a self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd wle m-learning symposium london, 27 march...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices
3rd WLE m-learning Symposium
London, 27 March 2009
Elisabetta Adami
University of Verona
![Page 2: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Aim of the study
What are the semiotic ‘affordances’ (Kress and van Leeuwen, 1996/2006) of mobile devices?
What skills are fostered and hindered by their use?
What are the implications on how we make meaning of ourselves and the world? (i.e., how we learn)
![Page 3: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Experimenting with Nokia N95
1-month usage No instruction manual No directions
![Page 4: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
From subjective narrative To ‘objective’ results
Observations:– Specific researcher– Specific model– Specific context
Semiotic Analysis:– General affordances
![Page 5: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hardware/Software design
Primacy: Visual output Navigational over textual input Menu-based semiotics
Content generation / text creation:
Representation-as-selection (inter)activity = navigation/selection among options
![Page 6: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Functionalities: Imaging
Immediacy, real-time, quantity
Representing (everyday) reality by capturing and selecting it becomes a ‘naturalized’ activity– every fact achieves further significance
– the environment is lived so as to capture/represent it
– life-world is turned into an artefact to be (re)used
![Page 7: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Functionalities: Web browsing
Mobility: interpersonal connectivity + information access
– Less strategic planning vs. More tactical thought– Intolerance to fixation
Environment is provided with online info: – Blurring of online/offline worlds – Life Experiencing: informed activity (no need of risk-
taking)– Learning = grabbing reliable info about your environment
![Page 8: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Functionalities: e-mail
adds up to mobile Web browsing: – merging sites and times of
information/relations/activities – merging online/offline environments
adds up to ‘representation-as-selection’:– selected artefacts rather than texts created in writing– a new textual genre: mobile emails
![Page 9: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Functionalities: GPS positioning
Displacement of the self ‘Live’ contextualization of the self in the
discursive representation of geography Geographical record of your life Movement -> representation/artefact
![Page 10: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Functionalities: Lifeblog
a multimodal chronological representation of the whole activity with the device
a multimodal diary automatically recorded and assembled while using the device
life turns into a visual artefact, which is (re)usable
![Page 11: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Multi-functionalities
Immediacy and real-time Adaptation and flexibility (from other devices) the more the functionalities, the more
complex their use at an advanced level, the more likely their use in their default settings (‘templates’)
Personalization is index of expertise
![Page 12: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Limitations of the experience
No appropriation, just exploration No personalization No use of interpersonal connectivity for
sharing artefacts – this affords chains of semiosis in terms of
multiple/collective transformation of representational resources (e.g., Web 2.0)
![Page 13: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Fostered Skills
Representation as selection + recontextualization
Adaptation and flexibility
‘how-to’ (processes) over ‘what’ (contents)
(local/operational) tactics over (global) strategies
Real-time multitasking synergy over fine-grained focus
![Page 14: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Learning
how-to access, select, capture, use in real-time
global/collective info/events
for local/individual aims/activities
![Page 15: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Implications for schools
Foreground skills:– Selection + Recontextualization– How-to– Real-time tactical and multi-tasking thinking
Navigational aids (to be provided) Background skills:
– Strategic/global planning– Text-creation from scratch– Architecture building (rather than navigation among options)– Focus on contents, on accuracy and reflection– Life = risk-taking, exploration, ephemeral experiencing
![Page 16: A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices 3rd WLE m-learning Symposium London, 27 March 2009 Elisabetta Adami University of Verona](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649e425503460f94b35a4d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Thank you!
A self-reflexive semiotic analysis of mobile devices
3rd WLE m-learning SymposiumLondon, 27 March 2009Elisabetta Adami University of Verona