a tool to protect minnesota's waters minnesota pollution control agency, sept. 10, 2012
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ProposedAntidegradation RuleA tool to protect Minnesota's waters
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012
![Page 2: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Why are we here?
Informational overview
Invite discussion
![Page 3: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Why antidegradation?
Clean Water Act“…restore and maintain the
chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters.”
• Designated uses• Criteria to support
designated uses• Antidegradation provisions
States establish standards
![Page 4: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
What is antidegradation?
A regulatory tool to preserve the state’s water quality
• implemented through control documents
• backstop, prevents degradation
• applies to waters of the state
![Page 5: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
How does antidegradation work?
Outstanding resources(Tier 3)
High water quality(Tier 2)
Existing uses(Tier 1)
Levels of protection
![Page 6: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Tier 2 protection
Prevents unnecessary degradation of high water quality
Assimilati ve capacity
Variability
Long-term average
Water quality criterion
Conditions
Degraded
Pristine
![Page 7: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Long-term average
Variability
Tier 2 protection
Permanent exceedance of water quality criterion is prohibited
Assimilati ve capacity
Water quality criterion
Conditions
Degraded
Pristine
![Page 8: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
What is antidegradation review?
A publically-informed decision-making process
to determine whether and to what extent high water quality may be lowered
![Page 9: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
What happens if a proposal would lower high water quality?
Proposer provides:1. Alternative analysis2. Social/economic justification
Agency review &preliminary
determination
Public participation
Agency finaldetermination
![Page 10: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Why revise the rule?
Current rules outdated
Reduce potential for litigation and
permit delays
Improve consistency with
Fed rules/guidance
Improve how we protect
water
![Page 11: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Improve consistency with
Fed rules/guidance
Why revise the rule?
• Scope of implementation
• De minimis discharges
• Demonstration of necessity through a thorough alternative analysis
• Establish existing water quality in antidegradation determinations
• Public participation
![Page 12: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Why revise the rule?
Current rules outdated
Reduce potential for litigation and
permit delays
Improve consistency with
Fed rules/guidance
Improve how we protect
water
![Page 13: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Rulemaking path
2007 Start
Initial stakeholder meetings
Response to comments/ questions
Water quality forum direction
Proposed changes
Initial draft
More internal/ external input
![Page 14: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Review trigger
Exemptions
Proposed changes
Scope of implementation
Physical alterations / existing uses
Clarify Restricted
ORVW protection
Public participation
Parameters ofconcern
![Page 15: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Proposed changes
The term "antidegradation" is more accurate and more consistent
with federal regulations, EPA guidelines and
other states’ provisions
Name change
![Page 16: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Rule format
Proposed changes
• Purpose statement reflects federal regulations
• More definitions
• Antidegradation procedures sequentially follows the review process
![Page 17: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Proposed changesName change
Rule format
Scope of implementation
Physical alterations / existing uses
Clarify Restricted
ORVW protection
Public participation
Parameters ofconcern
![Page 18: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Review trigger
Proposed changes
Review is triggered by anet increase in loading or
other causes of degradation
![Page 19: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Exemptions
Proposed changes
• Emergency response actions• Class 7 waters (under specific conditions)
• Temporary and limited impacts
![Page 20: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Review trigger
Exemptions
Proposed changesName change
Rule format
Physical alterations / existing uses
Clarify Restricted
ORVW protection
Public participation
![Page 21: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Activities that impact waters of the state
CWA regulatory authority exists
21
No regulatory control, but implementation mechanisms may exist
(Size ≠ scale of activities)
Scope of implementation
Current scope of antidegradation implementation
![Page 22: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Activities that impact waters of the state
CWA regulatory authority exists
Proposed rule increases scope of
implementation
22
No regulatory control, but implementation mechanisms exist
(Size ≠ scale of activities)
Scope of implementation
![Page 23: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Scope of implementation
Proposed changes
Separate procedures for:
• Individual NPDES wastewater permits and individual 401
certifications; and• Individual NPDES stormwater
permits and general authorizations
![Page 24: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Parameters ofconcern
Proposed changes
Parameters to be reviewed are identified early, allowing for an effective alternatives analysis
![Page 25: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Review trigger
Exemptions
Proposed changesName change
Rule format
Scope of implementation
Parameters ofconcern
![Page 26: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Physical alterations / existing uses
Proposed changes
Reconcile the maintenance of
existing uses with physical modifications
allowed under the Clean Water Act
![Page 27: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Clarify Restricted
ORVW protection
Proposed changes
Preserve existing water quality necessary to maintain exceptional
characteristics for which the Restricted ORVW was designated
![Page 28: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Public participation
Proposed changes
Agency provides critical information:
Alternative analysis
Social/economic justification
Agency's preliminary determination
![Page 29: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Public participation coincides with the comment periods for permits and certifications
Public participation
Minn R 700
1
Minn R 700
1
![Page 30: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Review trigger
Exemptions
Proposed changesName change
Rule format
Scope of implementation
Physical alterations / existing uses
Clarify Restricted
ORVW protection
Public participation
Parameters ofconcern
![Page 31: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Rulemaking next steps
2008 Start
Initial stakeholder meetings
Response to comments/ questions
Water quality forum direction
Proposed changes
Initial draft
More internal/ external input
Revise rule
SONAR development
“Administrative” process
Adopt
EPA approve
![Page 32: A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/551b4506550346d31b8b498e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)