abcs of cpdos

9
Cross-Prod uct Research 35 November 6, 2006 Situation Room 6  The ABCs of CPDOs The synthetic market recently introduce d a new structure, which is a rolling five-year combination of the US and European investment grade CDS indices (CDX IG and iTraxx Main). Called a CPDO—Constant Proportion Debt Obligation—this product is initially 15 times leveraged, with a ten-year maturity. In the first round of issuance, CPDOs offered a triple-A rated spread of approximatel y L+200 bps. Interest from the  product has been viewed as a major factor in sending the IG and iTraxx indices to record tights. The CPDO investor always has five-year on-the-run IG, even though the structure has a ten-year maturity date. In other words, every six months, any credit that suffers a downgrade to high yield (split-rated or worse) would be dropped out of IG, and therefore dropped out of the structure. This resulted in an S&P triple AAA rating, on the logic that the only credit risk was that an investment grade-rated credit may default within a six-month interval. Below we discuss the impact of CPDOs on the broader credit market, both under base case scenarios and low probability, high impact events. To be clear, we do not express an opinion regarding CPDOs. We simply discuss how CPDO activity may impact the overall market. Reserves and Leverage CPDOs achieve their high credit rating through the accumulation of reserves (the excess of coupon income earned over coupons paid out), which are made available to cover potential losses from future defaults. Currently, the average spread for five-year IG and iTraxx is roughly 30 bps. 1  At 15 times leverage, the funded structure therefore earns three-month Euribor+450 bps. Now subtract a coupon of Euribor+200 bps and fees of roughly 20 bps for net income (reserves) of approximately 230 bps. In strong credit environments, mark-to-market gains build reserves, improving the ability of the CPDO to make future payments (coupons + fees). To realize these gains, the structure buys back some index protection, reducing leverage. That is, should the CPDO no longer need as much leverage to make future payments, then it deleverages. Figure 5 and Figure 6 shows sample deleveraging, over the life of a transaction, in a  base case scenario with constant index spreads and no defaults. Mark-to-market gains come from rolldown in the credit curve. That is, the investor benefits from selling five- year index protection, which rolls down to a 4.5-year maturity by the next index roll. 1 50% x (34 bps for five-year IG) + 50% x (24 bps for five-year iTraxx) = 29 bps.  This is an excerpt from the Credit Market Strategist, November 6, 2006.  A Constant Proportion Debt Obligations (CPDO) is a new structure in the credit derivatives market Glen Taksler (212) 933 2559 CPDOs achieve a high credit rating through the accumulation of reserves

Upload: gnicholso

Post on 06-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 1/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

Situation Room 6 

 The ABCs of CPDOs

The synthetic market recently introduced a new structure, which is a rolling five-year combination of the US and European investment grade CDS indices (CDX IG and 

iTraxx Main). Called a CPDO—Constant Proportion Debt Obligation—this product isinitially 15 times leveraged, with a ten-year maturity. In the first round of issuance,CPDOs offered a triple-A rated spread of approximately L+200 bps. Interest from the product has been viewed as a major factor in sending the IG and iTraxx indices torecord tights.

The CPDO investor always has five-year on-the-run IG, even though the structure has aten-year maturity date. In other words, every six months, any credit that suffers adowngrade to high yield (split-rated or worse) would be dropped out of IG, and therefore dropped out of the structure. This resulted in an S&P triple AAA rating, onthe logic that the only credit risk was that an investment grade-rated credit may defaultwithin a six-month interval.

Below we discuss the impact of CPDOs on the broader credit market, both under basecase scenarios and low probability, high impact events. To be clear, we do not expressan opinion regarding CPDOs. We simply discuss how CPDO activity may impact theoverall market.

Reserves and Leverage

CPDOs achieve their high credit rating through the accumulation of reserves (theexcess of coupon income earned over coupons paid out), which are made available tocover potential losses from future defaults. Currently, the average spread for five-year IG and iTraxx is roughly 30 bps.

1 At 15 times leverage, the funded structure therefore

earns three-month Euribor+450 bps. Now subtract a coupon of Euribor+200 bps and fees of roughly 20 bps for net income (reserves) of approximately 230 bps.

In strong credit environments, mark-to-market gains build reserves, improving theability of the CPDO to make future payments (coupons + fees). To realize these gains,

the structure buys back some index protection, reducing leverage. That is, should theCPDO no longer need as much leverage to make future payments, then it deleverages.Figure 5 and Figure 6 shows sample deleveraging, over the life of a transaction, in a base case scenario with constant index spreads and no defaults. Mark-to-market gainscome from rolldown in the credit curve. That is, the investor benefits from selling five-year index protection, which rolls down to a 4.5-year maturity by the next index roll.

150% x (34 bps for five-year IG) + 50% x (24 bps for five-year iTraxx) = 29 bps.

 This is an excerpt from the

Credit Market Strategist,

November 6, 2006.

 A Constant Proportion Debt

Obligations (CPDO) is a

new structure in the credit

derivatives market

Glen Taksler 

(212) 933 2559

CPDOs achieve a high

credit rating through the

accumulation of reserves

Page 2: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 2/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

Situation Room 7 

Figure 5. In Strong Credit Environments, CPDOs Deleverage, to

Realize Mark-to-Market Gains

CPDO Deleverages by Buying Back Index Protection

Index Spreads Widen as CPDO Deleverages

Figure 6. Cash-In Event

If the CPDO Has Enough Value to Meet All Scheduled Coupon

Payments and Fees, the Structure Completely Deleverages

Index Spreads Widen on a Cash-In Event 

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time from Trade Inception (Years)

   L  e  v  e  r  a  g  e   (   X

Mark-to-market

gains allow the CPDO

to reduce leverage, by

buying back index

protection

 

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time from Trade Inception (Years)

   %   o

   f   P  a  r

PV of Future Payments

NAV

CPDO completely

deleverages

 Base case scenario, which assumes constant index spreads, no defaults, and 7% rolldown

every six months (see discussion of rolldown below).

Source: Banc of America Securities LLC Estimates.

Base case scenario, which assumes constant index spreads, no defaults, and 7% rolldown

every six months (see discussion of rolldown below).

Source: Banc of America Securities LLC Estimates.

To further protect principal, should the CPDO ever have enough value to pay all futurescheduled coupon payments and fees, the transaction completely deleverages. All proceeds are then invested in risk-free assets until the CPDO’s maturity. In Figure 6, acash-in event occurs when the red line (NAV of the CPDO) reaches the thick gray line(present value of future coupon payments and fees).

In any type of deleveraging event, notice that the CPDO needs to buy back index protection, which it had previously sold. For example, in a $100 million transaction, a

CPDO that is 15x initially leveraged would sell $1.5 billion in index protection. Should the structure later deleverage to 11x, it would do so by buying back $400 million inindex protection (15x initial leverage – 11x new leverage, times $100 million).

As such, credit investors should understand that, going forward, any time that CPDOsexperience significant mark-to-market gains, they are likely to deleverage. This should result in the structured credit market buying back index protection, sending IG and iTraxx spreads wider.

Index Rolls

Credit Quality 

Since the product always invests in on-the-run IG, the index roll is very important.

Typically, a CPDO assumes constant credit quality between indices, i.e., the samecredit quality between the constituents of an old index and a new index.

However, suppose there were a few downgrades between now and the next roll. Then,credit quality would improve significantly in the new index, prompting the new indexto trade much tighter than the old index.

For example, focus on the US, temporarily ignoring the European (iTraxx) component.In the CDX IG roll from Series 4 to Series 5, eight credits dropped out of the new on-

CPDOs are likely to

deleverage following 

significant mark-to-market gains

Since CPDOs always

invest in on-the-run IG,

the index roll is very 

important

Page 3: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 3/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

Situation Room 8 

the-run index because of downgrades.2 Accordingly, IG5 traded tighter than IG4, even

with the six-month maturity extension. Figure 7 compares the old index spread—in thiscase, the mark on the IG4 position—versus the new index (IG5) coupon:

Figure 7. Risk to CPDO of a Negative Credit Quality Roll…Old Index Spread One Day Before the Roll vs. New Index Coupon

New Index Coupon Income Would Not Be Sufficient to Offset Mark-to-

Market Loss From Spread Widening on the Old Index 

Figure 8. …Would Cause the CPDO to Deleverage Later Deleveraging in Base Case Scenario vs. Four IG4-to-IG5 Like Rolls

Mark-to-Market Losses from Improved Credit Quality of the New On-the-

Run Index Delay CPDO Deleveraging 

30

35

40

45

50

55

IG3 IG4 IG5 IG6 IG7

Roll to Index

   b  p  s

Old Index Spread (bps)

New Index Coupon (bps)

 

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time from Trade Inception (Years)

   %   o

   f   P  a  r

PV of Future PaymentsNAV: Base CaseNAV: IG4-to-IG5 Like Rolls

CPDO completely

deleverages

 Sources: Bloomberg; Banc of America Securities LLC Estimates. Base case scenario assumes constant index spreads, no defaults, and 7% rolldown every six 

months (see discussion of rolldown below).

IG4-to-IG5 Like Rolls is similar to the base case scenario, but assumes four rolls with a -6 bp

credit quality component.

Source: Banc of America Securities LLC Estimates.

Series 4 IG has a coupon of 40 bps (the gray bar in the “IG4” section of Figure 7. Therefore, had a similar CPDO structure been in place, the vehicle would have earned 

40 bps x 15x leverage = 600 bps.By the next roll date, Series 4 had widened by 11 bps (to 51 bps), resulting in a mark-to-market loss. Had the coupon in Series 5 IG been set at the same 51-bp mark asSeries 4 IG, there would have been no loss to the structure. That is because the mark-to-market loss would have been exactly offset by an expected gain in future couponincome.

However, due to improved credit quality, the coupon on Series 5 IG was set at 45 bps,or 6 bps tighter than the then-mark on Series 4. Reserves available to the CPDO thenwould have fallen by about 6 bps x 4.1 duration x 15x leverage, or 3.7 points.

Figure 8 shows the effect on deleveraging. Compared with the base case scenario (red line), which completely deleverages after approximately 4 years, a series of four successive IG4-to-IG5 like rolls would delay the cash-in time to approximately year 6.

To be clear, the current assumption of unchanged credit quality is a realistic reflectionof the current market environment, as experienced in the last roll (to IG7). But, should we see meaningful downgrades in investment grade credits, then there could be a return

2Eastman Kodak, Ford Motor Credit, GMAC, Kerr-McGee, Lear, Liberty Media, Maytag, and SRAC. A ninth credit, MBNA,

dropped out of the new on-the-run index due to M&A activity.3This is an approximation. In later years, leverage may need to be adjusted so that expected coupon income will offset losses.

Page 4: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 4/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

Situation Room 9 

to the roll environment of IG5 and earlier, when significantly improved credit qualitywould have hurt CPDOs.

Credit Curve

In fact, embedded in a typical CPDO is an assumption that spreads widen on the rolldate, providing the investor with additional coupon income (rather than a loss). This isdue to rolldown on the credit curve.

For example, take the current structure at 30 bps. Over the next six months,4 a typical

CPDO assumes that credit spreads will roll down to 27.9 bps, or 93% of their currentlevel. Subtract a 1 bp assumed transaction cost, and the investor still realizes a mark-to-market gain, from rolldown, of about 3/4 point (2.1 bps rolldown minus 1 bptransaction cost x 4.1 duration x 15x leverage).

Figure 9 illustrates the impact of rolldown. In the base case scenario, the credit curverolls down by 7% every six months (e.g., from 30 bps for a 5-year index maturity to27.9 bps for a 4.5-year index maturity). For illustrative purposes, we also assume onedefault in year two. The CPDO cashes in around year five:

Figure 9. Steep Credit Curves Are Good for CPDOs

 Assumes One Default at Year 2

Flat Credit Curve Delays Cash-In Time, Because Investor Is Unable to Realize Mark-to-Market Gains From Rolldown

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time from Trade Inception (Years)

   %   o

   f   P  a  r

PV of Future PaymentsNAV: Base Case Credit CurveNAV: Flat Credit Curve

CPDO completely deleverages

Base case credit curve assumes constant index spreads, one default in year 2, and 7% rolldown every six months.

Flat credit curve scenario is similar to the base case credit curve, but assumes no rolldown.

Assumes one default in year 2 with 40% recovery.

Source: Banc of America Securities LLC Estimates.

By contrast, the thick black line shows what happens if the credit curve is perfectly flat.Since the investor is unable to realize mark-to-market gains from rolldown, the cash-intime is delayed by approximately three years.

4More accurately, from one index roll date to the next.

5Duration is roughly 4.1 because the investor unwinds the old (4.5 year maturity) index.

Page 5: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 5/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

Situation Room 10 

Flatter Credit Curves on the Horizon? 

Our economists look for the 3s/5s Treasury curve to move from inverted to flat over thenext six months and to slightly normal (positively sloped) near the end of 2007. Asillustrated in Figure 10, steeper Treasury curves generally suggest tighter creditscurves:

Figure 10. As the Treasury Curve (Eventually) Normalizes, Look for Flatter 3s/5s Credit Curves

3s/5s Credit Curve (%) vs. 3s/5s Treasury Curve (bps)

Flatter Credit Curves Hurt CPDO Cash Flows

y = 0.14x + 57.94

R2 = 0.52

52

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

3s/5s Treasury (bps)

   3  s   /   5  s

   C  r  e   d   i   t   (   %   )

3s/5s Credit (%) Current

Spring 2005 - Curves later steepened

Dec 2004-Jan 2005

Curves later flattened

Current

Steeper

Flatter

Sources: Bloomberg; Banc of America Securities LLC Estimates.

In principle, suppose the yield that investors require to invest in a particular ReferenceEntity remains constant, even when Treasury rates change. If 3-year Treasury rates fallrelative to 5-year rates, then, to keep the yield on CDS constant, 3-year CDS must

widen. In turn, the 3s/5s credit curve flattens.

7

 That said, even though some credit curve flattening may be on the horizon—whichwould delay CPDO cash-in time—we would not expect the extreme case illustrated bythe perfectly flat credit curve in Figure 9. 

IG (and iTraxx) Intrinsics “Permanently” Cheap to Intrinsics? 

The index “basis” is defined as the intrinsic spread on underlying components minusthe index spread. Since CPDO investors buy credit risk which is directly linked toindex spreads, dealers need to sell index protection, driving the intrinsics minus index basis wider. Indeed, as shown in Figure 11, the basis is near one-year wides:

6 Following general market convention, the credit curve is shown in percent (three-year spreads trade at 53% of five-year spreads)rather than basis points (three-year spreads trade 26 bps tighter than five-year spreads). As such, a lower number means a steepercredit curve—for example, a 3s/5s curve at 53% (three-year spreads well below five-year spreads) is steeper than a 3s/5s curve at90% (three-year spreads almost the same as five-year spreads).7For more details on the general framework, please see, “Expect Continued Steepening in CDS Curves: The Impact of the

Treasury Market on Credit Default Curves,” June 30, 2005. Note that the outlook has changed from steepening (in June 2005) toflattening.8To improve readability, Figure 11 starts after the May 2005 correlation crisis. Yet, we caution that during the correlation crisis,

intrinsics traded in a range of 6 bps tighter than the index, to 12 bps wider than the index, which is far wider than current levels.

Steeper Treasury curves

generally suggest flatter 

credit curves

Page 6: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 6/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

Situation Room 11 

Figure 11. IG and iTraxx Intrinsics Cheapening to the Index 

Intrinsics – Index in Rolling on-the-Run IG and iTraxx 

-6-5-4-3-2-10123456

20-Sep-05 20-Dec-05 20-Mar-06 20-Jun-06 20-Sep-06

   I  n   t  r   i  n  s   i  c  s  -   I  n   d  e  x   (   b  p  s   )

IG iTraxx

Intrinsics cheap

Index cheap

Source: Mark-It Partners; Banc of America Securities LLC estimates.

For leveraged investors, we would suggest selling IG intrinsics and buying index protection. The investor earns roughly 2.5 bps, and is hedged against any futuredefaults (Bankruptcy and Failure to Pay). In older index series, the basis is even moreattractive, at 2.6 bps in IG6, 3.0 bps in IG5, and 3.5 bps in IG4.

We caution that the investor remains long Modified Restructuring risk, because theintrinsics—where the investor is long risk—trade with Modified Restructuring, whilethe index—where the investor is short risk—trades with No Restructuring. However,the market typically assesses Restructuring risk to be at most 2% of index spreads (i.e.,2% of roughly 34 bps for IG7, or 0.7 bps). As such, we believe that “index arb”investors are more than adequately compensated in the current environment.

New Roll Technicals

Finally, we point out that credit market investors should look for strong technicals infuture rolls. In previous rolls, the credit market looked at the change in credit quality,the shape of the credit curve, and an adjustment for Modified Restructuring (intrinsics)vs. No Restructuring (index). Going forward, CPDOs will need to buy back old on-the-run index protection, and sell new on-the-run index protection. This technical will produce flatter, possibly inverted, rolls between indices.

Accordingly, for non-CPDO investors who are current sellers of index protection, itmay make sense to unwind existing positions well in advance of the roll (before CPDOinvestors buy back protection). After the roll, index protection sellers should consider re-establishing their positions quickly, before the CPDO market sells new on-the-runindex protection and drives spreads tighter.

Similarly, for non-CPDO investors who are current buyers of index protection, it maymake sense to wait for CPDO roll technicals to set in to the market, allowing indexspreads to widen. Post-roll, index protection buyers should consider waiting for theCPDO market to sell new on-the-run index protection, to re-establish a market short ata tighter index spread.

Credit market investors

should look for strong 

technicals in future rolls

Page 7: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 7/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

13 Situation Room 

REG AC — ANALYST AND FIRM CERTIFICATION

The research analyst(s) who prepared research contributions to this report certify(ies) that: (1) all of the views expressed in such research report accurately reflecthis or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the research analyst in such research report. To the extent that any of the viewsexpressed in this report have been produced as a result of the application of the Credit OAS quantitative proprietary model, Banc of America Securities LLC

(BAS) and its affiliates certify that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect the Credit OAS quantitative model as to the securities and companiesmentioned in the report and (2) no part of the firm’s compensation from any company mentioned in this report was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related tothe views or results produced by the Credit OAS quantitative model. For a description of the Credit OAS proprietary credit evaluation model, including the datainput into the model, please see Introduction to Lighthouse: Credit Option Adjusted Spread, Portfolio Analytics and Data Analysis, dated May 12, 2006.

IMPORTANT RESEARCH CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

The analyst and associates responsible for preparing this research report receive compensation that is based upon various factors. These include (i) the overall  profitability of BAS and its affiliates, (ii) the profitability of the fixed income department of BAS and its affiliates and (iii) the profitability of BAS and itsaffiliates from the fixed income security asset class covered by the analyst or associate. A portion of the profitability of BAS and its affiliates, their fixed incomedepartment and each security asset class is generated by investment banking business. Research analysts and associates do not receive compensation based uponrevenues generated from any specific investment banking transaction.

BAS and affiliate policy prohibits research personnel from disclosing a rating, recommendation or investment thesis for review by an issuer prior to the  publication of a research report containing such rating, recommendation or investment thesis. Materials prepared by BAS and affiliate research personnel are based on public information.

BAS and its affiliates prohibit analysts, their associates and members of their households from maintaining a financial interest in the securities or options of anycompany that the analyst covers except in limited circumstances as permitted by BAS and affiliate policy. Any such direct securities ownership by the analyst(s)

  preparing this report is disclosed above. The absence of any such disclosure means that the analyst(s) preparing this report does(do) not have any such direct

securities ownership in his or her covered companies mentioned in this report. Such persons may own diversified mutual funds.

BAS and its affiliates are regular issuers of traded financial instruments linked to securities that are mentioned in this report.

BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES RATINGS DISCLOSURES

BAS High Grade and High Yield Research employ a Buy/Neutral/Sell rating system, and these recommendations carry a time horizon of six months.

Buy: Spreads and / or total returns are likely to outperform sector averages over the next six months; the company has improving credit fundamentals and/or it istrading at a notable spread concession relative to bonds of comparable risk within the sector.

 Neutral: Spreads and / or total returns are likely to perform equal to or near sector averages over the next six months; the company generally has solid creditfundamentals and/or it is trading in line relative to bonds of comparable risk within the sector.

Sell: Spreads and / or total returns are likely to underperform sector averages over the next six months; the company may have weakening credit fundamentalsand/or it is trading at a notable spread premium relative to bonds of comparable risk within the sector.

High Grade and High Yield Research use the following rating system with respect to Credit Default Swaps (CDS). Buy: We recommend that investors buy protection in CDS, therefore going short credit risk; Neutral: We are neutral on CDS and expect performance in line with sector performance; Sell: Werecommend that investors sell protection in CDS, therefore going long credit risk.

High Grade Research also employs a formal structure to define sector performance, using Overweight/Market Weight/Underweight. The sector recommendationtime horizon is determined by the expected performance over the next six months, but sector recommendation changes may occur at any time based upon sector analysis and relative value.

Overweight: The sector is expected to outperform excess spread returns of High Grade corporate indices, namely the BAS Broad Market Index (BAS BMI), over the next six months.

Market Weight: The sector is expected to perform in line with excess spread returns of High Grade corporate indices, namely the BAS BMI, over the next sixmonths.

Underweight: The sector is expected to underperform excess spread returns of High Grade corporate indices, namely the BAS BMI, over the next six months.

Rating Distribution*CoverageUniverse Recommendations Pct.

InvestmentBanking Clients Recommendations Pct.**

Buy 171 31 Buy 72 42

Hold 317 58 Hold 137 43

Sell 59 11 Sell 37 63* For the purposes of this Rating Distribution, “Hold” is equivalent to our “Neutral” rating.

** Percentage of recommendations in each rating group that are investment banking clients.As of 10/1/2006.

Further information on any security or financial instrument mentioned herein is available upon request.

Page 8: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 8/9

Cross-Product Research 35November 6, 2006

14 Situation Room 

DisclaimersThis document is being provided to you based on the fact that you are a Qualified Institutional Buyer under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 or equivalentsophisticated institutional investor or professional in the fixed income market. Recipients who are not institutional investors or market professionals should seek the adviceof their independent financial advisor before considering information in this report in connection with any investment decision or for a necessary explanation of its contents.

This report has been prepared as part of independent research activity or quantitative analytics and not in connection with any proposed offering of securities or as agent of the issuer of any securities. This report has been published independently of any issuer of securities mentioned herein. None of BAS, i ts affiliates or their analysts(collectively, BofA) have any authority whatsoever to make any representation or warranty on behalf of the issuer(s). This report is provided for information purposes onlyand is not an offer or a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities in any offering must be based solely on existing public information on such security or the information in the prospectus or other offering document issued in connection with such offering, and not onthis report.

BofA may have issued, and may in the future issue, a trading call regarding a security that is the subject of this report. Trading calls are short term trading opportunities based on market events or catalysts, while ratings reflect investment recommendations based on 12-month period relative to the relevant coverage universe. Because tradingcalls and ratings reflect different assumptions and analytical methods, trading calls may differ directionally from the rating on a security. In addition, BofA may have issued,and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect thedifferent assumptions, views and analytical methods of the persons who prepared them and BofA is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to theattention of any recipient of this report.

Securities recommended, offered or sold by BofA are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, are not deposits or other obligations of any insured depository institution (including Bank of America, N.A.) and are subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.

The information contained in this report (with the exception of the information set forth under the captions “Regulation AC Certification” and “Important Disclosures”) has been obtained from and is based on sources believed to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. Allopinions, projections and estimates constitute the judgment of the author as of the date of the report and are subject to change without notice. Prices also are subject tochange without notice. BofA is under no obligation to update this report and BofA’s ability to publish research on the subject company(ies) in the future is subject toapplicable quiet periods. You should therefore assume that BofA will not update any fact, circumstance or opinion contained in this report.

Investing in non-U.S. securities may entail certain risks. The securities of non-U.S. issuers may not be registered with, nor be subject to, the reporting requirements of theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. There may be limited information available on foreign securities. In general, foreign companies are not subject to uniform audit

and reporting standards, practices and requirements comparable to those of U.S. companies. In addition, exchange rate movements may have an adverse effect on the valueof an investment in a foreign stock and its corresponding dividend payment for U.S. investors. Investors who have received this report from BAS or an affiliate may be prohibited in certain states or other jurisdictions from purchasing securities mentioned in this report from BAS or its affiliate(s).

Investments in general, and derivatives (that is, options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences) in particular, involve numerous risks, including, among others,market risk, counterparty default risk and liquidity risk. Derivatives are not suitable investments for all investors, and an investor may lose all principal invested and, in somecases, may incur unlimited losses. It may be difficult to sell an investment and to obtain reliable information about its value or the risks to which it is exposed. Past

 performance of securities, loans or other financial instruments is not indicative of future performance.

This report is not prepared as or intended to be investment advice and is issued without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. In the event that the recipient received this report pursuant to a contract between the recipient and BAS for the provision of research services for aseparate fee, and in connection therewith BAS may be deemed to be acting as an investment adviser, such status relates, if at all, solely to the person with whom BAS hascontracted directly and does not extend beyond the delivery of this report (unless otherwise agreed specifically in writing by BAS). BAS is and continues to act solely as a

 broker-dealer in connection with the execution of any transactions, including transactions in any securities mentioned in this report. Neither BofA nor any officer or employee of BofA accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of this report or its contents.

BofA does not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any statements contained herein as to tax matters were neither written nor intended by the sender or BofA to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on such taxpayer. If any person uses or refers to any such tax statement in

 promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any taxpayer, then the statement expressed above is being delivered to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or matter addressed and the recipient should seek advice based on its particular circumstances from an independenttax advisor.

 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any party hereto (and any of its employees, representatives and other agents) may disclose to any and all persons, withoutlimitation of any kind the tax treatment or tax structure of this transaction.

With the exception of information regarding BofA, materials prepared by BofA research personnel are based on public information. Facts and views presented in thismaterial have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas of BofA, including investment banking personnel.

To European and Asian Customers: This report is distributed in Europe by Banc of America Securities Limited and in Asia by Banc of America Securities Asia Limited.

To U.S. Customers: BAS has accepted responsibility for the distribution of this report in the United States to BAS clients, but not to the clients of its affiliate, Banc of America Investment Services, Inc. (BAI). Transactions by U.S. persons (other than BAI and its clients) in any security discussed herein must be carried out through BAS.BAS provides research to its affiliate, BAI. BAI is a registered broker-dealer, member NASD and SIPC, and is a nonbank subsidiary of Bank of America N.A.

To U.K. Customers: This document has been approved for distribution in the United Kingdom by Banc of America Securities Limited, which is authorized and regulated bythe Financial Services Authority for the conduct of investment business in the United Kingdom. Prices, values or income ascribed to investments in this report may fallagainst your interests. The investments may not be suitable for you, and i f in any doubt, you should seek advice from an investment advisor. Changes in rates of exchangemay have an adverse effect on the value, price or income from an investment. Levels and basis for taxation may change. The protection provided by the U.K. regulatoryregime, including the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, do not apply in general to business coordinated by BAS or i ts affiliates from an office outside of the United Kingdom.

These disclosures should be read in conjunction with the Banc of America Securities Limited general policy statement on the handling of research conflicts—available uponrequest.

To German Customers: In Germany, this report should be read as though BAS has acted as a member of a consortium that has underwritten the most recent offering of securities during the past five years for companies covered in this report and holds 1% or more of the share capital of such companies.

To Canadian Customers: The contents of this report are intended solely for the use of, and only may be issued or passed on to, persons to whom BAS is entitled to distributethis report under applicable Canadian securities laws. In the province of Ontario, any person wishing to effect a transaction should do so with BAS, which is registered as anInternational Dealer. With few exceptions, BAS only may effect transactions in Ontario with designated institutions in foreign securities as such terms are defined in theSecurities Act (Ontario).

To Hong Kong Customers: Any Hong Kong person wishing to effect a transaction in any securities discussed in this report should contact Banc of America Securities AsiaLimited.

To Customers in Other Countries: This report, and the securities discussed herein, may not be eligible for distribution or sale in all countries or to certain categories of investors. In general, this report may be distributed only to professional and institutional investors.

This report may not be reproduced or distributed by any person for any purpose without the prior written consent of BAS. Please cite source when quoting. All rights arereserved.© 2006 Bank of America Corporation

Page 9: Abcs of Cpdos

8/2/2019 Abcs of Cpdos

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abcs-of-cpdos 9/9

 

Banc of America Securities — Debt Research Directory 

Paula Dominick, Global Head of Debt and Equity Research (212) 847 5322

Credit Strategy Research

  Jeffrey A. Rosenberg, CFA (212) 933 2927

Head of Credit Strategy Research

Michael Contopoulos (212) 933 3372 Lighthouse Portfolio Strategy & Analytics  

Hans Mikkelsen (212) 847 6468 High Grade

Clemens Mueller (212) 933 2577 High Yield 

Olivera Radakovic (212) 933 2496 Index, Strategy

Adam Roffman (212) 933 2076Collateralized Debt Obligation Strategy

Glen Taksler (212) 933 2559 Derivatives Strategy

Mingsung Tang (212) 847 6083 Lighthouse Portfolio Strategy & Analytics

Xiaodong Zhu (212) 847 5489 Lighthouse Portfolio Strategy & Analytics

High Grade Research

Gregory Ransom, CFA (212) 847 5773

Head of High Grade Research Basic Industries

Stan August (704) 388 5373 Domestic Banks, Brokers, European Banks

Michael J. Barry (212) 933 2547 Insurance

Andrew Bressler, CFA (202) 442.7454Washington Healthcare

Christopher N. Brown, CFA (704) 386 2524 REITs, Retail, Leisure, Homebuilding 

Kevin Christiano (212) 933.2485 Media, Telecommunications

Dennis P. Coleman, CFA (212) 847 6224 Energy, Pipelines, Master Limited Partnerships

Todd Duvick, CFA (704) 388 5053

 Food & Beverage, Supermarkets, ConsumerJohn Guarnera (704) 683 4878

 Domestic Banks, Finance Companies

Douglas Karson (212) 933 2405 Aerospace/Defense, Manufacturing, Autos

Faith N. Klaus, CFA (704) 386 8440 Electric Utilities, Independent Power

David K. Peterson, CFA (704) 386 9419 Healthcare

High Yield Research

Larry Bland (212) 847 6502

Head of High Yield Research

 Healthcare, Deathcare

Philip Birbara (212) 847 5473Chemicals

Andrew Brausa (212) 847 6481 Building Materials, Homebuilding 

Kevin Cohen, CFA (212) 933 2721 Paper & Packaging, Metals & Mining 

Melissa Ford, CFA (212) 847 5577 Restaurants, Supermarkets

Ana Goshko (212) 847 5936Telecommunications, Towers

Douglas Karson (212) 933 2405 Autos

James Kayler, CFA (212) 847 5223Gaming, Lodging & Leisure

Kelly J. Krenger (212) 847 6410 Energy

Manish A. Somaiya (212) 933 3455 Aerospace/Defense, Industrials, Services

Eric Toubin, CFA (212) 847 6498

Technology, Food & Beverage

Stephen Weiss (212) 933 2298Cable/Satellites, Broadcasting/Publishing, Theaters

International Credit Strategy Research

Raja Visweswaran, CFA +44 (20) 7174 5459

Head of International Credit Strategy Research, BASL 

Eve Cabrillac +44 (20) 7174 1517 European Credit Strategy, BASL

James Carey +44 (20) 7174 5314 European Credit Strategy, BASL

Ivy Li, CFA +852 2847 6346

 Asian Credit Strategy, BASAL 

John Schofield +44 (20) 7174 1518 European Credit Strategy, BASL

  The persons listed on this directory have the

title “research analyst”. Unless otherwise

noted, any other contributors named on the

front cover of this report but not indicated

above have the title “research associate”. 

  All research analysts are employed by Banc of 

  America Securities LLC (BAS) except as noted

above. 

BAS (United States)

Banc of America Securities LLC9 West 57

thStreet

 New York, New York 10019

Tel. Contact: 800 627 1804

BASL (United Kingdom)

Banc of America Securities Limited5 Canada Square

London E14 5AQ, England 

Tel Contact: +44 (20) 7174 4000

BASAL (Hong Kong)

Banc of America Securities Asia Limited42/F Two International Finance Centre

8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong

852 2847 6346 214 North Tryon StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28225Tel. Contact: 888 279 3457 

Manage Your Research Subscriptions Online

Did you know that you can control your Banc of America Securities research subscriptionsonline? Simply login at http://www.bofa.com/login and select My Alerts from your Toolbox.If you don’t have a User ID, please contact your Banc of America Securities salesperson. If youforgot your User ID or password, please call our Help Desk at 1.877.543.2632 or [email protected]