accomplishing interoperability certification in a ... // accomplishing interoperability...

LANDWARNET 2011 TRANSFORMING CYBER WHILE AT WAR UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a Federated

Net-Centric Sites Environment

Information Exchange Forum

Session: 3, Track: HQDA CIO/G-6

Facilitator: Mr. Steven Roscoe, Director

HQDA CIO/G-6, Interoperability & Certification Division


UNCLASSIFIED IEF Session 3, HQDA CIO/G-6 2011-08-24 // Accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a FaNS Environment 2

Mr. Alan Hentemann (CTR) Branch Chief HQDA CIO/G-6, Army Interoperability Certification Branch 2530 Crystal Drive Taylor Building, Suite 7136, Arlington, VA Phone: (703) 545-1418, DSN: 865-1418 E-mail: [email protected]

Mr. David Brumlow (CTR) Liaison Officer / FaNS Coordinator HQDA CIO/G-6 Phone: (254) 532-8321 ext:2491 E-mail: [email protected]

Mr. Steven Roscoe Director HQDA CIO/G-6, Interoperability & Certification Division 2530 Crystal Drive Taylor Building, Suite 7126, Arlington, VA Phone: 703-545-1410, DSN: 865-1410 [email protected]

Jacqueline Zachgo Branch Chief HQDA CIO/G-6; Policy, Integration & Configuration Management Branch 2530 Crystal Drive Taylor Building, Suite 7136, Arlington, VA Phone: 703-545-1583, DSN: 865-1583 [email protected]

2

mailto:[email protected]






UNCLASSIFIED

Introduction

AOJ Personnel

What is AIC?

Overarching AIC Requirements

Integrated Architecture

AIC Test Process

AIC Determination Options

FaNS What It IS and What It Is NOT!

Assigning Roles and Responsibilities

Net-Centric Sites Environment Today

Strategy for Accreditation

Take Aways

IEF Session 3, HQDA CIO/G-6 2011-08-24 // Accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a FaNS Environment 3

Mr. David Brumlow, HQDA CIO/G-6 CTSF Liaison Officer & FaNS Coordinator

Mr. Steven M. Roscoe, HQDA CIO/G-6 Director Interoperability & Certification Division

3


UNCLASSIFIED IEF Session 3, HQDA CIO/G-6 2011-08-24 // Accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a FaNS Environment 4 4

CHIEF INTEGRATION

OFFICE

SAIS-ZC

BG James Walton, Director,

571-256-8989

Vacant, Deputy 545-1446

Ms. Laura Hames, EA, 545-1495

ENTERPRISE

ARCHITECTURE

SAIS-AOE

COL Michael Gray

545-1453

PROGRAM

INTEGRATION

SAIS-ZRP

Mr. Mike Ramsey

697-0534

PLANS &

OPERATIONS

SAIS-AOP

COL Kenneth McNeill

614-9247

INFORMATION RESOURCE

INTEGRATION

SAIS-ZR

Ms. Deb Kelley, (SES), Dir 614-0439

COL William Ramsey, Dep 545-4633

Mr. Scott Baker, XO 695-0284

Vacant, EA, 697-1503

PEO ENTERPRISE INFORMATION

SYSTEMS (EIS), SFAE-PS

Ms. Terry Watson, Acting Dir., 806-4200

Vacant, MILDEP, 806-4294

Ms. Sandy Alvarez, EA, 806-3236

ARCHITECTURE, OPERATIONS,

NETWORKS & SPACE

SAIS-AO

MG Mark Bowman, Dir 614-5666

Mr. Rick Sirney, Dep, 545-1370

MAJ John Meister, XO, 695-4078

Mr. Terrell Anderson(Pent) 614-5666

ARMY ARCHITECTURE

INTEGRATION CNTR

SAIS-AEA

Mr. Gary Blohm (SES)

571-256-8951

ACQUISITIONS

COMP & CERT

SAIS-GKC

Mr. Allen Haines

571-256-8930

KNOWLEDGE

MANAGEMENT

SAIS-GKM

Mr. Joe Lyons

545-1529

CIO POLICY/

GOVERNANCE

SAIS-GKP

Mr. Keith Dean

545-1345

GOVERNANCE, ACQUISITION & CHIEF

KNOWLEDGE OFFICE SAIS-GK

Ms. Teresa Salazar, Director, 571-256-8927

Ms. Greta Lehman, Deputy, 545-1525

LTC Greg Willingham, XO, 545-1528

Mr. Steve Sipe, EA, 545-1571

Ms. Sarah Foley, EA, 545-4639

Ms. Maria Caravantes, SACO, 545-1323

ARMY ARCHITECTURE

INTEGRATION

SAIS-AOB

COL Anthony Howard

545-1558

STRATEGY,

INTEGRATION &

DEVELOPMENT

SAIS-ZCI

Mr. Larry Howard

545-1322

ARCHITECTURE

RESOURCE

INTEGRATION

SAIS-AOR

Ms. Karen Lacaden

571-256-8954

LANDWARNET

NETWORK

INTEGRATION

SAIS-AON

Mr. Dave Davis

571-256-8988

INFORMATION

INFRASTRUCTURE

INTEGRATION

SAIS-AOI

COL Gary Langston

545-1385

INTEROPERABILITY &

CERTIFICATION

SAIS-AOJ

Mr. Steven M. Roscoe

545-1410

Army Cyber Command

LTG Rhett Hernandez, CG

CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER/G-6 [Pentagon: 3E608]

LTG Susan S. Lawrence, CIO/G-6 • 695-4366 • SAIS-ZA COL Peter Gallagher, XO • 697-5503 • SAIS-ZX

Ms. Cindy Willis, EA • 697-5503

Mr. Michael E. Krieger, Deputy CIO/G-6 • 695-6604 • SAIS-ZB LTC Fitzgerald McNair, AXO • 697-1279 • SAIS-ZX

Ms. Marilyn Al-Mansoor, EA • 697-0845

SGM Kevin E. McCrary, CIO/G-6• 697-7494 • SAIS-ZS Ms. Saundra McCullough-Cobey, EA • 697-0688

PROGRAM MGT &

BUDGET EXECUTION

DIVISION

Mr. Charles Lankford

545-4602

Chief Cyber Officer

SAIS-CB

MG Steven W. Smith, Dir, 571-256-8996

Mr. Leroy Lundgren, Deputy, 545-1679

MAJ Jeffrey Thompson, XO, 571-256-8949

Ms. Tracey Johnson, EA, 545-1649

IDENTITY

MANAGEMENT

Ms. Tracy Trayler

545-1732

INFORMATION

ASSURANCE

PROGRAMS

Ms. Carol Assi

545-1692

SPECTRUM

SAIS-AOS

Mr. Richard DeSalvo

Director, 325-3810

Mr. David Pierce,

Deputy, 325-8285

ORGANIZATIONAL

EFFECTIVENESS

SAIS-ZCO

Mr. Ken Wilson

545-1513

NETCOM/9TH SC(A)

NETC-CG

MG Jennifer Napper, CG 520-538-6161

CSM Gerald Williams, CSM 520-538-6324

COL Michelle Fraley, CoS 520-538-6363

CPT Scott Leake, Aide 520-538-6162

Mr. Joseph Quinn, SGS 520-538-1503

IMCEN / AAIT-IM

Ms. Gaby Daniel, Director 602-2645

Mr. Daniel Batelka, Deputy, 602-4050

ENTERPRISE PROGRAM MGT OFFICE

Mr. George Woodard, Chief, 545-1381

Mr. Kary Sanders, 545-1331

Ms. Shirley Dixon, 545-1824

EMERGING

TECHNOLOGIES

Mr. Michael Jones

545-1694

MISSION

MANAGEMENT

Mr. James Lord

545-1650

Dotted Line denotes coordination

All Area Codes are 703 unless

otherwise noted

BUDGET

FORMULATION &

EXECUTION

SAIS-ZRE

COL Ramsey, (Acting)

545-4633

CONTRACT

MANAGEMENT

SAIS-ZRC

Ms. Joan Smith

545-1411

HUMAN RESOURCES

SAIS-ZCH

Ms. Marche’ Coleman

545-1510

HUMAN CAPITAL MGT

SAIS-GKH

Ms. Jackie Rustigian

545-2286

DATA

PROGRAM OFFICE

SAIS-AOD

Mr. Cliff Daus

571-256-8953

PNT: 1E629 TAY: 7114 PNT: 5C249 TAY: 7178 PNT: 3E620 TAY: 7208 PNT: 5C249 TAY: 7154 PNT: 5C249 TAY: 6018

SUPPORT SERVICES

SAIS-ZCS

Ms. Caroline Holman

545-1535

ENTERPRISE SERVICES

SAIS-ZCE

Ms. Lynn Caroe

545-1486



Sr. Technical Advisor

CW4 Pina

Directorate Support

MAJ Meister

Mr. Anderson (GS-13)

Mr. Salvaggio (Ctr)

Ms. Dunbar (Ctr)

AONS Director MG Bowman

Deputy Director Mr. Sirney (GS-15)

LandWarNet

Network Integration Mr. Davis (GS-15)

Army Data Center

Consolidation

COL Kramarich

Plans & Operations COL McNeill

Information

Infrastructure

Integration COL Langston

Army Architecture

Integration Center Mr. Blohm (SES)

Spectrum Management Mr. Desalvo (GS-15)

CERDEC Network Sys

Engineers

Interoperability

& Certification Mr. Roscoe (GS-14)

(coord)

Central Tech.

Support Facility

COL Drake

ASA (ALT)

G3/5/7

LWN DIR (coord)

(coord)

Military: 23

Civilian: 65

Ctr: 90* (*+55 OS)

Total: 178 (*233 w/OS)

5



AOJ Division Chief Mr. Steven Roscoe

(GS-14)

Capability IOP Mgt

Mr. Hentemann

(CTR)

Policy Integration &

Control Mgt

Mrs. Zachgo

(GS-14)

Capability Integration

Mgt

Ms. Moore

(GS-14)

LNOs

•Mr. Kovar (CTR)

•Ms. Lopez (CTR)

•Mr. Whitlock (CTR)

•Mrs. Wilson- Ft Hood Tester

(CTR)

•TBD (CTR)

•Mr. Bronson (CTR)

•Mr. Dunbar (CTR)

•Mr. Jaehnig (CTR)

•Mrs. Barclay (CTR)

•Mr. Dickman (CTR)

•Mr. Pennington

(CTR)

•Mr. McMaster – Ft Bliss (CTR)

•Mr. Brumlow – Ft Hood (CTR)

•SEC-FT Lee – LNO – TBD

•APG LNO - TBD

Mission Area

Test Agents

CTSF - WMA

SEC-FT Lee - BMA

Mil – 0 / Civ – 4 / Contr - 13

6


UNCLASSIFIED

PURPOSE: To provide an information briefing on accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a Federated Net-Centric Environment OBJECTIVE: By the end of this presentation you will be able to: • Have an understanding of how the Army meets DoD’s

objectives by partnering with Joint Services and Agencies to leverage and synchronize test events and test data in order to maximize interoperability testing and gain schedule efficiencies, with the goal of providing proven and mature interoperable capability to the User in an operationally relevant timeframe

IEF Session 3, HQDA CIO/G-6 2011-08-24 // Accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a FaNS Environment 7 7


UNCLASSIFIED

Army Interoperability Certification Testing

(AIC) Overview

Mr. Steven Roscoe

Director HQDA CIO/G-6

Architecture, Operations, Networks & Space Directorate (AONS) Interoperability & Certification Division

Phone: (703) 545-1410 DSN: 865-1410 E-mail: [email protected]




UNCLASSIFIED

PURPOSE: To provide an information briefing on accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a Federated Net-Centric Environment OBJECTIVE: By the end of this presentation you will be able to: • Have an understanding of how the Army meets DoD’s

objectives by partnering with Joint Services and Agencies to leverage and synchronize test events and test data in order to maximize interoperability testing and gain schedule efficiencies, with the goal of providing proven and mature interoperable capability to the User in an operationally relevant timeframe



UNCLASSIFIED

To facilitate and ensure Army Net-Centric capabilities by conducting System-of-Systems integration & validation of digital interoperability across all Mission Areas, to include

Configuration Management of Certified Baselines, and Software Distribution.


Mr. Steven Roscoe & Mr David Brumlow, SAIS-AOJ [email protected], DSN 865-1410

10



UNCLASSIFIED

AIC test process validates: • 1) a system, or groups of systems, successfully performs its digital interoperability and NC missions as

defined within its interoperability test requirements (mission threads), applicable capabilities or requirements documentation and baselined within its Information Support Plan (ISP);

• 2) those systems can securely generate and consume accurate, timely and actionable information/data/services as expected in order to execute specified operational processes; and

• 3) a system does not negatively impact the functionality of its expected network environment

* Note - The term ‘System’ encompasses ‘Platforms’, ‘applications’ and ‘services’ and includes the hardware, software and other components. A ‘System’ may be a component of a family-of-systems (FoS) or system-of-systems (SoS)

Bottom Line: The ability of IT/NSS, Units, or Forces to successfully digitally exchange secure and timely data, information, materiel, and services, to enable them to operate effectively and efficiently together, thus achieving information superiority



UNCLASSIFIED

DODD 4630.5

IT and NSS interoperability shall be verified early, and with sufficient frequency

throughout a system's life …

DOD 8000 Series

GIG Policy

DODD 5105.19

DISA shall ensure

end-to-end interoperability

CJCSI 3170.01 Establishes JCIDS w/ NR-

KPP for CRD, CDD and CPD

DOD 5000 series

For IT systems, including NSS, ... JITC shall provide system

interoperability test certification memoranda ... throughout the

system life-cycle and regardless of ACAT

DODI 4630.8

All IT and NSS … must be tested for interoperability before

fielding ... and certified by DISA (Joint Interoperability Test

Command (JITC))

CJCSI 6212.01

All IT and NSS must be

evaluated and certified for Joint interoperability by DISA (JITC)

DOD 4630/5000 Interoperability is

“the ability to provide and accept data, information, materiel, and services ...

...includes both the technical exchange of information and the end-to-end

operational effectiveness of that exchange, as required for

mission accomplishment.”



UNCLASSIFIED

• The USA CIO/G-6 is the AIC Certification Authority (CA) – Title 40

– Test Agent executes AIC on behalf of and under the direction of the USA CIO/G-6

– For MDA/GMD the CTSF will Execute AIC

HQDA CIO/G-6 Policy Signed 28 April 2009

AIC determination is required for all IT/NSS that have a Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP) and/or have the current capability or requirement to externally generate, utilize, transmit or process Information. All other IT/NSS must attain an AIC Exemption or Waiver, as appropriate.

CJCSI 6212.01E Definition of Interoperability:

The ability of systems, units or forces to provide data, information, materiel and services to and accept the same from other systems, units or forces and to use the data, information, materiel and services so exchanged to enable them to operate effectively together. IT and NSS interoperability includes both the technical exchange of information and the operational effectiveness of that exchanged information as required for mission accomplishment. Interoperability is more than just information exchange. It includes systems, processes, procedures, organizations, and missions over the lifecycle and must be balanced with IA.



UNCLASSIFIED

AIC applies to all Army Information Technology (IT) & National Security Systems (NSS) prior to release to the field, to include:

• All Mission Areas/Domains (WMA, BMA, EIEMA, DIMA)

• All ACATs

• Once Certified, any modifications that impact previously established interoperability requires re-certification prior to approval for fielding or materiel release

• Systems with no Army interoperability requirements may request an AIC Exemption

• Systems with a requirement to field, but can’t meet interoperability requirements in current build may request an AIC Waiver

• IC&L Assessments are conducted on non-DoDD 5000.1 IT/NSS which have been validated by use by the Army DCS

• 3/5/7 via the JU/ONS or Rapid Fielding Initiative process



UNCLASSIFIED

Programs are required to complete the AIC testing process:

• Prior to conducting OT events (IOT&E, LUT, LFT&E, etc.)

• Prior to or in coordination with Joint Interoperability Certification (JIC) by the Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC)



UNCLASSIFIED

CS 11-12

Backward compatibility means compatible with earlier models or versions of the same product. A new version of a program is said to be backward compatible if it can use files and data created with an older version of the same program. A computer is said to be backward compatible if it can run the same software as the previous model of the computer using mission threads.

CS 13-14

Backwards Compatibility for CS 13-14 and Beyond: requires a system of the current baseline to send, receive, and process data to all systems it has an interface with across the battlefield up to 1 previous CS baseline. For example, an CS 13-14 equipped FBCB2 JCR to pass information to all systems it has an interface with in CS 11-12 (Backwards interoperability) using mission threads.


** This is part of the Army Interoperability Certification Test for CS 13-14 with an emphasis on SoS **

Future focal point is SoS BWC

16




UNCLASSIFIED

Interoperability Testing

Learning Curve

Technical Expertise

DAG ESC

Entrance Criteria

Software

Threads

Architecture

Network/Comms

Subject Matter Experts

Test Incident Reports

Test Schedule CCB/TRR/CRR Inte

rde

pe

nd

enci

es


Co

nfi

gura

tio

n M

anag

emen

t

Co

nfi

gura

tio

n M

anag

emen

t

17


UNCLASSIFIED

Capability List

Developed by the Requirements and Architecture Working Group (RAWG) with the help of the DCD/ TSM

Modular Force Baseline Models

Validated Modular Force Operational Architecture provided the base models to begin the architecture effort.

CADIE Project: SWB III

OV-6c

SV-10c

Collaborative project between AIMD, NetOps, and ASEO using CADIE portal and tool sets with a common data set.

Tailored Test Thread to FaNS Specs

(Loads StarGen)

CTSF

1. Start with Desired Operational Capability from the user community 2. Use baseline architecture (Use Enterprise Approach for ERP Programs.) 3. Leverage an integrated architecture process that will use the baseline models to deliver the customer desired information sets 4. Refine and Specialize the required products (as specified in AV1) 5. Develop OV6c from applied models and associated SV10c product information (ERP Programs Deviation) 6. Run OV6c and SV10c thru AIMD GOTS application to create an integrated test thread to customer specs (This step is an iterative cycle of Community Review and

Architecture Update) 7. Deliver to CTSF --- Test Threads in CM Status; ‘Sponsor’ of Block responsible for CM until AIC Cert complete

Basic Process Outline for Capability Based Thread Analysis

OV-5’s

Foundational Project Specific Application

ORG UNIT

Node

CM

OV-4

Warfighting Community

Warfighting Community

PEO/ PM Community

OV-3

SV-5

SV-4

Feedback / Results TV-1

ISP

Scenarios &

Test Cases

“A Structured Approach” ERP Deviation

Enterprise Approach

1

2 3 4 5

6 7



UNCLASSIFIED

SW Execution

Phase

Begins

SW/HW Dev

(MATDEV)

PEO RRT

(MATDEVs)

Create & Distribute

Baseline Products (G-6)

Golden Bricks

AIC

Test

(G-6)

CM Audit

Of Fielded

Software

(G-6/LCMC)

Software Under Test CM provided by ANCMO

Change Control managed by Test Agent

Baseline

Established

(G-6)

Fielded Software CM under ANCMO control

[Software Baseline Change Process Compliance Required]

Approved SW

Fielded

(MATDEVs/LCMCs)

Test Floor

Established

(G-6)

• AIC certification

• Fielding authorization to operational

environment

• Materiel Release authorization

• Continued Congressional funding

• Meets OT/JITC entrance criteria

• Supports JTIC Certification

•PM’s AIC Request Memo

•Approved ISP

•Approved Test Requirements

•Funding in Place

•IATO/ATO documentation

•SUT delivered to Test Agent CM

•System Begins IA Scan Process

•Systems loaded, config’d & IAVA’s applied

•Systems Pass IA Scans

•Systems Probed by Test Agent CM

Entrance Criteria

Products

[Maintains Baseline]

Title 10 Title 40

Backwards Compatibility

and Interoperability

Testing (G-6)

Integration

Activities

(I2E)

SoS

ASA (ALT)

MATDEV

IA SoS NVA

TTP Validation



UNCLASSIFIED

AIC – Army Interoperability Certification BWC – Backward Compatibility CCB - Configuration Control Board CM BL – Configuration Managed Baseline CRR – Certification Readiness Review I2E – Interoperability Integration Event OE – Operational Evaluation OAR – OTA Assessment Report

O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S J F M

1QFY10 2QFY10 3QFY10 4QFY10 1QFY11 2QFY11 3QFY11 4QFY11 1QFY12 2QFY12 3QFY09 4QFY09 2QFY09

O N D

1QFY09

AIC – Army Interoperability Certification BWC – Backward Compatibility CCB - Configuration Control Board CM BL – Configuration Managed Baseline CRR – Certification Readiness Review I2E – Interoperability Integration Event OE – Operational Evaluation OAR – OTA Assessment Report

SWB 2 Tri-Annual Approved Insertions

T2.1 T2.3 T2.4 T2.5 T2.2

SWB 2 (AIC)

T2.6 T2.7 T2.8 T2.9 T2.10 T2.11

CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL

Start of Tri-Annual Preparation

CRR Start of a CRR in support of a Tri-Annual event

CCB

CCB event in support of a Tri-Annual event

G3 SW Release

Original I2E

Reset AIC Rpts

G-6 Cert Letters

CS 11-12 Tri-Annual Approved Insertions ζ

Development Time CS 11-12 (AIC)

Final SW To CM

OAR

TRR

T11.1 T11.2 T11.3 T11.4 T11.5

USF Planning

CM BL CM BL CM BL CM BL Modified I2E

AIC & BWC

CM BL CM BL

PEO C3T Bridge to AIC

OE Window (See Note)

CCB CCB CCB CCB CCB CCB

CS User Assessment

SO LUT JTRS

GMR LUT

TBD BCT CTC

SO IOT

CS 11-12 FOA

ATEC

Scheduled Event

Unscheduled Event

Report

Decision Point

FBCB2 LUT

WIN t Inc 2 IOTE

KEY:

Notional

Continuous Evaluation




Reduced overall test time (efficiency)

Changed signatory

responsibilities (accountability)

Reduced Variance & Mean

(measurability)

Improved process’s (efficiency)

Created draft Policy document (measurability & accountability)

21


UNCLASSIFIED

Criteria

Through Portfolio Management, conduct analysis of the

applicability of Mission Area IT/NSS systems required to

undergo the AIC testing process

Categorize

Identify type of certification required

Exemption

Systems without current or planned interoperability

capabilities or requirements Legacy system

Wavier Systems that have Army

Interoperability requirements, but cannot currently meet the requirements (i.e., due to the state of the art, requirements

blocking, evolutionary acquisition programs, etc.)

Certification

Systems that have current interoperability requirements

must undergo AIC testing before deployment to

the operational User

AIC Test Data

FANS-CTSF provides AIC test data to the CIO/G-6

CIO/G-6 Disposition

Determine Test

Location(s)

Test

ID

SORT

WHERE

4

1

2

CERTIFY

3



UNCLASSIFIED

Federation of Net-Centric Sites FaNS

Overview

Mr. David Brumlow HQDA CIO/G-6 Liaison Officer,

Federation Net-Centric Sites (FaNS) Coordinator Phone: (254) 532-8321 ext:2491

E-mail: [email protected]




UNCLASSIFIED

FaNS What it is and What it is NOT!

assigning Roles and Responsibilities

Net-Centric Sites Environment

•FaNS Capability Nodes

Strategy for Accreditation

•FaNS Accreditation Process Flow

•FaNS Accreditation Criteria



UNCLASSIFIED IEF Session 3, HQDA CIO/G-6 2011-08-24 // Accomplishing Interoperability Certification in a FaNS Environment 25 25


UNCLASSIFIED

IS:

A federation of existing Army and Joint (when applicable) facilities, network-connected together to execute horizontal integration, AIC testing and Configuration Management ISO applicable Army and Joint Information Technology/National Security Systems (IT/NSS), across all Mission Area’s (MA)/Domains, executed in a predictable and repeatable process.

End State:

An agile, efficient, flexible and persistent horizontal integration and interoperability testing capability. FANS will allow the Army to grow its integration and interoperability testing capacity, over time, by leveraging existing facilities, both Army and Joint.


http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/priorservice_2156_224126110

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.clipartheaven.com/clipart/occupations/cartoons_(a_-_l)/construction_worker_1.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.clipartheaven.com/show/clipart/occupations/cartoons_(a_-_l)/construction_worker_1-gif.html&h=588&w=351&sz=10&tbnid=q3L46gBI0oCAUM:&tbnh=135&tbnw=81&prev=/search?q=clip+art+construction+worker&tbm=isch&tbo=u&zoom=1&q=clip+art+construction+worker&hl=en&usg=__h6AkxPYR0U3jtlbvRTgMyTHfQgg=&sa=X&ei=bVTuTYnqA5P1gAfx3dCUDw&ved=0CCQQ9QEwBQ


UNCLASSIFIED

HQDA CIO/G-6

Mission Area Test Agent

Mission Area FaN Site



UNCLASSIFIED

AIC Certification Authority

FaNS Accreditation Authority

Establishes interoperability (IOP) test policy, standards, scope and AIC entrance, exit and evaluation criteria

Provides direction and oversight of IOP/AIC test events executed in FaNS Environment

Facilitates the AIC process in accordance with US Army DCS G-3/5/7 priorities

Performs Configuration Control/ Configuration Management (CC/CM) of fielded baselines in coordination with G-3/5/7, G-8, and ASAALT

Validates compliance to information assurance (IA) directives, policies and standards



UNCLASSIFIED

Assist in FaNS Accreditation

Ensure compliance to IOP/AIC testing Procedures

Support FaNS personnel in IOP/AIC testing

Produce Test Plan

Oversee IOP/AIC Event execution

Validate test data

Produce Test Report



UNCLASSIFIED

Develop procedures and practices for executing Interoperability Certification Testing in accordance with IOP/AIC, Configuration Management (CM), and Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM) Policies

Support the planning of IOP/AIC test event

Support the collection of test data and provide results to the IOP/AIC Test Agent

Support the production of the Test Report




Objective: A federation of existing Army, Joint and Coalition facilities, networked together to execute horizontal and vertical integration, AIC testing and CM ISO applicable Systems IT/NSS, across all Mission Areas/Domains

HQDA FaNS Accredited site

DIMA

INSCOM

FT HOOD

FT HUACHUCA

1ST IO

COMMAND

SPAWAR JITC

EGLIN AFB

JOINT

TBD

EIEMA

FT HUACHUCA

APC

OHIO

FT Belvoir

FINANCIAL LOGISTICS

BMA

SEC

MEDCOM

MCTSSA

(BA Domain)

COALITION CTE2 The Tactical Logistics

Directorate SIL will be

Accredited on 26 May

2011

TIC

Sites in one of the four phases of accreditation.

Other Mission Areas report to ACMO for baseline

PERSONNEL

31

http://www.theodora.com/flags_12b.html

http://www.theodora.com/flags

http://www.theodora.com/flags/australia_flag.html

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/USAF_logo.png

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/MCTSSA_Logo.gif


UNCLASSIFIED

SPAWAR Systems Center, Charleston.

INSCOM (Intel)

APG

PEO Ground Combat Warren MICH

JITC (Joint) ISEC TIC (Infrastructure) PEO

STRI(SIM/STIM)

Eglin AFB 46th Test Squadron

Redstone AVN/SMDC APTU

(FIRES) Ft. Sill Knox Hall / I-SEE-O-Hall

CTSF (TBC) Fort Hood Ft. Bliss/WSMR

(FCS)

Fort Lee

WPAFB SIMAF / Agile Fires

Nellis / AFB Agile Fires

NAS Patuxent River / Agile Fires

SPAWAR Systems San Diego

MCTSSA / Camp Pendleton


Projected FaNS location JOINT

Current FaNS location

Projected FaNS location Army

States with FaNS activities Army and JOINT

32




http://www.navy.mil/

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/MCTSSA_Logo.gif

http://www.navy.mil/

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US-MarineCorps-Seal.svg



UNCLASSIFIED

FaN Site Accreditation Process Flow


F1 Initial Self-Assessment

Of Accreditation Status

F2 Site

Preparation

F3 Official FaN

HQDA CIO/G-6 Site Inspection

F7 HQDA CIO/G-6 FaNS

Accreditation Ceremony

F8 Data Analysis

Is Site

Accredited F6

No

Site Identification Initial FaNS

Briefing

F4 Prepare MOU to

address inspection issues

System Identification

Army CIO/G-6

Mr. David Brumlow, SAIS-AOJ [email protected], COM 254-532-8321 X2491

Confirm Network Connectivity

F5 Make

Recommendation to HQDA CIO/G-6

YES

Currently under process improvement

through LSS

33


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/67/Six_sigma-2.svg


UNCLASSIFIED

1. Consideration Entrance Criteria a) Does the Site have a validated requirement to execute AIC in the FaNS environment?

b) Is there a costs / schedule savings for the program?

c) Is there a strategy to ensure the facility meets all FaNS Environment Accreditation standards?

2. Site Criteria a) Is the site government controlled?

b) Does the site have a physical security policy that includes access control to testing floor?

c) Does the site have the capability to maintain the test architecture?

3. Communications Criteria a) Does the site have a current DAA-approved DIACAP package? What is the expiration?

b) Does the site have the capability to communicate, coordinate, and/or collaborate with mission specific FaN sites?

c) Has the local DOIM approved access of other FaN Sites into the local DOIM-managed network?

4. Personnel Criteria a) Are the resident personnel subject matter experts on the system under test and/or the specific

mission area?

b) Are site personnel cleared to handle, process, and control data at the highest classification level of the system expected to test there?



UNCLASSIFIED

5. Configuration Management Criteria a) Does the site maintain a centralized documented CM process? Is the process ANCMP compliant?

b) Has the ANCMO validated the plan and / or local IA SOP?

c) Does the site maintain a centralized, trained, and proficient CM staff?

d) Does the site maintain a centralized and secure CM Repository / Library Facility?

e) Does the site maintain a centralized CM tool Suite?

f) Does the Candidate have an approved published COOP plan?

6. Information Assurance Criteria a) Does the site maintain a centralized documented IA process?

b) Is the process compliant with all DoD policies?

c) Has the HQDA CIO/G-6 validated the plan and or local IA SOP?

d) Does the site maintain a centralized, trained IA staff?

e) Does the site maintain an IA test tools suite?

7. Event Execution Criteria a) Does the site have an AIC event Execution SOP?

b) Has the SOP been reviewed/approved by the test agent?

c) Does the SOP contain detailed procedures for: i. Development of an Event Design Plan (EDP) and Test Plan Annex

ii. Various event type execution

iii. Test data management (collections, processing, reduction, and reporting)



UNCLASSIFIED

Mr. Steven Roscoe , SAIS-AOJ [email protected], DSN 865-1410

HQDA CIO/G-6 is Decision Authority for AIC

Test Agent, ICW FaNS, executes AIC on behalf on CIO/G-6

AIC technically validates the end-to-end flow of information/data through an operationally representative architecture in a system of systems environment

We continue to streamline interoperability testing through partnerships with Joint, DoD and Federal Agencies through the FaNS Environment




UNCLASSIFIED

Questions





UNCLASSIFIED


Backups




UNCLASSIFIED

System

Acquisition

(DoD 5000)

Concept Refinement Technology Development System Development &

DemonstrationProduction & Deployment Operations & Support

Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment

Concept

Decision

Design

Readiness

Review

FRP

Decision

Review

A B C

Critical

Design

Review

Program/System Specific Processes

JCIDS

(CJCSI 3170)ICD CDD CPD

IT & NSS I&S

(CJCSI 6212)J-6 I&S

Cert

ICTO/

CTO

J-6 Sys

Valid.

J-6 I&S

Cert

Information

Support Plan (ISP)

ATEC T & E Process

(ATEC 73-1)TEMP SEP

MS-B

SERTEMP

SEP/

EDPSER

Rock

Drill

DoD Information Assurance

Certification and Accreditation

Process (DIACAP)

Plan &

Initiate

IA C&A

Execute

DIACAP

Imp Plan

Cert.

Deter. &

Acc Dec.

Maintain

ATO/

Reviews

Enterprise Interoperability &

Configuration Management

Identify

BaselineIAIC Fielding Auditing

Integrated

Architectures

Operational View (OV) Development

Technical Standards View (OV) Development

Systems View (OV) Development

Networthy

Initial

ISP

Revised

ISPFinal ISP

Joint JITC

AIC


delete

39


UNCLASSIFIED 40

FIRE SUPPORT

X

COP

GIG Interface

GIG Interface

Step 4 – Conduct Firing of the Mission.

Step 5 – Send Message to Observer

Step 7 – Send Shot

Step 9 – Send Splash

Step 11 – Send Rounds Complete

Step 14 – Receive End of Mission

Step 3 – Process Mission to

Firing Unit

Step 2 – Process Mission.

SEC at Fort Monmouth, NJ BCT

CTSF at Fort Hood, TX Fires BDE

Fort sill, OK Fires BN/Guns

Step 1 - Initiate Call for Fire from an Aerial

Observer

Step 6 – Receive Message from Fires BN

Step 8 – Receive Shot

Step 10 – Receive Splash

Step 12 – Receive Rounds Complete

Step 13 – Send End of Mission SED at Huntsville, AL

AV BDE



UNCLASSIFIED

1. There are many interdependent variables that affect the AIC process.

2. The number of PCRs to threads used for each tri-annual have impact especially when number of changes effect threads selected for testing with late delivery of these changes delay test case development.

3. TIRs with severity levels 1 – 3 the trend shows we are still writing TIRs at rate nearly equal to the closing of TIRs and not just against systems under test during a tri-annual event.

4. Most TIRs are software error in nature and 40% of those errors are system specific.

5. Test plans on average met the T-30 day criteria; however, timely concurrences and software delivery would greatly improve the process.




DIMA

INSCOM

FT HOOD

FT HUACHUCA

1ST IO

COMMAND

SPAWAR

EGLIN AFB

JITC

JOINT

TBD

EIEMA

FT HUACHUCA

APC

OHIO

FT Belvoir

FINANCIAL LOGISTICS

BMA

SEC-LEE

MEDCOM

MCTSSA

(BA Domain)

COALITION CTE2 The Tactical Logistics

Directorate SIL will be

Accredited on 26 May

2011

TIC

42

http://www.theodora.com/flags_12b.html

http://www.theodora.com/flags

http://www.theodora.com/flags/australia_flag.html


UNCLASSIFIED

PM’s AIC Request Memo

Approved ISP

Approved Test Requirements

Funding in Place

IATO/ATO documentation

SUT delivered to Test Agent CM

System Begins IA Scan Process

Systems loaded, config’d & IAVA’s applied

Systems Pass IA Scans

Systems Probed by Test Agent CM


accomplishing interoperability certification in a ... // accomplishing interoperability...

Documents