aapm task group 51 - md anderson cancer centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/research_tg51/tg-51/tg 51...

65
AAPM Task Group 51 AAPM Task Group 51 (Med Phys 26, p.1847 - 70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000 William F. Hanson, Ph.D. Sang Cho, Ph.D. Jessica Lowenstein, M.S. Peter Balter, M.S. San Antonio TX. October 6, 2000

Upload: vutruc

Post on 07-Apr-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

AAPM Task Group 51AAPM Task Group 51(Med Phys 26, p.1847 - 70, 1999)

SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

William F. Hanson, Ph.D.

Sang Cho, Ph.D.

Jessica Lowenstein, M.S.

Peter Balter, M.S.

San Antonio TX.

October 6, 2000

Page 2: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

RPC 10/99

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

• Beta test performed by:

–Sang Cho, Ph.D.

– Jessica Lowenstein, M.S.

–Peter Balter, M.S.

• ADCL staff:

–Nathan Wells, M.S.

–Peter Balter, M.S.

• Courses, laboratories and presentations– lab instructors,

– students,– attendees

Page 3: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

RPC 10/99

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by PHS

grant CA10953 awarded

by the NCI, DHHS.

Page 4: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Traceability of StandardsTraceability of Standards

• Dosimeters Traceable to National Standards

• National Protocol for calculation of Dose at a

reference point (TG-21 & TG-51)

• National Protocol for Calculation of Dose to

arbitrary point in a patient (relative to

reference point dose) (EORTC)

Page 5: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Traceability to National StandardsTraceability to National Standards

Calibration of Ion Chamber by ADCL (NIST)Chamber Calibration Factor

NX : EXPOSURE CALIBRATION FACTOR: (Roentgen/ Charge)

Exposure at the chamber-center with the chamber removed.

NK: AIR KERMA CALIBRATION FACTOR: (Gray/Charge)

Air Kerma at the chamber-center with the chamber removed

(never used seriously except maybe in a few European Centers.)

Ngas: CAVITY GAS CALIBRATION FACTOR: (Gray/Charge)

Absorbed dose to the gas in the chamber at chamber-center

[Ngas related to NK (NX) through calculational algorithm.]

ND,w: ABSORBED DOSE (water) CALIBRATION FACTOR: (Gy/Charge)

Absorbed dose to water at chamber-center,

with chamber removed and replaced by water.

Page 6: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

AAPM TGAAPM TG--5151Protocol for Clinical Reference Protocol for Clinical Reference

Dosimetry of HighDosimetry of High--Energy Photon Energy Photon and Electron Beamsand Electron Beams

• Based on an Absorbed dose to water (in Water)

Standard (at reference energy 60Co):

– More robust standard than AIR-KERMA

– Close to quantity needed (absorbed dose in

tissue)

Page 7: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

AAPM TGAAPM TG--5151

• Conversion to absorbed dose - other energies

– Photon: Single factor; kQ

– Electron: 3 Factors;

• Chamber specific corrections in “classes”

few kQ values

• Calibration in water (annually)

Plastics - reference to water calibration

ecal

'

50R

Q

gr k,k,P

Page 8: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

AAPM TGAAPM TG--5151

• Photon:

�Beam Quality: %dd @ 10 cm

(remove e- contamination)

�Reference depth: 10 cm

• Electron:

�Beam Quality: R50

�Reference depth: dref α R50

Page 9: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

TG-51

• Based on Bragg Gray Cavity Theory

–Chamber specific Corrections

- TG-21 formalism

- hidden in kQ and k’R50.

–Determine kQ and k’R50 directly

- for chamber make & model

- at National laboratories

Page 10: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Absorbed Dose Calibration FactorAbsorbed Dose Calibration Factor

Ideal:

Where: is the chamber Absorbed Dose

Calibration Factor specific for the energy and

modality of the beam being measured.

Q

wD,N M D •=

Q

wD,N

Page 11: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Absorbed Dose Calibration FactorAbsorbed Dose Calibration Factor

Ideal:

• Too expensive to be practical• We understand the behavior of chambers in the

megavoltage range.

• Cobalt 60 is still available, and very reproducible

• Cobalt 60 is a near perfect beam to use as the

reference energy for chamber calibration.

Q

wD,N M D •=

Page 12: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Photon EquationPhoton Equation

= Dose to water at beam quality Q

M = Corrected meter reading

kQ = Energy correction factor

= Absorbed Dose to Water

calibration factor at Cobalt 60

energy

[Gy] wD,Q

Qw

Co60

Nk MD =

Co60

wD,N

DQ

w

(Eq 3)

Page 13: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Chamber

Calibration Factor• Obtain from ADCL

• Chamber waterproofing material:

– 1 mm Acrylic (PMMA) wall

– Provided by ADCL

– Waterproof chambers

• Obtain both NK, (NX), and ND,W– Traceability to TG-21

Co60

wD,N

Page 14: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

M = M = PPionionPPTPTPPPelecelecPPpolpolMMrawraw [C or rdg] [C or rdg] ((EqEq 8)8)

Pion = Collection efficiency correction

PTP = Temp-Press correction

Pelec = Electrometer factor

Ppol = Polarity Correction

Mraw = uncorrected charge reading

Page 15: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Pelec

• Electrometer Calibration factor [C/rdg]

• Previously included in Chamber calibration

factor.

• Watch the powers of ten.

Page 16: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

PPionion Pulsed BeamPulsed Beam

( )

=

L

HLraw

Hraw

L

H

Hion

V

V

M

M

V

V00.1

VP(Eq 11)

Pulsed

VH = normal operating potential of chamber

VL = reduced potential on chamber

= raw reading with full potential

= raw reading with reduced potential

H

rawM

L

rawM

2/VV HL <

Page 17: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Polarity CorrectionPolarity Correction

M+(M-) is the charge collected with positive

(negative) polarity on the collector

Mraw = charge collected with normal polarity

raw

rawrawpol

2M

M - M P

−+

= (Eq 9)

Page 18: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

energycobalt at evaluatedcelwallrepl

Qenergy at the evaluatedcelwallrepl

Q

|

|

PPP

PPP

K

••

••

=water

air

water

air

L

L

ρ

ρ

For PhotonsFor Photons

• Prepl and Pwall same as for TG-21

• Pcel corrects for the influence of the Al center electrode

• Prepl is weakly dependent on chamber diameter

• Pwall is strongly dependent on thimble materials,

less dependent on exact dimensions

(See Table 1 and Figure 4 for values)

Page 19: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

KQ for photons

• Similar chambers have similar Pwall & Pcel,

so few kQ needed.

• TG-51 does not list values for my Chamber ???

– Choose chamber in Protocol that has

• Same wall material

• Same center electrode material

• Approximately same wall thickness

• Similar length and diameter -- weak depend

Page 20: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Reference Conditions Reference Conditions

(Photons)(Photons)

• in Water

• On Central Axis

• 10 cm depth (chamber center)

• 10cm x 10 cm field

– SSD (field size defined at surface)

– SAD (field size defined at depth)

Page 21: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000
Page 22: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Electron EquationElectron Equation

Co

wD,Q

Q

w

60

N k M D =

where

and

50R

Q

grQ k Pk =

Co

w,DecalR

Q

gr

Q

w

60

50N k'k P MD =

ecalRR kk'k5050

=

(Eq 4)

(Eq 5)

Page 23: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

For ElectronsFor Electrons

= correction for gradient at the

point of calibration (dref)

Q

grP

( )( )refraw

cavrefQ

grdM

0.5r d M P

+= (Eq 21)

NOTE: M(dref +0.5rcav) and M(dref) are the

reading at the depth, (dref+05rcav and dref )

NOT the reading times the depth.

Page 24: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

kecal Electronskecal Electrons

Modality conversion factor: Photon ⇒ electron

• carries into [at R50 = 7.5cm]

• Allows for a specific electron-calibration

factor to be introduced later.

• Includes L/ρ, Pcel, and Prepl for R50 = 7.5 cm &

L/ρ, Prepl, Pwall, and Pcel for Cobalt 60.

• Energy independent (actually a fixed energy)

Table 3 (cyl)Table 2 (pp)

N Co

wD,

60

ecalQ

wD,N

Page 25: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

• Energy Dependent Factor - chamber specific

(Includes ratio of L/ρ • Prep • Pcel for arbitrary

electron energy to that for R50 = 7.5 cm)

• well behaved (observed )

(cyl) = .9905 + 0.071e-(R50/3.67)

(cyl cham for 2cm < R50 < 9cm),

0.2% error for Farmer chambers.

Fig 5 & 7 (cyl)

Fig 6 & 8 (pp)

'

R50k'

R50k

'

R50k (Eq 19)

'

R50k

Page 26: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

For Electrons

60obalt at evaluatedcelrepl

7.5 Renergy at evaluatedcelrepl

|

|

PP

PP

50

Cwall

water

air

water

air

ecal

PL

L

k

•••

••

==

ρ

ρ

5.750Renergy at evaluatedcelrepl

50Renergy at the evaluatedcelrepl

50

|

|

PP

PP

'

=••

••

=water

air

water

air

R

L

L

k

ρ

ρ

Page 27: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Electrons:Electrons:

Reference ConditionsReference Conditions

• Field Size:

≥10 cm x 10 cm for R50 < 8.5 cm

≥ 20 cm x 20 cm for R50 > 8.5 cm

• Reference Depth, dref

dref = 0.6R50 - 0.1 [cm]

• Nominal SSD (90 cm to 110 cm)

(Eq 18)

Page 28: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Beam Quality Beam Quality

SpecificationSpecification

Page 29: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Photon: Beam QualityPhoton: Beam Quality

SpecificationSpecification%dd(10)x

• % depth dose due only to photons

(excluding electron contamination)

10 cm x 10 cm at 100 cm SSD

• above 10 MV-- may be electron

contamination. Need to remove the

electrons (coming from collimators).

Page 30: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

%dd(10)%dd(10)xx from %dd(10)from %dd(10)PbPb

• Measure %dd at 10 cm with 1 mm Pb foil:_______________________________________________

- 50 cm from surface (± 5 cm)

%dd(10)x = [0.8905+0.00150 %dd(10)Pb]%dd(10)Pb_________________________________________________

- 30 cm from surface (± 1 cm)

%dd(10)x = [0.8116+0.00264 %dd(10)Pb]%dd(10)Pb__________________________________________________

(Where: %dd(10)Pb measured with1mm Pb foil)__________________________________________________

DEPTHS ARE SHIFTED

Page 31: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

%dd(10)%dd(10)xx from %dd(10)from %dd(10)oo

• Interim solution (error < 0.4%)

%dd(10)x = 1.267 [%dd(10)o] - 20.0

[75% < %dd(10)o < 89%]

Where: %dd(10)omeasured with open beam

ALL DEPTHS ARE SHIFTED TO

EFFECTIVE POINT

Page 32: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Beam Quality Specification for Beam Quality Specification for

Electron BeamsElectron Beams

Specified by R50

R50 = depth (cm) at which dose falls to 50% of max

for a field with full side scatter.10 x 10 or 20 x 20 (R50 > 8.5)

R50 = 1.029 I50 -0.06 (cm) [I50 < 10cm]

R50 = 1.059 I50 -0.37 (cm) [I50 >10cm]

{I50 = depth of 50% ionization}

(Eq 16)

(Eq 17)

Page 33: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

TGTG--51 Measurements51 Measurements

Photons:

• Search for Imax

• Place chamber at 10cm + 0.6 rcav

(with/without lead - for energy > 10 MV)

• Determine kQ from %dd(10)x

• Move chamber to calibration depth

(physical 10 cm)

• Make measurements for Mraw, Ppol, and Pion

Page 34: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

TGTG--51 Measurements51 Measurements

Electrons:

• Look up kecal for your chamber.

• Search for Imax and I50 (use 0.5 rcav shift)

• Determine R50

• Determine dref and k’R50

• Move chamber to physical dref (no shift)

• Measure Ppol and Pion

• Move chamber to dref + 0.5 rcav

• Calculate the gradient correction, Pgr

Page 35: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Regions of Confusion and ConcernRegions of Confusion and Concern

• Water phantom

• 1 mm Acrylic cap• Parallel Plate vs Cylindrical Chambers• Ppol, Pion

• Why dref• Point of measurement

• % dd

• Beam Quality Specifications• Calibration

Page 36: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

PhantomsPhantoms

• Water only

–Annual calibration (reference dosimetry)

• Plastics:

–Weekly/Monthly

–Compare with water at annual calibration.

Page 37: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Chamber ProtectionChamber Protection

• Waterproof Chambers

–no protective sleeve needed

• Other Chambers

–1 mm thick Acrylic protective sleeve

• Cap correction: ????

Page 38: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Chambers:Chambers:

parallel plate vs cylindricalparallel plate vs cylindrical

• Photons:

–Cylindrical Chambers: ONLY (effect of back scatter from insulator and body of P-P not understood)

• Electrons:

–Parallel Plate Chambers: RECOMMENDED

–Cylindrical Chambers: ACCEPTABLE

–P-P Chamber required for R50 < = 2.6 cm

Page 39: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Calibrate PCalibrate P--P ChamberP Chamber

• ADCL’s:–TG-39, in water

–Cobalt 60

• User:–TG-39 in water/plastic(?)

–high energy electron (R50 ≈7.5 cm)–compare with cylindrical

• Traceability of Factor?????

Page 40: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Polarity CorrectionPolarity Correction

Watch the sign

Some situations: pol > signal

ref depth -- not a problem

Ppol ˜ 1.00

raw

rawraw

polM2

MMP

−+ +=

Page 41: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

PPionion Pulsed BeamPulsed Beam

( )

=

L

HLraw

Hraw

L

H

Hion

V

V

M

M

V

V00.1

VP(Eq 11)

VH = normal operating potential of chamber

VL = reduced potential on chamber -

= raw reading with full potential

= raw reading with reduced potential

(Precision < 0.4%)

I Recommend Weinhous & Meli Med Phys 11, 846-849, 1984

Almond Med Phys 8, 901-904, 1980

TG-21 Curve for

Equation for 60Co in worksheet is wrong.

H

rawML

rawM

2/VV HL<

/2VVHL

=

Page 42: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Why dWhy drefref not dnot dmaxmax ????

• K’R50 is smooth curve with low gradient

– remember L/ρ has high gradient at low energies.

• dref is close to dmax for low energy e-

• %dd gradient is low for high energy e-

• avoid 2-D interpolation of L/ρ • WARNING: For clinical use, correct to

dmax using clinical %dd data

Page 43: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Effective point of measurement, Effective point of measurement,

%%dddd,,

beam quality beam quality specifiersspecifiers,,

dose gradientsdose gradients

Page 44: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Effective Point of MeasurementEffective Point of Measurement

deff = dmeas - f ( rcav)

f = 0.6 rcav for photons

f = 0.5 rcav for electrons

f = 0 for parallel plateinner surface of front window

Page 45: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Chamber PositionChamber PositionCylindrical Chamber (hν & e-)

• Clinical depth dose:

–effective pt of measurement

• Beam quality specification:

–effective pt of measurement

• Calibration:

–Physical center of chamber

–gradient correction included in kQ

Page 46: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

energycobalt at evaluatedcelwallrepl

Qenergy at the evaluatedcelwallrepl

Q

|

|

PPP

PPP

k

••

••

=water

air

water

air

L

L

ρ

ρ

For PhotonsFor Photons

• Prepl = gradient correction

Page 47: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

For ElectronsFor Electrons

= gradient correction

( )( )refraw

cavrefQgr

dM

r5.0dM P

+=

R50

Q

gr k' P k Q(Eq 4)

(Eq 21)

QgrP

=

Page 48: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Photons: Photons:

Clinical % dd Clinical % dd (new procedure)(new procedure)

• Measure % ionization

• Shift to effective point of measurement.

– L/ρ and Pwall are ~ independent of depth

Use this value to correct dose from depth of calibration to

other depths in phantom.NOTE: This changes %dd values and shifts your dmax but does not change the gradient.

Page 49: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000
Page 50: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

ElectronsElectrons

Clinical % Clinical % ddddSame as before

• Measure % ionization

• Shift to effective point of measurement

• Convert to dose -- using TG-25 (revised

L/ρ)

• Use this value to shift from dref to dmax

Parallel Plate and diode need no shift

Figure 1

Page 51: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000
Page 52: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Depth Dose Without Depth Dose Without Electron ContaminationElectron Contamination

• Measure %dd at 10 cm with 1 mm Pb foil:

- 50 cm from surface

%dd(10)x = [0.8905+0.00150 %dd(10)Pb]%dd(10)Pb

Use percent depth dose,%dd,

not fractional depth dose, fdd.

Page 53: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Beam Quality SpecificationBeam Quality Specification

PhotonsPhotons

Specified by [ %dd(10)x ]–X-ray only %dd, 10 cm depth, 10 square

–Measure Imax and I10 at 10cm + f*rcav–Use only to determine kQ–Use lead sheet for energies > 10MV (vague)

• 1mm ± 20% (1/32” - 3/64”)

• Place at 30 (± 1) cm or 50 (± 5) cm from SSD

• Last material between collimator and phantom

• remove lead and throw away %dd(10)x• Interim equation to use without lead

Page 54: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Beam Quality Specification Beam Quality Specification

ElectronsElectrons

Specified by R50R50 ~ depth (cm) at which dose falls to 50% of max for

full scatter field.

R50 = 1.029 I50 - 0.06 (cm) [I50 < 10cm]

R50 = 1.059 I50 - 0.37 (cm) [I50 >10cm]

{I50 = depth of 50% ionization}

• May not agree with clinical depth dose

• Use only to determine dref and k’R50

Page 55: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Implementation

• Do Homework:

– Make measurements

– Determine Change in Dose to patient

– If change exceeds 2.5% -- contact RPC

– Choose a good date to change

• Inform everyone involved

• Make change

Page 56: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Expected Changes

• TG-51/TG-21 at 60Co

• TG-51/TG-21 at other energies/modalities

Page 57: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Calculation of ND,w/NK

for Cobalt-60

D(60Co) = M·ND,w = M·Ngas·L/ρρρρ·Prepl·Pwall

NK= 0.8791 [Gy/R] NX

[ ] [ ]water

airwallrepl

x

gas

K

w,D L P P

N

N

0.879

1

N

N

ρ

=

Page 58: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Comparison of Absorbed Dose and

Air Kerma Calibration Factors

Chamber ND,w / Nk ND,w / Nk Meas. / Calc.

(Meas.) (Calc.)

NEL (SN 1864) 1.100 1.088 1.011

NEL (SN 1503) 1.102 1.088 1.013

PTW (SN 1516) 1.099 1.086 1.012

PTW (SN 1483) 1.099 1.086 1.012

Capintec PR06C 1.095 1.079 1.015

Exradin A12 1.106 1.093 1.012

Page 59: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Dose (TG-51)/Dose (TG-21)

Chamber 60Co 6 MV hνννν 18 MV hνννν 9 MeV e- 16 MeV e-

NEL 1.012 1.010 1.007 1.015 1.021

(2 chambers)

PTW N23333/ 1.012 1.010 1.006 1.014 1.017

N30001

Capintec 1.015 1.011 1.004 1.014 1.015PR06C

Exradin A12 1.012 1.008 1.002 1.014 1.016

Note: The measurement uncertainty (1 SD) is less than ±±±± 0.4%.

Page 60: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000
Page 61: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

CAVEATS ABOUT DEPTH DOSE

MEASUREMENTS

• Effective point of measurement:

deff = dmeas - f ( rcav)

f = 0.6 rcav for photons

f = 0.5 rcav for electrons

• effective point of measurement is used to calculate

%dd used for clinical data and for energy

specification.

• for calibration: do not shift point of measurement,

gradient is corrected for in kQ.

Page 62: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

Learning Curve

• Photons --- rather short:

– One night of concentration

• Electrons --- somewhat longer

– Several sessions to become comfortable

Page 63: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000
Page 64: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

0.9

0.95

1

1.05

1.1

1.15

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Mean Incident electron Energy, Eo

L/ ρρ ρρ

4 cm depth

1.4 cm depth

L/L/ρρ vsvs. Electron Energy al la TG. Electron Energy al la TG--2121

(Electrons)(Electrons)

Page 65: AAPM Task Group 51 - MD Anderson Cancer Centerrpc.mdanderson.org/rpc/Research_tg51/TG-51/TG 51 SWAAPM.pdfAAPM Task Group 51 (MedPhys 26, p.1847 -70, 1999) SWAAPM Fall Meeting 2000

0.975

0.980

0.985

0.990

0.995

1.000

1.005

120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

Sequence #

Response (N

orm

to 1

st rd

g @

full b

ias)

6 e

@ dm

18 x

@ d10

--- Monitor

∆ NEL, NEL'X PTW, PTW'

� Cap-G, Cap-C