a statisical approach to machinery condition monitoring - blake

Upload: tylerdurdane

Post on 02-Jun-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    1/20

    STATISTICAL APPROACH TO MACHINERY CONDITION MONITORING

    Randall W. Blake

    Predictive Maintenance Staff Manager

    St. Johns River Power Park

    ~acks onville, lorida

    _ . ..

    :

    .::.I

    , : Randall W. Blake is the Predictive Maintenance

    : Staff Manager for St. Johns River Power Park in

    ; Jacksonville, Florida. In this capacity, he is

    i

    responsible for the predictive maintenance program

    which includes vibration analysis, oil analysis

    and equipment reliability assessment.

    Randy has

    been a SJRPP employee for eight years and has

    twenty-two years experience in electrical power

    generation.

    Abstract :

    This paper shows how to apply straightforward statistical methods

    to real world vibration problems. Statistical methods are

    effective tools for improving production processes and reducing

    unscheduled failures. Statistical tools can lend objectivity,

    accuracy and

    focus t o your vibration program.

    Introduction:

    All rotating or reciprocating machinery emits a unique pattern of

    vibration characteristics. The pattern of vibration, or

    vibration signature, represent the current mechanical condition

    of the individual machine. As time passes, the equipment

    mechanical condition will change due to internal wearing,

    unbalance, misalignment, looseness, and related problems. These

    changes

    in machinery condition will also affect the machines

    vibration signature.

    The purpose of a vibration monitoring and

    analysis program is to detect changes in equipment signatures and

    use this

    information t o pinpoint equipment degradation and thus

    schedule corrective maintenance or overhaul. The statistical

    methods outlined in this paper are effective tools fo r monitoring

    machinery condition, improving production processes and reducing

    unscheduled failures.

    Statistics:

    Webster defines statistics as, the mathematics of th e

    collection, organization, and interpretation of numerical data,

    esp. the analysis of population characteristics by inference from

    sampling.

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    2/20

    As Webster s definition points out,

    data collection by sampling,

    interpretation of numerical data,

    and analysis of population

    characteristics are all tools used in a vibration program.

    The

    statistical tools outlined in this paper are more tools to help

    monitor machinery condition.

    The following FACTORS are presented as an aid to help avoid

    problems in the statistical methods presented in this paper.

    Factor

    DATA COLLECTION

    Regardless of type of data collection equipment used,

    CONSISTENCY

    is of the utmost importance in data collection.

    Consistency in

    the, data collection techniques, location of data collection

    points, equipment operating parameters and, in some cases,

    ambient conditions.

    It is highly desirable that the same personnel remain in the

    program.

    It is especially important to have the same personnel

    collect data. Consistency in personnel helps to ensure accurate

    and consistent data collection and analyses.

    Factor

    2:

    DOCUMENTATION

    Once data is collected, various statistical methods may be used

    for analysis so that the data becomes a meaningful source of

    information.

    The data recording methods will vary greatly but

    the following points need to be considered no matter what method

    is used.

    First, the origin of the data must be clearly recorded.

    Data

    whose origin is not clearly known becomes dead data.

    Quite

    often, little useful information is obtained despite the fact

    that months were spent collecting data, because the date it was

    collected or which machines .the data represented was omitted.

    Secondly, data should be recorded in such a way that it can be

    used easily. Since data is often used later to calculate the

    mean, standard deviation, and days t o alarm etc, it is better to

    record the data in a manner which will facilitate these

    computations.

    Statistical Methods:

    All of the statistical methods outlined in this paper can easily

    be operated with

    a

    simple calculator or with any number of

    inexpensive computer software packages.

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    3/20

    Method 1 HISTOGRAMS

    The data obtained from a sample serve as the basis for decisions

    on the population. The larger the sample size, the more

    information we gain about the population. But an increase of

    sample size also means an increase in the amount of data and it

    becomes difficult to understand the population from these data,

    even when they are arranged into tables or reports. In such

    cases, we need a method which will enable us to understand the

    population at a glance. A histogram answers that need. By

    organizing many data into a histogram, we can understand the

    population in a objective manner.

    Making a Histogram

    Let's assume, for this demonstration,

    that we want to set or

    adjust the alarm level

    for one of the vibration parameters for

    pump motor B1.

    Table

    1

    shows the latest vibration data for the pump motor. Let

    us make a histogram using the data set PAR 4.

    Step 1: Obtain the largest and the smallest of collected values and

    calculate

    R.

    R (the largest value) (the smallest value)

    The largest value .048 in/sec.

    The smallest value .020 in/sec.

    R

    .048 .020 .028

    Step 2: The class interval is determined so that the range, which

    includes the maximum and the minimum of values,

    is divided into equal

    sizes. Obtain the number of interval by, dividing R by .001,.002

    or.005 (or 0.1, 0.2, 0.5:10,20,50, etc.) so as to obtain from 5 to 20

    class intervals of equal size. When there are two possibilities, use

    the narrower interval.

    Thus, the class intervals can be either 0.002 or 0.005, since

    0.002 is the narrower of the two intervals, we will use it for this

    example.

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    4/20

    TABLE 1

    Machine

    1: PUMP MOTOR B1

    ..........................................

    DATE TIME SPEED OVERALL PAR l PAR 2 PAR83 PAR 4 PAR 5 PAR 6

    1 AFP B1

    -MPA

    06-NOV-91 11:32

    03-DEC-91

    09:48

    13-DEC-91

    13:27

    02-JAN-92 16:Ol

    29-JAN-92 10: 55

    11-FEB-92

    14:12

    13-FEB-92 10~18

    09-MAR-92

    08: 49

    27-MAR-92 08:48

    29-APR-92

    08:54

    29-APR-92 13:58

    30-APR-92 06:34

    13-MAY-92

    05: 54

    01-JUL-92 14:13

    15-JUL-92 12:31

    22-JUL-92 14: 12

    21-AUG-92

    15:16

    08-SEP-92 08:44

    24-SEP-92 14:55

    30-SEP-92

    09:48

    12-OCT-92

    15:23

    27-OCT-92

    10:57

    27-NOV-92 14:45

    16-DEC-92

    14:28

    29-DEC-92

    10:57

    Step 3: Prepare a frequency table, as in Table 2, on which the class,

    midpoint, frequency count, frequency, etc., can be recorded.

    Step

    4:

    Determine the boundaries of the intervals so that they

    include the smallest and the largest of values,

    and write these down

    on the frequency table.

    Determine the lower boundary of the first class by subtracting

    112

    of

    the class interval size from the smallest sample value. If the lower

    boundary is

    0

    or less, use

    0

    for the lower boundary. The upper

    boundary can be determined by adding 112 of the class interval size to

    the smallest sample value.

    Lower class boundaries

    =

    0.02 0.001 0.019

    Upper class boundaries =

    0.02 0.001= 0.021

    Then keep adding the size of the interval to the previous value to

    obtain the second boundary, the third, and so on, and make sure that

    the last class includes the maximum value.

    Boundaries for the

    first class =

    0.0190

    0.0210

    Boundaries for the

    second class

    =

    0.0210

    0.0230

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    5/20

    Step :

    Calculate the mid-point of

    each class, and write them on the

    frequency table.

    Mid-point of

    the first class

    = 0.0190

    0.0210)

    2

    =

    0.02

    Mid-point of

    the second class =

    0.0210

    0.0230)

    2 0.022

    Step : Read the collected values one by one and record the

    frequencies falling in each class

    Table 2 Frequency table

    Step 7: Plotting the Histogram

    On a sheet of

    squared paper or with one of the software programs,

    label the horizontal axis scale based on the class interval. Mark the

    left-hand vertical axis with the frequency scale.

    The height of the

    vertical scale axis should be one unit of measure above the maximum

    frequency notation.

    Draw a bar whose height corresponds with the

    frequency in that class.

    refer to figure 1)

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    Step 8: Mean and Standard Deviation

    Mid- Point

    of class

    0.020

    0.022

    0.024

    0.026

    0.028

    0.030

    0.032

    0.034

    0.036

    0.038

    0.040

    0.042

    0.044

    0.046

    0.048

    Class

    0.019 - 0.021

    0.021

    -

    0.023

    0.023

    -

    0.025

    0.025 - 0.027

    0.027

    -

    0.029

    0.029 - 0.031

    0.031

    -

    0.033

    0.033

    -

    0.035

    0.035

    -

    0.037

    0.037

    -

    0.039

    0.039 - 0.041

    0.041

    -

    0.043

    0.043 0.045

    0.045

    -

    0.047

    0.047

    -

    0.049

    Standard Deviation STD) measures the degree to which individual

    values in the population vary from the Mean average) of all values in

    the population.

    The lower the STD, the less individual values vary

    from the mean.

    Frequency

    notation

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1

    3

    12

    4

    2

    1

    0

    Ex

    Mean =

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    6/20

    xi= The ,th samples in the population

    N = number of samples in the population

    Mean = average of samples in the population

    In a blank area of the

    histogram, note the number of

    sample points, the mean, and

    the standard deviation.

    Using the Histogram:

    Now that the data has been

    organized into a histogram,

    objective decisions can be made as

    to the alarm levels. Knowing the

    mean and standard deviation of the

    population, we can set or adjust

    our alarm levels based on the

    histogram and statistical data.

    For example, draw a vertical line

    on the histogram that represents

    the mean 2 STD and another that

    represents the mean - 2 STD, 95 percent of the data falls between the two

    lines. Alarm levels could be set +/- 1 (68 ), 2 (95 ), or

    3

    (99 ) STD

    for multiple alarm levels, as shown in figure 1.

    Level 1

    =

    0.03784

    +

    (1 0.004531)

    =

    0.04531 in/sec.

    level 2 =

    0.03784

    + (2 0.004.531)

    = 0.04690 in/sec.

    level

    3 =

    0.03784

    + (3 0.004531)

    = 0.05140 in/sec.

    Figure 1 Histogram

    14

    Frepuency

    N PS

    . .

    h

    am

    YOH

    12

    BrD-03D Dl

    am

    Another important point may be more obvious by using t he histogram in this

    fashion, that being OUTLIERS. Outliers are data points that, for one

    reason or another are in error. As shown in figure data point .020

    in/sec. may be an outlier. If it is discovered to be an outlier,

    corrections to the histogram, mean, standard deviation and alarm levels

    will need to be made.

    Method 2: OUTLIERS

    .

    All data collection systems may produce corrupted data points.

    These

    points may be caused by variations in process parameters, ambient

    conditions or actual variations in the vibration levels. Errors of this

    type should not be included as part of the analyses. Such points are

    meaningless as test data. All data should be inspected for corrupted data

    points as a continuing check in the data collection process.

    The effects of these outliers will increase the random error of the

    population. A test is needed to determine if a particular point from a

    sample is an outlier. The test should consider two types of errors in

    detecting outliers:

    a m

    .

    1 M I U

    .

    -

    Vibration

    (intsec.)

    . . . . .

    .am

    e

    a10

    . m

    10

    01 .

    6

    (1) Rejecting a good data point

    (2) Not rejecting a bad data point

    l-.bml'i:

    .. -

    .

    .

    4

    2 -

    J-J

    .

    -

    .o19 . . 7 ' l h .030

    A3

    MT

    . I

    .055 .W

    m m n m

    .

    ,

    0

    . .

    .

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    7/20

    The probability of rejecting a good point is usually set at

    5%.

    This

    means that the odds of rejecting a good point are 20 to

    1 (or less). For

    larger populations, (several hundred sample points), almost all corrupted

    data points can be identified. For small populations (five or ten),

    corrupted data points are more difficult to identify.

    A

    test commonly used t o

    identify questionable data points as outliers is

    the GRUBBS1 Method. (ref.1)

    Consider the ,th sample of N measurements. The mean (M) and an

    experimental standard deviation (S) are calculated using (1) (2).

    Suppose the ith observation is the questionable data point; then, the

    absolute statistic calculated is:

    Using table 3, a value of TN is obtained for the sample size (N) at

    the 5% significance level. This limits the probability of rejecting a

    good data point t o 5%.

    To test for outliers, compare the calculated TN with the table TN .

    If

    TN calculated is larger than or equal to TN table, is an outlier. If

    TN calculated is smaller than TN table,

    is not an outlier.

    Table

    3

    Rejection values for

    Grubbs' Method

    Let's reconsider the data points

    in TABLE 1, PAR 4. Th e histogram in

    figure 1 giv es reason to suspect data point .02 inlsec. to be an

    outlier. By using the Grubbsl Method:

    Mean

    (M) 0.03784

    Exp. STD

    (S) 0.00453

    Sample

    size

    N

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    0

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    Sample

    size

    N

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    5

    (1-side)

    1.15

    1.46

    1.67

    1.82

    1.94

    2.03

    2.11

    2.18

    2.23

    2.29

    2.33

    2.37

    2.41

    2.44

    2.47

    2.50

    2.53

    5

    1-side)

    2.56

    2.58

    2.60

    2.62

    2.64

    2.66

    2.75

    2.82

    2.87

    2.92

    2.96

    3.03

    3.09

    3.14

    3.19

    3.21

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    8/20

    Sample Size N)

    =

    25

    From TABLE

    3

    TN,,,

    =

    2.66,

    therefore, since 3.937 is

    larger than .2.66, data point

    -0 2 in/sec. is an outlier

    according to the Grubbsl test

    Method data point .048 in/sec

    is also an outlier).

    Figure 2 shows the corrected

    histogram plot with possible

    alarm levels.

    Note: Its important to do the

    Grubbs test and set alarm levels

    before the vibration data begins to

    show signs of trending up.

    -- Figure 2

    Histogram

    flcqu ncy u-m

    Yn.r mn

    810. Lk

    - . .

    Vibration (inlsec.)

    m

    01

    Method

    3:

    SCATTER DIAGRAMS

    It is often essential to study the relationship of two corresponding

    sample data sets.

    For example, to what extent will the vibration of a

    machine change in respect to time.

    To study two variables such as

    vibration of, the machine and time, a scatter diagram can be used.

    Making a Scatter Diagram

    A scatter diagram can by made by following these steps:

    Step 1: Collect paired data x,

    you want to study the relationshi

    Step 2: Find the maximum and

    minimum values for both the x

    and

    y.

    Make th e scales of

    horizontal and vertical axis

    so that lengths are approxi-

    mately equal. Keep the number

    of unit graduations to 3 to 10

    for each axis.

    Step 3: Plot

    the data on

    section paper or a computer

    .software program. Include all

    necessary information: 1.

    title of th e diagram, 2. time

    interval, 3. number of points,

    4 title and units of each

    axis, 5. name of person who

    made the diagram. See figure 3)

    y or time, vibration), on which

    ?

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    9/20

    In order to understand

    the strength of the relationship in quantitative

    terms, it is useful to calculate the correlation coefficient.

    TABLE 4

    x, y) DATA

    Outliers * )

    The correlation coefficient, r, is in the range -1to +l. When

    r

    is near

    +I, it indicates a strong positive correlation between

    x

    and

    y.

    Like-

    wise, when

    r

    is near -1, it indicates a strong negative correlation.

    Using the data collected in table 4, overall vibration amplitude and

    cumulative days data, the correlation coefficient can be calculated see

    table 5)

    Sample

    Date

    06-NOV-91

    03-DEC-91

    13-DEC-91

    02-JAN-92

    29-JAN-92

    11-FEB-92

    13-FEB-92

    09-MAR-92

    27-MAR-92

    29-APR-92

    29-APR-92

    3 -APR-9 2

    13-MAY-92

    01-JUL-92

    15-JUL-92

    22-JUL-92

    21-AUG-92

    08-SEP-92

    24-SEP-92

    30-SEP-92

    12 0CT-9 2

    2 -OCT-9 2

    27-NOV-92

    16-DEC-92

    29-DEC-92

    Cumulative

    Days

    1

    27

    37

    57

    84

    97

    99

    124

    142

    175

    175

    176

    189

    238

    252

    259

    289

    307

    323

    329

    341

    356

    387

    406

    419

    Vibration

    Amplitude

    0.131

    0.162

    0.149

    0.169

    0.172

    0.107

    0.106

    0.186

    0.190

    0.178

    0.174

    0.172

    0.222

    0.197

    0.154

    0.168

    0.148

    0.167

    0.176

    0.246

    0.253

    0.246

    0.178

    0.256

    0.232

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    10/20

    TABLE

    5

    Method 4: Regression Analysis

    NO.

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    SUM

    After establishing a strong correlation between

    x

    and y,

    a regression

    analysis can be used t o extrapolate how many days a machine can run before

    reaching an alarm point. To realize this analysis and to determine days

    to alarm, it

    is necessary to comprehend the relation between the vibration

    amplitude and cumulative days, quantitatively.

    As previously determined, the scatter diagram in figure 3 shows a strong

    correlation between vibration amplitude y) and cumulative days x) . From

    this diagram, it would seem that vibration and days have a straight-line

    relation.

    Such a straight line is called a linear regression line. The least

    squares regression analysis is the most popular means of curve fitting.

    For higher order fitting see attachment A.

    Cumulative

    Days

    dependent

    v ri ble

    x

    27

    37

    57

    84

    124

    142

    175

    175

    176

    189

    238

    329

    3 4 1

    356

    406

    419

    3276

    X Y

    0 . 1 3 1

    4.374

    5.513

    9.633

    14.448

    23.064

    26 .98

    31.15

    30 .45

    30.272

    41.958

    46.886

    80.934

    86 .273

    87.576

    103.936

    97.208

    720.786

    xA2

    729

    1369

    3249

    7056

    15376

    20164

    30625

    30625

    30976

    35721

    56644

    108241

    116281

    126736

    164836

    175561

    924190

    vibration

    Amplitude

    Y

    0 .131

    0.162

    0.149

    0.169

    0.172

    0.186

    0 .19

    0.178

    0.174

    0.172

    0.222

    0 .197

    0.246

    0.253

    0 .246

    0.256

    0.232

    3.335

    YA2

    0.017161

    0.026244

    0 .022201

    0 .028561

    0.029584

    0.034596

    0 .0361

    0.031684

    0.030276

    0.029584

    0.049284

    0.038809

    0.060516

    0.064009

    0.060516

    0.065536

    0.053824

    0.678485

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    11/20

    independent variable

    constant

    regression c oe f f i c i e n t

    This quantitative way of grasping the relationship between

    x

    and y by

    seeking a regression from

    x

    and y is called

    regression analysis.

    Using

    the data in Table 6 lets calculate the regression line.

    TABLE

    mean

    of x

    192.7058

    mean o f y

    0.196176

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    12/20

    The regression line is expressed by

    y

    =

    0.144782 0.000266~. That is,

    for every day of run time,

    the

    vibration will increase by 0.000266

    inlsec.

    Figure 4 shows th e regression line

    as calculated above.

    The points on

    the scatter diagram should be

    evenly distributed around the

    regression line.

    Method 5: Goodness Of Fit 1)

    There are two quantitative measures

    of goodness of fit.

    The deviation of data points around the regression

    line can be characterized by the standard of error of estimate SEE), the

    precision index of residuals.

    The smaller the residuals, the smaller the

    SEE, the better the fit.

    S

    =

    Yi Yi,fiC)*

    i

    N c

    Where

    C

    is the number of coefficients of the regression.

    For a linear

    relation, C = 2. This same equation applies to higher order fits, where C

    again indicates the number of coefficients of the regression.

    Table

    7

    and equation demonstrate the goodness of fit for the previous

    regression calculations.

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    13/20

    TABLE

    7

    S 0 003404

    0 .015064

    15

    Method 6: Goodness Of Fit 2)

    Another commonly used goodness of fit test is the

    coefficient of

    determination

    The fraction SSR/SST is called the coefficient of

    determination and is represented by the symbol r2 , Which varies from -1 to

    +l.

    The closer r2 is to

    1

    the better the fit.

    S S R

    12

    ST

    S S R y i d r l t - 7

    SST

    S S R

    SS

    ( 1 5 )

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    14/20

    T BLE

    8

    The preceding calculation shows goodness of fit r2to be 0.999979, which

    was determined earlier to be a very good fit.

    YI,M

    0.145048

    0.151983

    0.154650

    0.159984

    0.167184

    0.177852

    0.182653

    0.191454

    0.191454

    0.191721

    0.195188

    0.208256

    0.232525

    0.235726

    0.239726

    0.253061

    0.256528

    SUM

    Method 7: Days To Alarm Analysis

    Once a regression line has been fitted to the data, goodness of fit has

    been determined and alarm levels have been set, Days To Alarm can be

    calculated. Days to alarm can be determined in two ways, by calculations

    or reading it from a graph.

    i

    0.131

    0.162

    0.149

    0.169

    0.172

    0.186

    0.19

    0.178

    0.174

    0.172

    0.222

    0.197

    0.246

    0.253

    0.246

    0.256

    0.232

    3.335

    Calculation Method:

    Now that the constant and regression coefficient has been

    established,

    days to alarm can be calculated as follows;

    S S

    10.17578

    10.13159

    10.11462

    10.08072

    10.03505

    9.967578

    9.937289

    9.881879

    9.881879

    9.880202

    9.858418

    9.776526

    9.625346

    9.605498

    9.580717

    9.498344

    9.476986

    167.5084

    DT

    alarm

    -

    P

    -

    ct

    16)

    SSE

    0.000197

    0.000100

    0.000031

    0.000081

    0.000023

    0.000066

    0.000053

    0.000181

    0.000304

    0.000388

    0.000718

    0.000126

    0.000181

    0.000298

    0.000039

    0.000008

    0.000601

    0.003404

    DTA = Days To Alarm

    C,

    =

    Cumulative Time Days)

    yh = Alarm Point 0.300 in/sec

    for exponential regression curve fits;

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    15/20

    DT =

    lo Y

    -

    lo a

    lo

    t

    for'power regression curve fit;

    log Y log

    DT = 1 0 ~ )Cc

    Graphical Method:

    The days to alarm can simply be read from the scatter diagram with

    a fitted regression line by following these steps (see figure 5).

    step 1. Extend the regression line to the y axis alarm

    intersect point.

    step 2. Read the corresponding x axis, cumulative tim e

    (days).

    step 3. Subtract the present cumulative days from projected

    cumulative days.

    Method

    :

    Confidence Interval

    Confidence Intervals are measurements of precision in estimating a

    parameter, in this case days to alarm.

    A confidence interval around an

    unknown parameter is an interval of numbers derived from sample data that

    almost assuredly contains th e parameter.

    Managers are often interested in how far from the true value an estimated

    days to alarm might deviate.

    For this example, 95 confidence level will

    be used, that is to say, th e calculated interval has a 95 chance of

    containing the true parameter.

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    16/20

    DTA

    =

    0.3 - (0.144782 (2~0.015064) -

    ql

    1

    0.000266

    DTA

    =

    0.3 - (0.144782

    -

    (2x0 015064) )

    -

    41g

    =

    278

    0.000266

    DTA

    = Days to .Alarm upper limit

    DTA, = Days t o Alarm lower limit

    In an earlier example, the days to alarm was calculated at

    165

    days. We

    can now state with

    95

    confidence, the days to alarm will be between

    51

    and

    78

    days.

    Method

    9:

    Confidence Bands o n th e Regression Line

    In Method 8, the confidence interval was calculated for a single point.

    In much the same way, upper and lower Confidence Bands ca n be placed on a

    regression line. see figure

    5.1)

    y

    =

    (a

    -

    (2 SEE))

    + px

    yl = (a (2

    x

    SEE))

    + px

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    17/20

    ATTACHMENT A

    Higher Order Curve ~ i t t i n g

    Exponential Curve Fit:

    For vibration data, the most often used curve fitting calculation will be

    either Exponential or Linear regression. Use the goodness of fit test to

    determine which curve fit calculation best fits the data. see figure 6)

    TABLE

    X

    Log

    x EXP

    fit Y log y og

    Y X*Y

    27

    37

    57

    84

    124

    142

    175

    175

    176

    189

    238

    329

    341

    356

    4 6

    419

    SUM-

    s xy)

    =

    C x

    log Y

    C

    x

    C l og Y

    N

    S x x ) =

    Ex2

    Ex)

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    18/20

    Power Regression Curve Fit:

    Another curve fit that may be useful in analyzing vibration data is the

    Power Regression fit.

    S xy) C l0g logy ) -

    Elog Zlog y )

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    19/20

    REFERENCES

    1. Grubbs, F. E., Procedure for Detecting Outlying Observations in

    Sample,I1 Technometrics, Vol. 11, no. 1, February 1969.

    2. ANSIIASME PTC 19.1-1985, Measurement Uncertaintv. Par t 1,.

    3. Dr. Robert

    B.

    Abernethy, I1Test Measurement Accuracy, Jan uary 1989.

    4. Hitoshi

    Kume,

    Statistical Methods for Qualitv Im ~r ov em en t, une

    1990.

  • 8/11/2019 A Statisical Approach to Machinery Condition Monitoring - Blake

    20/20