a start-up company’s perspective on patent prosecution carolina innovations seminar january 8,...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
A Start-up Company’s Perspective on A Start-up Company’s Perspective on Patent ProsecutionPatent Prosecution
Carolina Innovations SeminarJanuary 8, 2009
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Overview: A Start-up’s Perspective on Overview: A Start-up’s Perspective on Patent ProsecutionPatent Prosecution
• Overview of Liquidia’s Technology• Intellectual Property Perspective of Liquidia
At conception Today
• Start-up Patent Strategy Considerations• Prosecution Activities• Enforcement / Defense Considerations
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Pattern Replication In Non-Pattern Replication In Non-wetting Templates (PRINTwetting Templates (PRINT®®))
“High Resolution Soft Lithography: Enabling Materials for Nano-Technologies”; Rolland, J. P.; Hagberg, E. C.; Denison, G. M.; Carter, K. R.; DeSimone, J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5796-5799 .
Replicate
Master Template
Fluorocur® Mold
or
2 μm
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
PRINTPRINT®® Film Fabrication Film Fabrication
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
PRINTPRINT®® Particle Fabrication Particle Fabrication
Apply liquid to be molded
Form Fluorocur® mold
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Control of Particle Size and Shape at Control of Particle Size and Shape at the Nanoscale the Nanoscale
d = 200 nm, L = 200 nmd = 113 nm, h = 36 nm d = 95 nm, h = 280 nm
Worm-like Flexible PRINT™ Particles: 80 nm x 2000 nm
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
PRINTPRINT®® Particle Therapeutics Particle Therapeutics
200 nm degradable particles with siRNA
3 μm drug particles for pulmonary delivery
2 μm vaccine particles 80 x 5000 nm particles for enhanced circulation
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
History of Liquidia – an IP PerspectiveHistory of Liquidia – an IP Perspective
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Films & Membranes Particles
Particle ApplicationsFilms & Membranes
Applications
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Fluoropolymer Compositions of Matter
Trademarks
Trade Secrets
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Manufacturing tools and techniques Methods of making and using
Mold materialsMethods of making and using
Compositions of MatterMethods of using
Trade Secrets
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Films & Membranes
Micro & Nano-Patterned FilmsMicro & Nano ArraysMicrofluidic DevicesPhotovoltaic Devices
MoldsMedical Devices
Including: Methods of Making and Using
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Particles
Micro & Nano-Particles
Harvesting, Collecting, & Purifying Particles
Molds
Including: Methods of Making and Using
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Films & Membranes Applications
Applications: Optical Films, Nano Wire Grid Polarizer, Liquid Crystal Alignment Layer, Alternative Energy,
Photovoltaic Device Patterned Layers, Fuel Cell Membrane, Patterned Membrane
Including:Methods of making and using
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Liquidia Today – an IP PerspectiveLiquidia Today – an IP Perspective
Particle Applications
Applications:Drug Delivery Particles, Inhalation Particles, Protein Particles, Targeted Particles, Specific
Particle Compositions, Size and/or Shape Specific Particles
Including: Methods of making and using, Treating a patient,
Dosages, etc.
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Choosing a Law Firm / RepresentationChoosing a Law Firm / Representation
• Considerations: Location
• Local can visit and become more comfortable and familiar with your technology, know reputation
Experience• Technical alignment
• Legal expertise
Cost Size
• Some law firms and/or groups are more tailored to working with small start-ups
• Larger firms typically offer more full serviceCorporate, licensing, employment…
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Initial Patent FilingsInitial Patent Filings
• Highly Important Creation of value Establishes initial footprint of company Priority date for your technology
• Timing File early File prior to any disclosure to potential investors,
collaborators, and any third-party
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Initial Patent Filings: DisclosureInitial Patent Filings: Disclosure
Bulk Filing Focused Filing
Pros: • establish early filing date for all your ideas and data• ability to mine the application for years to come• create value based on broad unknown quantity of ownership
Pros: • supported and enabled• cost effective • less blocking prior art against your later filing(s)
Cons:• may create prior art against your later filings (obviousness) • increased cost and complexity
Cons: • less subject matter to mine in future years• less mystery around scope of what you might eventually own
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Follow on FilingsFollow on Filings
• Protect ongoing technical developments• Create value• Increase your licensing position
Foresee where customers / competitors are and how your technology may apply in their field
• Create layers of IP protection around your core background
• Enforceability Strategize to enforce your follow-on filings rather than
most core filings whenever possible If lose a follow on filing less damaging to the company
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Route of Patent FilingsRoute of Patent Filings
• Timing Provisional application
• 12 months
• Very low filing fees
• No prosecution
• Must be converted
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application• 30 months
• Limited prosecution
• Relatively low filing fees
U.S. non-provisional application• Prosecution begins as soon as filed
• Filing fees can be high
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Route of Patent FilingsRoute of Patent Filings
• Timing
IssuanceFiling Date
Example 1: Provisional PCT Non-Provisional
12 mo. 30 mo.
IssuanceFiling Date
Example 2: Non-Provisional
Time spent in Provisional and PCT status will delay time before issuance.
By not entering Provisional or PCT national stage, applications should issue quicker, however, larger fees will be incurred earlier.
36-48 mo.
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Route of Patent FilingRoute of Patent Filing
• Strategy Cash is king in a start-up
• Filing provisional allows you to push off costs
• Provisional applications enable dynamic entrepreneurial environment by quickly and efficiently creating value
Caution – filing excessive cases without considering long term costs
• Abandonment of non-provisional cases results in the subject matter in that patent application being dedicated to the public if it’s not covered in another filing
Maintain confidentiality• File provisional application – if not converted to PCT or non-
provisional you can retain confidentiality Potential trap
• An incomplete provisional application can not be completed / updated upon conversion to Non-provisional or PCT without risking new-matter rejections / challenges
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
BudgetBudget
Sample budget for 1 patent filing
Country Fees Annuities Total
Australia 20,297 14,639 34,936
Canada 2,545 13,167 15,712
Europe 9,772 1,954 11,726
Japan 4,910 40,689 45,599
China 1,236 16,862 18,098
United States 1,990 7,800 9,790
$135,861
Drafting costsHourly fees v Flat rates
Filing feesWorld wide filings
Translation costsProsecution costs AnnuitiesPatent costs grow exponentially
Note: Translation fees and Prosecution costs are NOT included
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Prosecution ActivitiesProsecution Activities
• Working with Counsel In-house counsel v outside counsel
In-house counsel Outside counsel
Pros:• cost effective for large / complex portfolio• closer to technology and developments• able to nurture the portfolio
Pros:• depth and breadth of experience• necessary for docketing cases, tracking deadlines, etc
Cons: • not cost effective for a small portfolio
Cons: • often not as connected with the technology
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Prosecution Activities: Working with Prosecution Activities: Working with the Universitythe University
• A positive University representative can be your best asset
• Different models UNC: very collaborative with company, helps nurture technology Other Universities: different / less collaborative models
• Control prosecution University concerned with early stage companies Gain trust and common goal of commercial development as
company matures
• Interactions with University’s counsel Remember they do not represent the company Direct requests and comments through your University
representative
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Prosecution ActivitiesProsecution Activities
• File History Watch Prosecution History Estoppel
• Leading countriesUS Europe
• Leading claimsCover productsQuick issuance Continue to pursue broader claims: costs, law changesEstoppel
Information Disclosure Statements• Across family members• Watch examiner cited cases – cross-reference• Policy with scientists: centralize all research materials
www.liquidia.comwww.liquidia.com
Enforcement / DefenseEnforcement / Defense
• Caution when asserting key background cases Serious blow to company Family of patents might fall victim
• Layered Portfolio Build cases beyond core background that are
independent of the core background and can be asserted
• Costs Patent litigation is very costly