a2 geography urban regeneration booklet
DESCRIPTION
Booklet used for the fieldtrip on the urban regeneration of Birmingham.TRANSCRIPT
Figure 1 The header from Birmingham City Council's Website
A2 Geography Study Visit to Birmingham
A case study of Urban Regeneration
Name: ____________________________________
From the specification:
Plan for the day:
1. Arrive in Birmingham; Park. Walk into city centre. View Historic image of St. Martin’s church compared to its current location. Field sketch of the area as it is today.
2. Discuss the problem. Why did Birmingham need regeneration?3. Visit sites of regeneration:
a. Broad Streetb. Chamberland Squarec. Mailbox / Cubed. High Streete. Bullring f. Millennium Point
4. Lunch5. Critical evaluation in pairs of the different redevelopment schemes.
Using the tools provided critically evaluate the regeneration scheme. On your return to school you will have to produce a poster for display providing background information and your findings
6. Return Home
Birmingham- Place Profile
Statistics:
Family income-Very low Interest in current affairs-Medium Housing, with mortgage-Very low Educated, to degree-Low Couples with children-Very low Have satellite TV-Very low
Location:
Situated in England Transport links, motorways, trains, airport, canal. Spaghetti Junction. In the Midlands.
History:
In 1931 the population was of 1 million people. 2,000+ died in the bombings during World War Two, this was because it was a target. According to a survey in 1954 20% of houses were unfit for human habitation. Aston university was founded in 1966, this created connections. In 1991 Birmingham became international, hosting cultural events.
Birmingham's Neighbourhood:
People living in Birmingham are mainly aged between 18 and 44. Most households are single person. Neighbourhoods have a very high population density because of the type of housing they contain,
council flats. Flats are small, mostly one or sometimes two bedrooms. Relatively deprived neighbourhoods.
Occupation:
In the deprived areas unemployment is twice the national average. Typical jobs are in service industries such as tourism and retail, as well as research, technology and
education. This is mostly primary industries. A high number of people are earning less than £5,000. The number of people with no qualifications is higher than average. Many schools were below the national average of 47% this is for an A -C grade.
Lifestyle:
Most people read tabloid newspapers such as The Daily Mirror, The Sun and Daily Record. People enjoy activities such as bingo, racing and going to the pub. Car ownership is low. Most residents are dependent on public transport and walking to get around.
There was a map of Birmingham here but I removed it as I did not have the copyright permission to share it.
Obtained from the eMapsite under the school’s map pilot.
This photograph taken around 1950 bears little resemblence to the same view of the area today. In fact the historical 'Heart' of the city is probably one of the areas of Birmingham which has changed the most in the last fifty or sixty years.
The photograph was taken from a first storey window of number 104 High Street, at the junction with Bell Street. Number 104 High Street was one of the buildings which made up part of Market Hall, the building in the right hand edge of the picture was the front of the Fish Market.A month after Nelson's death at the Battle of Trafalgar, a public meeting in Birmingham decided that a statue should be erected in his honour and well over 1000 was raised by public subscription. William Westmacott was commissioned to design the statue and the work was unveiled on the Jubilee Day of George III in 1809. It was the first statue of Nelson to be erected in England as well as Birmingham's first public statue. The area in which the statue stood was regularly used for sales of all manner of goods, public meetings and the preachings of 'Soap Box' orators. The statue remained in place for nearly 150 years, it was put into a crate for protection during the Second World War, then removed into storage in 1959, re-sited on Moor St in 1961, surrounded by roads around the time of the first Bull Ring Shopping centre, it was removed again in the late 1990s before it made a reappearance near its original location for the redevelopment of the present Bull Ring shopping centre in 2003.
One of Birmingham's well known and historic company names, one which still survives today, can be seen on a shop front at the left side of the image. Oswald Bailey's Army and NavyEventually they moved to the Pallasades, where you'll find them today, when the area around the first Bull Ring shopping centre and St Martins Circus was cleared. Oswald Bailey's celebrated their centenary in 2006.
The view as seen in the image above is currently located in the central walkway of the Bull Ring Shopping Centre, the main route between New Street and St Martin's church.
Taken from Birmingham.gov.uk
Environmental Quality of Area: Broad Street
Qualities being assessed
Very High
+2
High
+1
Aver-age
0
Poor
-1
Very Poor
-2 Qualities being assessed
Bu
ildings
Well designed / pleasing to the eye
Poorly designed / ugly
In good condition In poor condition
Evidence of maintenance / improvement
Poorly maintained / no improvement
Outside – land, gardens or open space are in good condition
Outside – no gardens, or land / open space in poor condition
No vandalism evident Extensive vandalism
Traffic
Roads have no traffic congestion
Streets badly congested
Parking is easy, garages and spaces provided
Parking very difficult, no parking provision
No traffic noise High noise volume from traffic
Safe for people Dangerous for people
No smell from traffic or other pollution
Obvious smell from traffic or other pollution
Open
Space /
gardens
Large gardens or open space outside house
No garden / open space – door opens to street
Trees and shrubs visible from close by
No greenery visible from house
Public parks within easy distance
No public parks easily accessible
Gen
eral Qu
ality
No litter Much litter
Roads well maintained with paving etc well kept
Roads poorly maintained with paving etc broken
Close to public transport Long way from public transport
Close to shops, amenities or services
Remote from shops, amenities / services
Total Score:
Comments:
Regeneration Assessment Index: Broad Street
1 2 3 4Social Interaction – Places to hang out?
Social Exclusion – No areas for groups to meet or heavy monitoring
Authenticity –
Unique design and mixed of cultures (independent shops and cafes)
Generic design - common and facilities (chains etc). No mix of cultures.
Accessibility –
Spaces designed for pedestrians and well provided with public transport
Inaccessibility –
Reliance on cars with poor transport links
Identity –
Active citizenship and signs of community involvement
Disconnected from communities –
Few signs of the presence of involvement of locals
Vibrancy – Music, art, leisure facilities, open spaces, nightlife
Lack of atmosphere – Dull, stale, quiet or uninteresting environment
TOTALS
Decay index
Complete score for each location and enter the score into area data collection sheet.
Indicator None (4) Little (3) Some (2) Much (1)Deterioration of walls (crumbling plaster, ivy etc)Peeling paint
Broken window glass
Broken gutters/drains
Structural damage e.g. cracks/rotten timberGraffiti
Weeds/vegetation in front gardens
Displaced building material (missing roof tiles/fallen bricks/chimney pots etc)Total
Environmental Quality of Area: Chamberland Square
Qualities being assessed
Very High
+2
High
+1
Aver-age
0
Poor
-1
Very Poor
-2 Qualities being assessed
Bu
ildings
Well designed / pleasing to the eye
Poorly designed / ugly
In good condition In poor condition
Evidence of maintenance / improvement
Poorly maintained / no improvement
Outside – land, gardens or open space are in good condition
Outside – no gardens, or land / open space in poor condition
No vandalism evident Extensive vandalism
Traffic
Roads have no traffic congestion
Streets badly congested
Parking is easy, garages and spaces provided
Parking very difficult, no parking provision
No traffic noise High noise volume from traffic
Safe for people Dangerous for people
No smell from traffic or other pollution
Obvious smell from traffic or other pollution
Open
Space /
gardens
Large gardens or open space outside house
No garden / open space – door opens to street
Trees and shrubs visible from close by
No greenery visible from house
Public parks within easy distance
No public parks easily accessible
Gen
eral Qu
ality
No litter Much litter
Roads well maintained with paving etc well kept
Roads poorly maintained with paving etc broken
Close to public transport Long way from public transport
Close to shops, amenities or services
Remote from shops, amenities / services
Total Score:
Comments:
Regeneration Assessment Index: Chamberland Square
1 2 3 4Social Interaction – Places to hang out?
Social Exclusion – No areas for groups to meet or heavy monitoring
Authenticity –
Unique design and mixed of cultures (independent shops and cafes)
Generic design - common and facilities (chains etc). No mix of cultures.
Accessibility –
Spaces designed for pedestrians and well provided with public transport
Inaccessibility –
Reliance on cars with poor transport links
Identity –
Active citizenship and signs of community involvement
Disconnected from communities –
Few signs of the presence of involvement of locals
Vibrancy – Music, art, leisure facilities, open spaces, nightlife
Lack of atmosphere – Dull, stale, quiet or uninteresting environment
TOTALS
Decay index
Complete score for each location and enter the score into area data collection sheet.
Indicator None (4) Little (3) Some (2) Much (1)Deterioration of walls (crumbling plaster, ivy etc)Peeling paint
Broken window glass
Broken gutters/drains
Structural damage e.g. cracks/rotten timberGraffiti
Weeds/vegetation in front gardens
Displaced building material (missing roof tiles/fallen bricks/chimney pots etc)Total
Environmental Quality of Area: Mailbox / Cube
Qualities being assessed
Very High
+2
High
+1
Aver-age
0
Poor
-1
Very Poor
-2 Qualities being assessed
Bu
ildings
Well designed / pleasing to the eye
Poorly designed / ugly
In good condition In poor condition
Evidence of maintenance / improvement
Poorly maintained / no improvement
Outside – land, gardens or open space are in good condition
Outside – no gardens, or land / open space in poor condition
No vandalism evident Extensive vandalism
Traffic
Roads have no traffic congestion
Streets badly congested
Parking is easy, garages and spaces provided
Parking very difficult, no parking provision
No traffic noise High noise volume from traffic
Safe for people Dangerous for people
No smell from traffic or other pollution
Obvious smell from traffic or other pollution
Open
Space /
gardens
Large gardens or open space outside house
No garden / open space – door opens to street
Trees and shrubs visible from close by
No greenery visible from house
Public parks within easy distance
No public parks easily accessible
Gen
eral Qu
ality
No litter Much litter
Roads well maintained with paving etc well kept
Roads poorly maintained with paving etc broken
Close to public transport Long way from public transport
Close to shops, amenities or services
Remote from shops, amenities / services
Total Score:
Comments:
Regeneration Assessment Index: Mailbox / Cube
1 2 3 4Social Interaction – Places to hang out?
Social Exclusion – No areas for groups to meet or heavy monitoring
Authenticity –
Unique design and mixed of cultures (independent shops and cafes)
Generic design - common and facilities (chains etc). No mix of cultures.
Accessibility –
Spaces designed for pedestrians and well provided with public transport
Inaccessibility –
Reliance on cars with poor transport links
Identity –
Active citizenship and signs of community involvement
Disconnected from communities –
Few signs of the presence of involvement of locals
Vibrancy – Music, art, leisure facilities, open spaces, nightlife
Lack of atmosphere – Dull, stale, quiet or uninteresting environment
TOTALS
Decay index
Complete score for each location and enter the score into area data collection sheet.
Indicator None (4) Little (3) Some (2) Much (1)Deterioration of walls (crumbling plaster, ivy etc)Peeling paint
Broken window glass
Broken gutters/drains
Structural damage e.g. cracks/rotten timberGraffiti
Weeds/vegetation in front gardens
Displaced building material (missing roof tiles/fallen bricks/chimney pots etc)Total
Environmental Quality of Area: Highstreet
Qualities being assessed
Very High
+2
High
+1
Aver-age
0
Poor
-1
Very Poor
-2 Qualities being assessed
Bu
ildings
Well designed / pleasing to the eye
Poorly designed / ugly
In good condition In poor condition
Evidence of maintenance / improvement
Poorly maintained / no improvement
Outside – land, gardens or open space are in good condition
Outside – no gardens, or land / open space in poor condition
No vandalism evident Extensive vandalism
Traffic
Roads have no traffic congestion
Streets badly congested
Parking is easy, garages and spaces provided
Parking very difficult, no parking provision
No traffic noise High noise volume from traffic
Safe for people Dangerous for people
No smell from traffic or other pollution
Obvious smell from traffic or other pollution
Open
Space /
gardens
Large gardens or open space outside house
No garden / open space – door opens to street
Trees and shrubs visible from close by
No greenery visible from house
Public parks within easy distance
No public parks easily accessible
Gen
eral Qu
ality
No litter Much litter
Roads well maintained with paving etc well kept
Roads poorly maintained with paving etc broken
Close to public transport Long way from public transport
Close to shops, amenities or services
Remote from shops, amenities / services
Total Score:
Comments:
Regeneration Assessment Index: Highstreet
1 2 3 4Social Interaction – Places to hang out?
Social Exclusion – No areas for groups to meet or heavy monitoring
Authenticity –
Unique design and mixed of cultures (independent shops and cafes)
Generic design - common and facilities (chains etc). No mix of cultures.
Accessibility –
Spaces designed for pedestrians and well provided with public transport
Inaccessibility –
Reliance on cars with poor transport links
Identity –
Active citizenship and signs of community involvement
Disconnected from communities –
Few signs of the presence of involvement of locals
Vibrancy – Music, art, leisure facilities, open spaces, nightlife
Lack of atmosphere – Dull, stale, quiet or uninteresting environment
TOTALS
Decay index
Complete score for each location and enter the score into area data collection sheet.
Indicator None (4) Little (3) Some (2) Much (1)Deterioration of walls (crumbling plaster, ivy etc)Peeling paint
Broken window glass
Broken gutters/drains
Structural damage e.g. cracks/rotten timberGraffiti
Weeds/vegetation in front gardens
Displaced building material (missing roof tiles/fallen bricks/chimney pots etc)Total
Environmental Quality of Area: Bullring
Qualities being assessed
Very High
+2
High
+1
Aver-age
0
Poor
-1
Very Poor
-2 Qualities being assessed
Bu
ildings
Well designed / pleasing to the eye
Poorly designed / ugly
In good condition In poor condition
Evidence of maintenance / improvement
Poorly maintained / no improvement
Outside – land, gardens or open space are in good condition
Outside – no gardens, or land / open space in poor condition
No vandalism evident Extensive vandalism
Traffic
Roads have no traffic congestion
Streets badly congested
Parking is easy, garages and spaces provided
Parking very difficult, no parking provision
No traffic noise High noise volume from traffic
Safe for people Dangerous for people
No smell from traffic or other pollution
Obvious smell from traffic or other pollution
Open
Space /
gardens
Large gardens or open space outside house
No garden / open space – door opens to street
Trees and shrubs visible from close by
No greenery visible from house
Public parks within easy distance
No public parks easily accessible
Gen
eral Qu
ality
No litter Much litter
Roads well maintained with paving etc well kept
Roads poorly maintained with paving etc broken
Close to public transport Long way from public transport
Close to shops, amenities or services
Remote from shops, amenities / services
Total Score:
Comments:
Regeneration Assessment Index: Bullring
1 2 3 4Social Interaction – Places to hang out?
Social Exclusion – No areas for groups to meet or heavy monitoring
Authenticity –
Unique design and mixed of cultures (independent shops and cafes)
Generic design - common and facilities (chains etc). No mix of cultures.
Accessibility –
Spaces designed for pedestrians and well provided with public transport
Inaccessibility –
Reliance on cars with poor transport links
Identity –
Active citizenship and signs of community involvement
Disconnected from communities –
Few signs of the presence of involvement of locals
Vibrancy – Music, art, leisure facilities, open spaces, nightlife
Lack of atmosphere – Dull, stale, quiet or uninteresting environment
TOTALS
Decay index
Complete score for each location and enter the score into area data collection sheet.
Indicator None (4) Little (3) Some (2) Much (1)Deterioration of walls (crumbling plaster, ivy etc)Peeling paint
Broken window glass
Broken gutters/drains
Structural damage e.g. cracks/rotten timberGraffiti
Weeds/vegetation in front gardens
Displaced building material (missing roof tiles/fallen bricks/chimney pots etc)Total
Environmental Quality of Area: Millenium Point
Qualities being assessed
Very High
+2
High
+1
Aver-age
0
Poor
-1
Very Poor
-2 Qualities being assessed
Bu
ildings
Well designed / pleasing to the eye
Poorly designed / ugly
In good condition In poor condition
Evidence of maintenance / improvement
Poorly maintained / no improvement
Outside – land, gardens or open space are in good condition
Outside – no gardens, or land / open space in poor condition
No vandalism evident Extensive vandalism
Traffic
Roads have no traffic congestion
Streets badly congested
Parking is easy, garages and spaces provided
Parking very difficult, no parking provision
No traffic noise High noise volume from traffic
Safe for people Dangerous for people
No smell from traffic or other pollution
Obvious smell from traffic or other pollution
Open
Space /
gardens
Large gardens or open space outside house
No garden / open space – door opens to street
Trees and shrubs visible from close by
No greenery visible from house
Public parks within easy distance
No public parks easily accessible
Gen
eral Qu
ality
No litter Much litter
Roads well maintained with paving etc well kept
Roads poorly maintained with paving etc broken
Close to public transport Long way from public transport
Close to shops, amenities or services
Remote from shops, amenities / services
Total Score:
Comments:
Regeneration Assessment Index: Millenium Point
1 2 3 4Social Interaction – Places to hang out?
Social Exclusion – No areas for groups to meet or heavy monitoring
Authenticity –
Unique design and mixed of cultures (independent shops and cafes)
Generic design - common and facilities (chains etc). No mix of cultures.
Accessibility –
Spaces designed for pedestrians and well provided with public transport
Inaccessibility –
Reliance on cars with poor transport links
Identity –
Active citizenship and signs of community involvement
Disconnected from communities –
Few signs of the presence of involvement of locals
Vibrancy – Music, art, leisure facilities, open spaces, nightlife
Lack of atmosphere – Dull, stale, quiet or uninteresting environment
TOTALS
Decay index
Complete score for each location and enter the score into area data collection sheet.
Indicator None (4) Little (3) Some (2) Much (1)Deterioration of walls (crumbling plaster, ivy etc)Peeling paint
Broken window glass
Broken gutters/drains
Structural damage e.g. cracks/rotten timberGraffiti
Weeds/vegetation in front gardens
Displaced building material (missing roof tiles/fallen bricks/chimney pots etc)Total
Your Task is to critically evaluate the regeneration scheme in your assigned area of regeneration.
Questionnaire
Be polite!
Question (enter letter category) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101. Do you live in/near this area?a. Yes (continue) b. No (if tourist complete other q.)2. Age (estimate!)a. <18 b. 18-30 c. 31-40 d. 41-50 e. 51-60 f. >603. Sex (estimate!)a. Male b. Female4. Employment a. Full time b. Part time.c. Student d. House wife/husbande. Unemployed f. Retired5. Length of time lived in the Areaa. < 1 year b. 1 – 5 years c. 5 – 10 years d. >10 years6. Has this Area improved or deteriorated in the time you have lived here?a. Improved b. Deterioratedc. Why?
7. What effects of increase visitors have you noticed?a. job creation b. money into townc. upgraded facilities d. increased businesse. increased congestion f. lack of parkingg. crowded with tourists h. more litteri. any other?
8. Overall is regeneration is positive/negative for Birminham?a. Positive b. Negative