a study on the association of cytochrome-p450 1a1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in north...

1
ERRATUM A study on the association of cytochrome-P450 1A1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in north Indian women Virendra Singh Neeraj Rastogi Ashima Sinha Abhai Kumar Neeraj Mathur Mahendra Pratap Singh Published online: 9 January 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Erratum to: Breast Cancer Res Treat DOI 10.1007/s10549-006-9264-2 Due to an unfortunate oversight the odds ratios and p-values for some genotypes were calculated the wrong way around. The right values are tabulated as follows. Genotype Odds ratio (95%CI) p-Value Total women M1 (T/C) 1.05 (0.57–1.90) 0.989 M1 (C/C) 0.76 (0.27–2.09) 0.723 M2 (A/G) 0.53 (0.28–1.00) 0.052 M4 (C/A) 1.32 (0.71–2.45) 0.435 M4 (A/A) 4.96 (0.47–246.91) 0.179 Total premenopausal women M1 (T/C) 1.00 (0.41–2.46) 0.834 M1 (C/C) 0.62 (0.10–2.86) 0.738 M2 (A/G) 0.98 (0.40–2.41) 0.865 M4 (C/A) 1.02 (0.37–2.77) 0.850 M4 (A/A) 4.54 (0.22–272.17) 0.236 Total postmenopausal women M1 (T/C) 1.66 (0.62–4.50) 0.373 M1 (C/C) 1.28 (0.24–8.65) 1.000 M2 (A/G) 0.32 (0.12–0.89) 0.025 M4 (C/A) 1.22 (0.48–3.13) 0.809 The online version of the original article can be found at http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9264-2 V. Singh Á A. Sinha Á A. Kumar Á N. Mathur Á M. P. Singh (&) Industrial Toxicology Research Centre (ITRC), Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Post Box 80, Lucknow 226 001 UP, India e-mail: [email protected] N. Rastogi Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGI), Lucknow 226 014, India 123 Breast Cancer Res Treat (2007) 102:249 DOI 10.1007/s10549-006-9421-7

Upload: virendra-singh

Post on 15-Jul-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ERRATUM

A study on the association of cytochrome-P450 1A1polymorphism and breast cancer risk in north Indian women

Virendra Singh Æ Neeraj Rastogi ÆAshima Sinha Æ Abhai Kumar Æ Neeraj Mathur ÆMahendra Pratap Singh

Published online: 9 January 2007� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Erratum to: Breast Cancer Res TreatDOI 10.1007/s10549-006-9264-2

Due to an unfortunate oversight the odds ratios and

p-values for some genotypes were calculated the wrong

way around. The right values are tabulated as follows.

Genotype Odds ratio(95%CI)

p-Value

Total women M1 (T/C) 1.05 (0.57–1.90) 0.989M1 (C/C) 0.76 (0.27–2.09) 0.723M2 (A/G) 0.53 (0.28–1.00) 0.052M4 (C/A) 1.32 (0.71–2.45) 0.435M4 (A/A) 4.96 (0.47–246.91) 0.179

Total premenopausalwomen

M1 (T/C) 1.00 (0.41–2.46) 0.834M1 (C/C) 0.62 (0.10–2.86) 0.738M2 (A/G) 0.98 (0.40–2.41) 0.865M4 (C/A) 1.02 (0.37–2.77) 0.850M4 (A/A) 4.54 (0.22–272.17) 0.236

Total postmenopausalwomen

M1 (T/C) 1.66 (0.62–4.50) 0.373M1 (C/C) 1.28 (0.24–8.65) 1.000M2 (A/G) 0.32 (0.12–0.89) 0.025M4 (C/A) 1.22 (0.48–3.13) 0.809

The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9264-2

V. Singh � A. Sinha � A. Kumar � N. Mathur �M. P. Singh (&)Industrial Toxicology Research Centre (ITRC), MahatmaGandhi Marg, Post Box 80, Lucknow 226 001 UP, Indiae-mail: [email protected]

N. RastogiSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences(SGPGI), Lucknow 226 014, India

123

Breast Cancer Res Treat (2007) 102:249

DOI 10.1007/s10549-006-9421-7