abstract

36
Abstract Mechanical Inspection and Survey Steven Seiler, NSLS-II Project The Survey and Alignment Group is often the first and last to work with the Storage Ring magnets. Surveyors inspect, characterize and pre-align each magnet then later record the final location of each magnet on a girder assembly. This presentation describes the Survey and Alignment work on Storage Ring magnets with emphasis in the magnet’s local coordinate system creation and pre-alignment method. *Work performed under auspices of the United States Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC02-98CH10886 1

Upload: cassia

Post on 23-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Abstract. Mechanical Inspection and Survey Steven Seiler, NSLS-II Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Abstract

AbstractMechanical Inspection and Survey

 Steven Seiler, NSLS-II Project

  The Survey and Alignment Group is often the first and last to work with the Storage Ring magnets. Surveyors inspect, characterize and pre-align each magnet then later record the final location of each magnet on a girder assembly. This presentation describes the Survey and Alignment work on Storage Ring magnets with emphasis in the magnet’s local coordinate system creation and pre-alignment method.   *Work performed under auspices of the United States Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC02-98CH10886 

1

Page 2: Abstract

2

Mechanical Inspection & SurveyNSLS-II Magnet Workshop

Steve Seiler

April 11, 2012

Page 3: Abstract

3

Outline

• Girder Inspection• Magnet Inspection

– Local Coordinate System Creation• General Sextupole• General Quadrupole• Special Quadrupole

• Magnet Fiducial Discussion• Pre-Alignment• Environmental Room

Page 4: Abstract

4

Page 5: Abstract

5

Girder Inspection

• Goals– Verify drawing

dimensions are w/in tolerance

– Relate Datums to mounting slots and all magnet mounting holes

– Create girder reference file

Page 6: Abstract

6

Girder Inspection

• Two Laser Tracker setups w/ girder on stands (to get bottom datum)

Page 7: Abstract

7

Magnet Inspection

• Goals– Verify ICD

dimensions are w/in tolerance

– Relate mechanical center and orientation to all outside fiducials

– Create magnet reference file

Page 8: Abstract

8

Top Fiducial Frame

• Each of the three top fiducials is measured twice using a pin nest and the 1.5” probe– Once with the CMM arm top joint upstream– Once with the CMM arm top joint downstream

• US/DS points averaged for each fiducial• Frame built such that Y is normal to the

plane of the three averaged fiducials, Z points from fiducial 2 to 3, and the origin is at fiducial 2.

Page 9: Abstract

9

Top Fiducial Frame

X

Y

Z

1

3

2

Page 10: Abstract

10

US/DS Fiducial Planes

• 4 upstream and 3 downstream (most magnets) fiducials define these faces

• Each fiducial is measured with a pin nest and the 1.5” probe tip

• The dZ (with the Magnet Frame active) of the two plane centroids is the mechanical yoke length

Page 11: Abstract

11

US/DS Fiducial Planes

1

2 3

4

1 2

3

Upstream Downstream

Page 12: Abstract

12

Pole Tips (Sextupole)

• Space between pole tips measured from upstream and downstream faces

• Points grouped so that opposite groups form planes– Horizontal (H)– Diagonal 1 (D1)– Diagonal 2 (D2)

• 6 total planes created: – US: H, D1, D2– DS: H, D1, D2

H

D1 D2

Page 13: Abstract

13

Pole Planes/Lines (STP)

• Three lines are created upstream by intersecting each of the upstream planes to each other:– US H / US D1– US H / US D2– US D1 / US D2

• Same for downstream planes

• Points created at each line’s endpoints

Page 14: Abstract

14

Z Axis (STP)

2 plane intersection line

endpoints

2 plane intersection line

endpoints

US Plane DS Plane

US AVG LINE

DS AVG LINE

US US

DS US

DS DSUS DS

US DSZ AXIS

(Side View)

Page 15: Abstract

15

Pole Tips (Quadrupole)

• Space between pole tips measured from upstream and downstream faces

• Points grouped so that opposite groups form planes– Horizontal (H)– Vertical (V)

• 4 total planes created: – US: H, V– DS: H, V

H

V

Page 16: Abstract

16

Pole Planes/Lines (Quad)

• Line created upstream by intersecting the upstream planes to each other:– US H / US V

• Same for downstream planes

• Points created at each line’s endpoints

Page 17: Abstract

17

Z Axis (Quad)

2 plane (H & V) intersection line

endpoints

2 plane (H & V) intersection line

endpoints

US Plane DS Plane

US AVG LINE

DS AVG LINE

US US

DS US

DS DSUS DS

US DSZ AXIS

(Side View)

Page 18: Abstract

18

Pole Tips (Special Quad)

• Space between pole tips measured from upstream and downstream faces

• Points grouped so that opposite groups form plane– Horizontal (H)

H

• Spacer Bars prevent vertical plane from being measured

• Lines fit to Beam Left and Beam Right points

Page 19: Abstract

19

Pole Planes/Lines (Special Quad)

• Lines created through points measured between poles (horizontal plane)

• Points created where these lines intersect the upstream and downstream fiducial planes

• Points averaged to create endpoints for Z axis

Page 20: Abstract

20

Z Axis (Special Quad)US Plane DS Plane

BL DS

US DSZ AXIS

(Top View)

US BLDS

US BLUS

DS BLDS

DS BLUS

BL US

BL DS LINE

BL US LINE

BR DS

US BRDS

US BRUS

DS BRDS

DS BRUS

BR US

BR DS LINE

BR US LINE

PLANELINE

Lines fit through measured points on

Horizontal Plane

Lines fit through measured points on

Horizontal Plane

Horizontal

Plane

Horizontal

Plane

Page 21: Abstract

21

Temporary Magnet Frame

• Sextupoles and General Quadrupoles:– Origin at midpoint of Z AXIS line– Primary axis: Z AXIS line defines +Z– Secondary axis: US Horizontal plane normal defines +Y– “TEMP” frame has correct Z axis, but incorrect roll (only based

on 1 pole plane out of 4 or 6)

• Special Quadrupoles:– Mechanical Frame made directly, no need for “TEMP” Frame– Origin at midpoint of Z AXIS line– Primary axis: Z AXIS line defines +Z– Secondary axis: Normal direction of plane fit through four points

• BL US, BL DS, BR US, BR DS (Intersections of BL and BR lines with US and DS planes)

Page 22: Abstract

22

Magnet Frame

• Sextupole: Rotate “TEMP” Frame to account for other 5 pole planes– US D1, US D2, DS H, DS D1, DS D2

• Normalize each individual deviation from nominal (divide by 6)

• Add together normalized deviations and apply this rotation (Rz) to “TEMP” to create “MECHANICAL” frame

• Quadrupole: Rotate “TEMP” Frame to account for other 3 pole planes– US V, DS H, DS V

• Normalize each individual deviation from nominal (divide by 4)

• Add together normalized deviations and apply this rotation (Rz) to “TEMP” to create “MECHANICAL” frame

Page 23: Abstract

23

Roll

• Mechanical roll that is reported is the relationship (Rz) of the Top Fiducial Frame and the Magnet Frame.

• Top fiducials, US/DS fiducials, and pole tips are measured within a loop. The user determines how many times to iterate the loop and an average Top Fiducial Frame and Magnet Frame is produced as well as a Magnet Frame and roll for each iteration.

Page 24: Abstract

24

Magnet Inspection Data

Page 25: Abstract

25

Fiducial Considerations

• Repeatability– Variation of position under the same

conditions– Test: Fiducial position in different

iterations of magnet inspection

X Y ZAVG STDev (μm) 9 3 8AVG Range (μm) 21 8 20AVG STDev (μm) 11 11 2AVG Range (μm) 26 27 5AVG STDev (μm) 10 8 3AVG Range (μm) 22 21 6

STP-9801-SN1 COORD'S

TOP FID

US FID

DS FID

Most repeatable component (<10 μm) corresponds to banking surface.

Up to 30 μm error from pin nest fit.

Page 26: Abstract

26

Fiducial Considerations

• Reproducibility– Variation of

position under different conditions

– Test: Best fit of magnet fiducials measured with LT to CMM arm inspection file

Magnet # Fids X Y Z MAGMAX Error 28 53 39 59RMS Error 19 27 21 39MAX Error 62 106 38 124RMS Error 31 47 24 61MAX Error 40 61 32 62RMS Error 21 29 17 39MAX Error 42 44 30 53RMS Error 20 23 16 35MAX Error 32 49 22 50RMS Error 16 28 12 34MAX Error 32 32 32 55RMS Error 18 18 21 33MAX Error 31 59 57 77RMS Error 19 34 33 51MAX Error 38 58 36 68RMS Error 21 29 20 42

Fiducials measured in ER from 21 LT positions June 6-7, 2011

C24G4, Best Fit deviations with no weight, all fiducials, scaled.

AVERAGE

9

9

9

8

SM2

QM2

SM1

QM1

Deviation (μm)

QM1

SM1

QM2

9

10

9

Page 27: Abstract

27

Fiducial Type

• Repeatability, durability, cost

Requires pin nest

One less interface

Page 28: Abstract

28

Pre-Alignment

• Goals– Create ideal reference file of populated girder– Use two Laser Trackers to position magnets– Coarsely position magnets in X and Y (~100μm)– Insert and position vacuum chamber

Page 29: Abstract

29

Pre-Alignment Setup

• Two granite blocks & 4 posts w/ control points• Girder stops positioned in line with girder datums•Vibrating wire position in Environmental Room is known relative to girder banking surfaces and control points in P-A

Stops

Page 30: Abstract

30

Pre-Alignment Method

• Hamar Laser– Mechanical X, Y, Pitch, Yaw– Roll from level magnet tops, Z from laser

tracker

• Laser Tracker(s)– Mechanical X, Y, Z, Pitch, Yaw– Magnetic Roll (Requires reliable magnetic

data related to fiducials)– Vacuum chamber aligned to magnet centers

Page 31: Abstract

31

Environmental Room

• Goals– Complete final

alignment of magnets relative to girder

– Record offsets of individual magnets relative to ideal position on girder

– Create aligned reference file

Stops

Page 32: Abstract

32

Typical ER Procedure

• Pre-aligned, populated girder is moved to the ER• Girder is banked against stops replicating the P-A setup• Laser trackers (4 positions) are used to locate Vacuum

Chamber BPM positions relative to the wire V-notches• First run of vibrating wire shows best fit line & deviations• Magnets are moved close to the BPM line and re-

measured• Final offsets of magnets are recorded with vibrating wire

measurement• Reference of final conditions recorded by 12 laser

tracker positions

Page 33: Abstract

33

Aligned Reference File

• 12 Laser Tracker positions record all girder and magnet fiducials as well as all control in the Environmental Room

Page 34: Abstract

34

Environmental Room Data

• ΔX, ΔY– From vibrating wire

• ΔZ– From LT observations on magnet fiducials

• Roll, Pitch, Yaw– From LT observations on magnet fiducials

Page 35: Abstract

35

Typical ER Uncertainty

Target Ux (μm) Uy (μm) Uz (μm)Girder Fiducials 13.8 14.3 11.4Magnet Top Fiducials 14.0 14.1 11.5

URx URy URz dX (mm) dY (mm) dZ (mm) Ux (μm) Uy (μm) Uz (μm)GRD 2, 6 0.006 0.006 0.028 724 0 3150 19.6 20.2 16.1GRD 4 0.004 0.004 0.028 724 0 4572 19.6 20.2 16.1STP-9801 0.170 0.169 0.065 304 0 117 19.8 19.9 16.3QDW-9802 0.153 0.152 0.055 360 0 130 19.8 19.9 16.3QDP-9807 0.061 0.060 0.055 360 0 328 19.8 19.9 16.3

2σ Uncertainty

Approx. Inter-Fiducial Dist. Combined 2 Fid UncEst. Angular Unc (mrad)

Inter-Fiducial Distance

Combined 2 Fiducial Uncertainty

=√(U12+U2

2)

Estimated Angular Uncertainty

Roll

Page 36: Abstract

36

End