a new series of high frequency core loss measurement methods€¦ · 08/02/2012 · center for...
TRANSCRIPT
A New Series of High Frequency Core Loss Measurement Methods
1APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Mingkai Mu, Fred C. Lee Center for Power Electronics Systems
Virginia Tech
February 8, 2012
Increasing Frequency for High Power Density
Frequency
10MHz
Enpirion (9A)
Maxim (3.6A)TI
(1A)
TI(1A)
2APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Year
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
1MHz
100kHz
Linear (8A)
(1A)Maxim (10A)
Delta (15A)Power-one ( 15A)
103
104
Bm=20mTC
ore
Loss
Den
sity
(kW
/m3 )
Core Loss Map for Magnetic Materials
3APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
102
103
10410
1
102
Frequency (kHz)
Cor
e Lo
ss D
ensi
ty (
kW/m
Iron Powder Ferrite Flake Alloy Thin Film
Outlines
• Overview
• Existing core loss measurement methods
• Proposed core loss measurement methods– For sinusoidal excitations
– For general excitations
4APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
– For general excitations
• Conclusion
Core Loss Measurement Method I
pc m TP
dt
⋅ ⋅∆=
ProsArbitrary excitation
5APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Block Diagram of Closed Type Calorimeter
*Chucheng Xiao, Gang Chen and .G.Odendaal, “Overview of Power Loss Measurement Techniques in Power Electronics Systems”, Industry Applications Conference, 2002
Cons•Setup is complex and time consuming.•Not good for low power measurement•If use winding to excite the core, winding resistance can be hardly separated.
Liω
i
Cω
Core Loss Measurement Method II
Choose C to resonant with L at the measured frequency,
i
6APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Choose C to resonant with L at the measured frequency, so voltage on L and C cancel each other.
*Yehui Han, Grace Cheung, An Li, Charles R. Sullivan† and David J. Perreault, “Evaluation of Magnetic Materials for Very High Frequency Power Applications”, Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2008.
11
( )
cout pk
in pk core cu c core cu c
RV j C
V R R R C R R Rω
ω−
−
+= ≈
+ + + +
Pros.Minimize phase error.
Cons.•Hard to exclude winding loss•C value is critical•Sinusoidal waveform only
1 in pkcore cu c
out pk
VR R R
C Vω−
−
≈ − −
Core Loss Measurement Method III
7APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
mL1
22
(( ) )coreref
R
T
Nv t
RtP v
fdt
N= ∫
iR
Equivalent Circuit model
Calculation
*Thottuvelil, V.J.; Wilson, T.G.; Owen, H.A., Jr.; , "High-frequency measurement techniques for magnetic cores," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on , vol.5, no.1, pp.41-53, Jan 1990
22
(1
)e T
BN
v t dtA
= ∫
mL
Limitation: Sensitivity to Phase Discrepancy
1° discrepancyFor a film resistor of 2 ohm, if the ESL is 0.5nH, it will cause 0.9° discrepancy at 5MHz.
iRvR
v
8APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Phase angle betweenV2 and IR
1° discrepancy
Phase angle between V2 and IR
% P
owe
r E
rror
1° phase discrepancy
it will cause 0.9° discrepancy at 5MHz.v2iR
vR
ϕϕ ∆⋅=∆ − )tan( iv
Sources of Phase Discrepancy
Phase Discrepancy
9APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Mismatch betweenprobes
Sample rate limitation
Pros•Exclude winding loss.•Arbitrary waveform.
Cons•Sensitive to phase error. So not suitable for high frequency core loss measurement
Outlines
• Overview
• Existing core loss measurement methods
• Proposed core loss measurement methods– For sinusoidal excitations
– For general excitations
10APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
– For general excitations
• Conclusion
Proposed New Method I-- capacitive cancellation
11APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
* Mingkai Mu, Qiang Li, David Gilham, Fred C. Lee, Khai D.T. Ngo, “New core loss measurement method for high frequency magnetic materials”, Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Sept. 2010, pp. 4384 – 4389.
IR
3
1( )core m R
r
V R j L j IC
ωω
= + −
0 31 T
core RP dtT
V I= ∫Cr is used to cancel the observed reactive voltage seen by the probe.
V3
0 31 T
coreref
RP dtTR
v v= ∫
Proposed New Method I (cont’)-- capacitive cancellation
Tune the capacitor value
12APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Phase anglePhase angle between V2 and IR
% P
owe
r E
rror
1° phase discrepancy
Phase angle between V3 and IRGiven 1 ° phase discrepancy, 30° phase angle is enough to reduce phase error below 1%
V3
VR
Tune the capacitor value
Measurement Setup
Core material: NiZn ferrite (4F1)Number of Turns: 14:14Core Cross section area: A=5.98*10-6m2
Average flux path length: l=7.19 cmOsc-scope: Tek TDS7054
Hot plate
13APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
core under test immersed in thermal oil
OscilloscopePower Input
Working Waveform
V2
VR
V
VR (current sensing)
V2 (secondary side)
14APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
mL
rC
V3 V3 (cancelled voltage)
Measurement Result @ 10MHz
4F1 (NiZn Ferrite) @100 °C
103
104
Cor
e Lo
ss D
ensi
ty Pv
(kW
/m3 )
15APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Datasheet Result@100°CWithout Cap (conventional method) @100°CWith Cap (new method) @ 100°C。。。。
+
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 20 3010
1
102
Cor
e Lo
ss D
ensi
ty
Peak Flux Density Bm (mT)
Factors May Influence Accuracy
• Phase Error– This error can be minimized when Cr resonates at
excitation frequency.
• Resonant Cap ESR– An additional resistor is in series with the Rc, Lm, C branch.
16APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
– An additional resistor is in series with the Rc, Lm, C branch.
• Parasitic Capacitor– These parasitic capacitors (inter- and intra-winding
capacitor and probe loading effect) will introduce a small current on the secondary side.
Improved Circuit to Reduce the Probe Loading Effect
1lL 2lL
mL
C
i1
C
17APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
rC
Measure the voltage on resonant cap, instead of the voltage of transformer’s secondary. So it merges the parasitic cap into the resonant cap, and has less loading effect by probe input cap.
probeC
Choke
Choke
Test Setup with DC Bias Field
+_AC voltage
18APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Add Winding for DC Pre-magnetization
2 choke mL L>>Two Choke inductance should be large enough to block AC current
Improved Scheme
+_AC voltage
_
19APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
+
_AC voltage
The AC voltage seen by the DC current source is minimized.
Mingkai Mu, Yipeng Su, Qiang Li, Fred C. Lee, "Magnetic Characterization of Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC) Ferrite Materials for High Frequency Power Converters", Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Sept. 2011, pp. 2133 - 2138.
Yongtao Han, Yan-Fei Liu, "A Practical Transformer Core Loss Measurement Scheme for High-Frequency Power Converter", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2008, pp. 941-948.
1lL 2lL
mL
Limited for Sinusoidal Excitation
*
20APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
3
1( )core m R
r
V R j L j IC
ωω
= + −
The capacitor can only cancel the reactive voltage at a single frequency.
1lL 2lL
mL
Proposed New Method II-- Inductive Cancellation
*
21APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
3 ( )core m RV R j L j L Iω ω= − − +
31
2core
reR
f T
N fP dt
N Rvv= ∫
V3
Phase angleV2VR
Using inductor, we can still cancel the observed reactive voltage.Mingkai Mu, Fred C. Lee, Qiang Li, David Gilham, Khai D.T. Ngo, "A high frequency core loss measurement method for arbitrary excitations", Applied Power Electronics Conference, 2011, pg.157-162.
1lL 2lL
mL
Proposed Method II (cont’)-- Compatible with Arbitrary Waveform
*
22APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
3 ( )core m RV R j L j L Iω ω= − − +
For this method, a high Q inductor is needed in order to reduce the error introduced by the loss of the inductor.
When L = Lm, the reactive voltage is cancelled out, leaving only the voltage on resistor.
1lL 2lL
Using Air Core or Low -loss Core Transformer’s Magnetizing Inductor
Core under test
23APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Using the magnetizing inductance of air core or low loss core to eliminate the error caused by winding resistance.
Air core transformer or Low core loss transformer
From another perspective, the principle is to compare the core loss of DUT with the reference core.
Reference Core
Choice 2: Low loss coreAdvantage: smaller parasiticsDisadvantage: hard to find if measure low
loss material
Choice 1: Air coreAdvantage: no core lossDisadvantage: larger parasitic capacitance
and inductance
24APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
loss material not convenient to adjust inductance value.
Choice 3: Low loss core with adjustable air gapAdvantage: smaller parasitics
easy to adjust inductance valueDisadvantage: hard to find if measure low
loss material
Excitation
25APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
The circuit is excited by the function generator signal amplified by power amplifier.
The power amplifier has 50Ω internal impedance, so an impedance transformer is needed to reduce the voltage drop on the internal impedance.
Programmable function generator is used to generate desired waveforms.
Test ExampleCore-under-test and Reference Core
LTCC 40011 (ESL®) 4F1 (Ferroxcube®)
102
103
104
Core Loss @ 1.5MHz Sinusoidal Excitation*
26APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Toroid 4F1 N1:N2=9:9Ae=11.88mm2
le=24.5mmve=291mm3
1
4 14 1
1 4 1
1
2.81
LTCCLTCC eLTCC
FF
e F
v dtB n A
B v dtN A
= =∫
∫
LTCC 40011 (ESL®)Core sample
4F1 (Ferroxcube®)Reference
Toroid LTCC 40011n1:n2=10:10Ae=3.82mm2
le=64.5mmve=246.4mm3
100
101
102
101
*The core loss data is measured using the capacitive cancellation.
Core loss in 4F1 core is much smaller than LTCC 40011.
Measurement Setup
LTCC 40011
4F1
Test circuit
27APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
Test LTCC 40011 using 4F1
Hot plate
LTCC 40011 in oil bath
Impedance transformer
Measurement WaveformsSinusoidal Voltage
VR (current sensing)
V3 (cancelled voltage)
V2 (secondary side)
28APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
V3 (cancelled voltage)
Core Loss of Sinusoidal Excitation
103
104
Measured core loss with capacitive and inductive cancellation
29APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 3010
1
102
Peak Flux Density B (mT)
Method with Capacitor
Method with Transformer
*1.5MHz, 100°C
Measurement WaveformsRectangular Voltage (50% Duty Cycle)
VR (current sensing)
V3 (cancelled voltage)
V2 (secondary side)
30APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
V3 (cancelled voltage)
Measurement WaveformsRectangular Voltage (25% Duty Cycle)
VR (current sensing)
V3 (cancelled voltage)
V2 (secondary side)
31APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
V3 (cancelled voltage)
Core Loss of LTCC 40011 Rectangular Voltage Waveforms of Different Duty Cycles
1.3
1.4
1.5
32APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
Conclusion
• A new series of high frequency core loss measurementmethods are proposed, which excludes winding loss andreduce phase discrepancy sensitivity.
• The principle is using capacitor or inductor to cancel thereactivevoltageseenby the probeto reducethe sensitivity to
33APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
reactivevoltageseenby the probeto reducethe sensitivity tophase error. The capacitor version is good for sinusoidalexcitation; the inductor version is broad-band, so it canmeasure the core loss of general waveforms.
Conclusion (cont’)
• For capacitor version, high Q capacitor is needed to reduce theESR induced error. For inductor version, the reference core isimportant for this measurement. Air core, lowloss core or airgapped core should be selected according to the core undertest. Adjustable capacitor or transformer will make themeasurement more easier.
34APEC 2012February 8 , 2012Orlando, FL
• With this newseries of methods, high frequency core loss canbe accurately measured at different excitations. The core lossmeasurement problemcan be addressed for power electronicsapplications and material science research.