a vision for ship design and analysis tools -...

2
I (policy briefing) A Vision for Ship Design and Analysis Tools Mapping out a long-term strategy V ice Admiral Paul Sullivan, commander of the Naval Sea Systems Command, issued a memo on February 4, 2008 on ship design and anal- ysis tool goals. With this memo, the United States Navy had, for the first time, clearly articulated its vision for how ship design tools and design meth- ods should interact during the different stages of a ship acquisition. It includes: a) Preference for tool development integrated with the leading edge architecture for prototyping systems (LEAPS) and the advanced ship and submarine evaluation tool (ASSET) b) Recognition that design and analysis tool development efforts should include the collection or creation of experimental data to support verification, validation, and accreditation c) Specific goals for design and analysis tools for pre-milestone A work: i) Enable the generation and analysis of hundreds of ship concepts to a rough order of magnitude (ROM) with a period of weeks or months ii) Be compatible with design of experiments, response surface, and set-based design methods iii) For ROM studies, accurately predict relative acquisition and lifecycle costs; the impact of emerging technologies and threats; the effect of emerging capabilities on the overall fleet architecture and the fleet capabilities; and the uncertainty of cost and performance predictions iv) Enable generating and analyzedozens of ship concepts to support analyses of alternatives within six months to include cost forecasts sufficient for developing program budgets and schedules; technology risks must be defined to a level to enable mitigation planning d) Specific goals for design and analysis tools for preliminary and contract design: i) Enable informed decisions on subsystemtradeoffs ii) Reduce risk iii) Enable completion of a design iteration in 8 to 10 weeks iv) Have results equal to that achievable with physical modeling or prototyping e) Specific goals for design and analysis tools for lifecycle support: i) Within hours, provide engineering analyses regarding the effects of damage, grounding, or other incidents ii) Facilitate modernization planning and design iii) Enable end-of-service life predictions iv) Measure effectiveness with respect to changing threats and tactics v) Support force structure studies. These goals were re-affirmed by RDML Thomas Eccles, chief engineer and deputy commander for Naval Systems Engineering, Naval Sea Systems Command, in a memo dated September 29,2010. The impact of these memos on design tool develop- ment for ship design in the navy has been remarkable. ASSET has been re-architected to fully integrate with LEAPS. The computational research and engineering acquisi- tion tools (CREATE) program embraced these memos in the development of the requirements for their ship design tool development. In support of the objectives cited ear- lier, CREATE-Ships is producing tools in the area of shock/ damage response (NESM: navy-enhance sierra mechanics), hydrodynamics (IHDE: integrated hydrodynamics design environment; and NavyFOAM: navy field operation and manipulation), and rapid design and integration (RSDE: rapid ship design environment). CREATE is producing annual releases of these software programs to increase the number and complexity of use cases that can be analyzed. The preference for tools development to more fully integrate with LEAPS has resulted in the latest LEAPS release (4.3), which includes the following: LEAPS editor: provides visualization and man- ual population/editing of the LEAPS database from (8) MARINE TECHNOLOGY July2012 www.sname.org/sname/nit

Upload: ngoquynh

Post on 30-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Vision for Ship Design and Analysis Tools - doerry.orgdoerry.org/norbert/papers/MT-20120701-Vision4shipDesignTools.pdf · I (policy briefing) A Vision for Ship Design and Analysis

I(policy briefing)

A Vision for Ship Design andAnalysis ToolsMapping out a long-term strategy

Vice Admiral Paul Sullivan, commander of theNaval Sea Systems Command, issued a memoon February 4, 2008 on ship design and anal-ysis tool goals. With this memo, the United

States Navy had, for the first time, clearly articulatedits vision for how ship design tools and design meth-ods should interact during the different stages of a shipacquisition. It includes:

a) Preference for tool development integrated with the leading edge architecture for prototyping systems (LEAPS) and theadvanced ship and submarine evaluation tool (ASSET)

b) Recognition that design and analysis tool development efforts should include the collection or creation of experimentaldata to support verification, validation, and accreditation

c) Specific goals for design and analysis tools for pre-milestone A work:i) Enable the generation and analysis of hundreds of ship concepts to a rough order of magnitude (ROM) with a period of

weeks or monthsii) Be compatible with design of experiments, response surface, and set-based design methodsiii) For ROM studies, accurately predict relative acquisition and lifecycle costs; the impact of emerging technologies and

threats; the effect of emerging capabilities on the overall fleet architecture and the fleet capabilities; and the uncertaintyof cost and performance predictions

iv) Enable generating and analyze dozens of ship concepts to support analyses of alternatives within six months to include costforecasts sufficient for developing program budgets and schedules; technology risks must be defined to a level to enablemitigation planning

d) Specific goals for design and analysis tools for preliminary and contract design:i) Enable informed decisions on subsystem tradeoffsii) Reduce riskiii) Enable completion of a design iteration in 8 to 10 weeksiv) Have results equal to that achievable with physical modeling or prototyping

e) Specific goals for design and analysis tools for lifecycle support:i) Within hours, provide engineering analyses regarding the effects of damage, grounding, or other incidentsii) Facilitate modernization planning and designiii) Enable end-of-service life predictionsiv) Measure effectiveness with respect to changing threats and tacticsv) Support force structure studies.

These goals were re-affirmed by RDML ThomasEccles, chief engineer and deputy commander for NavalSystems Engineering, Naval Sea Systems Command, in amemo dated September 29,2010.

The impact of these memos on design tool develop-ment for ship design in the navy has been remarkable.ASSET has been re-architected to fully integrate with LEAPS.The computational research and engineering acquisi-tion tools (CREATE) program embraced these memos inthe development of the requirements for their ship designtool development. In support of the objectives cited ear-lier, CREATE-Ships is producing tools in the area of shock/

damage response (NESM: navy-enhance sierra mechanics),hydrodynamics (IHDE: integrated hydrodynamics designenvironment; and NavyFOAM: navy field operation andmanipulation), and rapid design and integration (RSDE:rapid ship design environment). CREATE is producingannual releases of these software programs to increase thenumber and complexity of use cases that can be analyzed.

The preference for tools development to more fullyintegrate with LEAPS has resulted in the latest LEAPSrelease (4.3), which includes the following:• LEAPS editor: provides visualization and man-

ual population/editing of the LEAPS database from

(8) MARINE TECHNOLOGY July2012 www.sname.org/sname/nit

Page 2: A Vision for Ship Design and Analysis Tools - doerry.orgdoerry.org/norbert/papers/MT-20120701-Vision4shipDesignTools.pdf · I (policy briefing) A Vision for Ship Design and Analysis

Icomputer-aided design models, MicrosoftExcel, and other tools

• SHCP-L: performs intact and damage sta-bility analysis and provides 3D visualizationof the results

• ASAP Translator: creates the input file torun ASAP-Lite (vulnerability assessment)

• NCCM Translator: creates the input fileto run the navy common cost model (costanalysis)

• LAMP Translator: creates the input file torun LAMP (seakeeping analysis)

• VERES Translator: creates the input file torun VERES (seakeeping analysis)

• SMP Translator: creates the input file to runSMP (seakeeping analysis)

»SWPE Translator: creates the input file torun SWPE (resistance analysis)

• TSD Translator: creates the input file to runTSD (resistance analysis)

• FKS Translator: creates the input file to runFKS (resistance analysis).

The next release of LEAPS is anticipated toinclude an early manpower assessment tool(EMAT), which estimates manpower require-ments based on preventative maintenance andwatch standing requirements. EMAT popu-lates manpower data back to ASSET when theestimation is complete. The LEAPS release alsowill incorporate intelligent ship arrangements,which uses the ASSET-generated LEAPS modelas input, as well as a prepopulated constraintsdatabase to generate a 3D compartmentarrangement of the entire ship.

Another outcome of these memos hasbeen the development of a ship design pro-cess model. Early on, the navy recognized thatto achieve the time goals outlined in VADMSullivan's memo, a better understanding ofthe ship design process was needed. Steven

Wynn described the creation of the shipdesign process model in the April 2011 issueof MT ("Design Process Improvement"). Inaddition to helping identify the priority of shipdesign tool development activities, this designprocess model is now being used alongsidetraditional planning processes in the plan-ning for near-term ship design projects.

Much work still remains to accomplish thegoals of these two memos. In an era of limitedresources, the affordability, quality, and capa-bility of our future fleet depend on ensuringthat available funding for design and analysistool development is wisely used to incremen-tally add capability in a manner consistent witha long-term vision. These memos have servedwell in providing that vision. MT

Dr. Norbert Docrry is technical director of the Naval Sea

Systems Command SEA 05 Technology Office.

Engineered for Life at SeaQuality Steering systems

\.Steering GearMotor Starter & AlarmsDigital Steering ControlEngineering Services & Commissioning -,^-'^J,

^Ur.4:.j£gi

,*-b. 4jf

1. --••- —

iTiiBI

/AGNER

JASTRAM Engineering Ltd. www.jastram.com Designed and Made in Canada Image courtesy of POSH Semco Pte Ltd.

www.sname.org/sname/int July2012 MARINE TECHNOLOGY (9)