a randomized phase ii study of …...background • paclitaxel/carboplatin (pc) is a standard...
TRANSCRIPT
A randomized phase II study of paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab,
paclitaxel/carboplatin/temsirolimus and
ixabepilone/carboplatin/bevacizumab as initial therapy for
measurable stage III or IVA; stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer,
GOG-86P
C Aghajanian, VL Filiaci, DS Dizon, J Carlson, MA Powell, AA
Secord, KS Tewari, D Bender, DM O’Malley, A Stuckey, J
Rotmensch, DA Levine, HA Lankes, KN Moore
Background
• Paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) is a standard initial therapy for
advanced endometrial cancer (EC)
• GOG209, a randomized noninferiority trial of initial therapy
(n=1381), showed that PC was not inferior to TAP in terms of
PFS and OS
• Bevacizumab, temsirolimus and ixabepilone have shown
single agent activity in recurrent EC
TAP, Paclitaxel + Doxorubicin + Cisplatin
Gynecol Oncol 2012,125(3) Suppl 1:S2-188, page 771; J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2259-65; Gyn Oncol 2013;129:22-7; J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3278-85; Gynecol
Oncol 2014;132:585-92; J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3104-8
GOG86P: Schema
Endometrial Cancer
No prior chemotherapy
-Stage III or IVA (measurable disease)
-Stage IVB (measurable disease or not)
-Recurrent (measurable disease or not)
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV 3 hours
Carboplatin AUC 6 IV
Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV*
Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV 3 hours
Carboplatin AUC 5 IV
Temsirolimus 25 mg IV days 1 & 8*
Temsirolimus 25 mg IV days 1, 8 and 15
Ixabepilone 30 mg/m2 IV 1 hour
Carboplatin AUC 6 IV
Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV*
Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV
One Cycle = 3 weeks
Treatment until disease progression or adverse events prohibit further therapy
*Starting cycle 2 when within 12 weeks of surgery
EBRT, External Beam Radiation Therapy
Stratification:
•performance status (< 1 vs 2)
•recurrent disease (yes/no)
•measurable disease (yes/no)
•prior EBRT (yes/no)
Open: 9/14/09
Closed: 1/9/12
6 cycles Maintenance
GOG86P: Statistical Design
• Primary endpoint: PFS
• Secondary endpoints: ORR, OS, safety – Matched group from GOG209 PC Arm used as historical control
– 3 experimental Arms of GOG86P are compared individually to historical control
– RECIST 1.1
– Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0
• Planned sample size: 330
• PFS: 35% decrease (HR=0.65) considered significant – 12 month PFS from 39% to 54%
– 58 PFS events in an experimental arm, 85% power, 3.9% type I error
– 6, 18 week time intervals evaluated to lessen bias (as comparisons made to matched group from GOG209)
GOG86P: Patient Characteristics PC + Bevacizumab PC + Temsirolimus IC + Bevacizumab
Enrolled (n=349) 116 115 118
Eligible and Treated (n=329) 108 111 110
Median Age, years (range) 62 (36-87) 63 (38-82) 65 (37-89)
Performance Status 0-1 106 (91%) 109 (95%) 113 (96%)
Stage
III (measurable disease) 12 (10%) 13 (11%) 10 (9%)
IV 58 (50%) 58 (51%) 62 (52%)
Recurrent 46 (40%) 44 (38%) 46 (39%)
Histology (Central pathology review)
Endometrioid, grade 1 17 (15%) 13 (11%) 15 (13%)
Endometrioid, grade 2 36 (31%) 24 (21%) 27 (23%)
Endometrioid, grade 3 30 (26%) 30 (26%) 22 (19%)
Serous 16 (14%) 26 (23%) 31 (26%)
Clear Cell 6 (5%) 4 (3%) 6 (5%)
Other 11 (9%) 18 (16%) 17 (14%)
PC, paclitaxel + carboplatin; IC, ixabepilone + carboplatin
GOG86P: Patient Characteristics PC + Bevacizumab PC + Temsirolimus IC + Bevacizumab
Eligible and Treated (n=329) 108 111 110
Prior EBRT
No 99 (85%) 95 (83%) 98 (83%)
Yes 17 (15%) 20 (17%) 20 (17%)
Measurable Disease
No 27 (23%) 30 (26%) 33 (28%)
Yes 89 (77%) 85 (74%) 85 (72%)
GOG86P: Treatment Exposure
Treatment Delivered PC + Bevacizumab
(n=116)
PC + Temsirolimus
(n=115)
IC + Bevacizumab
(n=118)
Chemotherapy
Median number of cycles, range
Paclitaxel/Ixabepilone
6 (0-6) 6 (0-6) 6 (0-6)
Median number of cycles, range
Carboplatin
6 (0-6) 6 (0-6) 6 (0-6)
Bevacizumab/Temsirolimus
Median number of cycles, range 12 (0-78) 8 (0-62) 9 (0-53)
GOG86P: Overview of AEs
Patients, %
PC + Bevacizumab
n=112
PC + Temsirolimus
n=113
IC + Bevacizumab
n=114
Any AE, Any grade 100 100 100
Any AE, Grade > 3 93.7 98.2 95.6
Any AE, Grade 5 3.6 5.3 5.3
AE Leading to Study Drug
Discontinuation
26.8 (bev) 23 (tem) 24.6 (bev)
15.8 (ixa)
SAE 42.8 50.4 46.5
GOG86P: AEs of Special Interest
Patients, %
PC +
Bevacizumab
n=112
PC +
Temsirolimus
n=113
IC + Bevacizumab
n=114
Fisher’s Exact
Test
(2 sided)*
ATE, grade > 3 0.9 0 0.9 p=0.554
VTE, grade > 3 8 9.7 7.9 p=0.681
Non-CNS Bleeding, grade > 3 2.7 0.9 4.4 p=0.281
GI Fistula, Leak, Perforation, Any grade 2.7 1.8 4.4 p=0.505
HTN, grade > 3 16.1 2.7 16.7 p<0.001
Proteinuria, grade > 3
5.4 0 4.4 p=0.018
Pneumonitis, any grade 0 6.2 0.9 p=0.002
Mucositis, oral, grade > 2 4.5 15.9 2.6 p<0.001
Rash, grade > 2 2.7 16.8 3.5 p<0.001
Hypertriglyceridemia, grade > 3 0 4.4 0 p=0.004
*Test comparing PC or IC + bevacizumab vs PC + temsirolimus
GOG86P: PFS Hazard
Ratio
92.2% Hazard Ratio
Confidence Limits
Arm 1 0.805 0.633 1.023
Comparison to Historical Reference
Hazard
Ratio
92.2% Hazard Ratio
Confidence Limits
Arm 2 1.222 0.961 1.554
Hazard
Ratio
92.2% Hazard Ratio
Confidence Limits
Arm 3 0.871 0.685 1.107
GOG86P: Objective Response Rate
Measurable Disease Patients
PC + Bevacizumab
(n=116)
PC + Temsirolimus
(n=115)
IC + Bevacizumab
(n=118)
GOG209 PC
Historical Reference
(n= 462)
Complete Response (CR) 22 (24.7%) 14 (16.5%) 9 (10.6%) 40 (10.8%)
Partial Response (PR) 31 (34.8%) 33 (38.8%) 36 (42.4%) 149 (40.4%)
Objective Response
Rate (CR + PR)
53 (59.5%) 47 (55.3%) 45 (52.9%) 189 (51.2%)
GOG86P: OS Arm Median Point Estimate
1 34.0 (p<0.039)
2 25.0
3 25.2
Reference 22.7
Translational science
Gene
Endometrioid, G1
(n=37)
Endometrioid, G2
(n=69)
Endometrioid, G3
(n=59)
Serous
(n=45)
PTEN 73% 71% 58% 9%
PIK3CA 38% 54% 53% 29%
TP53 14% 20% 44% 87%
ARID1A 38% 48% 39% 2%
CTNNB1 57% 32% 31% 2%
PIK3R1 27% 26% 19% 7%
KRAS 19% 20% 24% 2%
CHD4 27% 12% 20% 11%
PPP2R1A 11% 4% 5% 29%
FBXW7 0% 6% 10% 16%
MTOR 5% 9% 14% 4%
POLE 11% 6% 8% 2%
Top mutated genes by histology
(primary samples only, n=219)
25 most commonly mutated genes from TCGA endometrial cancer project
sequenced to a minimum mean depth of 600X
Profile of serous cases (n=45)
Douglas A. Levine, Fanny Dao
Conclusions
• PFS is not significantly increased in any Arm
• OS is significantly increased in the PC + Bevacizumab Arm when compared with historical controls
• No new safety signals
• Integration of the translational research findings and clinical endpoints is ongoing
Thank you
We gratefully acknowledge:
All the patients and their caregivers who
participated in this trial,
All the Investigators and staff who contributed
their time and effort to this study,
and NRG Oncology