access community gardens in boston · munity gardens. access to community gardens is an issue of...
TRANSCRIPT
Tomeasureaccesstocommunitygardens,anindexwascreatedthatincorporatedfourfac-tors:communitygardenserviceareas(≤0.25milesfromgardensalongthestreetnet-work),numberofcommunitygardenswithintheserviceareas,communitygardensquarefeetper1,000peoplelivinginserviceareas,andpresenceoflongstandingcommunitygardenwaitlistsattheneighborhoodlevel.Thesefactorsweretranslatedto2010U.S.Censusblocks.
Networkanalystwasusedtocreatethecom-munitygardenserviceareas.Aquarter-milewalkablearea,adistancewhichissupportedbyparkequityresearch,waschosentoen-surethatgardenscouldbeaccessibletopar-entswithyoungchildrenandelderlycom-munitymembers.
Walkableareasinsomeneighborhoodsover-lappedconsiderably,whichindicatedin-creasedgardenaccess.Becausetherewasnoclearmethodtoquantifythisoverlap,gar-dencountswithinthewalkableareaswereusedtoup-weighttheseareas.The
numberofgardensineachserviceareawascalculatedbyjoiningthecommunitygardenpointstotheserviceareapoly-gons.Whenserviceareapolygonsover-lapped,serviceareaswiththemaximumnumberofgardenswereassignedtothecorrespondingcensusblocks.
BostonNaturalAreasNetwork(BNAN)providedinformationonlongstandinggardenwaitlistsbyneighborhoodandsquarefootagepergarden.Usingcensusblockpopulationdataandtheserviceare-as,squarefeetofcommunitygar-dens/1,000peoplewascalculated.
Censusblocksoutsideofthequarter-mileareaswerecodedwithaccessscoresofzero.Quantilesofblockswithinthewalk-ableareaswerescoredbyfactors2-4(below),withatotalpossiblescoreof16.Factor2carriedthemostweightbecausetheareaavailablewithinawalkabledis-tancewasthemostimportantfactorre-latedtoaccess.The inalaccessscorewasthenmappedbyquantiles.
Measuringaccesstocommunitygar-densinaholisticwayrequiresas-sessingmultiplefactors:proximity,availabilityandadequacy.InBoston,acitythatcontinuestobeaffectedbyextremeracialsegregation,questionshavebeenraisedabouttheequitabil-ityofaccesstotheCity’s100+com-munitygardens.Accesstocommunitygardensisanissueoffoodjustice,aconceptthatincludestherightofcom-munitiestoproduceandconsumetheirownfood.Theseconcernsmoti-vatedthisproject,whichfocusedonmeasuringaccesstocommunitygar-denspacesandexploringpossibleconnectionstorace,ethnicityandso-cio-economicstatus.
Theresultingaccessindexmapisshown(topleft).Areaswithveryhighaccessarelocatedthroughoutthecity,withnotablepocketsinFenway,Roslindale,RoxburyandDorchester.Ontheotherendofthespectrum,muchofthecityhasloworverylowaccesstogardens.
Ananalysisofsocio-demographiccharac-teristicsofcensusblocksbyaccessscorerevealedafewsurprisingpatterns(right).Aposi-tivecorrelationwasseenbetweenpercentblackandaccess(below)andanegativecorrelationwasseenbetweenpercentwhiteandaccess.Thesecorrelationswerenotintheexpecteddirections,asitwashypothesizedthatpeopleofcolorhaveloweraccesstogardens.Finally,correla-tionmatricesbetweenaccessandhous-ingstatusattheblocklevelandaccessandmedianhouseholdincomeatthetractlevel(notshown)indicatedalackofassociationbetweenthesevariables.
Theseresultsareneithercomprehensivenorconclusive.Improvementscouldbemadetothemethodthatmayalterthere-sults.Additionally,theremightbefactorsrelatedtoaccessthatcouldnotbe
Overview
Factor 3: Garden count score
(1‐4 points)
ACCESS TO COMMUNITY GARDENS IN BOSTON
Methodology
Factor 2: Garden area/popula on
score (2‐8 points)
Factor 4: Waitlist score
(4, 3, or 1 points)
Results and Discussion
incorporatedhere(e.g.,individualtimecon-straints).Conversely,thisindexcouldbeac-curatelyvisualizinganon-the-groundreality.Perhapsaccessishighamongsomecommu-nitiesofcolor,butthereareotherfactorsthatneedtobetakenintoaccounttoencour-agegardening(e.g.,outreach).Finally,addi-tionalcommunity-drivenstrategiestowardfoodjusticemaybemoreeffectivethanafo-cusongardensalone.
Nicole Tichenor | 2012
Sources: MassGIS, BNAN, Boston Redevelopment Authority, U.S. Census Bureau 2010
NAD 1983 State Plane Massachuse s Mainland FIPS, 2001 (US Feet)
Factor 1: Within walkable distance
to gardens