access in groupware: criwg 2012

15
Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals A Matter of Access to Cooperation Systems CRIWG 2012 Michael Prilla, Information and Technology Management, University of Bochum

Upload: michaelprilla

Post on 14-Jun-2015

1.610 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Talk on technology layers providing access to cooperation systems, how they influence the cooperation of individuals and how we can use this in design at CRIWG 2012.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals

A Matter of Access to Cooperation SystemsCRIWG 2012

Michael Prilla, Information and Technology Management, University of Bochum

Page 2: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

„Digital technology is no longer confined to a support role; it is integral to many

activities.“ (J. Grudin, interactions, 2010)

(How) Does this matter for cooperation systems?

Page 3: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

3Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Access to cooperation systemsA motivating example: Twitter

Awareness, Overview, Personalized

Fully fledged, basic access

During travels, Quick AccessFor many: Default

Part of other interaction / information system

Page 4: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

4Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Multiple means for accessing information systems help these systems transcend into everyday life (“What’s app?”)

Page 5: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

5Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

AccessUnderstanding

Access: a vehicle supporting social tasks of individuals conducted in cooperation systems,

Includes

(“process of enactment”, Liu et al. 2008)

Layers (from the perspective of access) technologies used to access cooperation systems technology forming the cooperation system itself

devices, interfaces, sets of functionality , …

Page 6: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

6Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Access makes cooperation systemsattractive,usable and useful in many contexts

What influences the choice of access to cooperation systems?

How can this influence be supported systematically?

Page 7: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

7Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Access: In search of a foundationExisting concepts

Missing combination of access of multiple user groups (vs. focus on special needs) (collaborative) Interaction (focus on individual usage) variation of access for the same system

Media choice

Patterns / Thinklets Technology acceptance

User experience

Universal access / usabilityInteraction acts

Inclusive

designMedia

interactivity

Technologies-in-practiceActivity Theory

Use qualities

Embodiement

Structuration

Theory

Page 8: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

8Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Access in small scale cooperation systemsAn initial investigation

Communication / Cooperation:

Logging in vs. overseeing Embedded in habits:

Metaphor of access

Device / context:

Individual and work specific preferences Distance to digital artefacts:

Lowering the burden of tools

Page 9: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

10Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Personal and situational adequacyDimension of access

Personal (individual, group) adequacy Usage focus Habits and usage metaphor Knowledge and capabilities

Situational adequacy Time for usage Scope of usage Availability and immediacy Functional complexity

Page 10: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

11Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Impact of Access on …

Space and time of usage– Short time interaction e.g. during travels / other work, long

time in other contexts

Context and mental focus of usage– Casual (task in focus vs. parallel)– Focused (single vs. multiple tasks)

Process of usage– Fragmentation: Sustaining usage context over multiple

usage instances– Follow-up / interruption

Page 11: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

12Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Design constraints for AccessSupporting social tasks of individuals

The ability to access cooperation support

from different contexts (Hinman, Dourish)

use cooperation support naturally

fit cooperation system usage into personal rhythms (Höök)

access cooperation systems from proper devices

Page 12: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

13Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

OutlookTowards a framework of access design

Framework for the (informed) design of access

Challenging and

adapting insights on

access

Aligning findings

with existing

work

Broadening the base for

a framework

Page 13: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

14Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

„While digital technology can connect families and friends over geographic distances, it’s critical to recognize that Facebook pokes and postings aren’t equal to actual conversation.“ (S. Greengard, CACM, 2011)

Page 14: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

15Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Thanks for your attention.Questions?

Michael PrillaInformation and Technology ManagementUniversity of Bochum, GermanyUniversitätsstr. 150Tel.: +49 (0) 234 / 32 - 27735Fax: +49 (0) 234 / 32 - 14207Email: [email protected]

Page 15: Access in Groupware: CRIWG 2012

16Supporting Social Tasks of Individuals: A matter of Access to Cooperation Systems – Michael Prilla

Designing AccessQuestions

Which characteristics describe the adequacy of access for a user group?

Which influence do concepts, attitudes and usage intentions of users have on the interaction with (the access to) cooperation support systems?

Which goals and needs of communication (cooperation) can be fulfilled with which (type of) access?