a new context supporting ph.d. completion: a longitudinal study of 20 doctoral programs a new...

13
A New Context Supporting Ph.D. A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs Programs Howard E. Jackson University of Cincinnati Council of Graduate Schools December 10, 2004

Upload: ava-parker

Post on 27-Mar-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion:A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion:

A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral ProgramsA Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs

Howard E. Jackson

University of Cincinnati

Council of Graduate SchoolsDecember 10, 2004

Page 2: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Acknowledgements:Acknowledgements:

Robert FrankAssociate Dean

Eleanor BuczalaSenior Assistant Dean

Page 3: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Comments for CGS …Comments for CGS …

We are data driven…

Some simple data

Some simple data re-examined

Some simple data not in place

Some more complex data we wish

Page 4: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Some Simple DataSome Simple Data

University of Cincinnati Ph.D. completion data for entering cohorts 1992-1997 (as of 9/04)

English …………… 69.2%

College of Medicine (8 departments) … 66.8%

Psychology ............. 64.3%

Criminal Justice .... 62.3%

College of Engineering (9 programs) ....... 57.7%

Page 5: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Simple Data – displayed differentlySimple Data – displayed differently

Program PhDs Completed in 6 YearsPhDs Completed To DateYear n n Percent n Percent

Engineering 1992-93 109 42 38.53% 61 55.96%1993-94 78 44 56.41% 58 74.36%1994-95 86 55 63.95% 64 74.42%1995-96 96 45 46.88% 49 51.04%1996-97 95 34 35.79% 41 43.16%1997-98 85 42 49.41% 44 51.76% 57.74%1998-99 92 34 36.96% 34 36.96%1999-00 89 29 32.58% 29 32.58%

Average 91.3 40.6 44.52% 47.5 52.05%

Entering

Page 6: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Simple Data Reexamined …Simple Data Reexamined …

UC Engineering PhDs to date1992 - 1999 entering cohorts

32

75

139

88

3316

4 20

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Years to Degree

Nu

mb

er

of

Stu

de

nts

Page 7: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Simple Data Reexamined …Simple Data Reexamined …

Astonishing: 32 students completed in 3 years!

Implies

Terrifically talented engineering students

Or a difficulty – a definitional difficulty –

with the data

Page 8: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

Simple Data Reexamined: COESimple Data Reexamined: COE

Does one count from year of entry into the University?

Does one count from time of Masters degree completion?

University database does not have a field for when a student is admitted to candidacy(!)

Page 9: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

More Complex Data More Complex Data Longitudinal DataLongitudinal Data

Change over time can be observed

Quantitative data

Qualitative data

Data collection by a neutral third

party: Institute for Policy Research

Page 10: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

More Complex Data More Complex Data Longitudinal Data - Longitudinal Data - QuantitativeQuantitative

Student demographics, admissions, academic data, et al.

Survey data from students on attitudes, expectations goals, …

Information on student progress from graduate program directors and major professors.

Page 11: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

More Complex Data More Complex Data Longitudinal Data - Longitudinal Data - QualitativeQualitative

Taped in-depth individual interviews with 50 entering students

Interviewed by specially trained Graduate Research Assistants

Graduate Program Directors will be interviewed by IPR staff

Data will be analyzed using qualitative methods

Page 12: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

A Qualitative/Quantitative Longitudinal Database

Program for Graduate ProgramDirectors

GraduateRecruitmentWeekend

EarlyProfessionalEngagement

Flex ProgramEvaluation

Enhanced TeachingOpportunities

A Panoply of Existinginitiatives

Presently Imagined Interventions …Presently Imagined Interventions …

Page 13: A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study of 20 Doctoral Programs A New Context Supporting Ph.D. Completion: A Longitudinal Study

In Summary …In Summary …

Data is good!

Good data is better!

Complex longitudinal data is best!