abstract - acadpubl.eu · 2dept. of visual media & communication amrita school of arts and...

SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED PHOTOGRAPHS OF KEVIN CARTER

1Dilna.T and

2M.A.Krishnakumar

Master of Journalism & Mass Communication

Dept. of Visual Media & Communication

Amrita School of Arts and Sciences, Kochi

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.

9496091807

[email protected]

2Dept. of Visual Media & Communication

Amrita School of Arts and Sciences, Kochi

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.

9895127272

[email protected]

Abstract

The language of the photograph, today, is widely used in conveying ideas, stories, and

messages. The acceptance of photography, therefore, is increasing day by day. This paper

tries to analyze the storytelling powers of photographs. The study focuses on Kevin

Carter’s selected photographs and to substantiate the argument that photographs as a

powerful artistic media. Methodology of this research is visual analysis of photographs by

Kevin Carter using semiotic theory.

Key Words:photograph, Kevin Carter, Artistic, Semiotic Analysis

International Journal of Pure and Applied MathematicsVolume 119 No. 15 2018, 1801-1814ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)url: http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/Special Issue http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/

1801

Introduction

Kevin Carter is known as the famous South African photojournalist who receivedPulitzer

Prize for his photo that delineated the starvation in Sudan, 1993. He passed away at 33

years old by submitted suicide. Carter was the first to photo an open execution named

"necklacing" by dark Africans in South Africa in the mid-1980s. Carter later discussed the

pictures as I was shocked at what they were doing. At that point individuals began

discussing those photos, at that point I felt that perhaps my developments had not been at

all awful. Carter shot an image of what seemed to be a little girl, tumbled to the ground

from starvation, while a vulture prowled on the ground nearby.The photograph was sold to

The New York Times and first showed up on 26 March 1993 and cartel around the world.

Several individuals called the daily paper to solicit the fortune from the young lady.The

paper said that according to Carter, she improved enough to recommence her trudge after

the vulture was dashed away.Numerous essayists put the visual at the bleeding edge of the

social formation of social life in show day Western social orders, connoting that much

importance is conveyed by the visual.Within this framework, this paper sets out to inspect

the contexts in which Kevin Carter can reflect documentary photography. This

studyinvestigates how unique putting as a creator and distinctive portrayals of the subjects,

living and passing on, withphotography as a tool of change impactssignificance making,

and what that implies for narrative photography as an instrument of social change. In this

paper tries to analyses the selected photographs of Kevin Carter i.e. ‘The vulture and the

little girl’,this photo won a Pulitzer Prize for Feature photography, 'Little girl in Sudan'

and‘Famine in Sudan’ Methodology of this research is content analysis by studying the

semiotic aspects of selected photographs of Kevin Carter.

Literature Review

In Mark Osterman History and evolution of photography George Eastman House

International Museum of Photography and Film states thatthe Greek words photos and

graphics together signify, Light drawing.Now a day, photography is controlled to fit

advanced imaging, yet in its exquisite frame, a photo may best be portrayed as a sensibly

constant picture made by the impact of light on a synthetic element. Light is vitality as the

noticeable range. Assuming light or some other undetectable wavelength of vitality isn't

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

1802

utilized to make the last picture by substance implies, it can't, by this definition, be a photo.

Photography was not the result of only one man

Visual messages become an individual form of aesthetic wealth that enriches our

daily lives, which cannot be conveyed in words without great loss (Scharfstein, 2009, p.6).

Art philosopher Scharfstein Art without borders: A philosophical exploration of Art and

Humanity (2009) states that the cerebrum needs interest to test its general surroundings and

the interest needs the creative energy as a stage to investigate and review. Creative energy,

needs craftsmanship, or, rather, appears as workmanship, keeping in mind the end goal to

make its envisioned conceivable outcomes less criminal, more unmistakable, and more

available to investigation. On account of lacking craftsmanship, our imaginative capacities

would not cumulate or have workmanship's considerable bodies to examine and survey, it

would be harder for us 38 to keep our leverage alive by drawing in ourselves with any of

workmanship's various structures. Scharfstein cleared up that without craftsmanship and

the imaginative capacity individuals would be essentially sadder, blunter types of

themselves. We all in all have a need and a longing to make. Workmanship is the

instrument we use with a specific end goal to give virtual nearness to everything that

premiums us however isn't adequately sufficiently present to beat the fretfulness of a

creative energy excessively sit out of gear for its own particular solace (Scharfstein, 2009,

p. 3).

Yeong, W.X. (2013) in his research Our Failure of Empathy: Kevin Carter, Susan

Sontag, and the Problems of Photography states that it is, generally speaking; self-

evidenthow a photo like Carter's may empower enthusiastic recognizable proof through the

methods for its visual effect. Survey a photo includes focusing regarding its matter, and any

consideration, regardless of how weak, is normally desirable over numbness and lack of

concern. At the point when Carter's photograph was first circulated in the New York Times

on 26 March 1993, the picture started a noisy worldwide clamor, with several perusers

reaching the daily paper and requesting to know a definitive destiny of the young lady who

gave an unmistakable human picture to the far off emergency in Sudan (the paper detailed

that the young lady had enough quality to leave the vulture, however it was obscure

whether she achieved the sustaining Center). One could even estimate that the 'photo that


1803

influenced the world to sob' may have accomplished more to incite gifts to compassionate

associations supporting Sudanese starvation casualties than a large number of different

articles or discourses amid the time. At the end of the day, societal commitments may

struggle with proficient obligations—the expenses of not giving quick guide to people in

trouble should be estimated against the advantages of raising worldwide mindfulness about

the circumstance.

Macleod/Johannesburg, (2001) in his research The Life and Death of Kevin Carter

states that thepicture forecasted no festival: a youngster scarcely alive, a vulture so

energetic for carcass. However, the photo that exemplified Sudan's starvation would win

Kevin Carter acclaim and trusts in tying down a vocation spent harassing the news,

outsourcing in combat areas, sitting tight restlessly for assignments in the midst of critical

funds, remaining in the line of flame for that one fantastic picture. On May 23, 14 months

resulting to getting that basic scene, Carter walked around to the dais in the conventional

rotunda of Columbia University's Low Memorial Library and got the Pulitzer Prize for

feature photography.There would be brief period for that. Two months’ consequent to

tolerating his Pulitzer, Carter would be dead of carbon monoxide hurting in Johannesburg,

a suicide at 33. I’m to a great degree tragic, he cleared up in a note left on the voyager

arrange underneath a rucksack. The torment of life abrogates the delight to the point that

euphoria does not exist.

Clinder, in his research Kevin Carter: The Consequences of Photojournalism states

thatin 1994, South African photojournalist Kevin Carter won the Pulitzer Prize for his

maddening photograph of a Sudanese youngster being stalked by a vulture. That same year,

Kevin Carter submitted suicide.In Sudan, close to the town of Ayod, Carter found a little,

anorexic baby attempting to advance toward the nourishment station. When she ended to

rest, a vulture landed close-by with his eyes on the young girl. Carter took twenty minutes

to take the photo, requiring the most perfect possible, before seeking after the winged

creature away. The photo was conveyed in The New York Times in March of 1993 and

began a wide reaction. People expected to understand what happened the adolescent, and if

Carter had helped her. The Times issued a declaration saying that the young girl could

impact it to the sustenance to station, however past that, no one grasps the final product for


1804

her.Along these lines, Carter was shelled with inquiries regarding why he didn't help the

young lady and just utilized her to take a photo.

In any case, Carter was working when photojournalists were prompted not to touch

starvation setbacks motivated by a suspicious dread of spreading disease.Carter assessed

that there were twenty individuals for each hour biting the dust at the nourishment focus.

Carter's suicide isn't a quick result of the Sudanese youth, nor the assertions that he sorted

out the scene, or responses that he didn't help her. Carter had spiraled into a distress, to

which various things were a factor, his work as a photojournalist in 1980s Africa surely an

enormous bit of it.

Geurts, in her research The Atrocity of Representing Atrocity. Watching Kevin Carter’s

Struggling Girlstates that at the moment Kevin Carter's photo of an extremely youthful,

starving Sudanese kid, being nearly viewed by a moving toward vulture, was distributed in

the New York Times on March 26, 1993, observers did not respond in the way they should

respond. Outrage pictures are customarily used to give onlookers a chance to feel candidly

associated with the captured subject, yet this particular photo did not prevail with regards

to stirring its coveted effects. Namely, the observers of Carter's photo responded with

something other than the proposed sentiments of sympathy and blame for the envisioned

casualty. They concentrated on something that was not truly noticeable in the photo: the

photographer.

Regardless of the way that not anything in the picture double-crosses the nearness of the

picture taker neither the youngster nor the vulture investigates the camera all things

considered observers went so far as to reinsert the photo again into its unique setting to

remake the experience between the photographic artist and the captured subject.

In Remembering Kevin Carter and the photo that made the world weepstatesthat

Kevin Carter was a respect winning South African photojournalist and individual from the

Bang-Bang Club. He was the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize for his photograph depicting the

1993 starvation in Sudan. Following the triumphant of the Pulitzer Prize, he submitted

suicide at 33 years old.


1805

In March 1993, while on an trip to Sudan, Carter was preparing to photograph a

starving little tyke endeavoring to accomplish a managing center when a hooded vulture

landed close-by. Carter declared taking the photograph, since it was his "occupation title",

and leaving Sold to the New York Times, the photograph at first appeared on 26 March

1993 and was passed on in various distinctive day by day papers far and wide. Numerous

people achieved the Times to request the fate from the young woman. The paper uncovered

that it was dark whether she had made sense of how to accomplish the feeding center. On

May 23, 14 months in the wake of getting that basic scene, Carter walked around to the

phase in the customary rotunda of Columbia University's Low Memorial Library and got

the Pulitzer Prize for feature photography.

Methodology

Semiotics is the scientific study of signs and denotations of meaning. For a sign to exist

there must mean or substance (the implied) showed through some type of articulation or

portrayal (the sign). A Swiss etymologist named Ferdinand de Saussure, who contended

that that composed and visual dialect is an arrangement of signs, which is partitioned into

two sections; a signifier and Signified, concocted semiotics. The signifier is the type of the

message, so in photography, it will be a picture that we see that is effortlessly conspicuous

and the meant is the idea of the signifier. Visual semiotics stresses the ways visuals impart

and the framework overwhelming their utilization. As a mechanical assembly specifically

connected with culture, semiotics is on a very basic level different from the conventional

feedback. Clearly, conventional feedback principally investigations the stylish question or

the content as indicated by their face esteems. By the by, semiotics transcendently enquires

into the routes through which the importance is made as opposed to just researching what it

is. The techniques for this examination will be a combination of the writing on the notable

photographs and a semiotic investigation of the picked photographs, hunting down topics

and picking up an enthusiastic comprehension of the pictures. Semiology is a train that

elucidates each sense under each picture we see, and it uncovers the comprehension of each

reality we witness. The reason for a semiotic examination is to comprehend the importance

of the picture, which emerges from understanding the social setting in which the pictures


1806

were created and inside the pictures themselves, and also from the brains of the group of

onlooker’s individuals.

Hypothesis

The main hypotheses put forward in this study includes: -

Photographs become the powerful storyteller.

Photojournalism influence minds than verbal communication.

Photojournalism became an effective way to raise issues. It is evident from the

photos of Kevin Carter.

Content Analysis

Individuals are especially touchy to photos including children. At the point when people

see kids they for the most part consider their own particular children or children they are

known to and subsequently the guilelessness they by and large have. people regularly

appreciate the wide-looked at guilelessness that might be found in kids, significantly as a

result of they need not nonetheless been presented to the hardships and intense encounters

which will be proficient as they develop Seeing a child in an agony or languishing is most

difficult over individuals since they have not successfully merit it, while photos of grown-

ups in such circumstances may inspire a more saved reaction.

The Vulture and the Little Girl

The vulture and the little girl, otherwise called struggling Girl, is a photo by Kevin Carter,

which initially showed up inThe New York Times on 26 March 1993. It is a photo of a

slight starvation stricken child fallen in the frontal area with a vulture peering toward her

from adjacent. She was accounted for to endeavor to achieve a United Nations nourishing

focus in Ayod, South Sudan at some point in March 1993.The photo won the Pulitzer Prize

for Feature Photography grant in 1994 and was picked as Picture of the Year by The

American Magazine.


1807

Little girl in Sudan

A starving oppressed girl begs a passerby who clearly is not affected by the lack of food

(1993) is a photograph by Kevin Carter. This helpful fiasco was caused essentially by

human rights manhandle, and in addition dry spell and the disappointment of the universal

group to respond to the starvation chance with satisfactory speed. The most noticeably bad

influenced space was Bahr el Ghazal in southwestern Sudan amid this area, more than

70,000 people passed on all through the starvation.

Famine in Sudan

Sudan ‘famine’ our problem is nothing compared to what people in other countries endure.

This is a perfect example of a utilitarian view of photojournalism. It is graphic and it sends

the message that this is what people in Sudan are dealing with.

The Vulture and the Little Girl

Figure 1.

In this image, it can be noticed that the vulture is focusing diagonally on the child, which

also adds interest. This was central to carter’s photo and what more is the power of the

photo to capture viewer’s attention. Looking at the photo from a technical point of view,

human eyes will be normally attracted to the "third" of the photos. We can find a vulture

and a starving child at the intersection of the thirds, which is the only element in the barren

background and draws out the attention of the viewer’s central focus.

Figure 2.

In this image, it can be found that the foreground and the middle ground are sharply

focused. The background and the color of the objects are completely contrast and opposite.

The photographer has used natural lighting in this photo.

Figure 3.

Here both vulture and the child are sharply focused. In this image can find that the vulture

is just a couple of feet from the child.The photograph is a long shot as there is a positional

connection between the girl and the vulture and their setting This image clearly speaks the


1808

situation of Sudan. Thisphoto won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography in 1994 and

was taken by Kevin Carter though covering the starvation in Sudan in 1993

The photo is a tragic photograph of a small child attempting to make it to the UN camp that

was disseminating nourishment to the keeping individuals from the region. Kevin Carter

got genuine feedback following the production of the picture inside The New York Times

on Marchtwenty-six, 1993. many months once accepting the prize, he submitted suicide,

going his photographs behind as his inheritance.

Figure 4.

In semiotic perspective where each element i.e. the girl, hunting vulture all has a meaning

in itself. Therefore, the emaciated and anorexic girl in the picture enduring in Sudan would

itself deliver an exceptional and enthralling response. It is obvious from the girl’s body that

she is suffering and her country to is facing serious issues of starvation. It can also draw out

that she is in immense pain and she could not even support her own weightWhat makes the

photo all the more convincing is the vulture behind her with a hunting eye. The presence of

vulture straightaway passes on to the watcher that the girl is moving toward her demise and

also the scavenger is waiting to kill her body after she dies Vulture being a predator we can

see it focusing directly on the prey that is the child. Seeing the weak body of the child, the

vulture finds its prey in the child.

Little girl in Sudan

A starving oppressed girl begs a passerby who clearly appears to be rich (1993) is a

photograph by Kevin Carter. This compassionate debacle was caused primarily by human

rights mishandle, and in addition dry spell and the disappointment of the global group to

respond to the starvation chance with satisfactory speed. The most exceedingly bad

influenced region was Bahr el Ghazal in southwestern Sudan. amid this district, more than

70,000 people passed on all through the starvation.

Figure 1.

In this image, it can be traced that the starving girl is diagonally focusing the food in the

man’s hand, which symbolizes. This image is of a famine victim in a feeding center (1993)


1809

in South Sudan. The semiotics of this photo is the pain, struggle, hunger, survival, races,

and homelessness. A beat down city, sickness, starvation, a skeleton like a girl. In this

image, the starving girl is diagonally focusing the food in the man's hand.

Figure 2.

The color of the image (black and white) creates a mood. A sad, upsetting, depressing

mood. The image shows poverty and the power of others, to take away the most important

things we take for granted (food, water). The dark colors fit the dark situation the man is in;

the black in the image creates the negative feelings of the photo, which are the pain,

neglect, sadness, sympathy, and hunger. The contrast of the black and white colors

represents the two sides of the world. The rich and the poverty-stricken, black

underdeveloped countries. The negation of the mainstream white community on the

marginalized sect of society is implicitly conveyed in this picture. The authorities and the

powerful turn their back and walk away from the harsh relatives of the people.

Famine in Sudan

Figure 1.

In this image, it can be noticed that the child is sharply focused. Here tears from the eyes

and his weak body symbolize poverty. This photograph explicitly clear and open coveys

the straight meanings.

Figure 2.

In this image can be noticed that the neutral tone color represents sadness.Sudan ‘famine’

our problem is nothing compared to what people in other countries endure. This is a perfect

example of a utilitarian view of photojournalism.

Conclusion

Individuals of any age, races, sexual orientations, and ethnicities can make utilization of

these medium. Picture takers have utilized their pictures to reveal treacheries in the public

arena, denounce wars, and divulge the nobility of mankind. This research attends the issue

of social change, as it trusts that pictures convey what is going on in the public eye.


1810

Photography's particular qualities, to be watchful on later amid this investigation, set itself

up to end up society's vital visual too.

It is believed that the reason for a camera is to engage experts to see the world from another

vantage point. Congruently, common value incorporates the exhibit of making sense of

how to picture stuffs from an unmistakable purpose behind read.

Semiotics can be viewed as the urgent expertise for individuals who need to comprehend

the intricacy and precise investigation of media, which is an imperative component of the

advanced world. The individuals who don't have this basic expertise are in peril of those

gifted ones, where their own particular conclusions will control them. The explanation

behind this photograph is to pull at people's heartstrings, to persuade them to understand

and witness firsthand the edgy condition that Africans are going up against.It additionally

unmistakably addresses the social and political issues of Sudan. The common war is for the

most part what was causing the serious starvation in Sudan, which is depicted in the

photograph.

The two most striking components that shape our feelings and musings on the picture are

the crumpled youngster and the vulture. The tyke, for the most part observed as the all-

around guiltless character throughout everyday life. one defenseless needing sustaining and

mind stalked by an on looking vulture, a scrounger winged creature speaking to death. The

two segments of the picture cooperate to frame a troubling account in our psyches. A third

component introduce that isn't typically as talked about while analyzing a picture was the

person behind the camera.

In semiotics these image is known as a delineative photograph, that present us with a hauls

a result of they typically seem to possess been caused by real events (Sean Hall 2007,

16) the utilization of philosophical theory during these had empowered watchers to get a

handle on the impression of the real word.

Here we understand the esteem and adequacy of Semiotics which enables the perusers to

see and see how significance is constructed and disregarded in a visual picture of Kevin

Carter's photos. Furthermore, it empowers the watchers to consider a scope of implications


1811

and attributions that are offered from blends of signs in the edge. This picture conveys

uncertainty to Theist watchers, regardless of whether if God exists or not.

References

Carter, K. (1993, March). Famine in sudan [Photograph]. Sudan.

Carter, K. (1993, March). Little girl in Sudan [Photograph]. Sudan.

Carter, K. (1993, March). The vulture and the little girl [Photograph]. Sudan.

Geurts, M. (2015). The Atrocity of Representing Atrocity. Watching Kevin Carter’s ‘Struggling Girl’.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Carter.

Life and death of kevin carter. (2001). SCOTT MACLEOD/JOHANNESBURG

OSTERMAN, M., & ROMER, G. B. (n.d.). HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF PHOTOGRAPHY. Retrieved

January 25, 2018, from

http://www.bing.com/cr?IG=DD40BC55F81C443C8E912359F7D7EA56&CID=08086E6D4049678E1

58665EF41E666DC&rd=1&h=faAKmn5QW049DEM3isy6Qgc-zDANSWc51fC0E-

KthXw&v=1&r=http%3a%2f%2ffaculty.georgetown.edu%2firvinem%2ftheory%2fOsterman-

Romer-history-of-photography-ex.pdf&p=DevEx,5067.1

2016).

Kevin Carter Photographer. Retrieved January 17, 2018, from

http://www.kevincarterphotographer.com/

Remembering Kevin Carter and the photo that made the world weep. (2014, September 18).

Retrieved January 17, 2018, from

Representational photograph - Sample Essay. (2018, January 16). Retrieved January 25, 2018,

from https://writemyessaynow.net/essays/representational-photograph/

Richin, J. (2011, June). The Blood of the Victim: Revolution in Syria and the Birth of the Image-

Event. Retrieved January 25, 2018, from http://www.e-flux.com/journal/the-blood-of-the-victim-

revolution-in-syria-and-the-birth-of-the-image-event/


1812

Scharfstein, B. (2009). Art Without Borders. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226736112.001.0001

Visual Analysis. (2011, February 15). Retrieved January 25, 2018, from

https://nicholasmroberts.wordpress.com/visual-analysis/

Yeong, W. K. (2013). 'Our Failure of Empathy': Kevin Carter, Susan Sontag, and the Problems of

Photography. Retrieved January 17, 2018, from

http://www.academia.edu/9936478/_Our_Failure_of_Empathy_Kevin_Carter_Susan_Sontag_and

_the_Problems_of_Photography


1813

abstract - acadpubl.eu · 2dept. of visual media & communication amrita school of arts and...

Documents