a planning application by lovell partnerships ltd application/693… · october 2016 a planning...

150
October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Transport Assessment

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

October 2016

A Planning Application by

LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD

In respect of

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Transport Assessment

txgou
20160395
txgou
Amended
Page 2: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 i

DOCUMENT SIGNATURE AND REVIEW SHEET

Project Details

Project Title: GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Project No.: 1411-88 Report No.: 1411-88/TA/01 Rev D

Client: Lovell Partnerships Ltd

Prepared By: Checked By: Approved for issue

Name Jack Williams Ian Bryant Julian Clarke

Signature JW IB JC

Date 07/07/15 07/07/15 07/07/15

Document Review

Revision Date Description Checked By

A

B

C

D

09/07/15

27/11/15

02/03/16

14/10/16

Revisions made following comments

from planning consultant

Revised Site Masterplan

Update to Site Masterplan

Further Site Masterplan revisions

IB

IB

JW

JW

Issued by:

Bristol Transport Planning Associates Cambridge Sheraton House Cardiff Castle Park London Cambridge Oxford CB3 0AX Welwyn Garden City

01223 370135 [email protected]

www.tpa.uk.com

Page 3: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 ii

CONTENTS PAGE

1 INTRODUCTION 1

Report Structure

2 PLANNING POLICY 2

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

The Broadland District Local Plan

Joint Core Strategy (JCS) for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk

Norfolk County Council Local Transport Plan (LTP)

Norwich Area Transport Strategy (NATS)

Northern Distributor Road

3 SITE CONTEXT 6

Site Location

Pedestrian and Cycle Infrastructure

Passenger Transport

Local Facilities and Services

Local Highway Safety

Local Highway Network

Existing Traffic Flows

4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 12

Proposed Development

Pedestrian and Cycle Infrastructure

Vehicular Access

Car and Cycle Parking

5 TRIP GENERATION 15

6 FORECAST TRAFFIC FLOWS 17

Forecast Base 2021 Traffic Flows

Development Traffic Flows

Total Forecast 2021 Traffic Flows

7 HIGHWAY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 19

Existing Junction Operation

Forecast Junction Operation

Stopping-up of Broad Lane – Sensitivity Test

8 CONCLUSION 23

Page 4: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Broadland parking standards

Table 3.1 Summary of local bus services Table 3.2 Summary of rail services from Salhouse station Table 3.3 Local facilities and services Table 3.4 Road traffic collisions - summary table Table 4.1 Indicative development schedule

Table 5.1 Multi-modal trip rates Table 5.2 Multi-modal trip generations – 157 dwellings Table 5.3 Wroxham ward Census 2011 travel to work data Table 6.1 TEMPRO traffic growth factors to 2021 Table 7.1 ARCADY – Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West – surveyed

Table 7.2 ARCADY – Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West – calibrated Table 7.3 ARCADY – Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West – 2021

Table 7.4 ARCADY – Stopping-up of Broad Lane – sensitivity test

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 3.1 Site location

Figure 3.2 Surveyed AM peak traffic flows

Figure 3.3 Surveyed PM peak traffic flows

Figure 6.1 Forecast base (2021) AM peak traffic flows

Figure 6.2 Forecast base (2021) PM peak traffic flows

Figure 6.3 Development AM peak traffic flows

Figure 6.4 Development PM peak traffic flows

Figure 6.5 Total forecast (2021) AM peak traffic flows

Figure 6.6 Total forecast (2021) PM peak traffic flows

Figure 7.1 Re-distributed traffic flow assumptions

LIST OF APPENDICES

A NDR Salhouse Road junction

B Traffic surveys

C Indicative site layout

D General access arrangements

E Access junction visibility splays

F Access junction swept paths

G TRICS report

H Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West modelling output

I Stopping-up modelling output

Page 5: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 1 of 23

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Transport Planning Associates has been commissioned by Lovell Partnerships Ltd to

provide transport planning advice to support a residential development at land off Green

Lane East, Rackheath.

1.2 The site is bounded to the northeast and east by Green Lane East and to the northwest by

Salhouse Road, whilst a continuous hedgerow bounds the western and southern sides of

the site. It is currently situated on agricultural land, whilst further arable lane surrounds its

western and southern perimeters.

1.3 The development proposal is for 157 homes comprised of 105 open market dwellings and

52 affordable dwellings. Vehicular access will be provided off Green Lane East where

pedestrian provision will also be made. A shared use footway / cycleway will also be

provided on Green Lane East, running adjacent to the application site.

Report Structure

1.4 The following structure has been applied to this report:

Chapter 2: Planning Policy;

Chapter 3: Site Context;

Chapter 4: Development Proposal;

Chapter 5: Trip Generation;

Chapter 6: Forecast Traffic Flows;

Chapter 7: Highway Impact Assessment; and

Chapter 8: Conclusion.

Page 6: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 2 of 23

2 PLANNING POLICY

2.1 This section of the Transport Assessment sets out national and local planning policies that

are considered relevant to the development proposal insofar that they concern transport

matters.

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

2.2 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) sets out the Government’s policy which

informs local authorities and developers regarding future development.

2.3 When referring to the need for supporting evidence in relation to transport when planning a

new development, the NPPF states:

“All development that generates significant amounts of movement should be

supported by a Transport Statement or Transport Assessment. Plans and

decisions should take account of whether:

The opportunities for the sustainable transport modes have been taken

up depending on the nature and location of the site, to reduce the need

for major transport infrastructure;

Safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all people; and

Improvements can be undertaken within the transport network that cost

effectively limit the significant impacts of the development.

Development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds

where the residual impacts of the development are severe.”(Paragraph

32)

2.4 The NPPF outlines that local authorities should seek to provide the infrastructure necessary

to support sustainable economic growth, and with respect to planning decisions key

considerations include ensuring that opportunities for travel by sustainable modes are taken

up, safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved and measures to cater for the

residual impacts can be undertaken, in order to limit the significant impacts of development.

The Broadland District Local Plan

2.5 The Broadland District Local Plan was adopted in May 2006. It contains the policies and

proposals for development in the district. The Local Plan provides policy guidance for

developers and the council’s own development management service on where and what

kind of development may be permitted.

2.6 The transport objectives deriving from the Local Plan include:

Page 7: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 3 of 23

To promote an efficient and safe transport network and to assist in the

implementation of a comprehensive transport strategy for Broadland;

To locate major development where it is highly accessible for pedestrians and

cyclists and has a good level of public transport service provision;

To promote improved provision for non-motorised users; and

To minimise the adverse effects of traffic and the environment.

2.7 Policies from the Broadland Local Plan which concern transport include:

TRA 4: Within new developments suitable provision will be made for pedestrians

and the quality of the existing pedestrian environment should be enhanced where

possible;

TRA 5: Within new developments safe and coherent provision will be made for

cyclists and the quality of the cycling environment should be enhanced where

possible; and

TRA 7: Where clearly justified developers will be expected to enter into an

agreement to contribute to the appropriate public transport provision.

Parking standards

2.8 Car parking standards for residential developments are stipulated in the Broadland District

Local Plan. Table 2.1 below presents maximum car parking standards based on the number

of bedrooms per dwelling.

Table 2.1 Broadland parking standards

Dwelling size Maximum car parking

1 bedroom Average of 1.5 spaces per unit

2 or 3 bedrooms 2 spaces per unit

4 or more bedrooms 3 spaces per unit

2.9 The standards also indicate that average car ownership per dwelling is 1.6 vehicles within

the region.

2.10 The Local Plan has been replaced by the Joint Core Strategy (JCS) for Broadland, Norwich

and South Norfolk.

Joint Core Strategy (JCS) for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk

2.11 The Joint Core Strategy (JCS) is one of the key policy documents that make up the Local

Development Framework within Norwich. The document has been prepared by the three

Page 8: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 4 of 23

councils of Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk, working together with Norfolk County

Council as the Greater Norwich Development Partnership (GNDP).

2.12 The JCS sets out the long-term vision and objectives for the area, including strategic

policies for steering and shaping development up to 2026.

2.13 Policy 6 within the JCS aims to enhance the role of Norwich as a Regional Transport Node,

particularly through the implementation of the Norwich Area Transportation Strategy (NATS)

and will improve access to rural areas. This will be achieved by:

Implementation of the Norwich Area Transportation Strategy (NATS) including

construction of the Northern Distributor Road (NDR);

Upgrading the bus, cycling and walking network, including Bus Rapid Transit on key

routes in the Norwich area;

Enhancing the Norwich Park & Ride system;

Promoting improvement of rail services, including improved journey time and

reliability to London and Cambridge, and innovative use of the local rail network;

Provision of an A140 Long Stratton Bypass;

Promoting improvements to the A11 and A47;

Focusing development near to essential services to encourage walking and cycling

as the primary means of travel with public transport for wider access; and

Continuing to improve public transport accessibility to and between Main Towns and

Key Service Centres.

North East Growth Triangle

2.14 Changes to the JCS were adopted in January 2014 to include the North East Growth

Triangle (NEGT) in the Broadland Part of the Norwich Policy Area. This area for growth

includes Old Catton, Sprowston, Rackheath and Thorpe St Andrew. The Growth Triangle

AAP was adopted in July 2016.

2.15 This location will deliver an urban extension on both sides of the Northern Distributor Road

(NDR). Complete delivery of the extension is dependent on implementation of the NDR.

However, there is scope for partial delivery, the precise extent of which will be assessed

through the Area Action Plan which is being produced by the Broadland District Council.

2.16 The structure of the local geography suggests that this new community will take the form of

a series of inter-related new villages or quarters and will include:

at least 7,000 dwellings (rising to a total of at least 10,000 dwellings after 2026);

a district centre based around an accessible ‘high street’ and including a new library,

education and health facilities;

new pre-school provision and up to six new primary schools plus a new secondary

school with an initial phase to open as early as possible. To facilitate early provision

the early phases of development will concentrate on family housing;

Page 9: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 5 of 23

new employment allocations for local needs including expansion of the Rackheath

employment area;

Bus Rapid Transit to the city centre, possibly via Salhouse Road and Gurney Road,

and a choice of safe and direct cycle routes to the centre;

safe and direct cycle and pedestrian routes, and orbital bus services, to Broadland

Business Park, Rackheath employment area, airport employment areas and to the

surrounding countryside; and

new rail halts at Rackheath and Broadland Business Park.

Growth Triangle Area Action Plan (AAP) – Land Allocation

2.17 The Area Action Plan incorporates proposed allocations of land within the Growth Triangle.

Policy Allocation GT19 identifies the proposed development site to the south of Green Lane

East as land allocated for residential development.

2.18 The following conditions are proposed for future development at this location:

The provision of residential development including 33% affordable housing;

Pedestrian and cycle links across the frontage of the site;

Landscape masterplan prior to development should include: recreational areas and

public space and extensive landscaping along the western edge of the site adjacent

to the route of the NDR; and

Appropriate noise assessment to identify any appropriate mitigation necessary to

offset the impact of the operation of the NDR.

Norfolk County Council Local Transport Plan (LTP)

2.19 This Local Transport Plan defines Norfolk County Council's transport strategy for the period

2006 to 2021. The LTP overall vision for the Norfolk area is:

“Norfolk is a well-connected place in which to live and do business and to visit,

and is known as a national leader in making the transport system safer and

reducing the impact transport has on climate change and the wider

environment.”

2.20 The strategic approach within the LTP is to reduce the need to travel and encourage and

support people and businesses to get to destinations in a more sustainable manner while

reducing congestion, protecting the environment and enhancing road safety.

2.21 The main strategies that come through within the LTP are:

Delivering sustainable growth - Integrating spatial, economic and transport planning

by improving accessibility to reduce the remoteness of Norwich. In particular, by

improving road network connections and public transport within sub-regions; and

Page 10: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 6 of 23

Improving accessibility through enhancing local connections and promoting better

accessibility to jobs and services especially by public transport, walking and cycling.

2.22 The LTP recognises that Norwich is an area where growth will be focused and identifies the

importance of:

Providing essential infrastructure, including a NDR and improvements to the A11

and A47 trunk roads, needed to accommodate growth and support the development

of the Norwich area as a sustainable community; and

Supporting Norwich’s role as a Regional Interchange Centre and the role of

surrounding market towns.

Norwich Area Transport Strategy (NATS)

2.23 The NATS document details a transportation strategy for the Norwich Area until 2021. The

strategy has been prepared by Norfolk County Council, in partnership with Norwich City

Council, Broadland District Council and South Norfolk Council.

2.24 The policies within the strategy relating to transport include:

Improving accessibility in the Norwich area by improving facilities for all modes of

transport, improving access and accommodating growth in the number of trips by

means other than the car (Policy 8);

Improving facilities for pedestrians and cyclists (Policies 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14);

Improving public transport routes, information, frequency and reliability (Policies 15,

16, 17,18, 19, 20 & 21);

Improving traffic movement through policies on combating congestion (Policy 46 -

56); and

Providing access for everyone through appropriately designed infrastructure and

promoting buses with access for people with disabilities (Policies 75 – 80).

Northern Distributor Road

2.25 The NDR is a new 20 kilometre bypass linking the A47 to the south east of Norwich to the

proposed Eco-town and to Norwich International Airport to the north. On the 1st June 2015 it

won development consent after the transport secretary concluded there was a ‘compelling

case in the public interest’ for the scheme. It has been designed to relieve congestion and

spur development to the north of Norwich. The work on the road has now commenced and

the completion date is February 2018.

2.26 The new dual carriageway will run to the west of the proposed development site and a new

4-arm roundabout junction will be developed, linking directly with Salhouse Road. A plan

which illustrated the location of the consented junction in relation to Green Lane East and

the development site is provided at Appendix A.

3 SITE CONTEXT

Page 11: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 7 of 23

3.1 This section of the report highlights the application site in terms of the local highway network

and describes the existing opportunities for pedestrians, cyclists and passenger transport

users. It also outlines local services and facilities currently provided within the vicinity of the

site.

Site Location

3.2 The application site is located within the village of Rackheath to the northeast of Norwich. It

is bounded to the northeast and east by Green Lane East and to the northwest by Salhouse

Road, whilst a continuous shelter belt of mature trees bounds the western and southern

sides of the site.

3.3 The site is currently situated on agricultural land, whilst further arable lane surrounds its

western and southern perimeters. The location of the development is shown in Figure 3.1.

Pedestrian and Cycle Infrastructure

3.4 The location of the proposed development site, on the periphery of Rackheath, means that

opportunities for pedestrians and cyclists within the immediate vicinity are limited.

3.5 A pedestrian footway is provided on the eastern verge of Broad Lane which runs adjacent to

the site. This footway starts at the eastern most extent of the application site and runs in a

southeast to northwest alignment, separated from the carriageway by a grass verge.

3.6 Approximately 135m from its origin the footway merges onto Vera Road at a simple priority

junction and dropped kerbs are provided on either side of the junction to assist with

pedestrian movements. Vera Road has wider footways along both sides of the carriageway

providing pedestrian access to a large residential area east of the site.

3.7 To the northwest of this junction, Broad Lane becomes Green Lane East and the footway

continues to run adjacent to the carriageway.

3.8 Across the four-arm mini roundabout to the north of the site, the footway continues along

Green Lane West towards Rackheath Industrial Estate. To the east of the junction,

Salhouse Road has footways along both sides of the carriageway which continue through

the centre of Rackheath. No pedestrian infrastructure is provided along Salhouse Road to

the west of the junction and there are no formal pedestrian crossing facilities at the mini

roundabout.

3.9 Owing to the existing nature of the application site, opportunities for cyclists are limited.

Whilst there are no defined cycle routes, the nature of the roads and associated observed

traffic volumes ensure the local highway network is generally conducive to cycling.

Passenger Transport

Page 12: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 8 of 23

Bus

3.10 The application site is served well by public transport services, with the nearest stop located

directly adjacent to its eastern boundary along Green Lane East. A short section of footway

as well as tactile paving and a raised kerb have been provided on the grass verge to

accommodate pedestrians waiting at the stop. Bus route 53 heading north to Wroxham and

Hoveton can be boarded at this stop.

3.11 A bus stop, from which buses head in a southwest direction towards Norwich, is located

approximately 65m to the northeast of the site along Salhouse Road. A raised kerb with

tactile paving is also present at this stop and a bus shelter which incorporates seating, a bus

timetable and flag are also provided.

3.12 A summary of the local bus service is provided in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Summary of local bus services

Service Frequency

Number Route Monday to

Friday Saturday Sunday

53

Hoveton - Thorpe End

– Norwich Railway

Station - Tuckswood

2 services per

hour

First 07:00,

Last 18:28

2 services per

hour

First 07:00,

Last 18:28

1 service per

hour

First 09:38,

Last 17:38

First and Last times are taken from when a bus can be boarded or departed from the nearest stop.

3.13 The local bus service identified in Table 3.1 provides links to several key destinations such

as Norwich and the Wroxham / Hoveton area with a frequency of approximately 2 services

per hour during the week and on Saturdays, with a reduced service on Sundays.

3.14 An additional school bus service operates during the morning with a return service in the

afternoon. This provides a service for children attending Broadland High School in Hoveton.

Rail

3.15 Salhouse, the nearest railway station, is located approximately 2.3 kilometres to the

northeast of the application site. This station is served by trains operated by Greater Anglia.

3.16 Services operate between Norwich and Cromer railway stations at a frequency of

approximately 1 train every hour.

3.17 A summary of the services which halt at Salhouse railway station is provided in Table 3.2.

Page 13: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 9 of 23

Table 3.2 Summary of rail services from Salhouse station

Origin Destination Average journey

duration from Salhouse Main frequency

Norwich Cromer 38 minutes

1 service per hour

First Train Outbound: 05:50,

Last Train Outbound : 23:03

Cromer Norwich 13 minutes

1 service per hour

First Train Outbound: 06:27,

Last Train Outbound: 23:03

First and Last times are taken from when the train can be boarded at Salhouse railway station

3.18 As shown in Table 3.2, Salhouse railway station accommodates services that run to key

destinations such as Norwich and locations en-route to Cromer.

Local Facilities and Services

3.19 Rackheath incorporates a number of facilities and services which residents are likely to use

on a day to day basis. Table 3.3 below summarises the facilities available as well as

approximate walking and cycling distances based on 3mph and 12mph respectively.

Table 3.3 Local facilities and services

Destination

Approximate

distance from site

(kilometres)

Walk time, minutes

(based on 3mph)

Cycle time,

minutes (based on

12mph)

Primary school 0.12 2 1

Pharmacy 0.24 3 1

Fish and chip shop 0.35 4 1.5

Convenience store 0.4 5 2

Post office 0.4 5 2

3.20 Table 3.3 highlights a number of facilities which are available within a 500m radius of the

application site. A maximum walking time of 5 minutes to these amenities means that the

availability of basic services is good.

Local Highway Safety

3.21 Information on the road traffic collisions which have been recorded in the area has been

obtained from the CrashMap website for the most recent five year period.

Page 14: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 10 of 23

3.22 In total there have been five recorded accidents within the immediate vicinity of the site over

this period, with four of these occurring at the mini roundabout linking Salhouse Road with

Green Lane East and West.

3.23 The majority of these accidents resulted in slight injuries. In one accident a serious injury

was sustained by a motorcyclist at the mini roundabout. A summary of all the accidents

which have occurred near to the application site is presented in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4 Road traffic collisions - summary table

Year Location Severity Casualties Vulnerable

User?

2011 On mini roundabout (Green

Lane West – Salhouse Rd) Slight 1 Motorcycle

2012 Broad Lane southbound Slight 1 Cyclist

2013 On mini roundabout (Green

Lane West – Salhouse Rd) Slight 1 No

2013 On mini roundabout (Green

Lane West – Salhouse Rd) Slight 1 Cyclist

2015 On mini roundabout (Green

Lane West – Salhouse Rd) Serious 1 Motorcycle

3.24 The five incidents which have occurred across the five year period do not constitute a

pattern of behaviour that is likely to be exacerbated with the proposed development in place.

Local Highway Network

3.25 A mini roundabout junction at the northern most point of the site connects the two roads

running adjacent to its boundaries with the wider highway network.

3.26 From the south eastern arm of the mini roundabout, Green Lane East runs adjacent to the

eastern boundary of the site. Green Lane East is a single carriageway two-way road with a

footway running along the eastern edge, separated by a grass verge. There is no street

lighting provided along the extent of this road.

3.27 Approximately 95m from the mini roundabout the speed limit along Green Lane East

changes from 30 mph to 40 mph for vehicles heading south and vice versa for vehicles

heading north.

Page 15: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 11 of 23

3.28 Further south of this point, Vera Road joins Green Lane East at a simple priority junction.

Vera Road leads to a large residential area and provides access to a number of residential

streets.

3.29 From this junction Green Lane East becomes Broad Lane which continues in a northwest to

southeast alignment. The footway continues along its eastern verge before dissipating near

the south-eastern extent of the site. Further south Broad Lane crosses a railway track at an

automatic half barrier crossing (AHBC). A demarcated lane for pedestrians is also provided

across the level crossing.

3.30 Southwest of the mini roundabout, Salhouse Road runs adjacent to the northern boundary

of the application site. Approximately 85m from the mini roundabout the speed limit changes

from 30 mph to the national speed limit. Street lighting and pedestrian footway infrastructure

is not provided which is consistent with the rural character of the road. Salhouse Road

continues approximately 4 kilometres west before joining the A1042 Norwich ring road.

3.31 From the eastern arm of the mini roundabout, Salhouse Road continues towards the centre

of Rackheath. Footways are provided along both sides of the carriageway and the road is

subject to a 30 mph speed limit. Street lighting is provided along the stretch of carriageway

nearest to the mini roundabout.

3.32 Green Lane West constitutes the fourth arm of the mini roundabout to the north, providing

access towards Rackheath Industrial Estate and the A1151. A footway is provided on to the

eastern verge of the carriageway. No street lighting is present along the extent of Green

Lane West and the road is subject to a 30 mph speed limit.

Existing Traffic Flows

3.33 In order to provide an understanding of the existing traffic flows in the vicinity of the

application site, a full manual classified junction survey was undertaken on Tuesday 14th

April 2015 between 07:00 and 10:00, and 16:00 and 19:00 at the 4-arm mini-roundabout

junction between Salhouse Road, Green Lane East and Green Lane West.

3.34 The full dataset from this survey is presented in Appendix B.

3.35 Analysis of the traffic data has revealed that the local highway network peaks are between

08:00 and 09:00 for the morning peak and 17:00 and 18:00 for the evening peak.

3.36 The surveyed traffic flows across the mini-roundabout during both the AM and PM peak

periods are presented in Figure 3.2 and Figure 3.3.

Page 16: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 12 of 23

4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL

4.1 This section of the Transport Assessment sets out the key principles of the development

proposal.

Proposed Development

4.2 The development proposal is in outline for up to 157 dwellings and the illustrative

masterplan provides a mix of open market and affordable homes. An indicative schedule of

development is detailed in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 Indicative development schedule

Bedrooms Open Market Affordable

1 - 18

2 28 20

3 45 12

4 27 2

5 5 -

Total 105 52

4.3 The illustrative masterplan is contained in the ‘Proposed Development Plan’ by Richard Pike

Associates which is provided at Appendix C.

Pedestrian and Cycle Infrastructure

4.4 Improved pedestrian and cycle infrastructure will also be provided across the Green Lane

East and Salhouse Road frontages of the site which will link to proposed internal layout and

the existing footways.

4.5 An uncontrolled pedestrian crossing, characterised by dropped kerbs and tactile paving, will

be provided on Green Lane East, approximately 60m south east of the junction with

Salhouse Road. This will ensure that a link is created between the site and the existing

pedestrian infrastructure on the eastern side of Green Lane East.

4.6 A new 3m wide shared use footway/cycleway will be provided on Green Lane East which

will run adjacent to the carriageway along the length of the development from the southeast,

to Salhouse Road further north. The provision of this footway/cycleway was discussed with

the local highway authority during pre-application consultation and agreed to be appropriate.

Page 17: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 13 of 23

4.7 Site GT18 to the north-west of Salhouse Road is allocated for 300 additional residential

dwellings. Pedestrian links to this site will also need to be developed when it comes

forward. At present, an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing, characterised by dropped kerbs

and tactile paving, will be provided on the southern side of Salhouse Road where the

footway/cycleway is stopped providing part of this pedestrian link. It will however be the

responsibility of the developer of the GT18 site to provide the completed pedestrian link

across the two developments.

4.8 The proposed access improvements, including the shared use footway/cycleway, pedestrian

access points and crossing facilities are shown in TPA drawing PL101 Rev D contained in

Appendix D.

Vehicular Access

4.9 Two vehicular access points to the site will be provided off Green Lane East via priority T-

junctions. These may lead into an internal loop road and other links from which access to

dwellings would be provided. The location of these proposed access junctions is shown on

the drawing at Appendix D.

4.10 Access from Green Lane East is considered appropriate as traffic flows along this road are

likely to decrease following the stopping up of Broad Lane as part of the NDR scheme. The

location of the access junctions will minimise disruption to traffic flows on Salhouse Road,

which are likely to increase following the development of the NDR and prevent any possible

conflict with any new access to the development land to the north-west of the road.

4.11 In addition, a number of dwellings will be provided with access directly onto Green Lane

East. Access to these dwellings will be provided via six dropped kerb crossovers leading to

private driveways. These proposals are synonymous with the access arrangements for

existing dwellings on the eastern side of the road. This is likely to significantly change the

character of Green Lane East so it better represents a residential street.

4.12 The posted speed limit changes from 30mph to 40mph for vehicles heading south adjacent

to the proposed site. To reflect the change in character of Green Lane East following

development, an application may be submitted to relocate the speed limit signage further

south of the site. This would be appropriate given the reduced traffic volumes following the

stopping up of Broad Lane and the lower anticipated vehicle speeds following the change in

character of Green Lane East.

4.13 The local highway authority is ultimately responsible for the setting of speed limits and any

application to change the posted speed limit will be made through a Speed Regulation Order

under Section 84 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.

4.14 The access junctions have been designed in accordance with the visibility splays and site

stopping distances set out in Manual for Streets for a 30mph road. Visibility splays of 2.4m x

43m are provided at each access junction and these are shown in TPA drawing PL102 Rev

D at Appendix E.

Page 18: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 14 of 23

4.15 Additionally, the access junctions have been designed using swept paths of appropriate

servicing vehicles to ensure that refuse collection and emergency access can be achieved

at all times and TPA drawing SP101 Rev D contained in Appendix F shows these

movements.

Car and Cycle Parking

4.16 Car and cycle parking will be incorporated within the development in accordance with

Broadland District Council’s parking requirements set out in Chapter 2. Applying Broadland’s

standards, the maximum number of car parking spaces the development may provide is 339

spaces. Average car ownership within the district is 1.6 spaces per dwelling which would

demand 251 spaces to be provided for residents. Sufficient on-plot parking will be provided

within these parameters to discourage any on-street parking.

4.17 Broadland’s standards also stipulate that an average of 2 spaces per unit or less will be

provided over the development site for housing areas off good accessibility. This applies to

developments which fall within a 200m walking distance from a bus stop which is served by

buses of a frequency of 15 minutes or less to town, district or a local service centre.

4.18 Applying Broadland’s standards, formal cycle parking areas are not required where houses

are provided with garages or rear gardens for a shed. Sufficient on-plot space will be

provided allowing occupants to store cycles at their own discretion.

Page 19: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 15 of 23

5 TRIP GENERATION

5.1 This section of the Transport Assessment considers the quantum of trips that could be

expected to be generated by the proposed development.

5.2 The proprietary database TRICS 7.2.1 has been interrogated for trip rates using a sample of

sites similar to the proposed development.

5.3 Trip rates using ‘Land Use 03 – Residential, sub class M – Mixed private / affordable

housing’ have been extracted and the following criteria applied:

Multi-modal surveys;

Weekday surveys only;

Surveys dating back to 2010; and

Sites ranging from 80 – 250 dwellings.

5.4 A full copy of the TRICS report is contained in Appendix G and Table 5.1 below provides

the vehicle and people trip rates during the AM and PM peak periods.

Table 5.1 Multi-modal trip rates

Trip rates per

dwelling

AM peak PM peak

Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures

Vehicles 0.105 0.308 0.273 0.151

People 0.155 0.627 0.473 0.247

5.5 The trip rates detailed in Table 5.1 have been used to calculate the number of trips that may

be generated by the proposed development. These resultant trip numbers are provided in

Table 5.2.

Table 5.2 Multi-modal trip generations – 157 dwellings

Mode AM peak PM peak

Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total

Vehicles 16 48 64 43 24 67

People 24 98 122 74 39 113

Page 20: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 16 of 23

5.6 Based on the TRICS trip rates it is estimated that some 64 two-way vehicular trips may be

generated by the proposed development during the AM peak, with 67 trips during the PM

peak.

5.7 To provide a robust approximation for the modal share of trips for the proposed

development, travel to work data for the Wroxham ward has been interrogated from the

2011 Census.

5.8 Table 5.3 below presents the mode share of methods of travel within the ward. It also

presents a redistribution of people trips generated by the development based on mode

share.

Table 5.3 Wroxham ward Census 2011 travel to work data

Mode Mode

Share

AM peak PM peak

Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures

Train 1.0% 0 1 1 0

Bus, minibus or coach 5.4% 1 5 4 2

Motorcycle 1.4% 0 1 1 1

Driving a car or van 79.1% 19 78 59 31

Passenger in a car or van 4.7% 1 5 3 2

Bicycle 1.8% 0 2 1 1

On foot 5.1% 1 5 4 2

Other 1.5% 0 1 1 0

5.9 As can be seen from the data present in the table above, drivers of cars and vans account

for the greatest proportion of trips (79.1%) generated by the proposed development. A total

of 97 two-way vehicle trips may be expected during the AM peak with 90 two-way trips

during the PM peak period. Trips associated with all other transport modes are low in

comparison and this is owing to the rural nature of Rackheath.

5.10 The vehicle trips presented in Table 5.3 provide a higher approximation for those generated

by the development than calculated using TRICS trip rates (Table 5.2). This is nonetheless

considered a more robust approximation based on local travel characteristics.

Page 21: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 17 of 23

6 FORECAST TRAFFIC FLOWS

6.1 This chapter of the report presents the calculations associated with the establishment of a

forecast baseline traffic flow scenario which provides a basis for producing and modelling

future year traffic growth scenarios.

Forecast Base 2021 Traffic Flows

6.2 To determine the background growth that is anticipated in the area, TEMPRO has been

utilised to extract local growth factors for the AM and PM peak periods for 2015 to 2021

(future year 5 years post submission of the application).

6.3 Origin – destination growth factors for rural Broadland have been derived for car drivers

which have then been adjusted according to the National Traffic Model (NTM) (AF09

dataset) using rural and principal road parameters with regional effects. Table 6.1 below

details the growth factors derived from TEMPRO.

Table 6.1 TEMPRO traffic growth factors to 2021

Peak Local Growth

NTM Adjusted

Origin Destination

Weekday AM 1.0669 1.0626 1.1126

Weekday PM 1.0684 1.072 1.1183

6.4 The NTM adjusted growth factors presented in Table 6.1 have been applied to the surveyed

AM and PM peak period flows to produce the forecast base 2021 traffic flows. These flows

provide a model onto which the traffic associated with the development site can be added

and these are contained in Figure 6.1 and Figure 6.2 for each respective peak period.

Development Traffic Flows

6.5 The vehicular trips which are likely to be generated by the proposed development have

been distributed in accordance with the existing traffic flows on the local highway network.

6.6 In accordance with the directional flow proportions along Green Lane East, it is expected

that a number of vehicles will enter and leave the development via Green Lane East to the

south. This equates to approximately 20 percent of two-way development trips during each

respective peak period.

6.7 At the mini-roundabout between Salhouse Road, Green Lane East and Green Lane West,

development traffic has been distributed in accordance with existing turning proportions.

Page 22: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 18 of 23

6.8 The distribution of development traffic in both the AM and PM peaks is illustrated in Figure

6.3 and Figure 6.4 respectively.

Total Forecast 2021 Traffic Flows

6.9 The development traffic has been added to the forecast base 2021 traffic flows to produce

the total forecast 2021 traffic flows.

6.10 Total forecast traffic flows for the AM peak are presented in Figure 6.5 and for the PM peak

in Figure 6.6.

Page 23: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 19 of 23

7 HIGHWAY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

7.1 This chapter of the Transport Assessment considers the junction capacity of the 4-arm mini-

roundabout between Salhouse Road, Green Lane East and Green Lane West. The junction

has been modelled under the loading of the existing (2015) traffic flows and then calibrated

using queue length data to ensure its suitability for future year traffic analysis.

Existing Junction Operation

7.2 To provide an assessment of the potential impact of the development on the existing mini-

roundabout junction, it has been modelled in the 2015 AM and PM peak periods using

ARCADY in Junctions 9.

7.3 The results of the modelling are contained in Appendix H together with a geometric

parameter drawing. A summary of the modelling results is contained in Table 7.1 below.

Table 7.1 ARCADY – Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West – surveyed

AM Peak PM Peak

RFC Modelled

Queue

Observed

Queue RFC

Modelled

Queue

Observed

Queue

Salhouse

Road East 0.72 3 4 0.50 1 2

Green Lane

East 0.58 1 1 0.43 1 2

Salhouse

Road West 0.40 1 1 0.63 2 2

Green Lane

West 0.53 1 3 0.99 11 2

7.4 The results of the modelling in Table 7.1 indicate that the junction operates above its

theoretical capacity during the PM peak. The Green Lane West arm is modelled to have an

RFC of 0.99 (99%) with a corresponding queue of 11 vehicles.

7.5 However, the queue lengths recorded at the time of the survey do not suggest there is a

capacity issue at this arm of the junction. The average observed queue during the PM peak

hour was 2 vehicles.

Page 24: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 20 of 23

7.6 A direct intercept adjustment of this arm has therefore been applied to adjust its capacity

and reflect the practical operation of this junction. In addition, the model has been calibrated

during the AM peak to reflect the increased queueing, observed at the Green Lane West

arm. A summary of the adjusted results is detailed in Table 7.2.

Table 7.2 ARCADY – Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West – calibrated

AM Peak PM Peak

RFC Modelled

Queue

Observed

Queue RFC

Modelled

Queue

Observed

Queue

Salhouse

Road East 0.72 3 3 0.51 1 2

Green Lane

East 0.58 1 1 0.43 1 2

Salhouse

Road West 0.40 1 1 0.63 2 2

Green Lane

West 0.71 3 3 0.67 2 2

7.7 The results set out in Table 7.2 suggest that the junction operates within capacity without

any significant queuing and is representative of observed on-street conditions.

Forecast Junction Operation

7.8 Future year capacity analysis for 2021 has been undertaken (5 years post registration of the

application) with the following scenarios included in the modelling:

Forecast Base 2021 traffic flows [surveyed traffic plus TEMPRO background

growth]

Total Forecast 2021 traffic flows [surveyed plus background growth and proposed

development traffic]

7.9 The mini-roundabout has been modelled using ARCADY in Junctions 9 in the context of the

above traffic flows. The results of the modelling are contained in Appendix H and a

summary is presented in Table 7.3.

Page 25: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 21 of 23

Table 7.3 ARCADY – Salhouse Road / Green Lane East / Green Lane West – 2021

2021 Forecast Base 2021 Total Forecast

AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak

RFC Queue RFC Queue RFC Queue RFC Queue

Salhouse

Road East 0.83 4 0.62 2 0.84 5 0.68 2

Green Lane

East 0.68 2 0.50 1 0.81 4 0.55 1

Salhouse

Road West 0.45 1 0.73 3 0.47 1 0.75 3

Green Lane

West 0.81 4 0.78 3 0.85 4 0.85 5

7.10 The results presented in Table 7.3 suggest that the mini-roundabout is forecast to operate

within its theoretical capacity during the future year. The Salhouse Road East arm is

forecast to have a RFC of 0.84 during the AM peak, however this represents an RFC

increase of 0.01 from a scenario with no development.

7.11 The RFC at the Green Lane East arm which provides access towards and from the

development is forecast to increase by 0.12 within the AM peak following the introduction of

the development traffic. This increase is not considered significant and the forecast increase

in queue length by approximately 2 vehicles will not generate a traffic problem on this arm.

Stopping-up of Broad Lane – Sensitivity Test

7.12 As the consented NDR is developed, Broad Lane, which joins Green Lane East to the south

of the proposed site will be permanently stopped up at its junction with Norwich Road. The

stopping-up of Broad Lane is illustrated on the NDR general arrangement plan at Appendix

A.

7.13 The observed traffic flows presented in Chapter 3 have therefore been re-distributed to

reflect the road closure. In the absence of observed origin / destination data for local trips, a

number of assumptions have been made as to the re-distribution of these flows across each

arm of the mini-roundabout. Figure 7.1 illustrates these re-distributed traffic flow

assumptions.

7.14 The TEMPRO growth factors presented in Chapter 6 have been applied to the re-distributed

surveyed traffic flows to provide the 2021 forecast base situation following the stopping-up

of the road south of Green Lane East. The development traffic has also been added and

distributed across the mini-roundabout based on the turning proportions of the re-distributed

Page 26: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 22 of 23

traffic. It has also been assumed that all development traffic will be directed to and from the

development via the northern section of Green Lane East, across the mini-roundabout.

7.15 The re-distributed traffic following the stopping-up of Broad Lane at Norwich Road has been

loaded to the calibrated ARCADY model to assess the impact at the mini-roundabout

junction. The results of the modelling are contained at Appendix I and summarised in Table

7.4.

Table 7.4 ARCADY – Stopping-up of Broad Lane – sensitivity test

2021 Forecast Base 2021 Total Forecast

AM PM AM PM

RFC Queue RFC Queue RFC Queue RFC Queue

Salhouse

Road East 0.86 5 0.57 1 0.87 5 0.62 2

Green Lane

East 0.44 1 0.32 1 0.64 2 0.38 1

Salhouse

Road West 0.59 1 0.74 3 0.62 2 0.78 3

Green Lane

West 0.79 3 0.76 3 0.84 4 0.85 5

7.16 The results presented in Table 7.2 indicate that the mini-roundabout junction will operate

within its theoretical capacity in 2021 following the stopping-up of Broad Lane and with the

development in place.

7.17 The Salhouse Road East arm of the junction will have a maximum RFC of 0.87 during the

AM peak following development, however the development traffic will generate an RFC

increase of just 0.01 at this arm with no additional queuing forecast.

7.18 Modelling the mini-roundabout junction under various future year scenarios has indicated

that the junction will continue to operate within capacity with minimal queuing both with and

without the development in place. The impact of the traffic associated with the development

is likely to be negligible at the junction and is unlikely to cause any issues on the

surrounding highway network.

7.19 The stopping-up at Broad Lane will not significantly impact the capacity at the mini-

roundabout junction. Whilst a number of assumptions have been made regarding the flows

of traffic along the NDR and at the junction, it is anticipated that flows will be re-distributed

across the junction which will not create a capacity issue on any of the four arms.

Page 27: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Page 23 of 23

8 CONCLUSION

8.1 Transport Planning Associates has been instructed to provide transport planning advice in

relation to a proposed residential development at Green Lane East, Rackheath.

8.2 This Transport Assessment has set out the national and regional planning policies that are

relevant to the proposed development and its context. The existing transport context of the

application site has also been set out.

8.3 It has been identified that there is reasonable access to the site by various modes of

transport, as the quiet nature of the village centre means that, in the absence of specific

cycling infrastructure or high quality pedestrian facilities, the site benefits from an

appropriate level of accessibility.

8.4 Details of the proposed development have been provided and the level of car and cycle

parking that may be provided has been set out.

8.5 Details on access into the site for vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians has also been provided

and these have been designed in accordance with the relevant guidance.

8.6 The number of trips that may be generated by all modes of transport by the development

have been calculated using TRICS 7.2.1. These trips have been modified using Census

2011 travel to work data to better reflect existing travel patterns in the village. Given the rural

character of Rackheath and the distance from the nearest business area, the percentage of

those who travel by car is high and this is reflected in the estimated vehicle trips generated

by the development.

8.7 The mini roundabout junction between Green Lane East, Salhouse Road and Green Lane

West has been modelled under various traffic flow scenarios using ARCADY in Junctions 9.

Existing flows observed during turning count surveys, 2021 forecast base flows and 2021

total forecast flows (including development traffic) have been loaded into the model to

assess its current and future capacity. The results indicate that the impact of the

development traffic will be negligible and only moderate levels of queuing will be evident.

8.8 A modelling sensitivity test has also been conducted on the junction to reflect the consented

stopping-up of Broad Lane as part of the NDR scheme. It has been concluded that traffic will

be redistributed across the junction and there will be no material impact on the operational

capacity at any arm.

8.9 It is therefore concluded that there is no reason on highways or transport grounds for these

proposals not to go ahead.

Page 28: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Figures

FIGURES

Page 29: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

INDICATIVE

I N F O R M A T I O N

STATUS:

A4ORIGINALPLOT SIZE

WS

E

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Site location

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

SCALE:

DATE:

PREPARED BY:

NTS

3.1

FIGURE NO:

1411-88

JOB NO:

10/10/16

JW

CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY:

IB JC

Contains Ordnance

Survey data © Crown

copyright and database

right 2016

Site location

Page 30: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

1 99 191 25

0 2 7 2

75 3

115 4

26 0

2 0

2 1

40 1

331 3

36 3

105 169 29 0

0 4 4 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 3.2 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Surveyed AM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 31: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

0 109 241 94

0 1 8 0

50 1

313 0

86 0

1 0

0 0

31 0

160 6

27 3

52 114 67 0

0 0 2 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 3.3 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Surveyed PM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 32: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

1 110 213 28

0 2 8 2

83 3

128 4

29 0

2 0

2 1

45 1

368 3

40 3

117 188 32 0

0 4 4 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 6.1 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Forecast base (2021) AM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 33: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

0 122 270 105

0 1 9 0

56 1

350 0

96 0

1 0

0 0

35 0

179 7

30 3

58 127 75 0

0 0 2 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 6.2 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Forecast base (2021) PM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 34: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

0 0 11 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 0

22 34 6 0

0 0 0 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 6.3 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Developemt AM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 35: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

0 0 33 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0

12 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

4 0

5 11 7 0

0 0 0 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 6.4 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Developemt PM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 36: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

1 110 224 28

0 2 8 2

83 3

128 4

30 0

2 0

2 1

45 1

368 3

42 3

139 222 38 0

0 4 4 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 6.5 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Total forecast (2021) AM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 37: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

0 122 303 105

0 1 9 0

56 1

350 0

108 0

1 0

0 0

35 0

179 7

34 3

63 138 82 0

0 0 2 0

Traffic Flow : Total 000

Traffic Flow : HGV 000

IBJW

Approved By:

NTS

Checked By:Prepared By:

IB

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N

Scale:Status:Date:

1411-88 6.6 -

Project No: Figure No: Revision:

Total forecast (2021) PM peak traffic flows

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath

Lovell Partnerships Ltd

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Salhouse Road

West

Salhouse Road

East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 38: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

RESERVED COPYRIGHT

1/2

A B C

L

K

1/2 J

D

E + F

F - All

I H G

1/2 1/2 1/2

Existing flows #

Decreased flows #

Increased flows #

Revision:

1411-88 7.1 -

GT19 Green Lane East, RackheathPrepared By: Checked By: Approved By:

JW IB IB

Lovell Partnerships LtdProject No: Figure No:

10/10/16 I N F O R M A T I O N NTS

Stopped-up at Broad Lane

A4ORIGINAL

PLOT SIZE INDICATIVE

Northern Distributor Road

(NDR)

+ 1/2 B

Re-distributed traffic flow assumptions

Date: Status:

+ 1/2 H

+ 1/2 G

Scale:

Salhouse

Road West

Salhouse

Road East

Green Lane West

Green Lane East

Page 39: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix A

APPENDIX A

Page 40: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

����� ��� � � ��� ����

�� ��� ��� � � �� � ��� � �� � ��

� � ! " #$ % &' "( &) * + + ) !, * + - ) . %$ / ) * # &$ ( ) ' * ' 0# "1 $ ' % " ) 2 &) 3) ( +$ &$ & " $4 " 2

56 " % & " 2 7 8 . " + # " 2 7 %&) 8$ #$ ) + " % -$ #9$ !: * &;) . %$< * & & +$ 7 ' " #

= > ? 3 ) 8 " 2$ #! " & - : ' " # +$ ! * 0

9$ !: * &;) . %$

� � ! " #$ % &' "( &) * + + ) !, * + - ) . %$ / ) * # &$ ( ) ' * ' 0# "1 $ ' % " ) 2 &) 3) ( +$ &$ & " $4 " 2@$ ( ) ' * ' 0 @ ) ( % ) " + , &) ' * 7$

= > ? 3) 8 " 2$ #! " & - : ' " # +$ ! * 0, " &$ < ) ( ) . 2 # ! " & -8 * & 3 - " 2 7 ( + * 2 &A 8 ' " # 7$* 3 3$ % % * 2 # * 3 3$ % % &)' * " + ! * 0 8 ' " # 7$ 2 ) ' & -* 8 . & $ 2 & ! " & - &$ ( ) ' * ' 0 " & " 7 * & " ) 2 $ * % . ' $ %: ' ) * # B * 2$ &) 8$ , &) ( ( $ # C ( * &D . 2 3 & " ) 2 ! " & - = + . % &$ * # / ) * #< ) 8 " 2$ #@ . ' 2 " 2 7 ;$ * # * 2 #E "$ + # ? 3 3$ % %: ' " # 7$< ) ( ) . 2 #@$ ( ) ' * ' 0@ ) ( % ) " +, &) ' * 7$

@$ ( ) ' * ' 0@ ) ( % ) " +, &) ' * 7$, " &$ < ) ( ) . 2 # ! " & -&$ ( ) ' * ' 0 " & " 7 * & " ) 2 $ * % . ' $ % 9 $ ! E "$ + # ? 3 3$ % %

9 $ !9 $ ! &= ) 2 # %

9 $ !E "$ + #? 3 3$ % %

9 $ !E " $ + #? 3 3$ % %

9$ !E "$ + #? 3 3$ % %F GHI

JKLMNO PQRSTUVW XYZ[

\ ] ^_ `a bcd e fgh

ij k k l mn l k o k p q rs t t u vw u t x w y z {| } ~ �� ~ � ���� � �� � �� ��� �������� ���

�� � � ��� � �

�  ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥¦ £ § ¨©ª   ¦ «¦ ¬ ­®   ¯ £ ° ±²³   µ² £ ­µ²³ ¤ ­ £ «²³ ¶

� · µ ¦ ¬ ­®  ¹ ©ª   ¦ µ £ ¬ ° ¡ £º » ¬ ¤  ¼

½ ¾ ¿ ÀÁ ÂÃÄ Å Æ Ç Å È ÉÊËÊË

ÌÌÍÍ

Î Ï Ð;) $E * '

Ñ * Ò$ 8 )E * ' / * 3 Ó -$ * & -;* + +

;$ * & -Ô ) ) # > * ' 3 -< ) 1 $ ' &

< -$ ' ' 0@ ' $ $E * ' ;* + +E * '

\] ^_ `a bcd e fgh� · µ ¦ ¬ ­®  ¹ ©ª   ¦ Õ °³ ¢ ¶  £ ­ µ² £ ­ ¼

Ö × Ø Ù Ø Ú Û Ü Ý Ø Þ ßà Û á â ã ä å æ çãè é ê å å ë ì ãâ ã ä å æ çí â ã í ê å é î ìï ð é å ã çñ ò ó ã ã ô ã çñ ò ó ã ã ô ã çñ õ ã ã ô ã çö÷ ø ù úû ü ö ÷ ø ý üþ ø ÿ � ú� ý ø ú �� ý÷ ø �÷ � �� þ ÿ þ ø � � ø ø � ÿ þ �þ ÿ ý � � � ÿ ü þ þ ý � � ÷ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ! " " # " $% � � � � � � � � � � � & ' ( ) * + , - � . / � " � # " 0 1 2 34 5 6 7 1 2 3 ó 7 8 3 9: 5 ; ó 3 5 <= ó 2 3 â 2 > ?� � @ A ö � B A B C D ð E â F G H G : õ H: â ì I 1 õ Hä J G ä K G : õ H: G ð L ò 1 G : õ Hâ G FM : G ð ä â L N O L ï 1 : ì O Gä J G ä K G : : â ì I L 1 ò 1 2 ML 1 L O L ì P ð : ì O G Q R S T U V T U V W Xð ä ì P G Y L P G 1 2 MN â ï ñ G ä O O L O P GTom McCabe

Interim Director of Environment

Transport and Development

Norfolk County Council

County Hall, Martineau Lane

Norwich NR1 2SG

Z[\ ] _ ab _ c d ef ` _ e gh ` _ i j kl c k em j en b o^ k p j c k m _b j e cl c k em j en b q _ jf f p j c k m _b j e cl c k em j en b rm _h g p j c k m _b j e cst ef e c u o^ k p j c kst ef e c u v c kw p j xb _ _ en b _y _ v f b k r e b z { v h c ky _ v f b k |b { v _ j _ } | vf e pr _ j ub j _b jy _ v f b k |b { v _ j _ } | _ j ~ ~ emd en b _f e c � m { v pb `b eb� e c �y _ v f b k zh pn b _ `fy _ v f b k d _ j e c j ub � j u cfy _ v f b k � j q j c ` _ }st ef e c u �^ ` v j afst ef e c u ib f ` _ em `b k � } � j }f � i � �j c k � _ e k pb � j }f � � i �y _ v f b k z }m pb | _ jm xf � � e a_ e u a ^ ~ � j } c ~^ �y _ v f b k �^ ` � j }f � z }m p b � j }fy _ v f b k � _ e k p b � j }fy _ v f b k y _ en j `b � b j cf ~�m m b f f � y � � �y _ v f b k |h _ c e c u � b j kf �f {b� e a m { g e cb k � eb p k �m m b f f �y _ v f b k r � j p b fy _ v f b k d e m ab fz a j e c j uby p j c `^ gb _b j k e c m c � h cm e c � e a ab db n b p v {b c z cf b c � _ kb _�ib u h p j e c � � � � �^ �� �� � � �� � � � � �� � � � � �� � � ���� � � � � � � � � � � �

Page 41: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix B

APPENDIX B

Page 42: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Rackheath - Manual Traffic Survey, Tuesday 14th April 2015

Junction: Green Lane West / Salhouse Road / Green Lane East

Approach: Green Lane West

TIME P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL

0700 - 0715 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 17 10 0 0 0 27 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0715 - 0730 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 21 7 0 0 0 28 0 3 8 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0730 - 0745 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 32 12 3 0 0 48 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0745 - 0800 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 2 34 12 3 0 0 51 1 2 20 1 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 14 2 3 0 0 19 1 2 104 41 6 0 0 154 2 5 45 4 2 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0800 - 0815 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 24 11 2 0 0 37 0 0 25 3 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

0815 - 0830 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 38 8 1 0 0 47 0 0 16 2 1 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0830 - 0845 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 9 0 0 49 6 1 0 0 56 0 1 23 3 1 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0845 - 0900 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 5 0 1 39 11 2 0 0 53 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Hourly Total 0 0 19 7 0 0 0 26 0 1 150 36 6 0 0 193 0 1 79 8 2 0 0 90 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

0900 - 0915 0 0 10 2 2 0 0 14 0 0 28 13 0 0 0 41 0 0 12 1 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0915 - 0930 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 28 4 0 0 0 32 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

0930 - 0945 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 17 8 2 0 0 27 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0945 - 1000 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 11 4 0 0 0 16 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 18 8 2 0 0 28 0 1 84 29 2 0 0 116 0 0 40 6 1 0 0 47 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Session Total 0 0 51 17 5 0 0 73 1 4 338 106 14 0 0 463 2 6 164 18 5 0 0 195 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3

1600 - 1615 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 2 1 30 5 0 0 0 38 1 2 12 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1615 - 1630 0 0 13 3 0 0 0 16 1 1 33 12 0 0 0 47 0 0 12 4 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1630 - 1645 0 1 19 5 0 0 0 25 1 1 45 7 0 0 0 54 1 1 27 3 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1645 - 1700 0 1 15 3 0 0 0 19 0 0 33 5 2 0 0 40 0 1 15 2 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 2 54 11 0 0 0 67 4 3 141 29 2 0 0 179 2 4 66 12 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1700 - 1715 0 0 22 2 0 0 0 24 1 2 61 14 0 0 1 79 2 3 28 3 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1715 - 1730 0 0 23 2 0 0 0 25 0 3 41 13 0 0 0 57 0 0 20 7 1 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1730 - 1745 1 1 23 1 0 0 0 26 2 2 47 9 3 2 0 65 1 0 25 1 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1745 - 1800 0 1 13 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 30 4 0 0 0 34 0 0 12 2 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 2 81 6 0 0 0 90 3 7 179 40 3 2 1 235 3 3 85 13 1 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1800 - 1815 0 0 12 2 0 0 0 14 0 1 27 11 1 0 0 40 0 1 18 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1815 - 1830 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 24 4 0 0 0 28 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1830 - 1845 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 14 2 0 0 0 17 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1845 - 1900 0 1 7 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 1 38 7 0 0 0 46 0 2 76 17 1 0 0 96 0 2 48 3 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Session Total 1 5 173 24 0 0 0 203 7 12 396 86 6 2 1 510 5 9 199 28 1 0 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Left to Salhouse Road (East) Ahead to Green Lane East Right to Salhouse Road (West) U-Turn

Page 43: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Rackheath - Manual Traffic Survey, Tuesday 14th April 2015

Junction: Green Lane West / Salhouse Road / Green Lane East

Approach: Salhouse Road (East)

TIME P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL

0700 - 0715 0 0 4 2 0 0 1 7 0 0 37 4 0 0 0 41 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0715 - 0730 1 0 5 1 0 0 1 8 0 2 36 8 0 0 0 46 0 1 12 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0730 - 0745 0 0 4 3 0 0 1 8 2 0 55 7 1 0 0 65 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0745 - 0800 0 0 9 2 0 0 1 12 2 1 73 9 0 0 0 85 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 0 22 8 0 0 4 35 4 3 201 28 1 0 0 237 0 1 36 4 1 1 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0800 - 0815 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 9 3 2 86 5 0 0 0 96 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

0815 - 0830 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 66 10 0 0 0 79 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0830 - 0845 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 63 4 3 0 0 71 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

0845 - 0900 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 3 0 46 5 0 0 0 54 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 28 5 0 0 2 35 6 6 261 24 3 0 0 300 0 1 32 2 1 0 0 36 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2

0900 - 0915 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 9 0 2 46 3 1 0 0 52 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0915 - 0930 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 8 2 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0930 - 0945 0 0 5 1 1 0 1 8 0 0 33 5 0 0 0 38 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0945 - 1000 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 32 6 1 0 0 39 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 20 6 1 0 3 30 0 2 144 14 2 0 0 162 0 1 28 7 2 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Session Total 1 0 70 19 1 0 9 100 10 11 606 66 6 0 0 699 0 3 96 13 4 1 0 117 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2

1600 - 1615 0 0 5 2 0 0 1 8 0 0 19 9 0 0 0 28 0 0 13 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1615 - 1630 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 23 7 1 0 1 33 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

1630 - 1645 0 0 5 2 0 0 2 9 0 1 30 6 0 0 0 37 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1645 - 1700 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 7 0 3 33 8 0 0 0 44 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 20 6 0 0 3 29 0 5 105 30 1 0 1 142 0 0 28 8 1 0 0 37 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

1700 - 1715 0 0 6 2 0 0 2 10 0 2 38 7 1 0 0 48 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1715 - 1730 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 17 6 1 0 1 25 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1730 - 1745 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 6 2 2 30 6 3 0 0 43 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1745 - 1800 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 34 4 1 0 0 40 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 19 3 0 0 3 25 2 5 119 23 6 0 1 156 0 1 25 4 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1800 - 1815 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 31 4 0 0 0 36 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

1815 - 1830 0 0 7 1 1 0 1 10 0 0 27 5 1 0 0 33 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1830 - 1845 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 19 5 0 0 0 24 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1845 - 1900 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 16 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 0 22 1 1 0 2 27 1 0 92 15 1 0 0 109 0 1 22 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Session Total 1 0 61 10 1 0 8 81 3 10 316 68 8 0 2 407 0 2 75 12 1 0 0 90 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Left to Green Lane East Ahead to Salhouse Road (West) Right to Green Lane West U-Turn

Page 44: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Rackheath - Manual Traffic Survey, Tuesday 14th April 2015

Junction: Green Lane West / Salhouse Road / Green Lane East

Approach: Green Lane East

TIME P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL

0700 - 0715 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 12 9 0 0 0 23 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0715 - 0730 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 7 0 2 27 4 2 0 0 35 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0730 - 0745 0 0 21 1 1 0 0 23 1 1 22 6 1 0 0 31 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0745 - 0800 1 0 21 3 0 0 0 25 0 0 36 6 1 0 0 43 0 0 5 1 1 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 0 54 5 1 0 0 61 2 4 97 25 4 0 0 132 0 1 15 5 1 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0800 - 0815 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 32 8 0 0 0 40 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0815 - 0830 0 1 24 3 0 0 0 28 1 1 36 6 1 0 0 45 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0830 - 0845 1 0 22 1 0 0 0 24 0 1 30 8 2 0 0 41 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0845 - 0900 0 0 20 0 1 0 0 21 0 0 36 11 1 1 0 49 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 1 94 4 1 0 0 101 1 2 134 33 4 1 0 175 0 0 21 6 1 0 1 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0900 - 0915 0 1 12 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 17 7 1 0 0 25 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0915 - 0930 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 11 0 1 24 9 0 0 0 34 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0930 - 0945 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 3 24 5 2 1 0 35 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0945 - 1000 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 16 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 1 40 0 2 0 0 43 0 4 81 23 5 1 0 114 2 0 19 3 0 0 3 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Session Total 2 2 188 9 4 0 0 205 3 10 312 81 13 2 0 421 2 1 55 14 2 0 6 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1600 - 1615 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 10 7 0 0 0 17 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1615 - 1630 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 23 7 1 0 0 31 1 0 12 2 0 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

1630 - 1645 0 0 11 3 0 0 0 14 0 2 15 13 2 0 0 32 1 0 12 1 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1645 - 1700 1 1 9 1 0 0 0 12 0 1 19 5 0 0 0 25 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 1 36 6 0 0 0 44 0 3 67 32 3 0 0 105 2 0 36 10 0 0 3 51 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

1700 - 1715 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 12 0 2 24 6 0 0 0 32 0 0 20 2 0 0 1 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1715 - 1730 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 12 0 1 26 5 0 0 0 32 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1730 - 1745 0 0 12 4 0 0 0 16 0 3 21 1 0 0 0 25 0 0 13 4 0 0 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1745 - 1800 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 31 6 0 1 0 39 0 0 10 3 0 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 46 6 0 0 0 52 0 7 102 18 0 1 0 128 0 0 55 9 0 0 3 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1800 - 1815 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 17 8 0 0 0 25 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1815 - 1830 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 22 4 0 0 0 27 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1830 - 1845 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 15 1 0 13 4 0 0 0 18 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1845 - 1900 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 2 16 3 0 0 0 21 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 34 6 0 0 0 40 1 3 68 19 0 0 0 91 0 1 20 1 0 0 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Session Total 1 1 116 18 0 0 0 136 1 13 237 69 3 1 0 324 2 1 111 20 0 0 10 144 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Left to Salhouse Road (West) Ahead to Green Lane West Right to Salhouse Road (East) U-Turn

Page 45: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Rackheath - Manual Traffic Survey, Tuesday 14th April 2015

Junction: Green Lane West / Salhouse Road / Green Lane East

Approach: Salhouse Road (West)

TIME P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL P/CYCLE M/CYCLE CAR LGV OGV1 OGV2 BUS TOTAL

0700 - 0715 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0715 - 0730 0 0 8 2 1 0 0 11 0 1 19 5 1 0 0 26 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0730 - 0745 2 0 7 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 17 6 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0745 - 0800 1 1 12 4 0 0 0 18 0 0 19 6 1 0 1 27 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 3 1 37 9 1 0 0 51 0 1 64 22 2 0 1 90 0 0 9 2 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0800 - 0815 1 0 13 1 0 0 0 15 0 2 23 8 0 0 0 33 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0815 - 0830 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 15 1 0 14 7 1 0 0 23 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0830 - 0845 0 1 21 3 2 0 0 27 0 1 25 5 1 0 0 32 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0845 - 0900 0 0 12 1 1 0 0 14 0 0 18 6 1 0 0 25 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 1 1 60 5 4 0 0 71 1 3 80 26 3 0 0 113 0 0 22 7 0 0 0 29 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

0900 - 0915 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 15 8 1 0 0 24 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0915 - 0930 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 9 0 3 19 5 1 0 0 28 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0930 - 0945 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 14 1 0 23 6 0 0 0 30 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

0945 - 1000 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 15 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Hourly Total 0 0 28 12 0 0 0 40 1 3 72 22 2 0 0 100 0 1 18 5 2 0 0 26 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

Session Total 4 2 125 26 5 0 0 162 2 7 216 70 7 0 1 303 0 1 49 14 4 0 0 68 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 4

1600 - 1615 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 14 0 1 29 5 1 0 0 36 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

1615 - 1630 0 0 6 8 1 0 0 15 0 1 52 3 0 0 0 56 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1630 - 1645 0 0 12 3 1 0 0 16 0 6 47 6 0 0 0 59 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1645 - 1700 0 0 11 1 1 0 0 13 1 0 69 11 0 0 0 81 0 0 21 3 0 0 0 24 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Hourly Total 0 0 42 13 3 0 0 58 1 8 197 25 1 0 0 232 1 0 56 4 0 0 0 61 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

1700 - 1715 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 70 5 0 0 0 76 0 2 15 3 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1715 - 1730 0 2 8 2 0 0 0 12 4 3 68 6 0 0 0 81 0 1 19 3 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1730 - 1745 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 11 1 4 63 7 0 0 0 75 0 0 15 4 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1745 - 1800 1 0 13 2 0 0 0 16 3 0 60 3 0 0 0 66 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 2 3 44 4 0 0 0 53 8 8 261 21 0 0 0 298 0 4 64 10 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1800 - 1815 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 14 3 2 61 2 1 0 0 69 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1815 - 1830 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 18 2 1 34 2 0 0 0 39 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1830 - 1845 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 2 3 36 2 0 0 0 43 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1845 - 1900 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 8 1 2 27 1 0 0 0 31 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Total 0 0 46 3 0 0 0 49 8 8 158 7 1 0 0 182 1 1 34 4 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Session Total 2 3 132 20 3 0 0 160 17 24 616 53 2 0 0 712 2 5 154 18 0 0 0 179 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Left to Green Lane West Ahead to Salhouse Road (East) Right to Green Lane East U-Turn

Page 46: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Rackheath - Maximum Queue Length Survey, Tuesday 14th April 2015

Junction 1

TimeGreen Lane

West

Salhouse

Road (E)

Green Lane

East

Salhouse

Road (W)

07:05 1 2 2 1

07:10 1 2 2 1

07:15 1 3 1 2

07:20 1 3 2 2

07:25 2 6 2 1

07:30 1 5 2 2

07:35 2 7 2 1

07:40 2 5 2 1

07:45 2 7 2 1

07:50 2 8 2 1

07:55 1 7 1 1

08:00 2 6 2 2

08:05 2 7 1 2

08:10 3 5 1 1

08:15 2 6 1 1

08:20 3 5 1 1

08:25 3 4 1 2

08:30 5 5 2 1

08:35 6 3 1 1

08:40 3 4 1 1

08:45 3 2 2 1

08:50 2 2 2 1

08:55 1 2 2 1

09:00 2 3 2 0

09:05 1 1 2 0

09:10 2 2 2 1

09:15 1 1 1 0

09:20 1 1 2 0

09:25 1 1 2 0

09:30 1 2 1 1

09:35 1 2 1 0

09:40 0 1 1 0

09:45 1 1 1 1

09:50 0 1 0 1

09:55 1 1 1 1

10:00 0 1 1 1

TimeGreen Lane

West

Salhouse

Road (E)

Green Lane

East

Salhouse

Road (W)

16:05 1 2 2 3

16:10 1 1 2 1

16:15 2 2 2 2

16:20 2 1 1 1

16:25 3 1 2 2

16:30 2 2 1 2

16:35 4 2 2 3

16:40 3 2 2 2

16:45 3 1 2 3

16:50 2 1 2 3

16:55 2 2 1 2

17:00 3 2 2 2

17:05 3 3 1 2

17:10 2 2 2 2

17:15 2 1 2 1

17:20 3 1 3 3

17:25 4 1 3 2

17:30 4 3 2 3

17:35 6 4 4 2

17:40 4 3 2 3

17:45 5 2 2 3

17:50 2 4 4 2

17:55 2 2 3 2

18:00 3 2 4 2

18:05 2 2 2 1

18:10 2 2 2 1

18:15 2 3 3 1

18:20 1 2 2 1

18:25 1 2 1 1

18:30 1 1 1 2

18:35 2 1 2 1

18:40 1 1 1 2

18:45 1 2 2 2

18:50 2 2 1 1

18:55 1 2 1 3

19:00 1 1 1 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

AM Maximum Queues

Green Lane West Salhouse Road (E) Green Lane East Salhouse Road (W)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

PM Maximum Queues

Green Lane West Salhouse Road (E) Green Lane East Salhouse Road (W)

Page 47: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix C

APPENDIX C

Page 48: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western
Page 49: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix D

APPENDIX D

Page 50: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western
Page 51: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix E

APPENDIX E

Page 52: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western
Page 53: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix F

APPENDIX F

Page 54: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western
Page 55: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix G

APPENDIX G

Page 56: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 1

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-219603-150623-0625

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL

Category : M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas:

02 SOUTH EAST

ES EAST SUSSEX 3 days

SC SURREY 1 days

WS WEST SUSSEX 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range

are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Number of dwellings

Actual Range: 80 to 199 (units: )

Range Selected by User: 80 to 250 (units: )

Public Transport Provision:

Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/10 to 01/01/15

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are

included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days:

Monday 1 days

Wednesday 1 days

Thursday 2 days

Friday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types:

Manual count 5 days

Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding

up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are

undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations:

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 1

Edge of Town 3

Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories

consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and

Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories:

Residential Zone 4

Village 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories

consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out

of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Page 57: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 2

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class:

C 3 5 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005

has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 1 mile:

1,000 or Less 1 days

1,001 to 5,000 2 days

5,001 to 10,000 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles:

25,001 to 50,000 2 days

75,001 to 100,000 1 days

125,001 to 250,000 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles:

1.1 to 1.5 3 days

1.6 to 2.0 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling,

within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan:

Yes 5 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place,

and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans.

Page 58: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 3

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 ES-03-M-04 MIXED HOUSING EAST SUSSEX

SOUTH COAST ROAD

PEACEHAVEN

Edge of Town

Residential Zone

Total Number of dwellings: 1 8 8

Survey date: FRIDAY 25/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL

2 ES-03-M-05 HOUSES & FLATS EAST SUSSEX

A26 CROWBOROUGH RD

FIVE ASH DOWN VILLAGE

NEAR UCKFIELD

Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre)

Village

Total Number of dwellings: 1 3 8

Survey date: MONDAY 30/06/14 Survey Type: MANUAL

3 ES-03-M-06 MIXED HOUSES EAST SUSSEX

FIELD END

MARESFIELD

Edge of Town

Residential Zone

Total Number of dwellings: 8 0

Survey date: WEDNESDAY 01/10/14 Survey Type: MANUAL

4 SC-03-M-07 HOUSES/FLATS SURREY

EPSOM ROAD

GUILDFORD

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre)

Residential Zone

Total Number of dwellings: 1 9 9

Survey date: THURSDAY 24/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL

5 WS-03-M-05 MIXED HOUSING WEST SUSSEX

ELLIS ROAD

S BROADBRIDGE HEATH

WEST HORSHAM

Edge of Town

Residential Zone

Total Number of dwellings: 9 2

Survey date: THURSDAY 23/10/14 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a

unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week

and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.

Page 59: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 4

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.083 5 139 0.225 5 139 0.30807:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.105 5 139 0.308 5 139 0.41308:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.122 5 139 0.192 5 139 0.31409:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.121 5 139 0.154 5 139 0.27510:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.135 5 139 0.119 5 139 0.25411:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.103 5 139 0.135 5 139 0.23812:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.122 5 139 0.129 5 139 0.25113:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.141 5 139 0.165 5 139 0.30614:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.201 5 139 0.139 5 139 0.34015:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.217 5 139 0.143 5 139 0.36016:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.273 5 139 0.151 5 139 0.42417:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.291 5 139 0.131 5 139 0.42218:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 1.914 1.991 3.905

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 60: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 8

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL TAXIS

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.006 5 139 0.004 5 139 0.01007:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.004 5 139 0.004 5 139 0.00808:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.010 5 139 0.010 5 139 0.02009:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.001 5 139 0.006 5 139 0.00710:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.007 5 139 0.001 5 139 0.00811:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.007 5 139 0.006 5 139 0.01312:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.001 5 139 0.007 5 139 0.00813:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.006 5 139 0.006 5 139 0.01214:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.009 5 139 0.010 5 139 0.01915:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.003 5 139 0.000 5 139 0.00316:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.006 5 139 0.003 5 139 0.00917:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.001 5 139 0.003 5 139 0.00418:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 0.061 0.060 0.121

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 61: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 12

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL CYCLISTS

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.004 5 139 0.006 5 139 0.01007:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.000 5 139 0.014 5 139 0.01408:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.003 5 139 0.006 5 139 0.00909:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.000 5 139 0.000 5 139 0.00010:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.001 5 139 0.001 5 139 0.00211:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.001 5 139 0.003 5 139 0.00412:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.006 5 139 0.000 5 139 0.00613:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.001 5 139 0.003 5 139 0.00414:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.004 5 139 0.000 5 139 0.00415:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.013 5 139 0.016 5 139 0.02916:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.013 5 139 0.007 5 139 0.02017:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.004 5 139 0.006 5 139 0.01018:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 0.050 0.062 0.112

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 62: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 16

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL VEHICLE OCCUPANTS

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.085 5 139 0.294 5 139 0.37907:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.133 5 139 0.476 5 139 0.60908:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.142 5 139 0.270 5 139 0.41209:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.143 5 139 0.194 5 139 0.33710:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.164 5 139 0.138 5 139 0.30211:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.132 5 139 0.168 5 139 0.30012:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.148 5 139 0.158 5 139 0.30613:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.188 5 139 0.209 5 139 0.39714:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.333 5 139 0.175 5 139 0.50815:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.306 5 139 0.184 5 139 0.49016:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.370 5 139 0.192 5 139 0.56217:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.367 5 139 0.148 5 139 0.51518:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 2.511 2.606 5.117

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 63: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 20

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIANS

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.023 5 139 0.040 5 139 0.06307:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.022 5 139 0.096 5 139 0.11808:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.039 5 139 0.050 5 139 0.08909:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.042 5 139 0.039 5 139 0.08110:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.033 5 139 0.034 5 139 0.06711:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.029 5 139 0.023 5 139 0.05212:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.027 5 139 0.024 5 139 0.05113:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.032 5 139 0.029 5 139 0.06114:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.063 5 139 0.043 5 139 0.10615:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.067 5 139 0.023 5 139 0.09016:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.056 5 139 0.044 5 139 0.10017:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.027 5 139 0.022 5 139 0.04918:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 0.460 0.467 0.927

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 64: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 24

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT USERS

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.003 5 139 0.033 5 139 0.03607:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.000 5 139 0.040 5 139 0.04008:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.007 5 139 0.013 5 139 0.02009:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.003 5 139 0.004 5 139 0.00710:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.011 5 139 0.010 5 139 0.02111:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.006 5 139 0.004 5 139 0.01012:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.003 5 139 0.007 5 139 0.01013:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.014 5 139 0.001 5 139 0.01514:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.017 5 139 0.004 5 139 0.02115:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.027 5 139 0.000 5 139 0.02716:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.034 5 139 0.003 5 139 0.03717:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.007 5 139 0.001 5 139 0.00818:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 0.132 0.120 0.252

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 65: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

TRICS 7.2.1 040615 B17.16 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 23/06/15

Residential - Mixed private/affordable Page 28

Transport Planning Associates Ltd Castle Park Cambridge Licence No: 219603

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/M - MIXED PRIVATE/AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE

Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate

00:00 - 01:00

01:00 - 02:00

02:00 - 03:00

03:00 - 04:00

04:00 - 05:00

05:00 - 06:00

06:00 - 07:00

5 139 0.115 5 139 0.373 5 139 0.48807:00 - 08:00

5 139 0.155 5 139 0.627 5 139 0.78208:00 - 09:00

5 139 0.191 5 139 0.339 5 139 0.53009:00 - 10:00

5 139 0.188 5 139 0.237 5 139 0.42510:00 - 11:00

5 139 0.209 5 139 0.184 5 139 0.39311:00 - 12:00

5 139 0.168 5 139 0.198 5 139 0.36612:00 - 13:00

5 139 0.184 5 139 0.189 5 139 0.37313:00 - 14:00

5 139 0.235 5 139 0.242 5 139 0.47714:00 - 15:00

5 139 0.418 5 139 0.222 5 139 0.64015:00 - 16:00

5 139 0.413 5 139 0.222 5 139 0.63516:00 - 17:00

5 139 0.473 5 139 0.247 5 139 0.72017:00 - 18:00

5 139 0.406 5 139 0.176 5 139 0.58218:00 - 19:00

19:00 - 20:00

20:00 - 21:00

21:00 - 22:00

22:00 - 23:00

23:00 - 24:00

Total Rates: 3.155 3.256 6.411

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus

departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where

count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time

period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of

the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 80 - 199 (units: )

Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 01/01/15

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

Page 66: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix H

APPENDIX H

Page 67: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Filename: Green Lane East - Salhouse Road.j9

Path: P:\14\11\88 - Green Lane East, Rackheath\08 Calculations and Technical Data\Junction analysis\Arcady

Report generation date: 10/10/2016 16:18:56

»Un-calibrated - Surveyed, AM »Un-calibrated - Surveyed, PM »Calibrated AM - Surveyed, AM »Calibrated AM - Forecast Base, AM »Calibrated AM - Total Forecast , AM »Calibrated PM - Surveyed, PM »Calibrated PM - Forecast Base, PM »Calibrated PM - Total Forecast , PM

Junctions 9ARCADY 9 - Roundabout Module

Version: 9.0.0.4211 []

© Copyright TRL Limited, 2016

For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:

Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758    email: [email protected]    Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk

The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the

solution

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

1

Page 68: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Summary of junction performance

  AM PM

  Queue (Veh) Delay (min) RFC LOS Queue (Veh) Delay (min) RFC LOS

  Un-calibrated - Surveyed

1 - Salhouse Road East 2.5 0.34 0.72 C 1.0 0.23 0.50 B

2 - Green Lane East 1.3 0.27 0.58 C 0.7 0.17 0.43 A

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.6 0.14 0.40 A 1.7 0.21 0.63 B

4 - Green Lane West 1.1 0.18 0.53 B 10.6 0.97 0.99 F

  AM

  Queue (Veh) Delay (min) RFC LOS

  Calibrated AM - Surveyed

1 - Salhouse Road East 2.5 0.34 0.72 C

2 - Green Lane East 1.3 0.27 0.58 C

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.6 0.14 0.40 A

4 - Green Lane West 2.3 0.37 0.71 C

  Calibrated AM - Forecast Base

1 - Salhouse Road East 4.3 0.54 0.83 D

2 - Green Lane East 2.1 0.38 0.68 C

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.8 0.16 0.45 A

4 - Green Lane West 3.6 0.53 0.81 D

  Calibrated AM - Total Forecast

  PM

  Queue (Veh) Delay (min) RFC LOS

  Calibrated PM - Surveyed

1 - Salhouse Road East 1.0 0.25 0.51 B

2 - Green Lane East 0.7 0.17 0.43 B

3 - Salhouse Road West 1.7 0.21 0.63 B

4 - Green Lane West 2.0 0.21 0.67 B

  Calibrated PM - Forecast Base

1 - Salhouse Road East 1.5 0.33 0.62 C

2 - Green Lane East 1.0 0.20 0.50 B

3 - Salhouse Road West 2.5 0.28 0.73 C

4 - Green Lane West 3.3 0.31 0.78 C

  Calibrated PM - Total Forecast

Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

2

Page 69: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

File summary

Units

Analysis Options

Demand Set Summary

File Description

Title Green Lane East - Salhouse Road

Location Rackheath

Site number  

Date 12/05/2015

Version  

Status (new file)

Identifier  

Client La Ronde Wright Ltd

Jobnumber 1411-88

Enumerator TPA"jack.williams

Description  

Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units

m kph Veh Veh perHour min -Min perMin

Mini-roundabout

model

Vehicle

length (m)

Calculate Queue

Percentiles

Calculate detailed

queueing delay

Calculate residual

capacity

RFC

Threshold

Average Delay

threshold (min)

Queue threshold

(PCU)

JUNCTIONS 9 5.75       0.85 0.60 20.00

Scenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment length

(min)

Run

automatically

Surveyed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Surveyed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Forecast

BaseAM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Forecast

BasePM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Total

Forecast AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Total

Forecast PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

3

Page 70: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Un-calibrated - Surveyed, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A1Un-

calibratedü ü D1,D2 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.25 B

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

4

Page 71: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 852.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D1 Surveyed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

5

Page 72: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

2.000 36.000 331.000 40.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 29.000 0.000 105.000 169.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

115.000 26.000 2.000 75.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 25.000 191.000 99.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.09 0.81 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.53 0.12 0.01 0.34

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.60 0.31 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 8 1 3

 2 - Green

Lane East 14 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

3 0 0 4

 4 - Green

Lane

West 8 4 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.083 1.009 1.025

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.138 1.000 1.000 1.024

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.035 1.000 1.000 1.040

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.080 1.037 1.020 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.72 0.34 2.5 C 409.00 409.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.58 0.27 1.3 C 303.00 303.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.40 0.14 0.6 A 218.00 218.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.53 0.18 1.1 B 316.00 316.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

6

Page 73: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East436.00 109.00 314.20 623.26 0.700 427.28 162.22 0.0 2.2 0.294 C

2 - Green

Lane East304.00 76.00 490.57 535.74 0.567 298.95 250.91 0.0 1.3 0.248 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West204.00 51.00 240.22 700.40 0.291 202.37 549.30 0.0 0.4 0.120 A

4 - Green

Lane West316.00 79.00 163.45 725.64 0.435 312.97 279.14 0.0 0.8 0.144 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East456.00 114.00 302.62 630.18 0.724 454.83 162.64 2.2 2.5 0.339 C

2 - Green

Lane East304.00 76.00 511.65 523.41 0.581 303.67 245.79 1.3 1.3 0.272 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West204.00 51.00 246.09 697.54 0.292 203.98 569.23 0.4 0.4 0.122 A

4 - Green

Lane West300.00 75.00 165.09 724.61 0.414 300.17 284.98 0.8 0.7 0.141 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East380.00 95.00 278.20 644.74 0.589 383.95 150.81 2.5 1.5 0.233 B

2 - Green

Lane East312.00 78.00 439.32 565.78 0.551 312.34 222.84 1.3 1.3 0.237 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West184.00 46.00 244.40 698.38 0.263 184.20 507.25 0.4 0.4 0.117 A

4 - Green

Lane West276.00 69.00 152.60 731.99 0.377 276.41 276.00 0.7 0.6 0.132 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East364.00 91.00 376.53 586.16 0.621 363.59 206.15 1.5 1.6 0.269 C

2 - Green

Lane East292.00 73.00 451.23 558.70 0.523 292.55 288.89 1.3 1.1 0.226 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West280.00 70.00 229.68 705.53 0.397 278.85 514.10 0.4 0.6 0.140 A

4 - Green

Lane West372.00 93.00 212.70 696.80 0.534 369.99 295.84 0.6 1.1 0.182 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

7

Page 74: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Un-calibrated - Surveyed, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A1Un-

calibratedü ü D1,D2 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.46 D

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

8

Page 75: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 852.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D2 Surveyed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

9

Page 76: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 27.000 160.000 31.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 67.000 0.000 52.000 114.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

313.000 86.000 1.000 50.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 94.000 241.000 109.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.12 0.73 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.70 0.19 0.00 0.11

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.21 0.54 0.25 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 11 4 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 3 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 2

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 1 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.111 1.038 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.030 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.020

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.033 1.009 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.50 0.23 1.0 B 218.00 218.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.43 0.17 0.7 A 233.00 233.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.63 0.21 1.7 B 450.00 450.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.99 0.97 10.6 F 444.00 444.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

10

Page 77: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East228.00 57.00 329.79 602.98 0.378 225.61 448.80 0.0 0.6 0.158 A

2 - Green

Lane East204.00 51.00 273.16 673.18 0.303 202.28 282.24 0.0 0.4 0.127 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West476.00 119.00 189.22 749.69 0.635 469.31 286.22 0.0 1.7 0.209 B

4 - Green

Lane West308.00 77.00 475.33 559.06 0.551 303.26 183.20 0.0 1.2 0.231 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East252.00 63.00 493.73 507.38 0.497 250.56 492.74 0.6 1.0 0.232 B

2 - Green

Lane East268.00 67.00 347.75 628.64 0.426 266.80 396.54 0.4 0.7 0.165 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West440.00 110.00 242.89 723.70 0.608 440.34 371.67 1.7 1.6 0.212 B

4 - Green

Lane West556.00 139.00 468.13 562.91 0.988 518.34 215.09 1.2 10.6 0.968 F

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East156.00 39.00 456.46 529.17 0.295 158.14 485.85 1.0 0.4 0.163 A

2 - Green

Lane East224.00 56.00 253.81 685.43 0.327 224.95 360.79 0.7 0.5 0.131 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West464.00 116.00 197.23 745.76 0.622 463.89 281.52 1.6 1.6 0.213 B

4 - Green

Lane West440.00 110.00 477.03 557.96 0.789 465.28 184.09 10.6 4.3 0.745 E

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East236.00 59.00 453.39 530.83 0.445 234.57 460.52 0.4 0.8 0.202 B

2 - Green

Lane East236.00 59.00 322.30 643.92 0.367 235.68 365.66 0.5 0.6 0.147 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West420.00 105.00 216.44 736.51 0.570 421.02 341.55 1.6 1.4 0.191 B

4 - Green

Lane West472.00 118.00 442.02 578.22 0.816 471.90 195.45 4.3 4.3 0.560 D

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

11

Page 78: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated AM - Surveyed, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A2Calibrated

AMü ü D1,D3,D5 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.30 C

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

12

Page 79: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   -180.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 672.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D1 Surveyed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

13

Page 80: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

2.000 36.000 331.000 40.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 29.000 0.000 105.000 169.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

115.000 26.000 2.000 75.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 25.000 191.000 99.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.09 0.81 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.53 0.12 0.01 0.34

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.60 0.31 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 8 1 3

 2 - Green

Lane East 14 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

3 0 0 4

 4 - Green

Lane

West 8 4 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.083 1.009 1.025

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.138 1.000 1.000 1.024

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.035 1.000 1.000 1.040

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.080 1.037 1.020 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.72 0.34 2.5 C 409.00 409.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.58 0.27 1.3 C 303.00 303.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.40 0.14 0.6 A 218.00 218.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.71 0.37 2.3 C 316.00 316.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

14

Page 81: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East436.00 109.00 312.24 624.43 0.698 427.33 162.05 0.0 2.2 0.293 C

2 - Green

Lane East304.00 76.00 489.94 536.11 0.567 298.96 249.63 0.0 1.3 0.248 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West204.00 51.00 240.23 700.39 0.291 202.37 548.67 0.0 0.4 0.120 A

4 - Green

Lane West316.00 79.00 163.45 551.68 0.573 310.84 279.14 0.0 1.3 0.244 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East456.00 114.00 302.70 630.13 0.724 454.78 162.65 2.2 2.5 0.339 C

2 - Green

Lane East304.00 76.00 511.64 523.42 0.581 303.66 245.84 1.3 1.3 0.272 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West204.00 51.00 246.08 697.55 0.292 203.98 569.22 0.4 0.4 0.122 A

4 - Green

Lane West300.00 75.00 165.09 550.66 0.545 300.26 284.97 1.3 1.2 0.240 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East380.00 95.00 278.64 644.48 0.590 383.94 150.84 2.5 1.5 0.234 B

2 - Green

Lane East312.00 78.00 439.46 565.70 0.552 312.33 223.12 1.3 1.3 0.237 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West184.00 46.00 244.40 698.38 0.263 184.20 507.39 0.4 0.4 0.117 A

4 - Green

Lane West276.00 69.00 152.60 558.04 0.495 276.89 276.00 1.2 1.0 0.214 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East364.00 91.00 373.70 587.85 0.619 363.64 205.91 1.5 1.6 0.267 C

2 - Green

Lane East292.00 73.00 450.30 559.25 0.522 292.56 287.04 1.3 1.1 0.226 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West280.00 70.00 229.68 705.52 0.397 278.85 513.18 0.4 0.6 0.140 A

4 - Green

Lane West372.00 93.00 212.70 522.85 0.711 366.91 295.84 1.0 2.3 0.373 C

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

15

Page 82: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

16

Page 83: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated AM - Forecast Base, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A2Calibrated

AMü ü D1,D3,D5 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.43 D

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

17

Page 84: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   -180.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 672.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D3Forecast

BaseAM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

18

Page 85: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

2.000 40.000 368.000 45.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 32.000 0.000 117.000 188.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

128.000 29.000 2.000 83.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 28.000 213.000 110.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.09 0.81 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.09 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.53 0.12 0.01 0.34

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.61 0.31 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 8 1 2

 2 - Green

Lane East 13 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

3 0 0 4

 4 - Green

Lane

West 7 4 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.079 1.009 1.024

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.129 1.000 1.000 1.022

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.033 1.000 1.000 1.038

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.071 1.038 1.019 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

19

Page 86: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.83 0.54 4.3 D 456.00 456.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.68 0.38 2.1 C 338.00 338.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.45 0.16 0.8 A 244.00 244.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.81 0.53 3.6 D 350.00 350.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East488.00 122.00 346.48 604.64 0.807 473.55 180.64 0.0 3.6 0.421 D

2 - Green

Lane East340.00 85.00 542.57 506.40 0.671 332.36 277.46 0.0 1.9 0.332 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West228.00 57.00 266.87 688.98 0.331 226.05 608.06 0.0 0.5 0.129 A

4 - Green

Lane West352.00 88.00 182.16 541.01 0.651 344.96 310.76 0.0 1.8 0.296 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East508.00 127.00 335.20 611.40 0.831 505.18 181.10 3.6 4.3 0.542 D

2 - Green

Lane East336.00 84.00 567.48 491.82 0.683 335.42 272.89 1.9 2.1 0.381 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West228.00 57.00 272.10 686.44 0.332 227.98 630.80 0.5 0.5 0.131 A

4 - Green

Lane West332.00 83.00 183.86 539.96 0.615 332.44 316.22 1.8 1.6 0.290 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East424.00 106.00 307.81 627.75 0.675 432.49 169.42 4.3 2.2 0.319 C

2 - Green

Lane East348.00 87.00 492.50 535.77 0.650 348.52 247.79 2.1 1.9 0.322 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West208.00 52.00 273.06 685.99 0.303 208.21 567.96 0.5 0.4 0.126 A

4 - Green

Lane West304.00 76.00 171.80 547.06 0.556 305.43 309.48 1.6 1.3 0.250 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

20

Page 87: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East404.00 101.00 410.52 566.48 0.713 403.33 229.31 2.2 2.4 0.365 C

2 - Green

Lane East328.00 82.00 497.45 532.77 0.616 329.04 316.40 1.9 1.7 0.296 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West312.00 78.00 257.61 693.48 0.450 310.55 568.88 0.4 0.8 0.156 A

4 - Green

Lane West412.00 103.00 237.05 508.87 0.810 402.78 331.10 1.3 3.6 0.525 D

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

21

Page 88: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated AM - Total Forecast , AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A2Calibrated

AMü ü D1,D3,D5 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.53 D

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

22

Page 89: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   -180.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 672.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D5Total

Forecast AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

23

Page 90: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

2.000 42.000 368.000 45.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 38.000 0.000 139.000 222.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

128.000 30.000 2.000 83.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 28.000 224.000 110.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.09 0.81 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.53 0.12 0.01 0.34

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.62 0.30 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 7 1 2

 2 - Green

Lane East 11 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

3 0 0 4

 4 - Green

Lane

West 7 4 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.071 1.009 1.024

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.111 1.000 1.000 1.019

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.033 1.000 1.000 1.038

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.071 1.036 1.019 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

24

Page 91: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.84 0.59 4.7 E 459.00 459.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.81 0.60 3.8 E 398.00 398.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.47 0.17 0.9 A 245.00 245.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.85 0.61 4.4 E 362.00 362.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East492.00 123.00 358.47 597.89 0.823 476.33 185.13 0.0 3.9 0.449 D

2 - Green

Lane East396.00 99.00 543.33 507.71 0.780 383.63 291.47 0.0 3.1 0.448 D

3 - Salhouse

Road West228.00 57.00 299.95 673.67 0.338 225.98 627.01 0.0 0.5 0.133 A

4 - Green

Lane West364.00 91.00 187.42 538.51 0.676 356.19 338.52 0.0 2.0 0.317 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East512.00 128.00 344.38 606.33 0.844 508.90 186.42 3.9 4.7 0.586 E

2 - Green

Lane East400.00 100.00 568.17 493.12 0.811 397.31 285.11 3.1 3.8 0.601 E

3 - Salhouse

Road West228.00 57.00 312.17 667.77 0.341 227.96 653.30 0.5 0.5 0.136 A

4 - Green

Lane West340.00 85.00 190.17 536.80 0.633 340.63 349.97 2.0 1.8 0.307 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East424.00 106.00 320.36 620.66 0.683 433.64 175.40 4.7 2.3 0.335 C

2 - Green

Lane East412.00 103.00 492.56 537.59 0.766 413.01 261.44 3.8 3.5 0.490 D

3 - Salhouse

Road West208.00 52.00 314.60 666.64 0.312 208.22 590.97 0.5 0.5 0.131 A

4 - Green

Lane West316.00 79.00 178.33 543.77 0.581 317.43 344.49 1.8 1.4 0.267 C

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

25

Page 92: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East408.00 102.00 425.42 558.03 0.731 406.92 236.34 2.3 2.6 0.392 C

2 - Green

Lane East384.00 96.00 499.35 533.50 0.720 387.01 332.99 3.5 2.8 0.419 D

3 - Salhouse

Road West316.00 79.00 295.18 676.01 0.467 314.39 591.18 0.5 0.9 0.165 A

4 - Green

Lane West428.00 107.00 245.65 504.35 0.849 416.12 363.93 1.4 4.4 0.612 E

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

26

Page 93: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated PM - Surveyed, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A3Calibrated

PMü ü D2,D4,D6 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.21 B

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

27

Page 94: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   270.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 1122.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D2 Surveyed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

28

Page 95: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 27.000 160.000 31.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 67.000 0.000 52.000 114.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

313.000 86.000 1.000 50.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 94.000 241.000 109.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.12 0.73 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.70 0.19 0.00 0.11

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.21 0.54 0.25 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 11 4 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 3 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 2

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 1 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.111 1.038 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.030 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.020

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.033 1.009 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.51 0.25 1.0 B 218.00 218.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.43 0.17 0.7 B 233.00 233.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.63 0.21 1.7 B 450.00 450.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.67 0.21 2.0 B 444.00 444.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

29

Page 96: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East228.00 57.00 331.66 601.89 0.379 225.60 449.30 0.0 0.6 0.158 A

2 - Green

Lane East204.00 51.00 273.74 672.83 0.303 202.28 283.53 0.0 0.4 0.127 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West476.00 119.00 189.22 749.69 0.635 469.31 286.80 0.0 1.7 0.209 B

4 - Green

Lane West308.00 77.00 475.33 823.69 0.374 305.64 183.20 0.0 0.6 0.115 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East252.00 63.00 519.09 492.61 0.512 250.34 499.54 0.6 1.0 0.246 B

2 - Green

Lane East268.00 67.00 355.46 624.08 0.429 266.76 413.97 0.4 0.7 0.167 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West440.00 110.00 242.83 723.73 0.608 440.34 379.40 1.7 1.6 0.212 B

4 - Green

Lane West556.00 139.00 468.12 827.55 0.672 550.51 215.05 0.6 2.0 0.213 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East156.00 39.00 439.02 539.33 0.289 158.41 481.18 1.0 0.4 0.158 A

2 - Green

Lane East224.00 56.00 248.61 688.51 0.325 225.00 348.81 0.7 0.5 0.130 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West464.00 116.00 197.31 745.72 0.622 463.89 276.30 1.6 1.6 0.213 B

4 - Green

Lane West440.00 110.00 477.04 822.58 0.535 443.15 184.15 2.0 1.2 0.159 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East236.00 59.00 453.23 530.92 0.445 234.53 460.48 0.4 0.8 0.201 B

2 - Green

Lane East236.00 59.00 322.21 643.98 0.366 235.67 365.55 0.5 0.6 0.147 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West420.00 105.00 216.43 736.51 0.570 421.02 341.46 1.6 1.4 0.191 B

4 - Green

Lane West472.00 118.00 442.01 842.85 0.560 471.70 195.44 1.2 1.2 0.161 A

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

30

Page 97: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

31

Page 98: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated PM - Forecast Base, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A3Calibrated

PMü ü D2,D4,D6 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.28 C

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

32

Page 99: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   270.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 1122.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D4Forecast

BasePM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

33

Page 100: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 30.000 179.000 35.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 75.000 0.000 58.000 127.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

350.000 96.000 1.000 56.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 105.000 270.000 122.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.12 0.73 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.70 0.19 0.00 0.11

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.21 0.54 0.25 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 10 4 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 3 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 2

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 1 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.103 1.035 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.028 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.019

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.031 1.009 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

34

Page 101: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.62 0.33 1.5 C 244.00 244.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.50 0.20 1.0 B 260.00 260.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.73 0.28 2.5 C 504.00 504.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.78 0.31 3.3 C 497.00 497.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East256.00 64.00 370.39 581.19 0.440 252.92 503.28 0.0 0.8 0.181 B

2 - Green

Lane East228.00 57.00 306.57 653.62 0.349 225.89 316.74 0.0 0.5 0.140 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West536.00 134.00 211.78 738.92 0.725 526.11 320.68 0.0 2.5 0.271 C

4 - Green

Lane West344.00 86.00 532.70 791.19 0.435 340.97 205.19 0.0 0.8 0.132 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East284.00 71.00 579.13 459.34 0.618 280.95 558.41 0.8 1.5 0.331 C

2 - Green

Lane East300.00 75.00 398.06 599.05 0.501 298.20 462.01 0.5 1.0 0.198 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West492.00 123.00 271.98 709.78 0.693 492.52 424.28 2.5 2.3 0.277 C

4 - Green

Lane West624.00 156.00 523.71 796.07 0.784 613.83 240.79 0.8 3.3 0.314 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East172.00 43.00 493.35 509.45 0.338 176.06 539.03 1.5 0.5 0.182 B

2 - Green

Lane East248.00 62.00 277.79 671.52 0.369 249.54 391.63 1.0 0.6 0.143 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West520.00 130.00 219.13 735.31 0.707 519.91 308.20 2.3 2.4 0.278 C

4 - Green

Lane West492.00 123.00 534.00 790.32 0.623 498.38 205.02 3.3 1.7 0.210 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

35

Page 102: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East264.00 66.00 506.77 501.49 0.526 261.78 514.42 0.5 1.1 0.248 B

2 - Green

Lane East264.00 66.00 360.04 621.81 0.425 263.48 408.50 0.6 0.7 0.167 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West468.00 117.00 242.25 724.16 0.646 469.88 381.27 2.4 1.9 0.238 B

4 - Green

Lane West528.00 132.00 493.57 813.74 0.649 527.62 218.56 1.7 1.8 0.209 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

36

Page 103: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated PM - Total Forecast , PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A3Calibrated

PMü ü D2,D4,D6 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.34 C

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

37

Page 104: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   270.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 1122.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D6Total

Forecast PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

38

Page 105: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 34.000 179.000 35.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 82.000 0.000 63.000 138.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

350.000 108.000 1.000 56.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 105.000 303.000 122.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.14 0.72 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.68 0.21 0.00 0.11

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.20 0.57 0.23 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 9 4 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 2 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 2

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 1 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.094 1.035 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.025 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.019

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.028 1.009 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

39

Page 106: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.68 0.40 1.9 C 249.00 249.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.55 0.22 1.2 B 284.00 284.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.75 0.31 2.8 C 516.00 516.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.85 0.40 4.6 C 529.00 529.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East260.00 65.00 402.79 562.91 0.462 256.65 507.53 0.0 0.8 0.194 B

2 - Green

Lane East248.00 62.00 305.51 654.88 0.379 245.60 353.94 0.0 0.6 0.146 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West548.00 137.00 227.15 731.62 0.749 536.96 323.96 0.0 2.8 0.294 C

4 - Green

Lane West364.00 91.00 549.74 782.25 0.465 360.58 214.37 0.0 0.9 0.141 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East292.00 73.00 627.10 432.18 0.676 287.64 565.70 0.8 1.9 0.403 C

2 - Green

Lane East328.00 82.00 398.56 599.31 0.547 325.71 516.19 0.6 1.2 0.218 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West504.00 126.00 293.80 699.39 0.721 504.35 430.48 2.8 2.7 0.309 C

4 - Green

Lane West664.00 166.00 543.88 785.32 0.846 648.92 254.26 0.9 4.6 0.403 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East176.00 44.00 540.72 482.57 0.365 181.37 547.76 1.9 0.6 0.203 B

2 - Green

Lane East276.00 69.00 280.44 670.56 0.412 277.84 441.65 1.2 0.7 0.153 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West532.00 133.00 241.59 724.59 0.734 531.89 316.69 2.7 2.7 0.311 C

4 - Green

Lane West524.00 131.00 554.56 779.31 0.672 533.92 218.92 4.6 2.1 0.254 C

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

40

Page 107: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East268.00 67.00 553.95 474.73 0.565 265.37 521.59 0.6 1.2 0.283 C

2 - Green

Lane East284.00 71.00 359.63 622.65 0.456 283.55 459.68 0.7 0.8 0.177 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West480.00 120.00 257.88 716.75 0.670 482.33 385.31 2.7 2.1 0.259 C

4 - Green

Lane West564.00 141.00 512.04 804.01 0.701 563.50 228.17 2.1 2.3 0.248 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:20:14 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

41

Page 108: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western
Page 109: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

GT19 Green Lane East, Rackheath Lovell Partnerships Ltd Transport Assessment

1411-88/TA/01 Rev D Transport Planning Associates

October 2016 Appendix I

APPENDIX I

Page 110: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Filename: Green Lane East - Salhouse Road - Stopping up.j9

Path: P:\14\11\88 - Green Lane East, Rackheath\08 Calculations and Technical Data\Junction analysis\Arcady

Report generation date: 10/10/2016 16:21:04

»Un-calibrated - Surveyed, AM »Un-calibrated - Surveyed, PM »Calibrated AM - Surveyed, AM »Calibrated AM - Forecast Base, AM »Calibrated AM - Total Forecast, AM »Calibrated PM - Surveyed, PM »Calibrated PM - Forecast Base, PM »Calibrated PM - Total Forecast, PM

Junctions 9ARCADY 9 - Roundabout Module

Version: 9.0.0.4211 []

© Copyright TRL Limited, 2016

For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:

Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758    email: [email protected]    Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk

The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the

solution

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

1

Page 111: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Summary of junction performance

  AM

  Queue (Veh) Delay (min) RFC LOS

  Calibrated AM - Surveyed

1 - Salhouse Road East 2.7 0.36 0.74 C

2 - Green Lane East 0.5 0.22 0.35 B

3 - Salhouse Road West 1.1 0.17 0.53 B

4 - Green Lane West 2.2 0.36 0.70 C

  Calibrated AM - Forecast Base

1 - Salhouse Road East 4.9 0.60 0.86 E

2 - Green Lane East 0.8 0.27 0.44 C

3 - Salhouse Road West 1.4 0.20 0.59 B

4 - Green Lane West 3.3 0.49 0.79 D

  Calibrated AM - Total Forecast

1 - Salhouse Road East 5.2 0.64 0.87 E

2 - Green Lane East 1.7 0.41 0.64 C

3 - Salhouse Road West 1.6 0.21 0.62 B

4 - Green Lane West 4.3 0.59 0.84 E

  PM

  Queue (Veh) Delay (min) RFC LOS

  Calibrated PM - Surveyed

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.9 0.22 0.47 B

2 - Green Lane East 0.4 0.16 0.26 A

3 - Salhouse Road West 1.9 0.22 0.67 B

4 - Green Lane West 1.9 0.20 0.66 B

  Calibrated PM - Forecast Base

1 - Salhouse Road East 1.3 0.28 0.57 C

2 - Green Lane East 0.5 0.18 0.32 B

3 - Salhouse Road West 2.7 0.29 0.74 C

4 - Green Lane West 2.9 0.28 0.76 C

  Calibrated PM - Total Forecast

1 - Salhouse Road East 1.5 0.34 0.62 C

2 - Green Lane East 0.6 0.20 0.38 B

3 - Salhouse Road West 3.2 0.33 0.78 C

4 - Green Lane West 4.7 0.40 0.85 C

There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set.

Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

2

Page 112: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

File summary

Units

Analysis Options

Demand Set Summary

File Description

Title Green Lane East - Salhouse Road

Location Rackheath

Site number  

Date 12/05/2015

Version  

Status (new file)

Identifier  

Client La Ronde Wright Ltd

Jobnumber 1411-88

Enumerator TPA"jack.williams

Description  

Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units

m kph Veh Veh perHour min -Min perMin

Mini-roundabout

model

Vehicle

length (m)

Calculate Queue

Percentiles

Calculate detailed

queueing delay

Calculate residual

capacity

RFC

Threshold

Average Delay

threshold (min)

Queue threshold

(PCU)

JUNCTIONS 9 5.75       0.85 0.60 20.00

Scenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment length

(min)

Run

automatically

Surveyed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Surveyed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Forecast

BaseAM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Forecast

BasePM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Total

ForecastAM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Total

ForecastPM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

3

Page 113: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Un-calibrated - Surveyed, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID Name Use specific Demand Set(s) Specific Demand Set(s) Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)

A1 Un-calibrated ü D1,D2 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.24 B

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

4

Page 114: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 852.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D1 Surveyed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

5

Page 115: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 2.000 0.000 367.000 40.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 15.000 0.000 53.000 85.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

130.000 13.000 2.000 160.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 25.000 96.000 195.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.90 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.43 0.04 0.01 0.52

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.30 0.62 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 8 2 3

 2 - Green

Lane East 13 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

5 0 0 3

 4 - Green

Lane

West 8 4 3 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.083 1.016 1.025

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.133 1.000 1.000 1.024

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.046 1.000 1.000 1.031

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.080 1.037 1.031 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.74 0.37 2.7 C 409.00 409.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.35 0.22 0.5 B 154.00 154.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.53 0.17 1.1 B 306.00 306.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.53 0.18 1.1 B 317.00 317.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

6

Page 116: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East424.00 106.00 295.11 634.22 0.669 416.35 162.89 0.0 1.9 0.267 C

2 - Green

Lane East156.00 39.00 606.89 464.78 0.336 154.02 104.58 0.0 0.5 0.192 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West288.00 72.00 144.38 743.95 0.387 285.51 616.53 0.0 0.6 0.130 A

4 - Green

Lane West308.00 77.00 152.87 730.62 0.422 305.13 277.02 0.0 0.7 0.140 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East460.00 115.00 323.03 617.50 0.745 456.85 164.63 1.9 2.7 0.365 C

2 - Green

Lane East152.00 38.00 666.16 429.75 0.354 151.83 113.72 0.5 0.5 0.216 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West284.00 71.00 147.21 742.57 0.382 284.00 670.79 0.6 0.6 0.131 A

4 - Green

Lane West336.00 84.00 152.14 731.01 0.460 335.52 279.07 0.7 0.8 0.151 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East396.00 99.00 249.33 661.62 0.599 400.62 145.53 2.7 1.5 0.234 B

2 - Green

Lane East160.00 40.00 561.30 491.82 0.325 160.19 88.65 0.5 0.5 0.181 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West252.00 63.00 146.65 742.86 0.339 252.41 574.84 0.6 0.5 0.122 A

4 - Green

Lane West256.00 64.00 137.66 739.65 0.346 257.20 261.40 0.8 0.5 0.125 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East356.00 89.00 356.52 597.54 0.596 356.15 214.58 1.5 1.5 0.249 B

2 - Green

Lane East148.00 37.00 584.94 477.48 0.310 148.13 127.73 0.5 0.5 0.182 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West400.00 100.00 134.55 748.72 0.534 397.60 598.53 0.5 1.1 0.170 B

4 - Green

Lane West368.00 92.00 205.29 699.55 0.526 365.81 326.86 0.5 1.1 0.179 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

7

Page 117: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Un-calibrated - Surveyed, PM

Data Errors and Warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

Severity Area Item Description

Warning Mini-roundabout

Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction;

treat results with caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 3 and 4 have 73% of the total flow

for the roundabout for one or more time segments]

ID Name Use specific Demand Set(s) Specific Demand Set(s) Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)

A1 Un-calibrated ü D1,D2 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.42 D

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

8

Page 118: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 852.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D2 Surveyed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

9

Page 119: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 0.000 187.000 31.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 34.000 0.000 26.000 57.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

347.000 43.000 1.000 107.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 94.000 121.000 230.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.86 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.70 0.09 0.00 0.21

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.21 0.27 0.52 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 0 5 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 3 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 1

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.000 1.048 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.030 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.009

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.033 1.022 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.46 0.21 0.8 B 217.00 217.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.26 0.15 0.3 A 118.00 118.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.67 0.22 1.9 B 500.00 500.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.96 0.82 8.7 E 446.00 446.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

10

Page 120: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East228.00 57.00 285.13 628.36 0.363 225.76 453.93 0.0 0.6 0.148 A

2 - Green

Lane East104.00 26.00 383.74 604.71 0.172 103.18 127.15 0.0 0.2 0.119 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West524.00 131.00 112.35 787.12 0.666 516.37 374.56 0.0 1.9 0.216 B

4 - Green

Lane West308.00 77.00 435.41 582.73 0.529 303.65 193.32 0.0 1.1 0.212 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East244.00 61.00 461.55 525.55 0.464 242.86 497.04 0.6 0.8 0.211 B

2 - Green

Lane East136.00 34.00 517.57 524.15 0.259 135.44 186.85 0.2 0.3 0.154 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West496.00 124.00 139.88 773.79 0.641 496.31 513.13 1.9 1.8 0.217 B

4 - Green

Lane West560.00 140.00 429.03 586.27 0.955 529.57 207.15 1.1 8.7 0.817 E

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East156.00 39.00 417.01 551.53 0.283 157.78 488.98 0.8 0.4 0.153 A

2 - Green

Lane East112.00 28.00 402.42 594.27 0.188 112.44 172.37 0.3 0.2 0.125 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West512.00 128.00 109.89 788.26 0.650 511.98 404.97 1.8 1.8 0.217 B

4 - Green

Lane West452.00 113.00 434.65 583.12 0.775 471.34 187.22 8.7 3.9 0.599 E

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East240.00 60.00 408.25 556.57 0.431 238.63 459.97 0.4 0.7 0.188 B

2 - Green

Lane East120.00 30.00 479.93 546.80 0.219 119.83 166.96 0.2 0.3 0.140 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West468.00 117.00 127.13 779.96 0.600 469.17 472.62 1.8 1.5 0.194 B

4 - Green

Lane West464.00 116.00 403.19 601.34 0.772 465.03 193.12 3.9 3.6 0.447 D

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

11

Page 121: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated AM - Surveyed, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A2Calibrated

AMü ü D1,D3,D5 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.29 C

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

12

Page 122: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   -180.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 672.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D1 Surveyed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

13

Page 123: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 2.000 0.000 367.000 40.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 15.000 0.000 53.000 85.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

130.000 13.000 2.000 160.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 25.000 96.000 195.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.90 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.43 0.04 0.01 0.52

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.30 0.62 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 8 2 3

 2 - Green

Lane East 13 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

5 0 0 3

 4 - Green

Lane

West 8 4 3 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.083 1.016 1.025

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.133 1.000 1.000 1.024

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.046 1.000 1.000 1.031

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.080 1.037 1.031 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.74 0.36 2.7 C 409.00 409.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.35 0.22 0.5 B 154.00 154.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.53 0.17 1.1 B 306.00 306.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.70 0.36 2.2 C 317.00 317.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

14

Page 124: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East424.00 106.00 293.35 635.28 0.667 416.39 162.74 0.0 1.9 0.266 C

2 - Green

Lane East156.00 39.00 605.74 465.46 0.335 154.02 104.00 0.0 0.5 0.191 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West288.00 72.00 144.38 743.95 0.387 285.51 615.38 0.0 0.6 0.130 A

4 - Green

Lane West308.00 77.00 152.87 556.93 0.553 303.22 277.02 0.0 1.2 0.232 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East460.00 115.00 322.49 617.82 0.745 456.83 164.58 1.9 2.7 0.364 C

2 - Green

Lane East152.00 38.00 665.79 429.98 0.354 151.83 113.54 0.5 0.5 0.216 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West284.00 71.00 147.20 742.58 0.382 284.00 670.42 0.6 0.6 0.131 A

4 - Green

Lane West336.00 84.00 152.14 557.32 0.603 334.93 279.07 1.2 1.5 0.268 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East396.00 99.00 250.50 660.92 0.599 400.58 145.63 2.7 1.5 0.234 B

2 - Green

Lane East160.00 40.00 562.05 491.37 0.326 160.19 89.03 0.5 0.5 0.181 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West252.00 63.00 146.65 742.86 0.339 252.41 575.58 0.6 0.5 0.122 A

4 - Green

Lane West256.00 64.00 137.66 565.96 0.452 258.47 261.40 1.5 0.8 0.197 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East356.00 89.00 353.68 599.24 0.594 356.20 214.34 1.5 1.5 0.247 B

2 - Green

Lane East148.00 37.00 583.08 478.58 0.309 148.14 126.80 0.5 0.5 0.182 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West400.00 100.00 134.55 748.72 0.534 397.60 596.67 0.5 1.1 0.170 B

4 - Green

Lane West368.00 92.00 205.29 525.86 0.700 362.73 326.86 0.8 2.2 0.357 C

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

15

Page 125: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

16

Page 126: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated AM - Forecast Base, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A2Calibrated

AMü ü D1,D3,D5 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.42 D

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

17

Page 127: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   -180.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 672.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D3Forecast

BaseAM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

18

Page 128: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

2.000 0.000 408.000 45.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 17.000 0.000 59.000 95.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

145.000 14.000 2.000 178.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 28.000 107.000 217.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.90 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.56

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.43 0.04 0.01 0.53

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.30 0.61 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 0 2 2

 2 - Green

Lane East 12 0 0 2

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

5 0 0 3

 4 - Green

Lane

West 7 4 3 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.000 1.017 1.024

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.118 1.000 1.000 1.022

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.048 1.000 1.000 1.034

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.071 1.038 1.032 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

19

Page 129: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.86 0.60 4.9 E 455.00 455.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.44 0.27 0.8 C 171.00 171.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.59 0.20 1.4 B 340.00 340.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.79 0.49 3.3 D 352.00 352.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East476.00 119.00 325.73 615.38 0.774 463.77 181.23 0.0 3.1 0.371 C

2 - Green

Lane East172.00 43.00 674.09 425.67 0.404 169.36 115.40 0.0 0.7 0.232 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West320.00 80.00 159.79 735.17 0.435 316.97 683.66 0.0 0.8 0.142 A

4 - Green

Lane West344.00 86.00 169.41 546.66 0.629 337.54 307.34 0.0 1.6 0.279 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East512.00 128.00 356.08 597.19 0.857 504.70 185.51 3.1 4.9 0.598 E

2 - Green

Lane East172.00 43.00 735.31 389.38 0.442 171.56 125.48 0.7 0.8 0.275 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West320.00 80.00 165.55 732.39 0.437 319.96 741.32 0.8 0.8 0.145 A

4 - Green

Lane West372.00 93.00 171.23 545.52 0.682 370.36 314.28 1.6 2.0 0.339 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East436.00 109.00 278.22 643.83 0.677 446.68 162.35 4.9 2.2 0.319 C

2 - Green

Lane East176.00 44.00 626.07 454.23 0.387 176.49 98.83 0.8 0.6 0.216 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West280.00 70.00 162.55 733.84 0.382 280.57 640.01 0.8 0.6 0.133 A

4 - Green

Lane West284.00 71.00 152.76 556.57 0.510 287.81 290.37 2.0 1.1 0.226 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

20

Page 130: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East396.00 99.00 387.91 578.22 0.685 396.04 236.54 2.2 2.2 0.330 C

2 - Green

Lane East164.00 41.00 644.98 442.60 0.371 164.19 138.96 0.6 0.6 0.216 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West440.00 110.00 149.58 740.09 0.595 436.82 659.59 0.6 1.4 0.196 B

4 - Green

Lane West408.00 102.00 225.52 513.34 0.795 398.93 360.87 1.1 3.3 0.490 D

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

21

Page 131: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated AM - Total Forecast, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A2Calibrated

AMü ü D1,D3,D5 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.48 D

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

22

Page 132: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   -180.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 672.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D5Total

ForecastAM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

23

Page 133: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

2.000 0.000 408.000 45.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 25.000 0.000 86.000 138.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

145.000 16.000 2.000 178.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 28.000 124.000 217.000 1.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.90 0.10

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.55

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.43 0.05 0.01 0.52

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.08 0.34 0.59 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 50 0 2 2

 2 - Green

Lane East 8 0 0 1

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

5 0 0 3

 4 - Green

Lane

West 7 3 3 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.500 1.000 1.017 1.024

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.083 1.000 1.000 1.015

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.048 1.000 1.000 1.034

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.071 1.033 1.032 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

24

Page 134: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.87 0.64 5.2 E 455.00 455.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.64 0.41 1.7 C 249.00 249.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.62 0.21 1.6 B 342.00 342.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.84 0.59 4.3 E 369.00 369.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East476.00 119.00 342.79 605.51 0.786 463.01 189.47 0.0 3.2 0.392 C

2 - Green

Lane East248.00 62.00 672.60 429.73 0.577 242.80 133.20 0.0 1.3 0.313 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West324.00 81.00 207.72 713.17 0.454 320.73 707.68 0.0 0.8 0.152 A

4 - Green

Lane West360.00 90.00 179.72 541.60 0.665 352.54 348.73 0.0 1.9 0.307 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East512.00 128.00 370.26 589.06 0.869 504.03 192.37 3.2 5.2 0.642 E

2 - Green

Lane East252.00 63.00 731.15 394.78 0.638 250.56 143.14 1.3 1.7 0.411 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West320.00 80.00 217.12 708.68 0.452 319.99 764.60 0.8 0.8 0.154 A

4 - Green

Lane West384.00 96.00 180.33 541.18 0.710 382.31 356.78 1.9 2.3 0.372 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East436.00 109.00 299.59 631.33 0.691 447.49 170.44 5.2 2.4 0.344 C

2 - Green

Lane East256.00 64.00 630.66 454.86 0.563 257.29 116.42 1.7 1.3 0.306 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West280.00 70.00 215.48 709.50 0.395 280.63 672.46 0.8 0.7 0.140 A

4 - Green

Lane West304.00 76.00 161.94 552.19 0.551 308.09 334.17 2.3 1.3 0.250 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

25

Page 135: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East396.00 99.00 407.75 566.74 0.699 396.05 244.63 2.4 2.4 0.352 C

2 - Green

Lane East240.00 60.00 643.72 446.65 0.537 240.56 160.08 1.3 1.2 0.292 C

3 - Salhouse

Road West444.00 111.00 199.51 717.13 0.619 440.37 684.77 0.7 1.6 0.214 B

4 - Green

Lane West428.00 107.00 236.40 507.89 0.843 415.99 403.49 1.3 4.3 0.590 E

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

26

Page 136: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated PM - Surveyed, PM

Data Errors and Warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

Severity Area Item Description

Warning Mini-roundabout

Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction;

treat results with caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 3 and 4 have 73% of the total flow

for the roundabout for one or more time segments]

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A3Calibrated

PMü ü D2,D4,D6 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.21 B

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

27

Page 137: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

Origin-Destination Data

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   270.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 1122.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D2 Surveyed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

28

Page 138: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Vehicle Mix

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 0.000 187.000 31.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 34.000 0.000 26.000 57.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

347.000 43.000 1.000 107.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 94.000 121.000 230.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.86 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.70 0.09 0.00 0.21

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.21 0.27 0.52 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 0 5 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 3 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 1

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.000 1.048 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.030 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.009

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.033 1.022 1.000

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.47 0.22 0.9 B 217.00 217.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.26 0.16 0.4 A 118.00 118.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.67 0.22 1.9 B 500.00 500.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.66 0.20 1.9 B 446.00 446.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

29

Page 139: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East228.00 57.00 286.78 627.40 0.363 225.75 454.37 0.0 0.6 0.149 A

2 - Green

Lane East104.00 26.00 384.81 604.06 0.172 103.18 127.72 0.0 0.2 0.120 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West524.00 131.00 112.35 787.12 0.666 516.37 375.64 0.0 1.9 0.216 B

4 - Green

Lane West308.00 77.00 435.41 847.37 0.363 305.74 193.31 0.0 0.6 0.110 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East244.00 61.00 481.49 513.94 0.475 242.73 502.38 0.6 0.9 0.220 B

2 - Green

Lane East136.00 34.00 530.50 516.39 0.263 135.41 193.72 0.2 0.4 0.157 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West496.00 124.00 139.84 773.80 0.641 496.31 526.07 1.9 1.8 0.217 B

4 - Green

Lane West560.00 140.00 429.02 850.91 0.658 554.85 207.12 0.6 1.9 0.199 B

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East156.00 39.00 403.92 559.15 0.279 157.95 485.49 0.9 0.4 0.150 A

2 - Green

Lane East112.00 28.00 394.02 599.31 0.187 112.48 167.86 0.4 0.2 0.123 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West512.00 128.00 109.95 788.23 0.650 511.98 396.55 1.8 1.8 0.217 B

4 - Green

Lane West452.00 113.00 434.66 847.76 0.533 454.75 187.26 1.9 1.2 0.154 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East240.00 60.00 407.45 557.04 0.431 238.60 459.75 0.4 0.7 0.188 B

2 - Green

Lane East120.00 30.00 479.38 547.13 0.219 119.82 166.68 0.2 0.3 0.140 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West468.00 117.00 127.12 779.97 0.600 469.17 472.07 1.8 1.5 0.194 B

4 - Green

Lane West464.00 116.00 403.19 865.98 0.536 464.02 193.11 1.2 1.2 0.149 A

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

30

Page 140: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

31

Page 141: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated PM - Forecast Base, PM

Data Errors and Warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

Severity Area Item Description

Warning Mini-roundabout

Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction;

treat results with caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 3 and 4 have 73% of the total flow

for the roundabout for one or more time segments]

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A3Calibrated

PMü ü D2,D4,D6 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.27 C

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

32

Page 142: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   270.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 1122.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D4Forecast

BasePM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

33

Page 143: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 0.000 209.000 35.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 38.000 0.000 29.000 64.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

388.000 48.000 1.000 120.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 105.000 135.000 257.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.86 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.70 0.09 0.00 0.22

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.21 0.27 0.52 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 0 5 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 3 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 1

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 3 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.000 1.048 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.028 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.008

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.031 1.023 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

34

Page 144: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.57 0.28 1.3 C 244.00 244.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.32 0.18 0.5 B 132.00 132.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.74 0.29 2.7 C 556.00 556.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.76 0.28 2.9 C 496.00 496.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East256.00 64.00 316.05 610.54 0.419 253.17 501.13 0.0 0.7 0.167 A

2 - Green

Lane East116.00 29.00 428.56 577.65 0.201 115.01 140.65 0.0 0.2 0.129 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West580.00 145.00 125.86 780.78 0.743 569.24 417.71 0.0 2.7 0.271 C

4 - Green

Lane West340.00 85.00 479.96 821.22 0.414 337.21 215.14 0.0 0.7 0.123 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East276.00 69.00 534.02 483.44 0.571 273.73 561.11 0.7 1.3 0.283 C

2 - Green

Lane East152.00 38.00 592.77 478.64 0.318 151.17 214.98 0.2 0.5 0.183 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West556.00 139.00 156.96 765.72 0.726 556.03 586.97 2.7 2.7 0.286 C

4 - Green

Lane West624.00 156.00 480.08 820.98 0.760 615.04 232.91 0.7 2.9 0.280 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East176.00 44.00 451.55 531.54 0.331 179.09 540.55 1.3 0.5 0.172 B

2 - Green

Lane East128.00 32.00 443.40 569.50 0.225 128.66 187.25 0.5 0.3 0.136 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West568.00 142.00 125.86 780.73 0.728 568.00 446.19 2.7 2.7 0.282 C

4 - Green

Lane West504.00 126.00 482.95 819.42 0.615 509.15 210.91 2.9 1.6 0.196 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

35

Page 145: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East268.00 67.00 453.01 530.63 0.505 266.05 511.02 0.5 1.0 0.225 B

2 - Green

Lane East132.00 33.00 533.87 514.16 0.257 131.81 185.19 0.3 0.3 0.157 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West520.00 130.00 140.79 773.56 0.672 522.19 524.88 2.7 2.1 0.241 B

4 - Green

Lane West516.00 129.00 447.92 839.72 0.614 516.11 215.06 1.6 1.6 0.186 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

36

Page 146: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Calibrated PM - Total Forecast, PM

Data Errors and Warnings

Analysis Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Network Options

Arms

Arms

Capacity Options

Severity Area Item Description

Warning Mini-roundabout

Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction;

treat results with caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 3 and 4 have 72% of the total flow

for the roundabout for one or more time segments]

ID NameInclude in

report

Use specific Demand Set

(s)

Specific Demand Set

(s)

Network flow scaling factor

(%)

Network capacity scaling factor

(%)

A3Calibrated

PMü ü D2,D4,D6 100.000 100.000

Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (min) Junction LOS

1 - Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Green Lane East - Salhouse Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3,4 0.34 C

Driving side Lighting Road surface In London

Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown  

Arm Name Description

1 Salhouse Road East  

2 Green Lane East  

3 Salhouse Road West  

4 Green Lane West  

Arm Minimum capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum capacity (PCU/hr) Assume flat start profile Initial queue (PCU)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.00 99999.00   0.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.00 99999.00   0.00

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

37

Page 147: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Arm Intercept Adjustments

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Demand

Demand Set Details

Demand overview (Traffic)

ArmApproach road

half-width (m)

Minimum approach

road half-width (m)

Entry

width (m)

Effective flare

length (m)

Distance to

next arm (m)

Entry corner kerb

line distance (m)

Gradient over

50m (%)

Kerbed

central

island

1 - Salhouse

Road East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 10.96 9.31 0.0  

2 - Green Lane

East3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 12.08 10.62 0.0  

3 - Salhouse

Road West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.37 9.28 0.0 ü

4 - Green Lane

West3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 11.35 9.86 0.0  

Arm Type Reason Direct intercept adjustment (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East None    

2 - Green Lane East None    

3 - Salhouse Road West None    

4 - Green Lane West Direct   270.00

Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.591 826.565

2 - Green Lane East 0.593 844.978

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.480 843.099

4 - Green Lane West 0.592 1122.775

IDScenario

name

Time Period

name

Traffic profile

type

Model start time

(HH:mm)

Model finish time

(HH:mm)

Model time period

length (min)

Time segment

length (min)

Run

automatically

D6Total

ForecastPM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü

Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)

ü ü HV Percentages 2.00

Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Scaling Factor (%)

1 - Salhouse Road East   DIRECT   100.000

2 - Green Lane East   DIRECT   100.000

3 - Salhouse Road West   DIRECT   100.000

4 - Green Lane West   DIRECT   100.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

38

Page 148: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Origin-Destination Data

Vehicle Mix

Results

Demand (Veh/hr)

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.000 0.000 209.000 35.000

 2 - Green

Lane

East 47.000 0.000 36.000 79.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

388.000 63.000 1.000 120.000

 4 - Green

Lane

West 105.000 179.000 257.000 0.000

Proportions

  To

From

 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road

East 

0.00 0.00 0.86 0.14

 2 - Green

Lane

East 0.29 0.00 0.22 0.49

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0.68 0.11 0.00 0.21

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0.19 0.33 0.48 0.00

Heavy Vehicle proportion

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 0 0 5 0

 2 - Green

Lane East 2 0 0 0

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

0 0 0 1

 4 - Green

Lane

West 0 2 2 0

Average PCU Per Veh

  To

From

  1 -

Salhouse

Road East 

 2 - Green

Lane

East 

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

 4 - Green

Lane

West 

 1 - Salhouse

Road East 1.000 1.000 1.048 1.000

 2 - Green

Lane East 1.025 1.000 1.000 1.000

 3 - Salhouse

Road

West 

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.008

 4 - Green

Lane

West 1.000 1.023 1.023 1.000

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

39

Page 149: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Arm Max RFC Max delay (min) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Junction Arrivals (Veh)

1 - Salhouse Road East 0.62 0.34 1.5 C 244.00 244.00

2 - Green Lane East 0.38 0.20 0.6 B 160.00 160.00

3 - Salhouse Road West 0.78 0.33 3.2 C 572.00 572.00

4 - Green Lane West 0.85 0.40 4.7 C 541.00 541.00

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East256.00 64.00 362.81 584.02 0.438 252.94 510.17 0.0 0.8 0.180 B

2 - Green

Lane East140.00 35.00 429.10 577.91 0.242 138.74 186.66 0.0 0.3 0.136 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West600.00 150.00 144.19 772.01 0.777 587.28 423.64 0.0 3.2 0.307 C

4 - Green

Lane West372.00 93.00 504.33 808.65 0.460 368.65 227.15 0.0 0.8 0.135 A

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East276.00 69.00 602.89 444.44 0.621 272.86 570.83 0.8 1.5 0.344 C

2 - Green

Lane East184.00 46.00 591.51 479.88 0.383 182.83 284.24 0.3 0.6 0.201 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West572.00 143.00 181.34 754.04 0.759 572.02 593.00 3.2 3.2 0.330 C

4 - Green

Lane West684.00 171.00 505.06 808.04 0.846 668.67 248.30 0.8 4.7 0.395 C

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East176.00 44.00 511.88 497.37 0.354 179.96 548.09 1.5 0.6 0.191 B

2 - Green

Lane East152.00 38.00 444.19 569.58 0.267 152.96 247.65 0.6 0.4 0.144 A

3 - Salhouse

Road West584.00 146.00 144.78 771.67 0.757 584.05 452.36 3.2 3.2 0.320 C

4 - Green

Lane West544.00 136.00 505.90 807.67 0.674 554.06 222.93 4.7 2.2 0.245 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

40

Page 150: A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD Application/693… · October 2016 A Planning Application by LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LTD In respect of GT19 Green Lane East, ... western

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Arm

Total

Demand

(Veh/hr)

Junction

Arrivals

(Veh)

Circulating

flow (Veh/hr)

Capacity

(Veh/hr)RFC

Throughput

(Veh/hr)

Throughput (exit

side) (Veh/hr)

Start

queue

(Veh)

End

queue

(Veh)

Delay

(min)LOS

1 - Salhouse

Road East268.00 67.00 514.40 495.83 0.541 265.69 519.79 0.6 1.1 0.258 C

2 - Green

Lane East164.00 41.00 534.56 514.26 0.319 163.63 245.53 0.4 0.5 0.171 B

3 - Salhouse

Road West532.00 133.00 165.38 761.76 0.698 534.93 532.81 3.2 2.4 0.268 C

4 - Green

Lane West564.00 141.00 470.18 828.38 0.681 564.01 230.13 2.2 2.2 0.227 B

Generated on 10/10/2016 16:22:29 using Junctions 9 (9.0.0.4211)

41