accvpollo earthmovers ltd new.pptx

7/25/2019 AccvPOllo Earthmovers ltd new.pptx

1/32

APresentation On

Summer Internship Program InGujarat Apollo Earthmovers

Ltd.

Prepared By:-Prajapati

KuldipRoll No:-42!am No:-4"

Su#mitted to:-$r% Nishith Bhatt


2/32

INTRODUCTION

Name: Gujarat Apollo earthmovers Ltd

Year of Establishment: The company was

establshn! n "#$%&

Registered Office: '"'(A) G&I&D&C& *state)

+ehsana.

An Apollo earthmovers Lmted had set up ,or

manu,acture mechancal pavers ,nsher and hot mo-plants& The company.s busness !rew steadly and ts

product earned a !ood reputaton n the mar/et


3/32

&ON'IN())

In "#01 the Apollo *arthmover 2rvate Lmted termed wth Gujarat

Industral Investment Corporaton 3GIIC4 to set up Gujarat Apollo

*5upments Lmted 3G&A&*&L&4 &The Company started

manu,acturn! drum type asphalt plant and hydrostatc sensor paver

,nshers under a techncal collaboraton arran!ement wth 6arberGreene U7A& Apollo earthmovers Lmted has been entered n stoc/

e-chan!e just ,rom "#th 8une '99"&Apollo *arthmover Lmted

Company s I7O #99":'999 cert,ed&

Apollo company today o,,ers the entre ran!e o, road constructon

e5upment that helps n buldn! roads) whch are sa,e) durable ;

economcal& Apollo.s msson s to retan the leadershp throu!h

contnuous R;D and world class technolo!y avaled throu!h

technolo!y trans,ers&


4/32

*ISION

To ncrease the turnover o, the product&

To establsh prest!e o, number one at the world

level&


5/32

+ISSION

The company.s !oal s to retan the leadershp by

des!nn! ; buldn! the state o, the art e5upment)

throu!h technolo!y that s proven and s the best n

the world) avaled by lcense and jont venture wthponeers and leaders n respectve ,eld& To ma/e t

possble n the developn! world&


6/32

BOR$ O, $IR&'ORS

+R& ANIL T& 2AT*L DIR*CTOR

+R& +ANI6=AI >& 2AT*L DIR*CTOR

+R& A7IT A& 2AT*L +ANAGING DIR*CTOR

+R& ANAND A& 2AT*L & 2AT*L IND*2*ND*NT DIR*CTOR +R& NA>INC=ANDRA >& 7=A= IND*2*ND*NT DIR*CTOR

CO+2AN? 7*CR*TAR?

C7 N*=A C=I@ANI 7=A=


7/32

PRO$(&'S

7tatonary Drum +- 2lants& 3D+ 7eres 9 to "B9tph4

+oble Drum +- Type Asphalt 2lants 3+oble m-

7eres '9 to #9tph4


8/32

&ON'IN())


9/32

RA'IO ANA.SIS

Rato analyss s the power,ul tool o, ,nancal

analyss& A rato s de,ned as relaton between two

or more thn! or as the systematc use o, the rato

to nterpret the ,nancal statement& 7o that thestren!th and wea/ness o, a ,rm as well hstorcal

per,ormance ; Current ,nancal condton can be

de,ned&


10/32

I/($I'. RA'IO

These ratos ndcate the ablty o, the company to dschar!e the labltes

as and when they mature&

Current Ratio:

=ere companes. Current rato s lower n the year '9" at

'&1% and t s h!her n the year o, '9" at $&%9

The h!her current rato ndcate that the !reater the mar!n o,sa,ety ,or credtors& That means company.s currents assets are ncreasn!

n current year& 7o company s !rown! n stron! poston a!anst ts

current obl!aton&

Year '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Current Rato $&%9 '&1% '&1B '&09


11/32

&ON'IN())

uc/ Rato:

Ths rato s called the Acid Test Ratio& It establshed the

relatonshp between 5uc/ assets and current labltes&

The 5uc/ rato o, the company o, the last ,our years s constantly

ncrease& The company s not very well n the 5uc/ rato& It ncreases

constantly& Over all the company.s poston s not !ood n terms o, 5uc/

rato& 7o we can say that ,rm can not able to pay ther lablty 5uc/ly&

Year '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

uc/ Rato 1&%% '&9B '&9B "&0'


12/32

ASS' '(RNO*R RA'IOS

Net -ed Turnover Rato :

=ere companes Net -ed Turnover Rato s h!her n the year '9"' at

&0% as compared to year '9"% at "&BB& Ths stuaton o, low rato arses due to ne,,cent use o, ,-ed assets

a,ter deducton o, deprecaton amount&

Total Asset turnover Rato:

Total assets turnover s ncreasn! durn! year '9"' as compare to '9""&

6ut on or a,ter '9"' t s reducn! tll '9"%& 6ut here companes Total Assets

Turnover ratos s better utlEe ts nvestment n stoc/ e,,cently

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

TAT 3tmes4 "&BB "&0$ '&9% "&11

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Net A turnover 3t mes4 " &BB &10 &0% &$B


13/32

&ON'IN())

Net


14/32

&ontinue)%

Inventory olding !eriod

In the above company Inventory =oldn! 2erod s ,luctuatn! durn! ths year& Inventory

=oldn! 2erod s h!her n the year '9"" and a,ter then t constantly decreasn! up to year'9" and there a,ter h!hly ncrease n the year '9"%

Ths stuaton arse that , Inventory =oldn! 2erod s lower t ndcates that ,rm s wor/n!

e,,cently and selln! more stoc/ n less days& 6ut ncrease n Inventory =oldn! 2erod

ndcates that company stoc/ or nventory s remann! dle and ,re5uently used at tme&

=ere company Inventory =oldn! 2erod s h!h n the year '9"% at "0$ days as compare to

all prevous year& 7o t.s not !ood ,or company or company.s nventory remans same&

"ebtor Turnover Ratio

Year '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Inventory holdn!

perod 3Days4

"0$ $" $B #'

Year '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Debtors turnover Rato

3Tmes4

'&10 B&"0 B&$ B&B0


15/32

&ontinue)%

In the above !raph the companes Debtor Turnover Rato s ,luctuatn! durn! ths,our year& In the year o, '9"' t was h!her) whle t s lower n the year o, '9"%

The ncrease n the rato ndcates better snce t would ndcate that debt are ben!

collected more promptly means there s more avalable o, ,und then t can be use

,or other purpose and lower the rato ndcates ne,,cent collecton o, debts ,rom

debtors& =ere companes Debtor Turnover Rato s h!h n the year '9"" at B&B0 tmes and t

was lover n the year '9"% at '&10 tmes& There ,ore the company s not !ood n

collectn! o, debts ,rom debtors&

Average Age Of "ebtors

Year '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Av!& collecton 2erod

3Days4

"% $9 1 1B


16/32

&ontinue)

In the above !raph the rato o, the company s ,luctuatn! durn! the year& And t s

ntally h!her n year '9"% and t was h!her ,rom last years&

n ths stuaton h!h rato ndcates that debtors are enjoyn! h!h credt perod

,orm debt collecton ,rom them by company but a lower rato ndcates vce versa

o, t&

=ere companes. rato n the year '9"% s at "% days& It.s h!h ,rom last three

years& 7o company.s collecton ualty s not better ,rom prevous year&


17/32

,INAN& S'R(&'(RRA'IOS E#uity Ratio:

=ere companes. e5uty rato s h!her n the year '9"% at 9:"

and t was lower n the year o, '9"" at 9":"& A rato constantly ncreaseso company s !ood n provdn! ade5uate sa,ety to the credtors who !ve

loan to ,rm or nvest n the ,rm assets&

"ebt Ratio:

=ere companes debt rato lower n the year '9"% s just 9&9": "

There ,ore t.s !ood ,or company to ndcatn! that shows more sa,ety

mar!n to the nvestors or credtors&

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

*5uty Rato 3:4 9 9' 9' 9"

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Debt Rato 3:4 9 &9" 9&9$# 9&9$$ 9&90"


18/32

&ON'IN())

"ebt E#uity Ratio:

The company.s debt e5uty rato s ,luctuatn! durn! ,our year and t wash!her n the year '9" and '9"" whle t was lowest n the year '9"% debt e5uty rato&

=ere companes s lower n the year '9"% at 9&9":" so t.s better ,or company to use ,und

e,,cently than debt and !ve lar!er sa,ety mar!n to the credtors&

Interest coverage ratio

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Debt *5uty Rato 9 &9" 9&9# 9&90 9 &9#

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Interest Covera!e Rato

3tmes4

9 &B" $&$ 0&BB ""&"#


19/32

&ontinue)%

In the above !raph companes Interest Covera!e Rato s h!her n the year '9"" and there

a,ter constantly decrease&

The stuaton o, h!h rato ndcatn! that ,rmFndustry s utlEn! ts nterest bearn! debt

,unds more e,,cently&


20/32

PROFITABILITY RATIO

$ross !rofit %argin Ratio

In the above !raph companes !ross pro,t rato s ncrease or decrease& In '9"' !ross pro,t rato s

"#&"% and then t s decrease and reaches to "'B n '9"%&

Ths may be arsn! due to ,luctuaton n the selln! prce o, a product) relatvely wth chan!e n materal

prce or wa!es&

=ere ndustral !ross pro,t rato s better than company n comparson to subse5uent years whch shows

that ndustry s more e,,cent than company to cover ts admn ; mar/etn! e-p&

O&erating !rofit %argin Ratio

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

G2 Rato 34 "'B "$&1 "#&"% "%&B9

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Operatn! pro,t % &91 "$&%$ "1&1% "#&$1


21/32

&ontinue)

Operatn! pro,t mar!n measures a company.s operatn! e,,cency and prcn!

e,,cency wth ts success,ul cost controlln!& The h!her the rato) the better a

company s& The rato ndcates that there s ncrease n operatn! pro,t mar!n

,rom $&$1 n '99$ to "#&00 n '99#&

In the above !raph the companes. Operatn! pro,t mar!n rato s reducn! an

ncrease& Ths s because o, ,luctuaton n d,,erent ndrect costs over ts sales l/e cost o, !oods sold)

admnstraton *-pense a h!hly rato reduce n the year '9"% at %&91 That means a

company.s operatn! e,,cency and prcn! e,,cency s not wth ts success,ul cost

controlln!&


22/32

&ontinue)%

Net !rofit %argin Ratio

In the above !raph companes. net pro,t rato s ncrease and decrease& In '9"" rato s #&$9

and then t s and reach to B&B0 n '9"%

It could be because o, n su,,cent pro,t avalable to cover ts cost o, !oods sold ; ndrect

costs ncurred durn! the busness&

6ut here ndustral net pro,t rato s ,luctuatn! ; tryn! to mprove ts e,,cency ;

operatonal actvty durn! ths subse5uent year than company&


23/32

&ontinue)

In the above !raph the companes. rate o, return on nvestment ,luctuatn! s wth lower mar!n as

compared to other years especally n '9"'&Ths s because that be,ore payn! nterest) dvdend and ta-& The avalable pro,t s less than the

captal employed n busness say Htotal assets&Ths /nd o, 7tuaton Company wll ncrease burden o, nterest payment and dvdend& =ence) both

are not enou!h !ood ,or nvestment&

Rate of Return on E#uity

=ere companes. roe s decreasn! durn! year '9"' as compare to '9""& 6ut than a,ter t

ncrease tll '9"%Ths stuaton shows that a,ter payn! su,,cent dvdend to ts pre,erence shareholders)

both have su,,cent pro,t to enttle the e5uty dvdend to e5uty shareholders&7uch stuaton wll attract nvestors and may ncrease n ts shareholdn!& It also su!!ests

that t s properly utlEn! ts busness resources&

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Rato 34 %1&% "'&0$ "9 "'&%#


24/32

*A('ION RA'IO

*arnn! 2er 7hare:

=ere a company *27 h!her n the year '9"% s 0B&'# per share whle *27 s lower

n the year '9"' s ""&99&

In ths h!her earnn! per share s ndcatn! that a,ter payn! pre,erence dvdend out

o, the avalable pro,t) what could be the pro,t earnn! capacty o, the busness on per e5uty

shares and s shown! better per,ormance ; prospect o, the company

$i0idend Pay-out Ratio:

1ere ompanies $i0idend Pay-Out Ratio is highest in the year 23"2is at "%5 times and it is lo6est in the year 23"4 at 3%27times%

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

*arnn! 3rs per share4 0B&'# "&"9 ""&99 ""&B'

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""Dvdend pay 3rs per share4 9&'# 9 "&1 9&%


25/32

&ontinue))

Return on Assets

Ths rato measures the pre ta- rate o, return on assets and can be used to measure the e,,ectve

utlEaton o, assets on the pro,tablty o, the busness& An ndcator o, how pro,table a company srelatve to ts total assets& ROA !ves an dea as to how e,,cent mana!ement s at usn! ts assets to

!enerate earnn!s&

The rato ndcates that there s ncrease n the ROA ,rom "9 n '9"" to 1&"$ n '9"%& That

means the percenta!e o, the real return on the assets s lead to ncrease net earnn! o, the owners&

The company s e,,ectve utlEaton o, assets on the pro,tablty o, the busness&

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Rato 34 1&"$ "9&0$ #&"9 "9


26/32

&ontinue)

Return on Total 'hareholders( E#uity

Ths rato relates the pre ta- returns to the level o, e5uty captal employed n the busness&Cauton should be used when nterpretn! ths rato& A h!h rato) normally assocated wth a

pro,table ,rm) may ndcate an under captalEed ,rm whle a low rato) whch normally

ndcates an ne,,cent or unpro,table ,rm& J

The rato ndcates that there s ncrease n the RO* ,rom ""B&'1 n '9"" to 0B'% n

'9"%& That means the ,rm has earned a sats,actory return ,or ts e5uty shareholders& The rate

o, return on shareholders. e5uty s o, crucal s!n,cance n rato analyss vs(K(vs ,rom thepont o, the owners o, the ,rm&

?ears '9"% '9" '9"' '9""

Rato 34 0B'% "9 ""9&"9 ""B&'1


27/32

S8O' ANA.SIS

'trengths:

I7O #99" cert,ed company

Ac/nowled!ed mar/et leader wth h!h level o, customer !oodwll

Always close to the customer& 2roactve lather than reactve to chan!n!

mar/et needs

Lar!e customer base ; h!h brand loyalty

astest delvery o, e5upment and spare parts


28/32

&ON'IN())

)ea*nesses:

In competton wth the ,ore!n companes) prce o, the

e5upment s h!h compare to the ,ore!n companes

There s a lot o, nose polluton at the wor/ place& Ths noses dan!erous ,or the wor/ers


29/32

&ON'IN())

O&&ortunities:

Opportunty always e-sts but man thn! s they need to be realEed and

reco!nEed& Ths re5ures a stron! motvatonal ,actor and premum

,ores!ht

Threats:

There s no nter,erence o, anyone e-cept the !overnment because the

HApollo *arthmovers Lmted s lmted company


30/32

ARNIN9

I have really a un5ue e-perence n Apollo *arthmovers Ltd) mehsana

durn! my trann! perod& I have learnt many un/nown thn!s) whch are

out o, my /nowled!e o, mana!ement aspects& I have ,ound there the

mana!ement n my practcal l,e& I have collected all my necessary

n,ormaton ,rom the concernn! department by mysel,& I have come

across many ntell!ent and e-pert persons n the Apollo *arthmovers Ltd&


31/32

&ON&(SION

+A!O,,O EART%O-ER' ,T" s Inda.s No " manu,acture o,

road constructon ; mantenance e5upment& There are very less

compettors a!anst Apollo.s product n mar/et and 5ualty o, ts products

s better than compettors& Its products are ncreasn! every year so there s

br!ht ,uture ,or company&

+A!O,,O EART%O-ER' ,T"s able to use ma-mum capacty o,

manpower and also o, techncal /now how nowadays& Ths shows 5ualty

mprovement o, product and best mana!ement company&


32/32

Thank

accvpollo earthmovers ltd new.pptx

Documents