a pilot study of biomonitoring ambient genotoxic exposure of children
DESCRIPTION
A PILOT STUDY OF BIOMONITORING AMBIENT GENOTOXIC EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN. L. Anna , B. Schoket, E. Győrffy, E. Erdei, P. Rudnai National Institute of Environmental Health, József Fodor National Centre for Public Health, Budapest, Hungary. AIM OF THE STUDY. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A PILOT STUDY OF BIOMONITORING AMBIENT GENOTOXIC EXPOSURE
OF CHILDREN
A PILOT STUDY OF BIOMONITORING AMBIENT GENOTOXIC EXPOSURE
OF CHILDREN
L. Anna, B. Schoket, E. Győrffy, E. Erdei, P. Rudnai
National Institute of Environmental Health,
József Fodor National Centre for Public Health,
Budapest, Hungary
L. Anna, B. Schoket, E. Győrffy, E. Erdei, P. Rudnai
National Institute of Environmental Health,
József Fodor National Centre for Public Health,
Budapest, Hungary
AIM OF THE STUDYAIM OF THE STUDY
• To assess genotoxic exposure of children
to air pollution
• To explore the suitability of aromatic DNA adducts
as a biomarker of genotoxic exposure of children
• To assess genotoxic exposure of children
to air pollution
• To explore the suitability of aromatic DNA adducts
as a biomarker of genotoxic exposure of children
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDYEPIDEMIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
• Investigation of the respiratory health of 1800 children of 8 to 10 years of age (Nov-Dec 1998)
• Six towns in Hungary, three of those with elevated air pollution
• Exposure and health questionnaires filled in by the parents
• Investigation of the respiratory health of 1800 children of 8 to 10 years of age (Nov-Dec 1998)
• Six towns in Hungary, three of those with elevated air pollution
• Exposure and health questionnaires filled in by the parents
STUDY POPULATION FOR THE BIOMONITORING STUDY
STUDY POPULATION FOR THE BIOMONITORING STUDY
Exposure categories
Polluted towns Control towns
ETS & Traffic ETS & TrafficETS only ETS onlyTraffic only Traffic onlyNo ETS & No traffic No ETS & No traffic
Exposure categories
Polluted towns Control towns
ETS & Traffic ETS & TrafficETS only ETS onlyTraffic only Traffic onlyNo ETS & No traffic No ETS & No traffic
N = 105N = 105
METHODOLOGYMETHODOLOGY
• Isolation of DNA from frozen whole blood (ca. 1.5 ml)
• Detection of aromatic DNA adducts by 32P-postlabelling
• Radioactivity measurement by electronic autoradiograph
• Statistical analyses by Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test
• Isolation of DNA from frozen whole blood (ca. 1.5 ml)
• Detection of aromatic DNA adducts by 32P-postlabelling
• Radioactivity measurement by electronic autoradiograph
• Statistical analyses by Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test
STRUCTURE OF BENZO[A]PYRENE DIOL-EPOXIDE-DNA ADDUCT
STRUCTURE OF BENZO[A]PYRENE DIOL-EPOXIDE-DNA ADDUCT
TYPICAL TWO-DIMENSIONAL DNA ADDUCT MAPS FROM CHILDREN’S BLOOD
a
ed
cb
f Blank
PERCENTAGE OF BLOOD SAMPLES WITH DNA ADDUCT SPOTS IN THE
POLLUTED AND CONTROL TOWNS
PERCENTAGE OF BLOOD SAMPLES WITH DNA ADDUCT SPOTS IN THE
POLLUTED AND CONTROL TOWNS
Pollute
d (49)
Control (
56)
Pollute
d (49)
Control (
56)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAIN SPOT SECONDARY SPOT
Yes
No
Det
ecta
ble
sp
ot
(% o
f al
l sam
ple
s)
Pollute
d (49)
Control (
56)
Pollute
d (49)
Control (
56)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAIN SPOT SECONDARY SPOT
Yes
No
Det
ecta
ble
sp
ot
(% o
f al
l sam
ple
s)
PERCENTAGE OF BLOOD SAMPLES WITH
DNA ADDUCT SPOTS
PERCENTAGE OF BLOOD SAMPLES WITH
DNA ADDUCT SPOTS
POLLUTED TOWNSPOLLUTED TOWNS CONTROL TOWNSCONTROL TOWNS
ETS&Traffi
c (18)
ETS only
(13)
Traffi
c only
(10)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (8)
ETS&Traffi
c (18)
ETS only
(13)
Traffi
c only
(10)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (8)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAIN SPOT SECONDARY SPOT
Yes
No
Det
ecta
ble
sp
ot
(% o
f al
l sam
ple
s)
ETS&Traffi
c (7)
ETS only
(11)
Traffi
c only
(8)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (30)
ETS&Traffi
c (7)
ETS only
(11)
Traffi
c only
(8)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (30)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAIN SPOT SECONDARY SPOT
Yes
No
Det
ecta
ble
sp
ot
(% o
f al
l sam
ple
s)
ETS&Traffi
c (18)
ETS only
(13)
Traffi
c only
(10)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (8)
ETS&Traffi
c (18)
ETS only
(13)
Traffi
c only
(10)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (8)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAIN SPOT SECONDARY SPOT
Yes
No
Det
ecta
ble
sp
ot
(% o
f al
l sam
ple
s)
ETS&Traffi
c (7)
ETS only
(11)
Traffi
c only
(8)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (30)
ETS&Traffi
c (7)
ETS only
(11)
Traffi
c only
(8)
No ETS&No T
raffi
c (30)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAIN SPOT SECONDARY SPOT
Yes
No
Det
ecta
ble
sp
ot
(% o
f al
l sam
ple
s)
ODDS RATIOS FOR DNA ADDUCT FORMATION
DUE TO ELEVATED AIR POLLUTION
(Main adduct spot)
ODDS RATIOS FOR DNA ADDUCT FORMATION
DUE TO ELEVATED AIR POLLUTION
(Main adduct spot)
Exposure OD 95% CI P
Polluted vs. Control 2.59 1.17 - 5.73 0.029
Polluted, ETS & Traffic vs.Control, No ETS & No Traffic 5.20 1.44 – 18.72 0.016
Exposure OD 95% CI P
Polluted vs. Control 2.59 1.17 - 5.73 0.029
Polluted, ETS & Traffic vs.Control, No ETS & No Traffic 5.20 1.44 – 18.72 0.016
INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN AROMATIC DNA ADDUCT
LEVELS IN BLOOD SAMPLES FROM CHILDREN
INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN AROMATIC DNA ADDUCT
LEVELS IN BLOOD SAMPLES FROM CHILDRENValues for the main adduct spotValues for the main adduct spot
Polluted townsPolluted towns Control townsControl towns
ETS&Traf
fic (1
8)
ETS (13)
Traf
fic (1
0)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic (8
)
ETS&Traf
fic (7
)
ETS (11)
Traf
fic (8
)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic(3
0)0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
DN
A a
dd
uc
ts/1
08
nu
cle
oti
de
s
ETS&Traf
fic (1
8)
ETS (13)
Traf
fic (1
0)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic (8
)
ETS&Traf
fic (7
)
ETS (11)
Traf
fic (8
)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic(3
0)0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
DN
A a
dd
uc
ts/1
08
nu
cle
oti
de
s
P=0.02for theMeans
P=0.02for theMeans
AROMATIC DNA ADDUCT LEVELS IN BLOOD SAMPLES FROM CHILDRENAROMATIC DNA ADDUCT LEVELS IN BLOOD SAMPLES FROM CHILDREN
Polluted townsPolluted towns Control townsControl towns
P=0.002P=0.002** **
Values for the main spot (Mean ± SD)Values for the main spot (Mean ± SD)
ETS&Traf
fic (1
8)
ETS (13)
Traf
fic (1
0)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic (8
)
ETS&Traf
fic (7
)
ETS (11)
Traf
fic (8
)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic(3
0)0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
DN
A a
dd
uc
ts/1
08
nu
cle
oti
de
s
ETS&Traf
fic (1
8)
ETS (13)
Traf
fic (1
0)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic (8
)
ETS&Traf
fic (7
)
ETS (11)
Traf
fic (8
)
NoETS&NoTraf
fic(3
0)0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
DN
A a
dd
uc
ts/1
08
nu
cle
oti
de
s
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
• DNA adducts were detectable from frozen whole blood
• Detection limit was as low as 0.02-0.07 adducts in 108 nucleotides
• Two characteristic distinct adduct spots were related to the exposure
• Statistically significant difference was observed in DNA damage between the highest and lowest exposure categories
• Aromatic DNA adduct was a sensitive biomarker of genotoxic exposure of children to air pollution
• DNA adducts were detectable from frozen whole blood
• Detection limit was as low as 0.02-0.07 adducts in 108 nucleotides
• Two characteristic distinct adduct spots were related to the exposure
• Statistically significant difference was observed in DNA damage between the highest and lowest exposure categories
• Aromatic DNA adduct was a sensitive biomarker of genotoxic exposure of children to air pollution