a quantitative method to determine ict delay requirements for wide-area power system damping...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Quantitative Method to Determine ICT Delay Requirements for Wide-Area Power System Damping Controllers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022073119/55ca3566bb61ebf7368b4656/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Quantitative Method to Determine ICT Delay
Requirements for Wide-Area Power System Damping
Controllers
1
Paper No: 15PESGMXXX
Nguyen Tuan Anha, Luigi Vanfrettib, Johan Driesena, and Dirk Van Hertema
aKU Leuven, BelgiumbKTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
![Page 2: A Quantitative Method to Determine ICT Delay Requirements for Wide-Area Power System Damping Controllers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022073119/55ca3566bb61ebf7368b4656/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background (What ?) A quantitative method to determine delay
requirements of the information and communication technology (ICT) system supporting wide-area power oscillation damping (WAPOD) controllers has been proposed. Equivalent time delay (ETD) is defined as an allowable
time delay for the ICT infrastructure. It is a time value for which Remote Input (RI)-based controller presents the same damping as Local Input (LI)-based controller.
(Why ?) The use of a WAPOD is only justified when its response outperforms that of a controller using local inputs. The total time delay in the control loop must be below the
calculated ETD. (Expected outcome?) ETD serves as a design criteria
to determine ICT latency requirements. The selection of an effective RI signal can be carried out by
considering the maximum delays (ETDs) of different wide-area measurements.
2
![Page 3: A Quantitative Method to Determine ICT Delay Requirements for Wide-Area Power System Damping Controllers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022073119/55ca3566bb61ebf7368b4656/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Equivalent Time Delay (ETD)
3
• ETDx% : allowable time delay at which the RI signals have a damping ratio which is x% higher than when using the LI signals
• ETD presents the maximum time delay of a wide-area measurement to provide the same damping as a LI signal
• ETDm : allowable time delay up to the stability margin, i.e. delay margin
A: Maximum damping level at zero delay
B: is defined as the improved damping required to provide x% of damping enhancement compared to the local signal
C: where RI-based controller yields the same damping as LI-based controller
D: delay margin ETDm (maximum allowable delay)
![Page 4: A Quantitative Method to Determine ICT Delay Requirements for Wide-Area Power System Damping Controllers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022073119/55ca3566bb61ebf7368b4656/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methodology Demonstration: TCSC Design
4
Inter-Area
Modes
Frequency (Hz)
Damping
(%)
Without TCSC
0.54 3.10
RI-based TCSC
0.57 16.9
LI-based TCSC
0.55 11.2
ETD 194 ms
ICT delays required for damping improvement
ETDs for different wide-area signals
Input Signal:
![Page 5: A Quantitative Method to Determine ICT Delay Requirements for Wide-Area Power System Damping Controllers](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022073119/55ca3566bb61ebf7368b4656/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Conclusions
5
• ICT delay requirements for WACS are defined by ETD.
• ETD provides the lower bound for the design of WAPOD (which the wide-area controller performs equally as the local-based controller).
• Thus, it is only beneficial to employ wide-area signals when the ICT delays are less than the ETD.
• Capital and operational expenditure costs of the ICT network have to be considered in practice.
• Laboratory tests for validation of the proposed methodology are needed.