a sustainable development plan for parkview gardens neighborhood - university city, mo by h3 studio,...

8/3/2019 A Sustainable Development Plan for Parkview Gardens Neighborhood - University City, MO by H3 Studio, #3

1/94

A V I S I O N F O R P A R K V I E W G A R D E N SC O N N E C T I N G P E O P L E , P L A C E S & P A R K S

P U B L I C W O R K S H O P # 3

D R A F T I N G T H E P L A N : P U T T I N G T H E P I E C E S T O G E T H E R

U N I V E R S I T Y C I T Y , M I S S O U R I

H 3 S T U D I O

N O V E M B E R 9 , 2 0 1 1


2/94

CONNECTING PEOPLE, PLACES & PARKS

A VISION FOR PARKVIEW GARDENS

AGENDA

INTRODUCTION

PLANNING PROCESS

PUBLIC WORKSHOP #2 REPORT

PREFERRED OPTION: NEIGHBORHOODSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

small-group work session

report back & conclusion


3/94



A Vision for Parkview Gardens

INTRODUCTIONINCEPTION :: OBJECTIVE :: BOUNDARIES :: SCOPE :: SCHEDULE :: PARTNERS


4/94



PROJECT INCEPTIONHUD-DOT PARTNERSHIP FORSUSTAINABLE COMMUNTIES

The City of University City, in partnership withWashington University, the Parkview Gardens

Association, Great Rivers Greenway, Trailnet,

RHCDA, developed a grant proposal entitled

Parkview Gardens: A Sustainable &Accessible Community for a HUD-DOTPartnership for Sustainable Communitiesgrant. On October 20, 2010, University City

was notified of their receipt of the grant award.

A sustainable community is a community that has more housingand transportation choices, is closer to jobs, shops or schools, ismore energy independent and helps protect clean air and water

The grant application and this planning process

is one ofthe early-action implementationitems specified in the Parkview GardensParks and Open Space Plan, adopted by theUniversity City, City Council on February 22,

2010


5/94



OBJECTIVE

The overall objective is to continue to revitalize

and redevelopment Parkview Gardens

neighborhood in a manner that builds upon

its history, diversity and charactersothat new housing, parks and public spaces,

green infrastructure, and economic

development projects complement existing andplanned public transportation resources to

increase community & environmental

sustainability and improves the quality

of l ife and access to employmentopportunities.

The intent is that this plan is implemented over

the long-term (15-20 years) in a manner thatdoes not require the use of eminent domain.


6/94



BOUNDARIES

CONTEXT AREA Forsyth Blvd. to south

Tezel Ave. to the north Big Bend Blvd. to west Hamil ton Ave. to the East

OVERALL STUDY AREA

Alley north of Olive Blvd.Alley south of Delmar Blvd.Alley west of Kingsland Ave. Hodiamont Ave. to the East

DETAILED STUDY AREAAlley north of Olive Blvd.Alley south of Delmar Blvd. Kingsland Ave. to the west Skinker Blvd. to the East


7/94



SCOPE

1.0 SITE INVESTIGATION

2.0 GUIDING LIVABILITY PRINCIPLES

3.0 ENVISIONING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE

4.0 DRAFT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Preferred Option Sustainable Development Plan PPP Committee Meeting 03/Public Workshop 03 Refinement of Economic Development Assessment Parkview Gardens Parks 30% Design Development Preliminary Integrated Funding Plan

5.0 FINAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Draft Neighborhood Sustainable Development Plan Refinement of Integrated Funding Plan Parkview Gardens Parks 50% Design Development PPP Committee Meeting 04/Public Workshop 04 Final Neighborhood Sustainable Development Plan Final Public Presentation


8/94



SCHEDULE

August to present: Plan Commission: approved #3

Traffic Commission

Green Practices Com.Historic Preservation Com.

Stakeholder Interviews

City of St. Louis

Week of November 7: PPP/Public Workshop 03

Week of November 21: PPP Committee Review

Week of January 16: PPP / Public Workshop 04

January 25: Plan Commission

February 13: City Council Work Session

Week of February 20: Final Public Presentation

March 26: City Council Presentation


9/94



PARTNERSThe City of University City

Washington University In St. Louis

The Parkview Gardens Association

Great Rivers Greenway DistrictSt. Louis Regional Arts Commission

Regional Housing & Community Develp. Alliance

Arcturis

Trailnet

ADVISORSThe City of St. Louis

Gateway Foundation

University City Parks Commission

University City Arts and Letters Commission

Metro


10/94




PLANNING PROCESSHISTORY :: NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS :: MARKET ANALYSIS :: BENCH-MARKING

Parkview Gardens Parks and

Open Space Plan February 2010

Sustainability Strategic Plan for

The City of University City, Missouri October 2010

HUD-DOT Partnership for Sustainable Communities Livability Principles


11/94




12/94




13/94




14/94




15/94




16/94



MARKET DEMAND


17/94




18/94




PUBLIC MEETING IIPROCESS :: GOALS :: PREFERRED OPTION :: CONCERNS :: IDEAS

August 30, 2011


19/94



PUBLIC WORKSHOP II

SUMMARY

PROCESS

residents and community members

reviewed Development Options for

Parkview Gardens after a detailed

presentation on the Park Plan, ex.

conditions of the neighborhood,Residential Market Analysis, and

the Development Options.

GOALIdentify preferred development

option

Cross check issues and ideas with

the Vision Statement and Goalsgenerated at Public Workshop # I


20/94




21/94



PUBLIC WORKSHOP II

SUMMARY

OPTION 3

MIXED USE +RESIDENTIAL MARKET +

was consistently selected as the

preferred option.

There was overall support for the

suggested building heights, massing and

economic development program

There was support for the public space

network (streets and parks), and the

access, circulation and mobility

proposals.

There was support for the range of

housing & building types

OPTION 3 (MIXED-USE) BEST FORCOMMUNITY, JOBS + RESIDENTS


22/94



PUBLIC WORKSHOP II

SUMMARY: CONCERNS

1. Metcalfe Park

_improve park uses_remediation issues

2. Condominiums & Loop Parking

concerns with Condo location and the

impact this will have on free Loop

Parking

3. Delmar/Skinker Corner Grocery

concerns about location at corner,

especially with Traffic Impacts

4. Economics of Student Housing

concern about housing not being on

the tax roll


23/94



PUBLIC WORKSHOP II

SUMMARY: IDEAS

1. Move Grocery Store to Skinkerand

Olive Intersection

2. Integrate housing into the mixed use

buildings along Skinker

3. Make sure uses in mixed-use

buildings are compatible with

neighborhood needs

4. Redevelopment areas should not

require residents or businesses to

relocate

5. Preserve Community Gardens

6. Green Roof on the Condo Parking

Structure


24/94




PREFERRED OPTION:

NEIGHBORHOOD SUSTAINABLE

DEVELOPMENT PLANECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT :: JOBS | HOUSING BALANCE :: SMART COMMUNITIESACCESS, CIRCULATION & MOBILITY :: PARKING STRATEGY :: PUBLIC SPACE NETWORK

REGULATORY PLAN :: BUILDING HEIGHTS :: LAND USE CODE :: :: BUILDING TYPES

SUSTAINABLE URBAN & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

URBAN DESIGN PLAN


25/94



ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTJOBS|HOUSING BALANCE

SMART COMMUNITIES

PARKVIEW GARDENS


26/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

JOBS | HOUSING

Immediacy of employment:

potential to access alternate forms

of transportation for employment

While it is acknowledged that households face trade-offs when selecting a place to live, it is useful publicpolicy to offer a greater mix of uses so householdshave the choice of living closer to work and other

amenities in order to improve the quality of life.

PARKVIEW GARDENS


27/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

JOBS | HOUSING




Parkview Gardens is

linked to major centers ofemployment via the Loop

Trolley and MetroLink.

Parkview Gardens & adjacentareas, and any jobs relateddevelopment will have a greater

in | out transit employment

commute-shed

PARKVIEW GARDENS


28/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

JOBS | HOUSING




Number of jobs: roughly equal

number of jobs and housing units

Relationship to Housing:

Housing should provide a range of

types and prices that match therange of jobs types

(all numbers approximate)

To develop a healthy and choice neighborhood HUDrecommends a 1.5 :1 relationship between jobs andhousing units. Parkview Gardens needs 5,850 jobsnearby in order to match this ideal ratio. This could

be accommodated along Delmar and in five storeybuildings along the Skinker and Olive Blvd. edge

PARKVIEW GARDENS


29/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

JOBS | HOUSING

Type/range of jobs: type of jobs

should match the labor force skills,

demographic profile, and/or

educational/training resources

Range of business types includes:food service; supermarket / grocer;

small general office; retail / sales;

hospitality; non-profits; janitorial;

arts / entertainment; educationaluniversity; industrial; manufacturer;

storage / trucking; Local Govern.;

School District; newspaper;

neighborhood services; etc.

There is an opportunity to build upon the educational,arts and cultural resources of the area to furtherdiversify the economic development opportunitythat will support the market program for housing

SO O PARKVIEW GARDENS


30/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

JOBS | HOUSING

RECOMMENDATION

Develop an incentive program toincrease the number and range

of businesses that match

potential labor force

Encourage the development of amixed use office district along

Skinker Blvd. and the continued

re-development of North Campus

as well as the Industrial Park

Locate more jobs near transit tocreate regionally accessible jobs

Encourage the mixed-usedevelopment of the Loop

Provide a 21st

century digital technology infrastructurethat responds to the new knowledge based digitaleconomy and reposition the broader neighborhood asa smart community and a center for innovation, arts

and creativity

A VISIONFOR PARKVIEW GARDENS


31/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

SMART COMMUNITY

ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES Attracts new High Bandwidthbusiness and industry

Growth in small business

Connected Institutions andCommunity Arts

SOCIAL ADVANTAGES Free Wi-Fi in public realm forresidents and visitors

Equal access to job and

educational information for themost economically disadvantaged

residents.

Smart Community: one making a conscious effort touse information technology to transform life and workwithin its region in significant and fundamental, ratherthan incremental ways. (World Foundation for Smart Communities)



32/94



ECON. DEVELOPMENT

SMART COMMUNITY

ST. LOUIS CLOUD COALITION

Internet connectivity and speed is

essential for municipalities to:

Attract and retain businesses

Maintain quality of life

Expand arts and culture

St. Louis Cloud Coalition is currently developing aninformation and communications technology (ict)master plan for the loop trolley area



33/94



--

ECON. DEVELOPMENT

SMART COMMUNITY

ASSETS Metro Link has an existing highspeed Fiber Optic cable along its

tracks consider as a source

These cables could supplyinternet 100 times fasterthan

existing to the surrounding area.

CHALLENGES

Seek out funders & partnershipsfor construction, operation and

maintenance of network to expand

the use of Fiber Optic cable in this

area



34/94



Case Studies For A

SMART COMMUNITYChicago

Cleveland



35/94



ACCESS, CIRCULATION & PARKINGNEIGHBORHOOD TRANSIT

RESIDENTIAL PARKING

LOOP PARKING



36/94



NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSIT



37/94



TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT

NEIGHBORHOOD TOD

Existing 12 units pa. At full-build out& with market+ program = 24 upa

MIXED-USE CORRIDOR TOD

Existing 0.8 FAR. At full-build out &

with market+ program = 1.6 FAR




38/94



RESIDENTIAL PARKING



39/94



RESIDENTIAL PARKING

STREET PARKING

1,160 actual spaces


note: street parking cannot substitutefor on-site residential



40/94



RESIDENTIAL PARKING CODESINGLE FAMILY HOUSING 2 Parking Spaces

APARTMENT / CONDO 1.5 Parking Spaces for 1 Bedroom

APARTMENT / CONDO 2 Parking Spaces for 2+ Bedrooms

APARTMENT / CONDO 6+ Units in the Building,

1 Visi tor Parking Space Required



41/94



RESIDENTIAL PARKING

EXISTING

3,350 code spaces

1,600 actual spaces 1,750 DEFICIT BY CODE

PROPOSED

2,863 add. code spaces 1,358 add. actual spaces 1,505 DIFFERENCE


ACTUAL PARKING RATIO IS:0.5 PARKING SPACES PER BEDROOM0.8 PARKING SPACES PER HOUSING UNIT



42/94



IF ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD IS BY CODE:6,200 TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES

UP TO 2.0 MILLION SQ. FT. OF PARKING

RESIDENTIAL PARKING

EXISTING

3,350 code spaces


PROPOSED





43/94



IF NEW DEVELOPMENT MEETS CODE& ACTUAL PARKING IS UNCHANGED:

4,460 TOTAL SPACES

UP TO 1.5 MILLION SQ. FT. OF PARKING

RESIDENTIAL PARKING

EXISTING

3,350 code spaces


PROPOSED





44/94



IF ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD IS BY ACTUAL:2,950 TOTAL SPACES

UP TO 900,000 SQ. FT. OF PARKING

RESIDENTIAL PARKING

EXISTING

3,350 code spaces


PROPOSED





45/94



RESIDENTIAL PARKING OPTIONS1. Keep Existing Parking Code & Require Compliance

2. Maintain Actual Neighborhood Parking Ratio (0.5 per bedroom)

3. Set A Maximum Number Of Parking Spaces for a TOD based upon

best practices and proximity of transit

4. Let Parking Be Market Driven with a minimum and maximum

(0.5 per bed.) so that a developer has the option to respond to

the proximity of transit

5. Promote/Require Alternative Parking Strategies



46/94



LOOP PARKINGRESTAURANTS: 1 Parking Space for Every 50 SQ. FT.

RETAIL: 1 Parking Space for Every 200 SQ. FT.

OFFICE: 1 Parking Space for very 300 SQ. FT.

THEATER: 1 Parking Space for Every 3.5 Seats in Main Room

*EXCEPTIONS FOR SHARED PUBLIC PARKING AND REOCCUPANCY*On a case by case basis, a build ing owner can utilize city owned parking

within 500 feet for a fee in order to meet required commercial parking



47/94



Existing ratio of1 PARKING SPACE PER EVERY500 SQ. FT.

LOOP PARKING

EXISTING

1,430 actual spaces

1 SPACE PER 500 SQ. FT.




48/94



1,900 total spaces needed. Two (2) new parkingdecks provide 1,900 total spaces @ 500 sq. ft

LOOP PARKING

EXISTING

1,430 actual spaces

1 SPACE PER 500 SQ. FT.

PROPOSED

470 add. actual spaces




49/94



LOOP PARKING OPTIONS1. Keep Existing Parking Code the Same

2. Maintain Actual Parking Ratio for each Individual Property

(1 Parking Space per Every 500 SQ. FT.)

3. Create a Shared Parking District for The Loop that build,

manages and operates suffic ient parking for the entire district

4. Promote Alternative Parking Strategies



50/94



REGULATORY PLANBUILDING HEIGHT, MASSING & USE



51/94


SO O G S

REGULATORY PLAN

BUILDING HEIGHTS: LOOKING NORTH

All Neighborhood Buildings



52/94


REGULATORY PLAN



2-4 Stories



53/94


REGULATORY PLAN



2-4 Stories 3-5 Stories



54/94


REGULATORY PLAN



2-4 Stories 3-5 Stories 3-8 Stories



55/94


REGULATORY PLAN



2-4 Stories 3-5 Stories 3-8 Stories 3-12 Stories



56/94


REGULATORY PLAN

BUILDING HEIGHTS: LOOKING WEST





57/94


REGULATORY PLAN

BUILDING HEIGHTS: LOOKING EAST





58/94


DELMAR BOULEVARDLOOKING WEST



59/94


DELMAR BOULEVARDLOOKING WEST



60/94


NORTH SKINKER BOULEVARDLOOKING NORTH



61/94


NORTH SKINKER BOULEVARDLOOKING NORTH



62/94


REGULATORY PLAN

BUILDING HEIGHTS: THEORETICAL





63/94


REGULATORY PLAN






64/94


REGULATORY PLAN




BUILDING USE: GROUND FLOOR

Primary Commercial Mixed Use Residential

Civic/Institutional

CONNECTING PEOPLE PLACES PARKS



65/94


REGULATORY PLAN




BUILDING USE: GROUND FLOOR

Primary Commercial Mixed Use Residential

Civic/Institutional

BUILDING USE: UPPER FLOOR

Mixed Use

Residential Civic/Institutional

CONNECTING PEOPLE PLACES & PARKS



66/94





67/94


RECOMMENDATIONFollowing completion of this planning process and adoption of the

Sustainable Development Plan for Parkview Gardens, an overlay or replacement

FORM BASED REGULATORY CODE is developed and adopted for this neighborhoodto ensure that future development by right matches the intention and objectives of this plan




68/94


SUSTAINABLE URBAN &

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS




69/94


PLACE

MAKING,

COMMUNITY

CHARACTER,

MOBILITY

ECONOMICDEVEL.

&

PROSPERITY

ARTS&

CULTURE

COMMUNITY

HEALTHY,SAFETY,

&

EMPOWER-

MENT

WATER ENERGY LANDSCAPE FOOD




70/94


WATERPotable Water

Stormwater




71/94


STORMWATER

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE

Impervious surfaces are impenetrable materials such

asASPHALT, CONCRETE, STONE, BRICK,ROOFTOPSthat do not let water pass through.COMPACTED SOIL in urban areas is also highly

impervious.




72/94


STORMWATER

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE

Streets = 15% of total Area

Alleys = 1.5% of total Area

Parking Lots = 23.5% of total Area

Buildings = 20% of total Area





73/94


STORMWATER

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE






60% OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ISIMPERVIOUS SURFACE, increasing the likelihoodof flooding, polluted runoff, sewer over flows, and heatisland effects.




74/94


60% OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ISIMPERVIOUS SURFACE, increasing the likelihoodof flooding, polluted runoff, sewer over flows, and heatisland effects.

STORMWATER

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE









75/94


RECOMMENDATIONS

PERMEABLE

PARKING

LOTS

PERMEABLE

STREET

PARKING

GREEN

MEDIANS

RAIN

BARRELS

GREEN

ALLEYS




76/94


ENERGYRECOMMENDATIONS

WEATHER-

IZATION

GREEN &

WHITE ROOFS

RENEWABLE

ENERGYREFOREST-

ATION

DISTRICT

ENERGY




77/94

CO C G O , C S & S

FOODRECOMMENDATIONS

EQUITABLE

DISTRIBUTION

QUALITY AND

DIVERSITY OF

FOOD OPTIONS

EDUCATION/

YOUTH

PROGRAMS

COMMUNITY

GARDENS

RESTAURANT/

GARDEN

PARTNERSHIP




78/94

,

LANDSCAPE

RECOMMENDATIONS

INCREASE

TREE COVER

NATIVE

PLANTING

INCREASE

BIODIVERSITY

EDIBLE

LANDSCAPES




79/94

,

PLACEMAKINGRECOMMENDATIONS

TOD /PUBLIC TRANSIT

CREATELIVELY

STREETS

HOUSINGAFFORDABILITY

PROMOTEMIXED-USE

DEVELOPMENT

INCREASEWALKABILITY

BIKEABILITY




80/94

ARTS & CULTURERECOMMENDATIONS

SUSTAINABILITY

CURRICULUM

DEVELOP

PARTNERSHIPS

ARTS SPACE

AVAILABILITY

INCREASE

PUBLIC ART

ARTS FUNDING

INCREASE




81/94

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTRECOMMENDATIONS

INCREASE

NUMBER&

DIVERSITY OF

JOBS

PROMOTE

SUSTAINABLEBUSINESSES

CREATE A

SMARTCOMMUNITY

CREATE A

HOUSING \JOBS

BALANCE




82/94

COMMUNITY HEALTH & SAFETYRECOMMENDATIONS

IMPROVE SENSE

OF AND ACTUALPUBLIC

SAFETY

COMMUNITYPARTICIPATION

INCREASE

ACCESS TOSOCIAL &

HUMAN

SERVICES




83/94

DRAFTING THE PLANPUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER




84/94




85/94

DRAFTING THE PLAN

PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

Amended Street Network

Amended Park Boundaries Permeable Street Parking Permeable Crosswalks Green Medians

Green Alleys Parks & Public Landscape




86/94

METCALFE PARK




87/94

METCALFE PARK

THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY CITY, MISSOURI

A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARKVIEW GARDENS


88/94

ACKERT PARK




89/94

DRAFTING THE PLAN

PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

INFILL DEVELOPMENT Existing Buildings Primary Commercial Mixed Use / Office / Residential

Residential Infill Civic / Institutional Shared Parking Decks Permeable Parking Lots




90/94

TOWNHOUSE INFILL (CW) CWE (x2), Omaha NE, Boca Raton Fl, Longmont CO, Old North STL (x2)




91/94

CONDO INFILL (CC) CWE, PVG, Milwaukee (X2),




92/94

DRAFTING THE PLAN

PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

INFILL DEVELOPMENT

DRAFT NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN

DESIGN PLAN




93/94




94/94

a sustainable development plan for parkview gardens neighborhood - university city, mo by h3 studio,...

Documents