with our background model The likelihood gets worse when including a WIMP component

either as a standard halo or Sagittarius like stream Still to come

Try to understand the different conclusions with the likelihood analysis performed by Collaboration – (Collar and Fields)

Look at more exotic signals (such as axion-like particles scattering from electrons)

Set upper limits on the cross section