accountability on gender in humanitarian system in south...
TRANSCRIPT
Accountability on
Gender in
Humanitarian
System in South
Sudan
Page 2
Catalysing change
• In January 2014, the
IASC Reference
Group on Gender and
Humanitarian Action
issued a Gender Alert
for South Sudan.
• HCT in South Sudan
expressed their
commitments on
gender equality
programming .
Page 3
Accountability....Cluster lead agencies including
Cluster Coordinators develop
cluster gender policies, cluster
gender commitments with verifiable
checklists including indicators,
assign gender focal points for the
cluster and deliver on gender
related policies.
CLUSTER GENDER FOCAL POINT GROUP
Page 4
FROM 2014... SOUTH SUDAN
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE FACED
LOTS OF CHALLENGES IN GENDER
MAINSTREAMING BUT MADE SOME
PROGRESS
Page 5
GENDER MAINSTREAMING IN THE
HUMANITARIAN NEEDS OVERVIEW 2016 –Food Security and Livelihoods section ..page 21
• Affected People
• Recognises that female headed households are
significantly more likely to be food insecure and
to have malnourished child/children than a male
headed one.
Page 6
GENDER MAINSTREAMING IN THE HUMANITARIAN
RESPONSE PLAN 2016 – Food Security and Livelihoods
section ..page 19
Number of people
in need and their
specific needs
disaggregated
by sex and age
Promoting Quality Programming
Talks about (1) ensuring that risks such as forced
recruitment of children and GBV are prevented when
large populations gather to receive food assistance; and
(2) enabling the most marginalized and vulnerable
groups to access assistance.
Aim to support National NGOs to build capacity on cross-
cutting issues.
Page 7
GENDER AND PROTECTION
GENDER PROTECTION
Institutionalising GENDER in Emergencies:
Bridging Policy and Practice in the
Humanitarian System
September 2015 - Feb 2017
Cluster Gender Focal Point Group
Gender Analysis
Com-muniqu
esTraining
Case Study
Account
-ability
coordination
Page 9
Why have a Cluster Accountability
Monitoring Tool?
• To see if Humanitarian Clusters / technical
coordination groups support gender
accountability of humanitarian actors
• To see if coordination meetings pool
resources, and share best practices &
knowledge on gender.
• focus on a self-assessment rather than a
checklist - can be adaptable to context.
Page 11
Application of the tool: Who?
• This tool is to be used by cluster leads and co-
leads at field- operations level or technical
working groups. It provides guidance to
individual agencies on how to contribute to the
achievements of shared gendered accountability
within a cluster or working group setting.
Page 13
The measures 1-5
1. Quality gender analysis is available and used to
inform planning, implementation and monitoring.
2. Gender-responsive strategic planning documents
shape adequate prioritisation and set out member
agencies' roles
3. Contextualised minimum gender commitments
are endorsed and are coherently implemented
4. Adequate gendered competency of agency
expertise and staff is identified and strategically
coordinated
5. Inclusive and participatory cluster/sector meetings
generate space for discussing and addressing gender
concerns
Page 14
The measures 6-10
6. Learning spaces on gender-responsive
implementation are available and enable improved
implementation through action-learning
7. Gender-responsive cross-cluster/sector coordination
mechanisms address cross-cutting issues holistically
8. Continuous review and adaptation of ways of
working with affected populations increases levels of
transparency and participation of affected women and
men
9. Recurrent monitoring of the IASC and/or ECHO
Gender and Age Marker improves gender
mainstreaming and targeted action at project level
10. Enhancement of linkages between humanitarian
and development interventions contribute to reduce
structural barriers to gender equality
Page 15
Key elements & Examples of Effective
practice
Key Elements: Lays out what cluster/sector leads should
expect from this accountability measure and areas for
prioritised attention. Identifies elements that contribute to
facilitate, coordinate and generate space for gender
responsive actions to take place within a cluster/sector.
Examples of Effective Practice: Explains what this
measure could look like and provides elements to
contrast their own cluster/sector performance against.
This is an example and NOT an exhaustive list. These
are not indicators!
Page 16
Rating, description & follow up
actions
Tool provides a colour rating from the dropdown menu.
50-100 words substantiates a rating with positive
examples, learning and any identified gap(s). This
forms a useful monitoring tool.
Relevant actions for the next reporting period, including
person responsible (cluster agency/person), timeline and
resources required.
Quarterly follow-up against the sheet, noting support of
cluster/agency gender experts, aiming to improve in
areas weak and unsatisfactory.
Page 17
The rating in the dropdown menu
RatingColour Code
Explanation
Very Good
Dark Green
Exemplary and outstanding implementation of measure & innovative best practices for replication in other sectors
Good GreenFull implementation of measure & comprehensive sector coordination
Unsatisfactory
YellowSome elements of measure in place & limited sector coordination (improvements required)
Weak RedNo aspects of the measure in place
Page 19
Please do look at the 10 measures.
Reflect and try to assess your cluster.
From there, decide on the top 3 measures
that this cluster will work on for the year.
WHEN?
Page 22