academic data for instructional decisions: secondary level

33
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level Dr. Amy Lingo Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project ABRI 2009

Upload: bevis-hopper

Post on 31-Dec-2015

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level. Dr. Amy Lingo Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville. ABRI Defined. ABRI: Academic and Behavior Response to Intervention Pilot program involving 3 districts and representing elementary, middle and high school levels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Academic Data for Instructional Decisions:

Secondary Level

Dr. Amy LingoRegina HirnProject ABRI

University of Louisville

Project ABRI 2009

Page 2: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

ABRI Defined• ABRI: Academic and Behavior Response to

Intervention• Pilot program involving 3 districts and

representing elementary, middle and high school levels

• In partnership with the Kentucky Department of Education

• To promote both academic and behavior responses in schools

Project ABRI 2009

Page 3: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

ABRI Process

Project ABRI 2009

Page 4: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Where can I find academic data at the secondary school level?

• State wide assessment results

• Screening results• District administered

standardized assessment• Teacher administered

formative assessment• Teacher administered

summative assessment

Project ABRI 2009

Page 5: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Data Examples within a Multi-tiered Intervention Model

Project ABRI 2009

Page 6: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Critical to the ABRI Process

Project ABRI 2009

Page 7: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Academic DataReading/Language Arts/English

Project ABRI 2009

Page 8: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Reading/Language Arts/English

• Collection – Year in Review– Screening results

• Compilation– Reformat/export for interpretation– Charts– Graphs– Questioning of results

Project ABRI 2009

Page 9: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Common Assessments (examples)

• Informal Reading Inventory• Reading Assessments• PAS• MAP• GRADE• ACT• Explore/Plan

Page 10: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Eckwall/Shanker Reading Inventory(Can be used through Grade 9)

Subtests• Phonemic Awareness– Skill(s) measured: Phonemic awareness

• Sight Vocabulary; Word List– Skill(s) measured: Word recognition

• Phonics; Structural Analysis– Skill(s) measured: Phonics

• Oral and Silent Reading– Skill(s) measured: Reading connected text

• Listening and Reading Comprehension– Skill(s) measured: Understanding connected text

Page 11: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Qualitative Reading Inventory

• Word List– Skill(s) measured: Word recognition

• Oral and Silent Reading– Skill(s) measured: Reading connected text

• Listening and Reading Comprehension– Skill(s) measured: Understanding connected text

Page 12: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Students who Score Below Benchmark

• In phonemic awareness– practice with rhyming, discriminating, blending, and segmenting

• In phonics or word recognition– practice with letter/sound correspondence, blending, word

families, and multisyllabic words• In reading fluency or reading connected text

– practice with letter recognition, letter/sound correspondence, high frequency words, oral reading

• In comprehension– practice with preparation, organization, elaboration,

metacognition, and text structures,

Page 13: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

• Review data sources – Standardized measures– Curriculum-based measures– Progress monitoring– Informal information (classroom data, observations)

• Identify at-risk students using data• Determine targeted areas for instruction• Students may have multiple areas of need• Consider course offerings or electives

13

Forming Groups Based on Assessment Data

Page 14: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Grade 8 Reading/Language Arts n=48

Project ABRI 2009

Page 15: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

High School Year in Review

Project ABRI 2009

Page 16: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

High School Year in Review

Project ABRI 2009

Page 17: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

High School Year in Review

Project ABRI 2009

Page 18: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Grade 11 KPR Results

Project ABRI 2009

Page 19: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

ACT Scores in English and Reading

Project ABRI 2009

Page 20: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Academic DataMathematics/Algebra/Geometry

Project ABRI 2009

Page 21: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Mathematics

• Collection – Year in Review– Overall Results

• Compilation– Reformatting– Charts– Graphs– Questioning

Project ABRI 2009

Page 22: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Common Assessments

• Fluency Assessments – One Minute Timings• Diagnostic Interviews• Error Analysis of student work• Benchmarking software programs• Course assessments• Credit recovery systems

Page 23: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Fluency Assessments

• One minute timings of basic math facts• Screening tool• 40 digits correct per minute ages 9 to adult– Addition/subtraction– Multiplication/division

Project ABRI 2009

Page 24: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Diagnostic Interviews in Mathematics

• Diagnostic interviews are a means of getting in-depth information about an individual student’s knowledge and mental strategies about the concept under investigation. A student is given a problem and asked to verbalize his or her thinking at points in the process for solving the problem.

Project ABRI 2009

Page 25: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Error Analysis of Student Work

• Problem completion analysis• Think Aloud with error analysis• Conceptual vs. procedural error analysis• Steps/procedures• Prior knowledge• Connections to work, technology, science,

everyday life activities

Project ABRI 2009

Page 26: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Software Programs

• Computer software programs that identify specific goals based on student responses

• Example:– Determines student performance on a variety of

problems identified as easy, medium and hard – Reveals student accuracy with problem types– Course programs– Programs designed to provide practice

Project ABRI 2009

Page 27: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Students who Score Below Benchmark

• In mathematics fluency• In conceptual understanding• In mathematics procedures within word

problems• In application of authentic problems

Page 28: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Grade 8 Mathematics n=50

Project ABRI 2009

Page 29: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Grade 10 Mathematics Results

Project ABRI 2009

Page 30: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

ACT Scores in Mathematics

Project ABRI 2009

Page 31: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Year in Review

Project ABRI 2009

Page 32: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

Sample Fluency Intervention

Great Leaps Math• 2 days per week 4/28 Probe

10 4/4 met benchmark 100%• 3 days per week 7/28 Probe

10 6/7 met benchmark 86%

Project ABRI 2009

Page 33: Academic Data for  Instructional Decisions: Secondary Level

ABRI Process Decision making

Project ABRI 2009