a streamlined, quantitative, web-based, course-level assessment process jörg moßbrucker glenn...

30
A Streamlined, A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Course-Level Assessment Process Process Jörg Moßbrucker Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering Milwaukee School of Engineering

Upload: nicholas-fields

Post on 16-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

A Streamlined, A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based,Quantitative, Web-based,Course-Level Assessment Course-Level Assessment

ProcessProcess

Jörg MoßbruckerJörg MoßbruckerGlenn WrateGlenn Wrate

Mike O’DonnellMike O’DonnellMilwaukee School of EngineeringMilwaukee School of Engineering

Page 2: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 22

OverviewOverview

Do what you say

Prove itMeasure what you do

Implement changes

to improve

Say what you do

Page 3: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 33

Say what you do, do what you Say what you do, do what you saysay

Detailed course descriptionsDetailed course descriptions– Course outlineCourse outline– Course prerequisites by topic and Course prerequisites by topic and

coursecourse– Course outcomesCourse outcomes– Course topicsCourse topics– Day-by-day descriptions of lecture and Day-by-day descriptions of lecture and

lab sessionslab sessions

Page 4: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 44

Example: Circuits IExample: Circuits I

Prerequisite by topics:Prerequisite by topics:

Differentiation of algebraic and Differentiation of algebraic and trigonometric functions trigonometric functions

Solution of a system of linear Solution of a system of linear equations using a calculator and/or equations using a calculator and/or computer computer

Page 5: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 55

Example cont: Course Example cont: Course OutcomesOutcomes

Upon successful completion of this course, the student will:Upon successful completion of this course, the student will:

Demonstrate problem solving skills Demonstrate problem solving skills Demonstrate a standard of expertise in the understanding Demonstrate a standard of expertise in the understanding

of circuit laws and in the analysis of electrical circuit of circuit laws and in the analysis of electrical circuit Write and solve KCL and KVL equations using standard Write and solve KCL and KVL equations using standard

methods of circuit analysis for CD circuits methods of circuit analysis for CD circuits Simplify networks using source transformations and Simplify networks using source transformations and

Thevenin's/Norton's theorems Thevenin's/Norton's theorems Use the superposition principle in circuit analysis Use the superposition principle in circuit analysis Demonstrate calculator skills to solve circuit equations Demonstrate calculator skills to solve circuit equations Demonstate the ability to analyze DC circuits using SPICE Demonstate the ability to analyze DC circuits using SPICE Demonstrate circuit laboratory skills and perform DC Demonstrate circuit laboratory skills and perform DC

measurements measurements

Page 6: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 66

Example cont: Course Example cont: Course TopicsTopics

DC circuit laws and concepts (10 DC circuit laws and concepts (10 classes) classes)

DC circuit analysis (9 classes) DC circuit analysis (9 classes) Op-Amps (3 classes) Op-Amps (3 classes) Inductors/Capacitors (3 classes) Inductors/Capacitors (3 classes) Review (3 classes) Review (3 classes) Tests and quizzes (2 classes) Tests and quizzes (2 classes)

Page 7: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 77

Example cont.Example cont.

All the above data plus day-by-day All the above data plus day-by-day description of lecture sessions and description of lecture sessions and suggested laboratory sessions are suggested laboratory sessions are stored in a MS Access databasestored in a MS Access database

Web description is automatically Web description is automatically created from databasecreated from database

Course coordinator is responsible for Course coordinator is responsible for datadata

Page 8: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 88

Measure what you doMeasure what you do

Course assessment measures IN/OUTCourse assessment measures IN/OUT

IN: Assessment of student IN: Assessment of student performance data of prerequisite performance data of prerequisite topicstopics– Prerequ-exam, homework etc.Prerequ-exam, homework etc.

OUT: Assessment of student OUT: Assessment of student performance data of course outcomesperformance data of course outcomes– Final examFinal exam

Page 9: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 99

AssessmentAssessment

Assessment of student performance Assessment of student performance data generated out of Prerequ. Exam data generated out of Prerequ. Exam and Final Examand Final Exam

Must generate meaningful dataMust generate meaningful data Must generate only a marginal Must generate only a marginal

increase in workload for facultyincrease in workload for faculty

Page 10: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1010

Assessment cont.Assessment cont.

How can we generate assessment How can we generate assessment data out of already existing (exam) data out of already existing (exam) data?data?– Two-dimensional grading schemeTwo-dimensional grading scheme

How can we generate meaningful How can we generate meaningful data (i.e. is there a difference data (i.e. is there a difference between 80% and 83%)?between 80% and 83%)?– Reduction of input data rangeReduction of input data range

Page 11: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1111

Assessment DataAssessment Data Data reduction by grouping student Data reduction by grouping student

performance into three categories:performance into three categories:

– AdequateAdequate understanding (excellent to understanding (excellent to satisfactory, 100% to app. 75%)satisfactory, 100% to app. 75%)

– MarginalMarginal understanding (below understanding (below satisfactory or poor)satisfactory or poor)

– InadequateInadequate understanding (failure) understanding (failure)

Good Just passed Clueless

Page 12: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1212

Generation of dataGeneration of data

Student 1

Student 2

Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Grade

90% 75% 80%

50% 60% 75%

82%

63%

A

M

I

A AM

MI I

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

Page 13: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1313

Generation of data cont.Generation of data cont.

A

M

I

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

Outcome 1

Outcome 2

Outcome 3

Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3

*

* *

*

A M I

1 0 1

1 2 1

1 1 0

Page 14: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1414

MS Excel ExampleMS Excel Example

Page 15: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1515

Cont.Cont.

Page 16: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1616

Cont.Cont.

Page 17: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1717

Cont.Cont.

Page 18: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1818

Cont.Cont.

Page 19: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 1919

Database EntryDatabase Entry

Web-based interfaceWeb-based interface– Allows direct entry of assessment dataAllows direct entry of assessment data– Enters data into MySQL databaseEnters data into MySQL database– Allows also entry of commentsAllows also entry of comments

Page 20: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2020

Data Flow OverviewData Flow OverviewAccess DBWorkload

Access DBCourse Descr.

Progress DB

Online CourseDescriptions

MySQL DB forCourses/Year/

Quarters/Sections

Web DataInput

MySQLDatabase

AccessDatabase

AdobeAcrobat

Report in pdf

Multiple ScriptsIn AccessReports/Queries

Page 21: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2121

Result ExampleResult Example

Page 22: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2222

Implement Changes to Implement Changes to ImproveImprove

What?What? How?How? When?When? Who?Who?

What?What?

– Course outcomes with the lowest Course outcomes with the lowest “Adequate” scores over one academic “Adequate” scores over one academic yearyear

– Collated and weighted results over all Collated and weighted results over all sections over one academic year sections over one academic year reduces noise considerablyreduces noise considerably

Page 23: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2323

Cont.Cont.

How?How?

– Change of course topics/focusChange of course topics/focus– Change of lab sessionsChange of lab sessions

……– Removal of unnecessary course Removal of unnecessary course

outcomesoutcomes

Page 24: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2424

Cont.Cont.

When and who?When and who?

– At end of academic year assessment team At end of academic year assessment team assembles results and determines “critical” assembles results and determines “critical” course outcomes requiring actioncourse outcomes requiring action

– Assessment team focuses on “tracks” in EE, Assessment team focuses on “tracks” in EE, such as:such as: Digital, Analog, Circuits, Communications etc.Digital, Analog, Circuits, Communications etc.

– Course coordinators implement changes over Course coordinators implement changes over summersummer

Page 25: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2525

ExampleExampleChange of a 2-course sequence in circuits without lab to a 3-course sequence with labChange of a 2-course sequence in circuits without lab to a 3-course sequence with lab

Page 26: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2626

ConclusionsConclusions Assessment data generated directly from student Assessment data generated directly from student

performance data already availableperformance data already available Data reduction by grouping into three categoriesData reduction by grouping into three categories Instant graphical feedback to teaching faculty on Instant graphical feedback to teaching faculty on

performance of their sectionperformance of their section Simple, web-based interface to input assessment Simple, web-based interface to input assessment

datadata One-click calculation of assessment data of multiple One-click calculation of assessment data of multiple

sections/quarters/yearssections/quarters/years Assessment team determines annually action neededAssessment team determines annually action needed Course coordinators implement changesCourse coordinators implement changes Data provides numerical feedback of changesData provides numerical feedback of changes Program director has overview over course Program director has overview over course

outcomes data for program outcomesoutcomes data for program outcomes

Page 27: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2727

Issues (past and present)Issues (past and present)

No. of prerequisites usually small -> No. of prerequisites usually small -> noise exceptionally largenoise exceptionally large– Common prerequisite exam for all sections Common prerequisite exam for all sections

of a course determined by course of a course determined by course coordinatorcoordinator

Different sections behave very Different sections behave very differentlydifferently– No common final examNo common final exam– Instructor understanding of performanceInstructor understanding of performance– Section/time/student etc. dependentSection/time/student etc. dependent– Adds to overall noiseAdds to overall noise

Page 28: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 2828

Cont.Cont.

Reduction to a very small set of Reduction to a very small set of outcomes:outcomes:

breadth vs. depthbreadth vs. depth

Page 29: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

??

Page 30: A Streamlined, Quantitative, Web-based, Course-Level Assessment Process Jörg Moßbrucker Glenn Wrate Mike O’Donnell Milwaukee School of Engineering

Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE Dr.-Ing. Joerg Mossbrucker, MSOE 20062006 3030

OverviewOverview Things I need:Things I need: General process (do what you say, measure what you do, improve)General process (do what you say, measure what you do, improve) Do what you sayDo what you say

– Course descriptionsCourse descriptions– Course outcomesCourse outcomes– Course topicsCourse topics– Role of the course coordinatorRole of the course coordinator– Example of course on-lineExample of course on-line– Where is the data storedWhere is the data stored

Measure what you doMeasure what you do– Different methods of assessmentDifferent methods of assessment– In/Out measuresIn/Out measures– Advantages/disadvantagesAdvantages/disadvantages– Numerical/non-numerical dataNumerical/non-numerical data– Common exams yes/noCommon exams yes/no– How can we use data already collected for a class?How can we use data already collected for a class?– Is there a difference between 85% and 80%? If so how muchIs there a difference between 85% and 80%? If so how much– -> reduction of in data (adequate/marginal/inadequate)-> reduction of in data (adequate/marginal/inadequate)– What do these mean?What do these mean?– How to get it out of final pre-requ?How to get it out of final pre-requ?– Multiple sources for a single course outcome from different questionsMultiple sources for a single course outcome from different questions– Computed automatically in Excel (example)Computed automatically in Excel (example)– How do we get the computed data and resultsHow do we get the computed data and results– Databases usedDatabases used– Examples of resultsExamples of results

ImproveImprove– Different possibilities how to improveDifferent possibilities how to improve– When to improveWhen to improve– Who decides when whatWho decides when what– Assessment processAssessment process

IssuesIssues– HonestyHonesty– Integrity of the course coordinatorIntegrity of the course coordinator– NoiseNoise– Still too much dataStill too much data