abs mepc 71 update 10july17 - mariko … · - mepc 71/5/2 implementation of eedi for ice class...

© 2017 American Bureau of Shipping. All rights reserved

© draganche / 123rf.com

Environmental Regulatory UpdatePost MEPC 71

Regulations Timeline2013 2015 2020 2025

NO

xS

Ox

CO

2O

ther

Regula

tions

Phase 3 EEDI ?

Possible Future Regulations

Ship Recycling

Underwater Noise

Bio-fouling

MBMIMO GBS

USCG BWDS<1500

>5000 m3

Tier III NOx N America ECA

0.1% LSFO ECA

Phase 0 EEDI

New SOLAS Ch XIII: III Code

IACS CSR-H

Phase 1 EEDI

Phase 2 EEDI

0.5% LSFO worldwide

New SOLAS Ch XIV IMO Polar Code Jan 2017

IMO IGF Code in 2017

EU MRV

EU IHMExisting

& Non-EU

US EPA VGP3 VGP4

Revised IMO IGC Code Revised IMO IGC Code

USCG BWDS

1500-5000 m3

EU IHMNB

US EPA VGP2BWMC

08 Sept 2017

Black Carbon

Tier III NOx Baltic/North Sea

IMO DCS

MEPC 71 Agenda

© Gonzalo Jara / Shutterstock.com

1. Adoption of the agenda

2. Decisions of other bodies

3. Consideration and adoption of amendments to mandatory instruments

4. Harmful aquatic organisms in ballast water

5. Air pollution and energy efficiency

6. Further technical and operational measures for enhancing the energy efficiency of international shipping

7. Reduction of GHG emissions from ships

8. Identification and protection of Special Areas and PSSAs

9. Pollution prevention and response (4th session)

10.Reports of other sub-committees

11.Technical cooperation activities for the protection of the marine environment

12.Capacity building for the implementation of new measures

13.Application of the Committees' Guidelines

14.Work programme of the Committee and subsidiary bodies

15.Election of the Chair and Vice-Chair for 2018

16.Any other business

17.Consideration of the report of the Committee

Agenda Item 4: Harmful aquatic organisms in ballast water


• Consideration and approval of ballast water management systems

- Review of proposals for Basic and Final Approval

- Review of the availability of ballast water treatment technologies

• Organizational arrangements related to the evaluation and approval of ballast water management systems

• Proposed amendments to regulation B-3 of the BWM Convention

• Code for approval of ballast water management systems

• Contingency measures

• Ballast water exchange

• Survey and certification

• Proposed amendments to guidelines and circulars

• Outcome of PPR 4

- Guidance on methodologies that may be used for enumerating viable organisms

- System Design Limitations

- Ballast Water Management – How to do it

- Experience-building phase

- Information on other matters related to ballast water management

Amendments to Regulation B-3

• (B-3/5): A ship constructed on or after 8 September 2017 shall at least meets the D-2 standard

• Ships constructed before September 8, 2017, are to comply with the D-2 standard at:- (B-3/10.1): the first MARPOL IOPP renewal survey after 8 September

2017 if :

- (B-3/10.1.1): this survey is completed on or after 8 September 2019; or

- (B-3/10.1.2): this survey is completed on or after 8 September 2014 but prior to 8 September 2017

- (B-3/10.2): the second IOPP renewal survey after 8 Sept 2017 if the first renewal survey after 8 Sept 2017 is completed prior to 8 September 2019, provided that the conditions of paragraph (B-3/10.1.2) are not met

- (B-3/8): A ship constructed before 8 September 2017 to which the IOPP renewal survey does not apply, shall meet the D-2 standard from the date decided by the Administration, but not later than 8 September 2024.

Amendments to Regulation B-3

OR

Sep 8

2024

Ships constructed before September 8, 2017

BWMC Entry

Into Force

Sep 8

20232019 2020 2021 2022

Sep 8 Sep 8 Sep 8 Sep 8 Sep 8

Reg B-3/10.1.2

does not apply

D-2 Compliance

D-2 Compliance

2nd

IOPP Ren Svy1st

IOPP Ren Svy

completed > EIF*completed > EIF*

Reg B-3/10.2

applies only if

Reg B-3/10.1.2

Sep 8 Sep 8 Sep 8Sep 8

2014 2015 2016 2017

Reg B-3/5Ships not subject to IOPP Certification

D-2 Compliance not later than Sep 8, 2024

2018

IOPP Ren Svy Completed 1st

IOPP Ren Svy completed ≥ EIF

Reg B-3/10.1.1D-2 Compliance

1st

IOPP Ren Svy completed ≥ Sep 8, 2019

• Technically equivalent to 2016 revised G8 (MEPC.279(70)

• Systems approved in accordance with 2016 G8 are deemed compliant with the Code

• Systems approved in accordance with the earlier versions of G8 (MEPC.125(53) and MEPC.174(58)) not later than 28 October 2018 may be installed on board ships until 28 October 2020

Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems

© imo

• Ships operating in sea areas where Ballast Water Exchange in accordance with regulations B-4.1 and D-1 is not possible- Engaged in geographically constrained

voyages

- Must record the reason why exchange was not conducted

- Not expected to meet performance standard in advance of D-2 compliance date

• Adopted revised Guidelines for BWE (G6) including updated, example ballast water reporting form

Ballast Water Exchange

• Guidelines on Contingency Measures- Actions predetermined in the Ballast Water Management plan

- Discharge to another vessels or shore facility

- Managing all or part of the ballast water in a method acceptable to the port

- BWE as agreed by the ship and port State

- Other operational actions (e.g. modifying sailing, internal transfer or the retention of ballast water on board the ship)

• Experience building phase- Non-penalization of early adopters

- Data gathering

- Data analysis

- Convention review

Contingency Measures and Experience Building Phase

Agenda Item 5: Air Pollution From Ships


• Outcome of PPR 4

- 2017 Guidelines for the discharge of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) bleed-off water

- Revision of the 2011 SCR Guidelines

- Review of the 2015 Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems

• Air Pollution from Ships

- Fuel oil quality

- Sulphur monitoring for 2016

- Unified Interpretation on engine test cycles required by the NOX Technical Code 2008

- Unified fuel oil verification procedure for different kinds of fuel oil samples

• Energy Efficiency of Ships

- EEDI reviews required under regulation 21.6 of MARPOL Annex VI

- Minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships in adverse conditions

- Review of reduction factors for existing ships which have undergone major conversion

- Relevant information on energy efficiency of ships

• Efficient Implementation of Marpol Annex VI Provisions

• MEPC 72 adopted:- The designation of the Baltic Sea as an ECA for

nitrogen oxides.

- The designation of the North Sea as an ECA for nitrogen oxides.

• Applies to ships constructed on or after January 1,2021 and operating in the Baltic and North Sea ECAs except for ships having:- a length less than 24m and specifically designed/used for recreational purposes; or

- a combined propulsion power less than 750kW that cannot comply due to design or construction limitations

• Temporary exemptions immediately following building of the ship converting/repairing and/or maintenance work at a shipyard located in ECA, if the ship is undertaking sea trials or follows a direct route inside the ECA(s) to or from the shipyard

New NOx Emission Control Areas


• A new work program included in thePPR S/C agenda for 2018-2019:- Transitional issues when shifting to the 0.50% m/m

sulphur limit;

- Possible impact on fuel and machinery systems

- verification/control actions to ensure compliance;

- Standard format for reporting fuel oil non-availability;

- Guidance to assist stakeholders in assessing the sulphur content of fuel oil delivered to the ship

- Safety implications with regard to using blended fuels to meet the 0.50% sulphur limit; and,

- Any consequential regulatory amendments and/or guidelines needed to address the above issues.

• ISO has also been requested to consider the framework of ISO 8217 with a view to ensure consistency between the relevant ISO standards on marine fuel oils and the Implementation of the global 0.50% sulphur limit.

Consistent Implementation of the Global 0.50% Sulphur Limit


• MEPC72 adopted revisions to Appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI (information to be included in the BDN)

• Now allows for the option to document the sulphur content specified by the purchaser which may exceed relevant limit values:- for use on ships fitted with SOx abatement

equipment

- or undergoing emission reduction and control technology research.

• The amendment enters into force on January 1, 2019

Bunker Delivery Note (BDN)


• 2017 Guidelines for the discharge of EGR bleed-off water - It is proposed that turbidity should not be included in

the bleed-off requirement

- PPR5 for finalisation and back to MEPC for adoption at MEPC 73.

• 2017 SCR Guidelines addressing aspects to theNOx Technical Code 2008- MEPC 71 adopted by a new Resolution.

- The revisions clarify certain aspects of testing, surveying and certification of engines equipped with SCR systems

• Review of the 2015 Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems - PPR5 for consideration.

Outcome of PPR4


• CG on Fuel oil quality – MEPC 71/5/3- Annex 1: Best Practice for Fuel Oil Purchaser/User for Assuring the Quality of Fuel Oil.

• Choice of quality oriented fuel oil provider

• Contracting

• Documentation

• Fuel Oil Handling On Board

• Fuel oil Sampling and Testing

• Dispute resolution

• Aspects with regard to other entities involved in a fuel oil transaction

- Annex 2: Best Practice For Member State/Coastal State

- New Annex: Best practice for fuel oil suppliers to be developed and included in the next report to be submitted at MEPC72

Fuel Oil Quality


Sulphur Monitoring for 2016


Total number of samples tested : 143,141

Corresponding quantity: 123,171,609 tonnes

Total number of samples tested : 71,901

Corresponding quantity: 11,362,954 tonnes

• Ro-ro cargo and ro-ro passenger ships - MEPC 71/5/14

EEDI reviews under Reg. 21.6


• Correction factors for ice class ships - MEPC 71/5/2 Implementation of EEDI for ice class ships:

� Restrictions on implementation of energy saving deviceson ice class ships

� Necessity to include the minimum propulsion powerrequirements of classification societies along with IMO's Guidelines for determining minimum propulsion power

� Not introducing EEDI for higher than 1А Super iceclass ships.

- MEPC 71/5/6 - new ice class correction factors for capacity:

� The correction factor for capacity fc should be considered together with the correction factor for the power fj.

- MEPC 71/5/7 - amendments to MARPOL Annex VI for exemption of ice class vessels higher than IA Super:

� The CG shall consider the issue on the exemption of ice class ships higher than IA Super.

EEDI Reviews Under Reg. 21.6


• EEDI review beyond phase 2 - MEPC 71/5/12- A CG established to review EEDI phase 3 requirements, with possibility:

• Of advancing the phase 3 implementation datefrom 2025 to 2022 after resolving concerns about maintaining minimum propulsion power.

• Consider whether a new set of phase 4 EEDI reduction rates should be introduced,

- The CG will also consider:

• the necessity of amending attained EEDI calculation guidelines relating to ice classed ships

• associated correction factors and applicationof EEDI requirements to ships with ice classes higher than IA Super.

- The group is expected to complete its work and submit a final report to MEPC 74 in 2019.



• Reduction factors for existing ships which have undergone major conversion (MEPC 71/5/11)

• Energy Efficiency Design Index (required EEDI) apply to- each new ship,

- each new ship which has undergone a major conversion and

- each new or existing ship which has undergone a major conversion, that is so extensive that the ship is regarded by the Administration as a newly-constructed ship.

• Proposal: When an existing ship has undergone a major conversion, phase 0 should be applied regardless the time of the conversion.

• MEPC endorsed the view:- The ship shall comply with the EEDI requirements at the time of

the conversion.

- Administration will consider if the conversion is considered major


• Progress has been made on the development of amendments to the Guidelines

• It was decided that the draft revised Guidelines were still not at a suitable stage to be finalized at this session.

• Accordingly, it was decided to:- consider the issue further at MEPC 72

- to extend the applicability of the 2013 Interim Guidelines to phase 2 EEDI requirements as an interim solution.

- keep the MSC informed of the on-going work

Minimum Propulsion Power

© Tappasan Phurisamrit / Shutterstock

• New Regulation 22A: Collection and reporting of ship fuel consumption data

Agenda item 6 : IMO Data Collection System (DCS)

• Ships above 5000 GT on international voyages to collect and report data for the calendar year:

- Fuel consumption, by fuel type, in MT and methods used for collecting fuel consumption data

- Distance travelled

- Hours underway

• MEPC71 Approved:

- The Guidelines for Administration data verification procedures

- The Guidelines for the development and management of the IMO Ship Fuel Consumption Database keeping the ships anonymized and ensuring the completeness of the database

- The draft MEPC circular to address non-Party ships submitting data to the IMO Ship Fuel Consumption Database

A summary report for the MEPC on an annual basis, including:

- Annual fuel consumption by fuel type,

- aggregated data on FO consumption, distance travelled and hoursunderway by ship type,

- the number of ships registered in the Party of Annex VI, above 5,000 GTfor which data was not received

CO2: IMO Data Collection System (DCS)

• Proposed amendments to add number of passengers to the standardized data reporting format

• Method used to measure fuel oil consumption:

- Method using BDNs,

- Method using flow meters,

- Method using bunker fuel tank monitoring

IMO DCS STANDARDIZED DATA REPORTING FORMAT

Roadmap for IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG EmissionsOctober 2016 (MEPC 70) Adoption of Data Collection System (DCS)

Approval of Roadmap

Week before MEPC 71 Intersessional meeting to start discussions on a comprehensive IMO strategy

July 2017 (MEPC 71) Discussion continues

October 2017 Intersessional meeting

Week before MEPC 72 Intersessional meeting

Spring 2018 (MEPC 72) Adoption of initial IMO Strategy (including short-, mid- and long term measures)

January 2019 Start of Phase 1: Data collection (Ships to collect data)

Spring 2019 (MEPC 74) Discussion continuesInitiation of Fourth IMO GHG Study using data from 2012-2018

Summer 2020 Data for 2019 to be reported to IMO

Roadmap for IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions

Autumn 2020 (MEPC 76) Start of Phase 2: data analysis (no later than autumn 2020)Publication of Fourth IMO GHG Study for consideration by MEPC 76

Spring 2021 (MEPC 77) Initiation of work for adjustments on Initial IMO Strategy, based on DCS data

Summer 2021 Data for 2020 to be reported to IMO

Spring 2022 (MEPC 78) Phase 3: Decision stepSecretariat report summarizing the 2020 data

Spring 2023 (MEPC 80) Data for 2021 to be reported to IMO

Summer 2022 Adoption of Revised IMO Strategy (short-, mid- and long-term measures)Secretariat report summarizing the 2021 data pursuant to regulation 22A.10

1. Preamble/introduction/context including emission scenarios

2. Vision

3. Levels of ambition

4. Guiding principles

5. List of candidate short-, mid- and long-term further measures with possible timelines and their impacts on States

6. Barriers and supportive measures; capacity building and technical cooperation; R&D

7. Follow-up actions towards the development of the revised strategy

8. Periodic review of the Strategy

Draft Outline of the Structure of the Initial Strategy

• EC published proposal for CO2 emissions MRV Regulation on 28 June 2013

• Approved by EU Parliament on 29 April 2015 as Regulation (EU) 2015/757

• Entry into force:1 July 2015

• Ships above 5,000 GT on voyages to, from and between EU ports

CO2: EU Monitoring, Reporting & Verification

Company Confidential

ESSF Groups: Best Practice Papers

Company Confidential

Monitoring Verification and Accreditation

Consideration of Voyages and Ports of Call for the

Monitoring

Best Practice for Verifiers on the Use of

External Ship’s Tracking Data in the Risk Assessment

Determination Of Cargo Carried Best Practices on Recommendations for Improvement

by Verifiers

Guidance on Estimated Index Value (EIV) Guidance for Materiality and Sampling

Guidance on LNG BOG Monitoring Best Practices on Backward Assessment of MPs

Guidance on Fuel Monitoring Verification of The Emissions Report

Guidance on the Determination of Distance Travelled

and Time Spent at Sea

Best Practices Assessment Verifiers National

Accreditation Bodies

Recommendations on Guidance for the Preparation of

Monitoring Plans

Guidance on the situation in which the Accreditation is

Suspended or Withdrawn.

Guidance On Monitoring Methods For Ships Using

The Exemption From Per-voyage Monitoring

Practical Guidance On Relevant Issues For Verifiers

Assessing Monitoring Plans

• EC announced a roadmap on the revision of the EU MRV in view of its alignment to the IMO Data Collection System

A. No alignment: Two sets of data are to be monitored, two different verification approaches are applied and EU data are to be published.

B. Full alignment: The EU-MRV is fully aligned to the IMO data collection system but ships using EEA ports have to submit reports in both systems with the reports for the EU system only covering voyages from and to EEA ports.

C. Partial alignment: EU MRV is maintained, including all elements (monitoring, reporting, verification and publication). Similar elements are harmonised in order to minimize administrative burden.

• The roadmap will be available for feedback until 19th July:- http://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2017-3112662_en

• The impact assessment will include intensive stakeholder consultations- A 12-week open public consultation, and at least one dedicated ad-hoc experts' workshop

• Publication of EC final proposal is being expected the 2nd quarter of 2018.

EC roadmap on the revision of the EU MRV Regulation

abs mepc 71 update 10july17 - mariko … · - mepc 71/5/2 implementation of eedi for ice class...

Documents