aaup letter to chancellor martin and president di mare 1-8-14
DESCRIPTION
Letter to DiMare and MsrtinTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: AAUP Letter to Chancellor Martin and President Di Mare 1-8-14](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072116/55cf9907550346d0339b1c92/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1133 19th Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036 PHONE: 202.737.5900 • FAX: 202.737.5526 • www.aaup.org
January 8, 2014
VIA ELECTRONIC AND USPS MAIL
Dr. Michael Martin
Chancellor
Colorado State University System
410 17th Street, Suite 2440
Denver, Colorado 80202
Dr. Lesley Di Mare
President
Colorado State University – Pueblo
2200 Bonforte Boulevard
Pueblo, Colorado 81001
Dear Chancellor Martin and President Di Mare:
This letter is prompted by reports that Chancellor Martin has informally proposed the
elimination of numerous Colorado State University - Pueblo faculty positions in order to
meet a planned 2014-15 budget reduction. The university is not reported as having
declared financial exigency.
You are doubtless aware that the interest of our Association in a current situation such as
that reported at Colorado State University – Pueblo stems from its longstanding
commitment to academic freedom, tenure, and due process. The basic standards are
articulated in the enclosed 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and
Tenure, jointly formulated by the AAUP and the Association of American Colleges and
Universities and endorsed by more than 210 scholarly and higher-education
organizations. Derivative procedural standards are set forth in the AAUP’s enclosed
Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure, and The Role
of the Faculty in Conditions of Financial Exigency.
As these documents specify, the AAUP recognizes only three bases for the termination of
faculty appointments as being consistent with principles of academic freedom and tenure:
(1) dismissal for cause, (2) bona fide financial exigency, and (3) program discontinuance
for educational reasons, as determined by the faculty. See particularly Regulations 4 and
5 of the Recommended Institutional Regulations. Because the stated grounds for the
threatened terminations are financial, the most applicable AAUP-recommended
![Page 2: AAUP Letter to Chancellor Martin and President Di Mare 1-8-14](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072116/55cf9907550346d0339b1c92/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chancellor Martin and President Di Mare
January 8, 2014
Page 2
procedural standards would appear to be those related to financial exigency, as
incorporated in Regulation 4c of the Recommended Institutional Regulations.
We shall be watching developments at Pueblo closely. We certainly hope that the
terminations of faculty appointments can be avoided. If not, we shall be available to
advise and assist professors who are adversely affected and other faculty and
administrative officers who may be involved.
Sincerely,
Anita Levy, Ph.D.
Associate Secretary
Enclosures (by electronic mail only)